Download Working group results from the Târnava Marè focal area

Working group results from the
Târnava Marè focal area
First session working group 2 (Târnava Marè)
CBA framework and ecosystem services
1.

Discussion on the ecosystem services baseline
Treat specific question per focal area
Târnava Marè qualitative analysis
First session working group:
CBA framework and ecosystem services
General:
• It’s difficult to focus one habitat 6210, it should be a wider habitat type
(e.g. dry grasslands or dry habitats)
• Ecotourism is hard to address because of the multifunctional aspects.
• Pollination is important for privately owned small fruit trees.
• Biological control of agricultural pests should be taken into account.
Questions:
• Each cow gains 130kg of weight (meat) every year.
This is too high if we only focus on 6210.
• Number of cows/ha in Tarnava Mare= 0.5/ha
A minimum of 5 data sources are required to assess this issue, e.g. town
hall, framers association and veteran resources
Life stock unit/ha should be used instead of differentiating between animal
species
First session working group:
CBA framework and ecosystem services
2.
Assessing climate change threats
Main threat
sheet
Target:
Discussing
the impact
of climate
change on
the focal
areas.
Ecosystem
Nr.
Threat
Is this
threat
relevant in
your area?
Grasslands
in Tarnave
Mare
1.
Sheep overgrazing
Y
Positiv
e
Y
Score: (--)
Major threat
because the
land use
manageme
nt changed,
e.g. year
round
grazing
2.
Score: (--)
First session working group:
CBA framework and ecosystem services
3.
First session working group:
CBA framework and ecosystem services
4. Adaptation measures shortlisting
Selection of the measures:
1. Support cross-sectoral cooperation to allow for the development of landscapes
adapted to climate change
2. Supporting and implementing high nature value farming
Questions:
4. Institutional capacity:
Pay Agency (intermediate agency) -governmental agency- ministry effective.
Bureaucracy is an issue in this system and there is a high institutional/operational
cost.
First session working group:
CBA framework and ecosystem services
4. Adaptation measures shortlisting
Selection of the measures:
1. Support cross-sectoral cooperation to allow for the development of landscapes
adapted to climate change
2. Supporting and implementing high nature value farming
Questions:
6. Costs of measures:
Current costs: Institutional costs, e.g. overhead and wages.
Costs of proposed measures: Increased institutional costs + infrastructure
investment and maintenance costs, e.g. satellite data maps
First session working group:
CBA framework and ecosystem services
4. Adaptation measures shortlisting
Selection of the measures:
1. Support cross-sectoral cooperation to allow for the development of landscapes
adapted to climate change
2. Supporting and implementing high nature value farming
Questions:
7. Stakeholder influence:
Enough, but no capacity for stakeholders to negotiate on financial distribution.
Hindrance: Investors are opposing the limitation on sheep numbers.
Technical barriers: Inventory should be more detailed, e.g. grazing pressure
effects should be established for specific habitats.
Knowledge barriers: Lack of stakeholder knowledge, e.g. on financing frameworks.
Thank you for your attention