Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Provenance of plutonic detritus in cover sandstones of Nicoya Complex, Costa Rica: Cretaceous unroofing history of a Mesozoic ophiolite sequence Claudio Calvo† Anna-Peters-Strasse 51/C, 70597 Stuttgart, Germany ABSTRACT This study presents new petrologic and sedimentologic data from northwestern Costa Rica concerning the provenance of Cretaceous forearc sandstones that contain plutonic detritus. Plutonic rock fragments are important accessory particles in pyroxenebearing sandstones overlying the ophiolite named the Nicoya Complex. Through the use of modal analysis of the framework grains, I studied three sandstone suites of the El Viejo and Rivas Formations that include both shallow- and deep-water deposits, ranging from late Campanian to Maastrichtian in age. In terms of primary framework components, the sandstones resemble those derived from magmatic arcs. Two modal parameters are introduced to evaluate detrital plutonic contributions and affinity of source rocks: the ratio of plutonic to total lithic fragments [(Lp 1 iQF)/Lt], and the ratio of uralitized pyroxene to total pyroxene grains (uralPx/Px). Modal values for (Lp 1 iQF)/Lt indicate that plutonic fragments comprise up to 9% of total lithic fragments. A strong correlation between these two parameters suggests that uralitized pyroxene grains were also derived from intrusive rocks of probably basic and intermediate compositions. In particular, significant concentrations of lithic fragments exhibiting micrographic textures and uralitized pyroxene grains are interpreted to have been derived predominantly from eroded plagiogranites. Sandstone suites containing plutonic detritus signal an unroofing of deeper levels of the Mesozoic ophiolitic sequence as a consequence of strong uplift of the Costa Rican arc in late Senonian time. This tectonic event began in E-mail: [email protected]. † the Campanian at ca. 75 Ma, ;9 m.y. after the intrusive magmatic activity on Nicoya Peninsula, and is consistent with the onset of the Laramide orogeny. Keywords: provenance, modal analysis, plagiogranites, ophiolite complex, Costa Rica. INTRODUCTION The ophiolitic basement of northwestern Costa Rica and its sedimentary cover strata constitute the most thoroughly studied on-land rock assemblage of the southern Central American forearc. This study focuses on the origin and provenance of plutonic detritus in both deep-sea channel and shallow-water basal sandstones from the Cretaceous cover units overlying the ophiolite named the Nicoya Complex. In these forearc sandstones, detrital grains of igneous plutonic origin are important accessory constituents, making up as much as 9% of total lithic framework grains. Previous studies on petrology and provenance of forearc sandstones from northwestern Costa Rica have suggested—on the basis of primary framework modes—that Cretaceous sandstones were derived from a magmatic arc (Lundberg, 1991; Calvo, 1998). Compositionally, both those sandstones within the Nicoya ophiolite complex and many of the unconformably overlying sandstones are commonly referred to as basaltic sandstones, derived from erosion of basaltic basement (e.g., Kuijpers, 1979; Baumgartner et al., 1984; Gursky, 1989; Lundberg, 1991). Although basaltic sandstones dominate in some sequences, there are also volcaniclastic sandstones that contain abundant nonbasaltic framework components. For example, volcaniclastic wackes from the Loma Chumico Formation of the upper Nicoya Complex exhibit a bimodal composition GSA Bulletin; July 2003; v. 115; no. 7; p. 832–844; 10 figures; 3 tables; Data Respository item 2003095. 832 For permission to copy, contact [email protected] q 2003 Geological Society of America consisting of basaltic fragments and differentiated pyroclastic materials (Calvo and Bolz, 1994). Similarly, Cretaceous cover sandstones of the Nicoya Complex contain a wide spectrum of framework grains from other sources: radiolarites (including radiolarian cherts), pelagic limestones, shallow-marine carbonates, andesitic lavas, differentiated ejecta, and igneous intrusive rocks (Calvo, 1998). This spectrum of grain types suggests that these forearc sandstones were derived predominantly from shallow levels of an intraoceanic arc, but it also reflects a significant contribution from uplifted ophiolitic basement areas partly fringed by shallow-water carbonate deposits (Calvo, 1998). The plutonic detritus particularly records an ophiolitic provenance and deeper unroofing of the ophiolitic basement than previous workers have suggested. The main objectives of this study are (1) to analyze mineral composition and textural features of plutonic detritus in order to determine likely source rocks and provenance relationships; (2) to establish detrital plutonic contributions and affinity of source rocks by using modal analysis of secondary framework parameters; and (3) to