* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Unknown Bi 324 lab T / R 8pm Evaluation and Conclusion The
Survey
Document related concepts
Horizontal gene transfer wikipedia , lookup
Microorganism wikipedia , lookup
Quorum sensing wikipedia , lookup
Phospholipid-derived fatty acids wikipedia , lookup
Anaerobic infection wikipedia , lookup
Triclocarban wikipedia , lookup
Disinfectant wikipedia , lookup
Human microbiota wikipedia , lookup
Marine microorganism wikipedia , lookup
Bacterial cell structure wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Unknown Bi 324 lab T / R 8pm Evaluation and Conclusion The unknown bacteria was grown in various media, observed, and tested. Comparison to controls identified the bacteria as serratia marcescens. The unknown, now identified as serratia marcescens, belongs to the family enterobacteriaceae. Triptic soy Agar (TSA-used for plating unless otherwise noted) was streaked with unknown resulting in small to moderately sized colonies (dependant on days of growth) with a striking burnished red pigment when grown at room temperature. It is interesting to note that there was little to no pigmentation when the plated bacteria were incubated at 37C. Varying pigmentation depending on growth temperatures for serratia marcescens is supported by the literature. While testing to determine which family the unknown bacteria belonged to, we found that it could be referred to as a facultatively anaerobic gram negative rod-shaped bacteria (see the exclusion worksheet and template in the appendix for identifying the unknown). The rod-shape of the bacteria was determined by a simple stain of methylene blue (all staining was observed under microscopic examination). Another staining method was used to determine whether or not the bacteria contained endospores. The bacteria tested negative for endospores using malachite green as the main stain and Safranin as the counter stain. A third stain, a Gram stain, resulted in pink-colored rods, indicating the bacteria was gram negative. Lastly, a thioglycollate medium was use to determine the aerotolerance of the bacteria. The bacteria were more prolific towards the top of the media and the concentration visibly decreased down the media. Such bacterial growth indicates the bacteria’s metabolic efficiency is decreased in the absence of oxygen, but it can maintain life via fermentation or aerobic respiration. Thus the unknown bacteria is a facultative anaerobe. Tests used to confirm our bacterial species was a facultatively anaerobic gram negative rodshaped bacteria included a wet mount, UV light exposure, a potassium hydroxide(KOH) test, and a deep stab test. The wet mount, using india ink as a stain, revealed clear rod shaped bacteria with growth in singlets. A different method was used to confirm the absence of endospores. The endospore stain was confirmed with a UV light experiment. A plated lawn of the unknown bacteria failed to grow under UV light exposure for both 30 second and one minute intervals (indicating a absence of endospores). The Gram negative characteristic of the unknown bacteria was confirmed with the KOH test where the bacterial smear turned noticeably stringy when exposed to the reagent. To solidify our identification of the unknown as facultatively anaerobic, the deep stab of the bacteria in agar showed a similar growth pattern to the test using the thioglycollate medium. After viewing the first flow chart (see appendix), one can see that identification of the unknown as a facultatively anaerobic gram negative rod-shaped bacteria reveals the bacterial family. The unknown bacterial species belongs to the family enterobacteriaceae. The second flow chart indicates the next tests that were primarily used to determine that the bacterial species was serratia marcescens. The main tests referenced to identify serratia marcescens as unknown were: the Indole Sim test, gelatin hydrolysis and sugar fermentation tests. The Indole Sim media showed the bacteria as slightly motile due to slight growth outside of the inoculation tracking. A liquefied media in the gelatin hydrolysis test showed that the bacteria can produce gelatinases. The positive result of the gelatin hydrolysis test is typical of serratia marcescens, but still other enterobacteriaceae as well. The last tests used to reveal serratia marcescens as the bacterial species were the sugar