Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ernance, stewardship, or management with an effective delegation of authority and responsibility. Possible Directions. During the past forty years, North America has come to appreciate the power of diversity in optimizing quality in any setting. Jewish communal structures, however, have missed powerful lessons regarding diversity, and they exhibit behaviors that are sexist and ageist to their own detriment. If one were to use the term "young professional7' instead of "woman" in most of these articles, one would find a similar sense of frustration. The field desperately needs to confront its sexism and ageism, for it cannot afford to lose the power, knowledge, and effectiveness of a large leadership pool. One of the concepts being discussed within the context of the previously noted Advancing Jewish Women project is the adaptation of "Sullivan-like" principles. The Sullivan Principles, which helped transform apartheid South Africa to a more equitable state, were simple declarations to which (investing) institutions could subscribe. We must encourage every Jewish organization to sign on to principles of equity and equality in the workplace, including collecting and making public data regarding hiring, retention, and promotion. If the chief pro- fessional and volunteer officers were to sign on to equity principles, we could begin to better sensitize and encourage a healthy norm while isolating the violators. Similarly, we must learn from the positives of affirmative action in the larger society. Imagine that every search committee required a qualified female finalist for any job search. Done seriously, we would locate scores of talented women who could help facilitate the debates we need to better serve our constituencies. I concur with my colleagues as to the importance of mentoring and other components of creating positive change. Chazan's use of "self" aptly illustrates the value and impact of these components in leadership development. However, I also implore that we become more assertive, more just, more effective in demanding what our community deserves — the best that we can deliver in smart, effective organizations, using all of those precious human resources available to us. Jeffrey R. Solomon is President of the Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies. He previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of UJA-Federation of New York. Balancing Work and Family: A Leadership Dilemma for Women Judith Glass H ow do we understand the problem of women moving into leadership positions? Whose problem is it? And who is responsible for solving it? The problem can be analyzed on three levels: 1) deficiencies in individual women; 2) role responsibilities; 3) institutional structures. The first level addresses women's leadership styles and temperament. The problem is hers; the solution is remedial programs and mentoring. The second level looks at gender roles and the totality of responsibilities that women carry in the society—how women split their allegiance between work and home. The problem is still hers; the solution lies in managing the family differently. Sh'ma • April 2002 The third level looks structurally at what underlines the relationship between the organization of the family and the organization of work. The way we work is based on an outdated model of the family. The problem is institutional; the solution lies in changes in the work site if women are to assume leadership roles. Compounding this analysis is the increased working hours of all professionals because of downsizing and competitive pressures. Women's working hours have increased more than those of men due to the combination of labor market work and responsibilities for housework, child care, and elder care. If we want more women in positions of leadership, then we must acknowledge and accom- www.shma.com modate women's "second shift" at home. Sociologist Arlie Hochschild's research shows that women work as much as an extra month of twenty-fourhour days each year. While the strong norms in Jewish organizations of "working for the common good" and "the work is never done" lead many to give priority to the demands of their work lives, it is done with an element of resentment- Some professionals feel that the worst enemy of the Jewish family is the Jewish community — because of its time demands. In a recent study exploring the extent to which professionals who work in the Jewish community experience tension between their work and personal lives, and what organizational changes would help them, several issues emerged of particular pertinence to leadership positions. The research, conducted by the Progressive Jewish Alliance, found that, consistent with national trends, Jewish professionals are increasing their working hours — 64 percent of the men and 35 percent of the women work more than 50 hours a week. For women working the "second shift," the long hours required for a leadership position become impossible. Eighty-nine percent of our sample agreed that family responsibilities inhibit the careers of women more than men, and two-thirds agreed that career advancement in the Jewish community is harder for women. In many ways, traditional role expectations continue to characterize the Jewish community. Implicit both in interview data and in the questionnaire results is, the extent to which women still do most of the care-giving and home maintenance, and the extent to which it is assumed that they will continue to do this. The costs to them are both slower career advancement and stress from overwork. There is no similar expectation on the part of women or men that men ought to bear these costs equally. Based on this research, both gender roles and the institutional structures of work need to be addressed if women are to take on greater leadership roles. Here are some questions, the answers to which can facilitate the search for solutions: What is the profile of the working Jewish family? Are roles changing, and if so, how? Can we measure, specifically for professional women in the Jewish community, the "second shift"? Control over work time (e.g., comp time, flextime, job sharing) is high on the list of desired accommodations, as are subsidized childcare, particularly for early morning and evening meetings, and on-site conveniences. How can the organization of work be restructured, and how can jobs be redesigned so that we work smarter and not longer? What amount of community resources should be spent on fiscal and organizational support for those who do the community's work? We will not significantly increase the numbers of women in leadership positions if we regard them as deficient — that is, as more needy of mentoring or further education in time /management, team building, or other skills than are men. We need to address the organizational structure and culture of our institutions. Judith Glass, Ph.D. is a former Director of the MBA Program at the University of Judaism, and chaired the Jewish Feminist Center in Los Angeles for several years. Currently, she is Vice President for Programming of the Progressive Jewish Alliance, supervised this research •project, and authored the analysis. The entire study, "Balancing Work and Family in Jewish Non-Profit Organizations," can be found at: www.pjalliance.org. Leading by Example: Philanthropy and Transformation Lynn Schusterman C harles Schusterman was my husband, my best friend, and my philanthropic partner. We worked together to form our family foundation, to develop our philanthropic agenda, Sh'ma * April 2002 and to pursue our shared vision of helping to promote a renewal of Jewish life throughout the world. Both of us were intimately involved in every aspect and detail of our foundation from its inception in o www.shma.com