integrate these new data into a model for the Cretaceous unroofing history of the ophiolitic sequence of southern Central America. TECTONIC SETTING Southern Central America (Costa Rica and Panama) represents an island arc that formed over an intraoceanic subduction zone situated at the western margin of the Caribbean plate (e.g., Kuijpers, 1979; Lundberg, 1982; Wildberg, 1984; Calvo and Bolz, 1994). At the present time, the Cocos plate is being subducted beneath Costa Rica at 90 mm/yr (Minster and Jordan, 1978). Bathymetric swath mapping of the convergent margin offshore CRETACEOUS UNROOFING HISTORY OF A MESOZOIC OPHIOLITE SEQUENCE, COSTA RICA Costa Rica shows an oceanic plate covered with numerous seamounts (von Huene et al., 1995). The most prominent feature is the Cocos Ridge subducting opposite the Osa Peninsula (Fig. 1). The study area is located in northwestern Costa Rica. This region is characterized by three major morphotectonic elements that reflect an evolved arc edifice (Fig. 1): (1) the emerged outer arc, forming the Nicoya and Santa Elena Peninsulas; (2) the inner forearc trough (Tempisque basin), comprising the Gulf of Nicoya and lowlands of the Tempisque River; and (3) the active volcanic cordilleras of Guanacaste and Tilarán, representing the inner magmatic arc. Behind the cordilleras are the Guatusos lowlands, representing the southern terminus of the extensional Nicaraguan Depression. STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK The forearc basement is exposed along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica and comprises a Mesozoic ophiolitic sequence, the Nicoya Complex (Dengo, 1962). It is principally composed of peridotites, basalts (massive and pillowed flows), basaltic breccias, dolerites, radiolarites, limestones, volcaniclastic rocks, and igneous intrusive rocks (plagiogranites and gabbros). Differentiated pyroclastic deposits of Albian to Campanian age within the Nicoya Complex record the earliest volcanic activity of the Costa Rican arc orogen (Calvo and Bolz, 1994; Calvo, 1998). Overlying the Nicoya Complex is the sedimentary cover that includes both shallow- and deep-marine strata ranging from Upper Cretaceous through Pliocene age. The forearc rock succession is partly covered by Quaternary volcanic rocks erupted from stratovolcanoes of the northwestern cordilleras (Fig. 1). Seismic reflection data from the Pacific margin offshore Costa Rica suggest the seaward continuation of the Nicoya Complex to the middle slope (Hinz et al., 1996). The cover sandstone suites studied are stratigraphically grouped into the El Viejo and Rivas Formations (Table 1). The El Viejo Formation (late Campanian–Maastrichtian) is a shallow-marine clastic and related carbonate reef unit a few meters thick consisting of rudistid framestones, bioclastic grainstones, and sandstones that rest unconformably on rocks of the Nicoya Complex (Schmidt-Effing, 1975; Ulloa, 1977; Seyfried and Sprechmann, 1985; Calvo, 1987). The Rivas Formation (late Campanian–Paleocene) comprises a turbiditic slope sequence ;1500 m thick composed of volcaniclastic sandstones, mud- stones, and minor conglomerates and breccias (Dengo, 1962; Protti, 1981; Lundberg, 1982; Rivier, 1983; Baumgartner et al., 1984; Calvo, 1998). This unit overlies conformably hemipelagic limestones and volcaniclastic rocks of the Sabana Grande Formation of Campanian age. MATERIALS AND METHODS Detritus derived from igneous intrusive rocks in Cretaceous cover sandstones was first detected during analysis of main framework grains (Calvo, 1998). On the basis of depositional environment and age, 20 sandstone samples were selected for this study. They were collected from three different locations in Cretaceous sandstone suites of the inner forearc: La Tigra, Quebrada Pilas, and Calle Codornices (Fig. 1). The sampled units form part of the sedimentary cover of Nicoya Complex, recording shallow- and deep-water clastic sedimentation in the forearc region of northwestern Costa Rica during the late Senonian. Their principal stratigraphic and sedimentologic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Sandstone ages were determined on the basis of their contained foraminiferal assemblages. Samples were examined petrographically in thin section, cut normal to bedding. For analysis of sandstone frameworks, an average of 500 grain points were counted in each section. Significant concentrations of plutonic detritus in these sandstones make possible the modal analysis of detrital plutonic contributions using the Gazzi-Dickinson point-counting method (Gazzi, 1966; Dickinson, 1970). Point-count results are listed in Table DR1.1 Plutonic lithic fragments and mafic mineral grains were counted as separated grains. In order to establish plutonic contributions, fragments of plutonic rock were included in tabulations of total lithic grains. Because of the scarcity of total counts of mafic