Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Ramdas layer: a micrometeorological paradox Ponnulakshmi V K and Ganesh S ABSTRACT: On calm clear nights, a peculiar temperature distribution called the ‘lifted temperature minimum (LTM)’ develops, in which a local minimum in the vertical temperature profile occurs a few decimeters above the ground. The LTM was first observed by Ramdas and Ramanathan in 1932, and has been variously referred to as the Ramdas layer, the Ramdas paradox, the elevated temperature minimum etc. It is quite robust and has since been widely observed on varied surfaces. Nevertheless, the phenomenon remains counterintuitive since it goes against conventional wisdom of ground being the coldest at night; further, the presence of a colder layer of air amidst warmer surroundings in an otherwise homogeneous atmosphere is difficult to explain. Such near-surface temperature distributions are of particular relevance to agricultural and boundary layer meteorology. The prevailing theoretical explanation for the LTM is the VSN model (Vasudevamurthy, Srinivasan and Narasimha, 1993) in which the infra-red radiation balance in a homogeneous water-vapor-laden atmosphere is modeled using a flux-emissivity formulation. The theory produces an LTM in apparent agreement with observations, and the underlying physics has been attributed to the presence of a nearsurface emissivity sub-layer. Crucially, the LTM is predicted to occur only above surfaces that are not perfect emitters (absorbers). We demonstrate here that the origin of the Ramdas layer remains a mystery. The theoretical explanation based on the VSN model is fundamentally inconsistent. The exaggerated effect of the reduced ground emissivity on the near-surface cooling rates predicted by the theory is spurious, and is due to a physically incorrect `band cross-talk'. The error arises in the treatment of the reflected radiation. This is shown by comparing the flux divergences obtained using gray and band model formulations for the simplistic case of a participating medium with only two bands. It is then argued that the cross-talk error in varying amounts is, in fact, inherent in a naive radiative heat transfer model, involving non-black emitting surfaces, that does not fully resolve the emission spectrum of the participating medium. For the Ramdas layer in particular, the discrepancy between a naive gray model and more accurate band models is greatly magnified due to the rapidly fluctuating nature of the emission spectrum of the principal radiating component (water vapor). It is finally shown that a careful treatment of the reflection term, even within the purview of a gray theory, eliminates the aforementioned spurious cooling. The inevitable conclusion from our analysis is that radiative processes, acting in a homogeneous isothermal atmosphere, will not lead to a preferential cooling of the air layers near the ground, and thence, to an LTM. The origin of the LTM must therefore lie in an atmosphere that is heterogeneous on the same length scales. We discuss the role of aerosols as a likely candidate for this heterogeneity.