Download Motion in an Inverse-Square Central Force Field

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Two-body Dirac equations wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Angular momentum wikipedia , lookup

Lagrangian mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Gravity wikipedia , lookup

Nordström's theory of gravitation wikipedia , lookup

Partial differential equation wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental interaction wikipedia , lookup

Metric tensor wikipedia , lookup

Momentum wikipedia , lookup

Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup

Euler equations (fluid dynamics) wikipedia , lookup

Force wikipedia , lookup

Torque wikipedia , lookup

Time in physics wikipedia , lookup

Vector space wikipedia , lookup

Euclidean vector wikipedia , lookup

Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup

Equation of state wikipedia , lookup

Van der Waals equation wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Four-vector wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup

Derivation of the Navier–Stokes equations wikipedia , lookup

Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup

Newton's theorem of revolving orbits wikipedia , lookup

Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup

Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Kinematics wikipedia , lookup

Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector wikipedia , lookup

Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Motion in an Inverse-Square Central Force
Field
1
Central Forces and Angular Momentum
Suppose we have a central force, that is, a force that depends only on the
distance to the origin and is directed either toward or away from the origin.
Then we can write the force as
F~ = f (r)~r
(1)
p
where f (r) is a scalar function (We write r = x2 + y 2 + z 2 for the length of
the vector ~r: of course this is just the distance to the origin). For a particle
of mass m whose position as a function of time is given by ~r(t), we define its
angular momentum by
~
L(t)
= m~r(t) × ~r0 (t)
Fact: If a particle moves subject to a central force, its angular momentum
is constant.
~
Proof: Using the product rule, we compute the derivative of L(t)
as
~ 0 (t) = m~r0 (t) × ~r0 (t) + m~r(t) × ~r00 (t) = m~r(t) × ~r00 (t)
L
since ~r0 (t) crossed with itself is the zero vector. But Newton’s second law
says that
F~ = m~r00 (t),
so our equation is
~ 0 (t) = ~r(t) × F~ .
L
But then, using equation (1), we have
~ 0 (t) = ~r(t) × f (r)~r(t) = 0
L
1
~
and so L(t)
must be a constant vector.
~ has two important consequences.
The constancy of the vector L
Consequence 1: The motion takes place in a plane containing the origin.
This is because the vector ~r must always be perpendicular to the constant
~
vector L.
Consequence 2: The radius vector ~r sweeps out areas at a constant rate.
(This is Kepler’s first law in the context of planetary motion.)
Let ∆A be the area swept out by r(t) in the time interval ∆t. Then
1
1
1
∆A = |~r(t) × ~r(t + ∆t)| ≈ |~r(t) × (~r(t) + ~r0 (t)∆t| = |~r(t) × ~r0 (t)|∆t
2
2
2
so that
1
L
∆A
≈ |~r(t) × ~r0 (t)| =
,
∆t
2
2m
~ (which is constant). In the limit,
where L = |L|
dA
L
=
.
dt
2m
2
Inverse-Square Force
Suppose now that f (r) = −K/r3 , where K is a constant. (Note that the
force is attractive if K > 0 and repulsive if K < 0.) In this case F~ is called
an inverse-square force since
K
K
K
F~ = − 3 ~r = − 3 rr̂ = − 2 r̂,
r
r
r
where r̂ is the unit vector in the direction of ~r. In the case of planetary
motion, K = GM , where G is the universal gravitational constant and M
is the mass of the sun. In the case of motion in the electric field of a static
charged particle, K = Cq, where C is a universal constant and q is the
particle charge: in this case K can be negative.
From the product rule
~ = m~r × (rr̂)0 = mrr̂ × (r0 r̂ + rr̂0 ) = mr2 r̂ × r̂0 ,
L
and since F~ = −Kr−2 r̂, we have
~ = −Kr−2 r̂ × (mr2 r̂ × r̂0 ) = −Kmr̂ × (r̂ × r̂0 ).
F~ × L
2
Now use the vector identity
a × (b × c) = (a · c)b − (a · b)c
(2)
to write this as
~ = −Km((r̂ · r̂0 )r̂ − (r̂ · r̂)r̂0 ).
F~ × L
But r̂ · r̂ = 1, and it follows from differentiating this equation that r̂ · r̂0 = 0.
Hence
~ = Kmr̂0 .
F~ × L
(3)
Since
d 0 ~
~ = F~ × L,
~
m~r × L = m~r00 × L
dt
equation (3) implies that
~ = Kmr̂ + ~c,
m~r0 × L
for some vector constant ~c. Dot both sides with ~r to get
~ = Kmr + ~r · ~c.
~r · (m~r0 × L)
(4)
On the other hand, the vector identity (2) implies that
~ = m2~r0 × (~r × ~r0 ) = m2 |~r0 |2~r − m2 (~r0 · ~r)~r0
m~r0 × L
and thus
~ = m2 r2 |~r0 |2 − m2 (~r0 · ~r)2 .
~r · (m~r0 × L)
(5)
Now
|a|2 |b|2 − (a · b)2 = |a × b|2
for any vectors a and b, so equation (5) gives
~ = m2 |~r0 × ~r|2 = L2 .
~r · (m~r0 × L)
Compare this with equation (4) to get
L2 = Kmr + ~r · ~c.
(6)
Now choose polar coodinates in the plane of motion so that ~c points in
the direction of the positive x-axis. Then equation (6) is
L2 = Kmr + cr cos θ
3
(where c = |~c|), or
L2
.
(7)
c cos θ + Km
Equation (7) is always a conic section (ellipse, parabola or hyperbola). It is
the equation of an ellipse if c < Km (and a circle if c = 0). If Km = c it is
a parabola, and for Km < c it is an hyperbola (in particular, we always get
hyperbolic orbits for a repulsive force). If the path of a particle is a closed
orbit, then it must be an ellipse: this is Kepler’s second law.
r=
4