mineral grains, additional 100 point counts for total pyroxene grains were necessary to improve the statistical reliability of the values for the uralitized pyroxene ratio. Petrologically, the general correspondence of ratios calculated here is considered to be significant because it reflects compositional tendencies observed on the basis of the detailed optical analysis of framework grains, made prior to the point counts. Following Dickinson’s (1970) convention, carbonate fragments were not included in 1 GSA Data Repository item 2003095, sedimentary petrography of forearc sandstones from northwestern Costa Rica, is available on the Web at http: //www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2003.htm. Requests may also be sent to [email protected]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 the modal analysis, because of their possible intrabasinal origin and generally minor importance for constraining ophiolitic provenance. Sandstone suites derived from different depositional environments were also analyzed to evaluate dispersal patterns of detrital sediment in the marine forearc basin. In this study, the timing of unroofing of the ophiolitic sequence was established from the relative ages of foraminiferal assemblages identified in sandstone samples. Radiometric age determinations of intrusive rocks from the Nicoya Peninsula by Sinton et al. (1997), coupled with the biostratigraphic data presented here, constrain the age of crystallization and earliest erosion of Nicoya Complex intrusive rocks in northwestern Costa Rica. RESULTS Detailed petrographic examination of framework grains reveals that Cretaceous forearc sandstones from northwestern Costa Rica contain abundant ophiolitic grains, ranging from basic volcanic fragments and igneous intrusive-derived detritus to cherty rock fragments of sedimentary origin (Fig. 2). This study focuses on plutonic rock fragments and radiolarian chert grains, which are thought to represent useful distinctive provenance indicators reflecting unroofing of deeper levels of the ophiolitic sequence. Petrographically, analyzed sandstones comprise dominantly lithic and feldspatholithic wackes, litharenites, and hybrid arenites as defined by Zuffa (1980), including arenites bearing Sulcoperculina. Plutonic Grains Detrital grains of plutonic origin comprise a diverse assortment of grain types, including both lithic fragments and monocrystalline grains. Figures 2A through 2D show photomicrographs of representative plutonic framework grains found in Cretaceous cover sandstones of the Nicoya Complex. A unique grain type consists of crystalline lithic grains that exhibit micrographic textures distinctive of igneous intrusive rocks (Tröger, 1967). These micrographic grains are composed of plagioclase feldspar (albite) and quartz intergrowths (Figs. 2A, 2C). Because of the instability of feldspars in the sedimentary environment relative to quartz, micrographic intergrowths generally exhibit differential weathering: In plane-polarized light, albite is seen to have been altered to clay minerals, whereas quartz remained essentially unaltered. Other rock fragments include polycrystalline quartz grains and crystalline lithic fragments. Poly- 833 C. CALVO 834 Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 CRETACEOUS UNROOFING HISTORY OF A MESOZOIC OPHIOLITE SEQUENCE, COSTA RICA TABLE 1. STRATIGRAPHIC AND SEDIMENTOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THREE CRETACEOUS FOREARC-SANDSTONE SUITES FROM NORTHWESTERN COSTA RICA Sandstone suite Formation Age Foraminiferal assemblage Thickness Type of facies Depositional environment La Tigra Quebrada Pilas Calle Codornices Rivas Rivas Late Campanian to early Maastrichtian Maastrichtian† Sulcoperculina dickersoni (Palmer); Gansserina gansseri (Bolli); Orbitocyclina Sulcoperculina globosa de Cizancourt; minima (H. Douvillé); Sulcoperculina sp. Pseudorbitoides sp.; Sulcorbitoides pardoi Brönnimann ;150 m ;30 m Channel sandstones Channel sandstones Inner forearc–trough (Tempisque Basin): Lowstand submarine slope Arc platform–related submarine slope El Viejo Late Campanian to early Maastrichtian Sulcoperculina globosa de Cizancourt; Sulcoperculina sp.; Pseudorbitoides cf. israelsky Vaughan & Cole ;5 m Basal sandstones Island-arc platform: Transgressive bioclastic shoals Age also supported by paleontologic determinations of macrofauna (Fischer and Aguilar, 1994) † crystalline quartz grains resemble those derived from granitoid source rocks, because they are composed of relatively few crystals of equant shape and have few or no intracrystalline sutured contacts. Crystalline lithic fragments containing polysynthetically twinned plagioclase and uralitized clinopyroxene are also present (Fig. 2B). Some of them display subophitic textures. Monocrystalline grains include plagioclase, quartz, and pyroxene. Both plagioclase and quartz grains are, however, difficult