fermentation tests. A red pH indicator revealed fermentation of carbohydrates to acids. Broths containing glucose, sucrose, mannitol and lactose were tested. The unknown yielded positive results for all but lactose. Inability of lactose would eliminate all enterobacteriaceae but serratia marcescens and proteus rettgeri (see flowchart). Bi 324 lab T / R 8pm However, the ability to ferment mannitol is not seen in proteus rettgeri. Therefore the unknown was determined to be serratia marcescens. A litmus milk test was used as an overall confirmation that the unknown was serratia marcescens because it is the only enteric bacteria that results in casein coagulation. Tests used to confirm motility, glucose fermentation, and the absence of lactose fermentation included a wet mount, other carbohydrate fermentation and Maconkey agar respectively. A wet mount showed clear bacterial movement or motility under microscopic examination. Glucose fermentation was naturally confirmed with fermentation of mannitol. It is important to note that the fermentation of mannitol could not be confirmed with growth on mannitol salt agar as serratia marcescens is not a halophile nor salt tolerant. Maconkey agar is used to reveal lactose fermenting bacteria and confirmed that the unknown did not ferment lactose. There was growth on the Maconkey agar but not the characteristic purple or pink appearance indicating lactose fermentation. Other tests detailed in the test template (appendix) supported the identification of unknown as serratia marcescens. As with many other enterobacteriaceae, unknown tested positive for the presence of catalase but negative for the presence of oxidase and starch hydrolysis. In addition, unknown showed complete resistance to the antibiotics penicillin and bacitracin. As is more common specifically to serratia marcescens, the unknown showed a zone of inhibition less than 22mm for amoxicillin and tetracycline, indicating resistance to the aforementioned antibiotics as well. Along the same lines, our unknown yielded a blue color in the Simmons Citrate Media Test indicating the unknown bacteria utilitzes citrate and ammonium ion. Also more typical to serratia marcescens was testing positive for the Vogue-Proskauer test and negative for the methyl red test. Such results show that the bacteria does produce acetoin from fermenting glucose but does not perform mixed acid fermentation of glucose. Based on the series of tests used, comparison to controls, and confirmed results in the literature, unknown is the bacterial species serratia marcescens belonging to the family enterobacteriaceae. As to be expected, tests confirmed that the facultatively anaerobic gram negative rod-shaped bacteria was of the family enterobacteriaceae. The gelatin hydrolysis, carbohydrate fermentation and litmus milk tests were most helpful in determining unknown as serratia marcescens. However, it is important not to forget that something as simple as the characteristic red pigmentation of serratia marcescens differentiates it from many other bacterial species. Such pigmentation makes it easily identifiable in restrooms where it commonly proliferates outside the human body. T / R 8pm APPENDIX Exclusion Worksheet Full Name: Unknown bacteria Selected Sections of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Fill in the third column using your lab notes on your unknown. Your goal is to exclude each section except for one, the section your unknown belongs to. Indicate which section you cannot exclude. Provide a reason for excluding each section, and the reason must exclude all members of the section. The first section has been filled in as an example to help you. Section Spirochetes (filled in as an example on how to do this) Aerobic, Motile, Helical Gramnegative bacteria Gram Negative Aerobic Rods and Cocci Gram Negative Cocci and Coccobacilli Facultatively Anaerobic Gram Negative Rods Rickettsiae & Chlamydiae Mycoplasmas Gram Positive Cocci Endospore-forming Gram Positive Rods and Cocci Regular Nonsporing Gram Positive Rods Irregular Nonsporing Gram Positive Rods Actinomycetes (Gram Positive Filamentous cells) Key Characteristics of Members of the Section Gram Negative, helical cells, move by axial filaments move by flagella, either helical or comma shaped cells Some are pigmented or motile, some have oxidase, some require special nutrients, and some fix nitrogen. Except