* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download CT Simulator
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Simulation & Acquisition Todd Pawlicki, Ph.D. Professor & Vice-Chair Director, Division of Medical Physics Objectives • Discuss the CT simulation process • Discuss applications of imaging to radiotherapy Radiation Oncology Workflow Tx Plan Consultation CT Scan Follow-up Tx Delivery Slide courtesy of Jack Yang, PhD Virtual Sim (Image Fusion) Imaging Plan QA Acquisition of Patient Data • 2 Dimensional Process – Solder wire – Plaster cast – Contour plotter • 3 Dimensional Process – CT of treatment area – CT, MR, PET Registration / Fusion The CT Simulator • Identical to regular CT – Scanner, couch, computer console, etc. • Flat hard top couch – Same as linac – Important for position reproducibility • Laser marking system • Virtual simulation workstation – 3D image • Larger aperture size – 70 to 90 cm Slide courtesy of Jack Yang, PhD Computed Tomography • The use of CT data in radiation therapy – – – – Diagnosis Tumor / Normal tissue delineation Treatment planning / beam orientations Dose calculation Types of CT Scanners http://www.asnt.org/publications/Materialseval/basics/may00basics/may00basics.htm Measured Linear Attn Coefficients Hounsfield Unit (HU) -1000 < HU < 1000 i , j water HU 1000 water 12 bit Internal Computer Number (C) 0 < HU < 4096 i , j C 1000 water Tissue Types Sternum (1030) Lung (285) Soft Bone (1220) Soft Tissue 1 (1050) Soft Tissue 2 (875) Hard Bone (1810) Window Width and Level • Window Width W – The range of gray shades in the image • Window Level – The middle HU of the window • Window adjustments are set to highlight the structures to be viewed L Window: Level: 100 20 W Window: Level: 3200 256 L Window: Level: 200 20 Slide courtesy of Jack Yang, PhD DRR – Image Quality • Scanning slice thickness creates different quality of DRR, thinner slices produce better images, but need more processing power • Need balance between large amounts of data and image quality (scanning protocols need to be established) 3mm Slices 1.2 mm Slices DRR and Image Quality CBCT RTCT CT Simulator – Pros and Cons • Small Bore vs. Large Bore – Patient population with different setup technique – Conventional simulator availability – Larger bore creates more scattering dose • Single Slice vs. Multi Slice – DRR quality (rendering technique and speed) – Image quality (Scanning slice thickness) – 4D CT (respiratory gating) Slide courtesy of Jack Yang, PhD CT Simulator – Large Bore (FOV) 70 cm Bore Opening 85 cm Bore Opening Better for Breast Simulation Slide courtesy of Jack Yang, PhD Isocenter Marking • Isocenter placement could affect the patient treatment accuracy since it serves as the base line information Slide courtesy of Jack Yang, PhD General Immobilization Equipment Multiple Bags Vac-Loc Bag Elekta Stereotactic Body Frame Civco Wing Board Medical Intelligence Body Fix System Immbolization Options (“Active”) Immbolization Options (“Passive”) • shoulder constraints CT Sim Head Immobilization Achievable variability in position1-3 mm Slide courtesy of Jack Yang, PhD Reproducibility • Difficult to reproduce a misaligned patient • Other artifacts can also create setup problems Head Position • Optimal position depends on the treatment volume and delivery type Example CT Simulation Checklist CT Simulation Policy & Procedure CT Simulation – Contrast Issues • Contrast can be used to help differentiate between tumors and surrounding healthy tissue • Using contrast is risky, nursing required to be present • For heterogeneity-based CT planning, contrast may create dose distribution errors due to large CT numbers – Contrast density override should be carefully examined Slide adapted from Jack Yang, PhD Simulation – General Issues CT Used for Dose Calculation CT Number versus Relative electron density 1.75 Relative electron density 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 -900 -600 -300 0 300 CT Number (H) 600 900 1200 CT/MR Anatomy • Primarily used for target delineation CT MR Bushburg et al. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 2nd Ed, 2002. T1 Weighted T2 Weighted FLAIR MRSI • MR spectroscopy and MR imaging methods – Produce a spectrum identifying different chemical compounds (metabolites) in various tissues • Metabolite ratios differentiate between active tumor, normal tissue, and necrosis Hunjan et al. IJROBP, 2003. MRSI Delorme and Weber. Applications of MRS in the evaluation of focal malignant brain lesions. Cancer Imaging, 2006. FDG PET (fluorodeoxyglucose PET Imaging) • Malignant cells compared to healthy cells – Divide rapidly – Metabolize glucose at a higher rate • Attach a positron emitter to a glucose analogue – Example, fluorine-18 • FDG PET studies show utilization of the glucose analogue – Tumor metabolism PET/CT Images Registration / Fusion • Choose fusion algorithm • Transform source image into coordinate system of destination image • Evaluation and interpretation of the registered images Hutton and Braun 2003 Choose Fusion Algorithm Use Pixel Data Hutton and Braun 2003 Manual Match • Interactive tools Fusion Evaluation Summary • CT Simulation is replacing conventional simulation • Multi-modality imaging is increasingly important • CT Simulation can improve target and normal tissue contouring and treatment planning • TG-66 report provides a very thorough QA process for CT simulation