to interpret, because in many cases they do not exhibit diagnostic petrographic features of a plutonic or volcanic origin. The most important mafic mineral grain is pyroxene, which often appears partly uralitized (Fig. 2B). The predominance of coarse-grained plutonic fragments showing little evidence of chemical weathering, in conjunction with angular grain textures exhibiting remains of intercrystalline boundaries (Fig. 2A), indicates that intrusive rocks in the source area were broken mechanically along intercrystalline boundaries and that detrital grain size is, in part, controlled by original textures of coarsegrained source rocks. Although tropical weathering conditions prevailed during denudation, as suggested by alterite grains identified in samples analyzed, the spectrum of plutonic detritus apparently reflects original compositions of igneous source rocks, an interpretation that implies significant relief in the source area. Cherty Rock Fragments Siliceous rock fragments of sedimentary origin, including radiolarian mudstones and cherts, are typical framework grains found with plutonic detritus in studied Cretaceous forearc sandstones (Fig. 2). In thin section, radiolarite grains exhibit a dark rusty red to brown color and bear silica-filled blebs that are likely microfossil (radiolaria) remains (Fig. 2E). Radiolarian chert grains are polycrystalline quartz fragments, commonly exhibiting hematitic clusters and vestiges of radiolaria (Fig. 2F). Such grains are of particular interest for provenance of cover sandstones, because they probably result from erosion of ribbon cherts within the Nicoya Complex that are interpreted to form part of a remnant accretionary unit (Baumgartner, 1990), i.e., the Punta Conchal Formation (Gursky and Schmidt-Effing, 1983). Modal Analysis of Plutonic Detritus In terms of primary framework grains (QFL, Qp-Lvm-Lsm), Cretaceous sandstones from northwestern Costa Rica containing plutonic detritus have a composition similar to those derived from magmatic arcs (Fig. 3; Calvo, 1998). Ophiolitic and especially plutonic provenances are commonly obscured in these sandstones by abundant volcanic fragments, but both sources are recognizable in channel sandstones and transgressive basal sandstones from the slope and neritic sequences, respectively, selected for this analysis. This study focused on the semiquantitative modal analysis of detrital parameters sensitive to plutonic provenance, defined in Table 2. Recalculated modal values are summarized in Table 3 and presented graphically in Figures 4 and 5. Original point data for primary and secondary parameters are available in Table DR1. In order to establish detrital plutonic contributions and affinity of source rocks, two new modal parameters are introduced. They are defined as the ratio of plutonic to total lithic fragments [(Lp 1 iQF)/Lt] and the ratio of uralitized pyroxene to total pyroxene grains (uralPx/Px). Uralitization, the alteration of clinopyroxene to amphibole, is characteristic of plutonic terranes (Tröger, 1967). Modal values for (Lp 1 iQF)/Lt indicate that plutonic fragments average up to 9% of total lithic fragments. Values between 4% and 9% are only found in sandstones of the Calle Codornices and La Tigra suites (Table 3). Modal content of plutonic materials calculated with this method represents only a minimum contribution, because (Lp 1 iQF)/Lt provides data only on the contribution of lithic fragments. Quartz and feldspar grains were not included in tabulations of plutonic grains, because their provenance remains in many cases unclear. Because many monocrystalline grains are independent of lithic fragments, but some were surely derived from plutonic rocks, it is not possible to calculate the true total contributions of detritus from plutonic rocks. Ternary Diagrams The ternary diagrams of Figure 4 display the detrital compositions of sandstones in terms of their populations of lithic fragments and mafic mineral grains. The [(Lp 1 iQF)/ Lt]–Lvm–(rC 1 Lsm) diagram shows modal values of plutonic, volcanic, and sedimentary rock fragments. Radiolarian chert grains are included in tabulations of lithic grains of sedimentary origin. This diagram demonstrates that the lithic grain fraction in all analyzed samples is strongly dominated by volcanic Figure 1. Geologic map of northwestern Costa Rica showing locations of studied Cretaceous forearc sandstone suites: La Tigra, Quebrada Pilas, and Calle Codornices. Place names discussed in text are also included. From Calvo and Bolz (1994). Inset map shows the regional tectonic framework of the study area (MPF—Motagua-Polochic Fault; MAT—Middle America Trench; ND—Nicaraguan Depression; PFZ—Panama Fracture Zone). N Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 835 C. CALVO Figure 2. Photomicrographs of ophiolitic detritus found in Cretaceous forearc sandstones from northwestern Costa Rica, including (A– D) plutonic