for the nitrogen fixers, cell shape is distinct. Nonmotile and nonspore forming aerobes. Cell shape is difficult to classify, as cocci are flattened and rods are very short, often being pleomorphic. Some have flagella, many ferment some or all sugars intracellular pathogens (live within cells) extremely small cells, lacking cell walls, require special media non-spore forming cells that grow in aerobic to anaerobic conditions some are motile, grow in aerobic to anaerobic conditions growth is facultative or strictly anaerobic, nonmotile club-shaped, pleomorphic, and filamentous cells, grow in aerobic to anaerobic Streptomycetes (Gram Positive Aerobes) Filamentous cells that branch and divide in more than one plane, some reproduce by reproductive spores Filamentous cells that resemble fungal hyphae, reproductive spores Mycobacteria (Gram Positive Rods) Acid Fast staining, occasional filaments and rare branching Characteristics of your Unknown that exclude it from the Section. Excluded-unknown is not helical Excluded-unknown is not helical or comma shaped Excluded-unknown was not completely aerobic Excluded-unknown is not nonmotile, the cell shape is not difficult to classify, and the rod shape is not particularly short CANNOT EXCLUDE UNKNOWNunknown did ferment Dextrose, Mannitol and Sucrose, no flagella viewed but unknown was motile Excluded-unknown grows extracellularily Excluded-unknown did not require special media-grows readily on nutrient agar, was not relatively small, and no cell wall was present Excluded-unknown was not cocci or gram positive Excluded-unknown did not contain endospores, and was not Gram positive Excluded- unknown is not nonmotile and unknown was not Gram positive Excluded-unknown was not Gram positive, no apparent pleomorphism, and there wasn’t any filamentous growth Excluded-unknown was not Gram positive, was not filamentous and there was no evidence of reproductive spores Excluded-unknown was not Gram positive, was not a complete aerobe, cells did not resemble fungal hyphae and there was not evidence of reproductive spores Excluded-unknown was not Gram positive, unknown was not filamentous or acid fast T / R 8pm Template for Identifying Unknown Test (indentations are not in the chart of unknowns) Fill in results as provided. Results Confirmation (y/n) (if no, discuss why it is no) Cell Shape (cocci, bacilli, etc.) Bacilli can wet mount confirm? Y Other cellular characteristics (describe cell size, growth pattern, etc) Gram Stain (Gram-/Gram+) Colonial characteristics (describe colony pigment/shape/margin/etc.) Gelatin hydrolysis (+/-) Motility test (+/-, if growth is it black?) Litmus Milk (0-6, C and R) Growth is in singlets Gram (-) can KOH test confirm? Y Pigment- burnished red pigment Shape-circular Margin-entire Elevation-slightly raised Size-Small Texture-Smooth Appearance-Dull Optical property-Opaque + + Y can wet mount or broth culture confirm? Y (Broth culture indicated slightly and wet mount confirmed) C One tube was solid and another had coagulation at the bottom indicating casein protein coagulation Glucose fermentation (-,A,*,K) A can another sugar confirm? Y Lactose (-,A,*,K) _ can Mac/Litmus confirm? Macokey: Y (growth but no pink appearance) Litmus: Y (solution did not turn pink) Sucrose (-,A,*,K) A can MSA confirm? Mannitol (-,A,*,K) Starch (+/-) A _ (growth but not fermentation) N (confirmation was not attainable because this bacterial species is not salt tolerant and did not grow. There was a negative result for salt tolerance) Bi 324 lab T / R 8pm Indole (+/-) + VP (+/-) + MR (+/-) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (from TSI, +/-) _ Simmons Citrate (–, G, or B) B Hemolysis (alpha, beta, or gamma) can another test confirm? Y (the wet mount showed motility and the gelatin agar yielded a positive result with Kovac’s reagent) gamma Capsules (+/-) _ Salt tolerance of MSA (+/-, if +, does it have a yellow halo?) _ Catalase (+i, +s, or -) +i Endospores (+/-, if + give position) _ Can UV test confirm? Y Acid Fast Stain (+/-) _ Can liquid culture confirm? N/A Oxygen requirements (a, fa, other) Oxidase (+/-) (if time permits) Crystal violet/bile tolerance of Mac (+/-, if growth, is it pink?) FA _ (took longer than 30 sec) + Tetracycline sensitive _ (15 mm) Bacitracin sensitive _ (1-5 mm) Amoxicillin Sensitive _ (10 mm) Penicillin Sensitive _ (1-5mm) Can deep stab confirm? Y