fragments and (E and F) cherty rock fragments. (A) Lithic fragment composed of monocrystalline quartz (Qm) and micrographic intergrowth of quartz and albite (iQF); albite at extinction. Irregular grain outline (right) is interpreted to be a relict intercrystalline contact. Calle Codornices sandstone, cross-polarized light. (B) Uralitized pyroxene grain (urPx) showing cores of unaltered pyroxene (Px). Calle Codornices sandstone, plane-polarized light. (C) Lithic fragment composed of altered plagioclase (P) and intergrowth of quartz and plagioclase exhibiting micrographic texture (iQF); quartz at extinction. Quebrada Pilas arenite, cross-polarized light. (D) Outsized feldspar grain (F) of probably plutonic origin showing differential weathering and thin coatings of hematite. It is composed of fresh albite and altered anorthite-rich zones, replaced by calcite and sericite minerals. Calle Codornices sandstone, planepolarized light. (E) Radiolarite fragment (Rf), bearing microfossil remains (radiolaria) filled with silica. La Tigra sandstone, crosspolarized light. (F) Radiolarian chert grains (rC) showing vestiges of radiolarian microfossils and hematitic clusters; tests of Sulcoperculina sp. (S), a late Senonian larger foraminifera species, also occur. Calle Codornices sandstone, plane-polarized light. 836 Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 CRETACEOUS UNROOFING HISTORY OF A MESOZOIC OPHIOLITE SEQUENCE, COSTA RICA Figure 3. QFL and Qp-Lvm-Lsm plots of mean framework values and their standard deviations for analyzed Cretaceous sandstone suites from northwestern Costa Rica containing plutonic detritus. Provenance fields from Dickinson and Suczek (1979) and Dickinson (1985). Mean values and standard deviations are represented by distinctive symbols and polygons, respectively. Magmatic arc provenance field on diagram QFL is divided into dissected arc (P . V) and undissected arc segments (P , V) (P—plutonic detritus, V—volcanic detritus); n—number of samples. Because plutonic fragments are accessory constituents in cover sandstones, plutonic contributions cannot be reflected directly by the primary framework parameters on both diagrams. Note that the QFL plot for the Quebrada Pilas sandstone suite within the P . V subfield, in particular, is caused by strong contents of radiolarian chert fragments in this suite (Table DR1). This origin is demonstrated by a second plot (depicted by a dashed polygon) where these rock fragments are added to the lithic grain populations L and Lsm. The detailed petrographic examination reveals that the Quebrada Pilas sandstones have relatively low contents of identifiable plutonic detritus. This example shows that the use of secondary parameters is indispensable to determine the real provenance relationships in cover sandstones. In general, all three cover sandstone suites record volcanic sources derived from the Cretaceous arc activity, in addition to an ophiolitic provenance derived from exposed plagiogranite bodies and radiolarian chert units of the Nicoya Complex. TABLE 2. MODAL PARAMETERS AND CLASSIFICATION OF FRAMEWORK GRAINS Primary parameters (after Dickinson and Suczek, 1979) Q 5 total quartz grains F 5 total feldspar grains Lt 5 total lithic fragments (including polycrystalline grains, Qp) Lvm 5 volcanic and metavolcanic rock fragments Lsm 5 sedimentary and metasedimentary rock fragments Secondary parameters sensitive to plutonic provenance (defined in this study) rC 5 radiolarian chert grains Lp 5 plutonic lithic fragments exhibiting granular and subophitic textures, composed of plagioclase, quartz, and pyroxene iQF 5 grains showing micrographic intergrowth of quartz and plagioclase feldspar Hbl 5 hornblende grains Px 5 total pyroxene grains Bt 5 biotite grains Ratios: uralPx/Px, where uralPx 5 uralitized pyroxene grains (Lp 1 iQF)/Lt, where (Lp 1 iQF) 5 total lithic grains demonstrably of plutonic origin fragments. Sandstone suites of the Rivas Formation display, however, divergent trends. Sandstones from the La Tigra suite show significant values of plutonic and volcanic fragments, very similar to those for Calle Codornices arenites. Arenites from Quebrada Pilas are a particular petrofacies, because they are characterized by extraordinarily high values of sedimentary lithic fragments and especially of radiolarian chert grains. In some samples, these dominate the lithic grain fraction. The predominance of radiolarian chert materials in this forearc suite is interpreted to suggest a subduction-complex provenance, in addition Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 to a magmatic arc source (Calvo, 1998). On the QFL diagram of Figure 3, in particular, such a compositional trend is expressed by a mean plot within the subfield for dissected-arc provenance. In contrast, identifiable plutonic detritus in these sandstones occurs only in trace amounts. The Bt-Hbl-Px diagram of Figure 4 displays modal values of the mafic mineral grain population. Two main types of sandstones can be distinguished: pyroxene- and pyroxenehornblende–bearing sandstones. Most of these samples contain clinopyroxene and green hornblende. Arenites from La Tigra are predominantly pyroxene-rich, whereas in sandstones from Quebrada Pilas, hornblende dominates. The Sulcoperculina-bearing sandstones from Quebrada Pilas are extraordinarily rich in hornblende, which accounts for 87% to 93% of the mafic mineral grain fraction. One volcaniclastic sandstone sample from La Tigra contains a similar high abundance of hornblende. Arenites from Calle Codornices contain exclusively clinopyroxene, partly uralitized, and are quite similar to most of La Tigra sandstones. The enrichment of detrital pyroxene grains is strongly related to significant contents of plutonic fragments within the lithic grain fraction (Fig. 4). Biotite grains are rare in most sandstones. Only a few samples from Quebrada Pilas and one sample from Calle Codornices contain trace amounts of biotite fragments. Plutonic Lithic Fragments vs. Pyroxene Grains The (Lp 1 iQF)/Lt vs. uralPx/Px diagram shows that abundance of uralitized pyroxene grains can be correlated with increasing amounts of plutonic rock fragments (Fig. 5). In sandstone samples from Calle Codornices and La Tigra that contain .4% of identifiable plutonic lithic fragments, these two detrital parameters increase in parallel. This observation allows the following conclusions. First, it indicates that uralitized pyroxene grains also are derived from eroded intrusive rocks. Second, because both uralitized pyroxene and intergrowths of albite and quartz are characteristic mineral phases and textures of plagiogranites (Wildberg, 1984), the strong correlation between these parameters records a plutonic provenance, probably resulting from erosion of plagiogranitic bodies. It also documents the predominantly intermediate composition of igneous source rocks (Wildberg, 1987; Sinton et al., 1997). This relationship can also be recognized indirectly, by comparing modal values of rock fragments with those of mafic mineral grains 837 C. CALVO (Table 3; Fig. 4). Note that significant values of plutonic lithic fragments only occur in those sandstones that contain a mafic mineral grain population strongly dominated by pyroxene grains. This statement is true for both La Tigra and Calle Codornices sandstone suites. In samples from Calle Codornices, plutonic contributions are, in part, documented by primary detrital modes (Table DR1). Some modal QmPK values fall in Dickinson’s (1985) volcanoplutonic suite of circum-Pacific sandstones (Calvo, 1998). DISCUSSION Source Rocks The stratigraphic context and framework grain compositions of the analyzed sandstones indicate that the source of plutonic material likely lies within the underlying Nicoya Complex. Plutonic rocks occur in the lower part of the ophiolitic sequence, where they generally have intruded massive basaltic flows (Kuijpers, 1979; Wildberg, 1987). The transgressive sandstones from Calle Codornices provide unequivocal sedimentologic evidence for this interpretation, because they were deposited directly on exposed basement. Thus, noncarbonate detritus reworked during the transgression was derived from basement rocks and/or from volcanic eruptions. The composition of framework grains that include radiolarian mudstones and cherts, pelagic limestones, and basalts records basement source lithologies that are all found in the ophiolitic sequence. Nonophiolitic grains are biogenic carbonate fragments and volcanic grains, principally andesitic grains and ejecta fragments including glass shards and fresh individual crystals. On the other hand, the composition of plutonic fragments clearly indicates that the dominant plutonic source was basic to intermediate in composition. Conglomerate deposits within the La Tigra sequence containing gabbro and dolerite clasts support this interpretation. Plagiogranites in the Nicoya Complex constitute a likely specific source rock of plutonic coarse-grained lithic fragments and related pyroxene grains. Plagiogranitic Source Rocks According to Wildberg (1987), plagiogranites on the Nicoya Peninsula occur within intrusions of isotropic gabbros and dolerites. They form dikes up to several meters in thickness and intrusive bodies of considerable size with exposures several hundred meters across. On the basis of the extent of outcrops, plagiogranites probably constitute no more than 5 838 Figure 4. Ternary diagrams displaying the lithic and mafic mineral grain populations of forearc sandstones from the El Viejo and Rivas Formations (upper Campanian– Maastrichtian). Mean values indicated by distinctive symbols; n—number of samples. vol% of the Nicoya Complex. Plagiogranites are composed of plagioclase, quartz, pyroxene, opaque minerals, apatite, and zircon. Most of them display subhedral granular textures. Graphic intergrowth of plagioclase and quartz is a further typical feature (Figs. 6A, 6C). Secondary amphibole resulting from complete or partial uralitization of clinopyroxene is often present (Fig. 6C). Gabbros, dolerites, and diorites also contain accessory mineral phases of uralitized pyroxene and micrographic intergrowths (Kussmaul, 1980) (Fig. 6D). However, the detrital abundance of micrographic grains of up to 9% of total lithic Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 fragments in some sandstone samples requires igneous source rocks to contain abundant micrographic intergrowth textures, rather than only accessory amounts. Such sources are the plagiogranites. Kuijpers (1979) called attention to the abundance of micrographic intergrowths of albite and quartz in some plagiogranites of the Nicoya Complex (e.g., Playa El Ocotal; Fig. 1). Petrographic examination of these rocks confirms a wide occurrence of micrographic textures with intergrowths of up to 10 mm across, displaying differential weathering recognizable in plane-polarized light (Fig. 6A). CRETACEOUS UNROOFING HISTORY OF A MESOZOIC OPHIOLITE SEQUENCE, COSTA RICA entiated intrusive rocks displaying a mature island-arc affinity, previously detected in this region by Wildberg (1984). Provenance Areas Figure 5. Correspondence of proportion of lithic fragments that are plutonic and proportion of clinopyroxene grains that are uralitized in pyroxene-bearing sandstones from the El Viejo and Rivas Formations (upper Campanian–Maastrichtian); n—number of samples. TABLE 3. RECALCULATED MODAL VALUES OF DETRITAL PARAMETERS FOR 20 FOREARC SANDSTONES OF EL VIEJO AND RIVAS FORMATIONS (UPPER CRETACEOUS) FROM NORTHWESTERN COSTA RICA Lithic fragments† Sample Lvm Lp 1 iQF Calle Codornices sandstones BB-14/1 81 6 BB-14/2 81 5 BB-14/4 80 5 BB-1414a 86 6 BB-14/7 78 9 La Tigra sandstones LT-1/1 86 8 LT-1/4 87 5 LT-1/5 80 6 LT-2/2 94 1 LT-2/6 83 3 LT-4/1 83 ,0.5 LT-4/1a 89 1 Quebrada Pilas sandstones BB-4/1b 43 3 BB-4/2b 49 2 BB-4/5b 56 0 BB-4/1a 49 ,0.5 BB-4/2a 42 ,0.5 BB-4/5a 47 1 BB-4/6b 70 0 BB-4/6a 56 2 Mafic mineral grains†‡ Ratios†§ rC 1 Lsm Px Hbl Bt (Lp 1 iQF)/Lt uralPx/Px 13 14 15 8 13 96 100 100 100 100 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5.5 4.4 5.0 5.1 9.0 9 3 5 12 25 6 8 14 5 14 17 10 100 97 100 21 100 67 100 0 0 0 79 0 33 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 8.2 5.6 6.0 0.9 3.4 0.3 0.6 22 15 8 0 0 0 0 54 49 44 51 58 52 30 42 33 53 33 40 63 31 5 13 62 47 67 57 37 54 93 87 5 0 0 3 0 15 2 0 2.2 0.9 0 0.3 0.5 1.2 0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Values in percent plotted on diagrams of Figure 4 and Figure 5. Includes independent monomineralic grains only. Values for uralPx/Px based on additional 100 point counts for total pyroxene. The geographic distribution of the sandstone suites records very different provenance areas of plutonic detritus in northwestern Costa Rica. On the other hand, the common occurrence of angular, coarse sand-sized plutonic particles requires limited transport and deposition near the source area. The sandstone suite from La Tigra, located in the eastern Nicoya Peninsula, illustrates the relationship between the source area and site of deposition, because this region exposes several intrusive bodies. In the Quebrada Cuajiniquil, near the locality of La Tigra where the clastic sequence is exposed, Protti (1981) found a plagiogranitic sill. This rock obviously represents a potential source of plutonic detritus present in the Cretaceous turbidite sandstones. In this case, the distance from source rock to site of deposition is only a few kilometers (Fig. 1). Similarly, sandstones from Calle Codornices and Quebrada Pilas record source areas situated on the northeastern margin of the Gulf of Nicoya (Fig. 1). The intrusive rocks of Cerro Barbudal, located 2.5 and 10 km from the outcrops of Quebrada Pilas and Calle Codornices, respectively, are considered to be possible sources. These intrusive rocks contain accessory mineral phases including uralitized clinopyroxene as well as myrmekitic and micrographic intergrowths of plagioclase and quartz (Calvo, 1998). Trace amounts of plutonic lithic fragments are also present in Maastrichtian bioclastic limestones within the rudistid reef facies of Cerro Barbudal (Fig. 1). The limestones rest unconformably on eroded basaltic flows laterally penetrated by the intrusions. † ‡ Detrital Dispersal Patterns § Only very minor amounts of both potassium feldspar and biotite grains in analyzed sandstones argue against granitic source rocks. This inference is consistent with the fact that no older rocks of continental affinity have been identified in southern Central America (Lundberg, 1991). The predominance of sodium-rich plagioclase feldspar within micrographic grains and the strong correlation between uralitized pyroxene grains and plutonic lithic fragments (Fig. 5) also require a plutonic source rock of basic to intermediate composition, preferably a plagiogranitic source. Geochemical studies of potential plagiogranitic sources (Wildberg, 1987; Sinton et al., 1997) suggest that plutonic rock fragments in cover sandstones and megabreccia deposits on Santa Elena Peninsula (Tournon and Azéma, 1980) were derived from intrusive rocks of both island arc– and oceanic plateau–related origin. Of particular interest is the occurrence of arc-derived plutonic grains containing potassium feldspar in Pliocene sandstones from the Montezuma Formation of the southern Nicoya Peninsula (Lundberg, 1991) (Fig. 1). They probably record the erosion of differ- Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 Sandstone suites from northwestern Costa Rica record the dispersion of plutonic rock fragments into both shallow- and deep-water environments during Late Cretaceous time. However, sandstones deposited in the two different environments exhibit very divergent dispersal patterns. The detrital dispersion appears to have been controlled mainly by a combination of location and areal extent of exposed source rocks, sedimentary environment, and relative sea-level changes. In the shallow-water clastic rocks (Calle Codornices sandstones) and related carbonate reef deposits of the El Viejo Formation, plutonic detritus commonly appears in lithofacies 839 C. CALVO Figure 6. Photomicrographs of representative intrusive rocks from the Nicoya ophiolite complex. (A) Plagiogranite exhibiting characteristic granophyric texture. The radiating intergrowth of quartz and albite (iQF) is arranged about a euhedral plagioclase crystal (P); albite at extinction. Rock sample from Playa El Ocotal, cross-polarized light. (B) Dolerite with subhedral texture consisting mainly of plagioclase laths and clinopyroxene crystals. Rock sample from Cerro Barbudal, plane-polarized light. (C) Plagiogranite exhibiting graphic intergrowth of quartz and albite (at the right of the photograph), clinopyroxene (Px), partly uralitized (urPx), and plagioclase phenocryst (P). Rock sample from Playa El Ocotal, cross-polarized light. (D) Accessory micrographic intergrowth of plagioclase and quartz (iQF), albite at extinction, and zoned plagioclase crystals (P) in dolerite from Cerro Barbudal, cross-polarized light. at the base of the sequence. Significant concentrations are found in clastic deposits that immediately overlie the basement rocks (Fig. 7). Up section, the relative content of plutonic detritus rapidly decreases in the reef framework and in grainstone facies overlying basal strata. In terms of sequence stratigraphy, these facies represent deposits of a transgressive systems tract. Moreover, it is clear from the presence of both plutonic detritus and weathered basaltic rocks that the unconformity at the base of the Calle Codornices transgressive sequence represents a subaerial erosional surface, a type 1 unconformity following the classification of Posamentier and Vail (1988). 840 Transgressive systems tracts are deposited during rapid rises in relative sea level when little sediment is delivered to the shelf (Posamentier and Vail, 1988). This scenario coincides with the accumulation of basementderived detritus at the base of the Calle Codornices sequence, proximal to the source area, indicating moderate reworking during the transgression. These observations suggest that plutonic detritus was deposited in shallowwater environments during rapid marine incursions on exposed and previously emergent source terranes of the Nicoya Complex. In comparison with the shallow-water sequence, the slope sequences of La Tigra and Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 Quebrada Pilas of the Rivas Formation (Table 1) have an extensive vertical distribution of plutonic detritus, but in generally lower concentrations. Identifiable plutonic fragments commonly appear in levels of these sequences that contain medium to coarse-grained channel sandstones (Fig. 7). Texturally, they comprise well-sorted, graded and massive sandstones with grain support and without or little matrix contents, showing erosional basal contacts. These sedimentologic features indicate that plutonic detritus in this case was redistributed into the deep-water environment by turbidity currents and/or sandy debris flows. Typical fining-upward trends in both sequences sug- CRETACEOUS UNROOFING HISTORY OF A MESOZOIC OPHIOLITE SEQUENCE, COSTA RICA gest, moreover, a grain transport via submarine channels, probably during periods of relative sea-level lowstands. Unroofing History of the Ophiolite Sequence and Tectonic Implications Basaltic sandstones directly overlying the Nicoya Complex were derived from eroded basaltic rocks (massive and pillowed flows). Cover sandstones bearing plutonic detritus record the erosion of deeper levels of the ophiolitic sequence. Biostratigraphic age determinations of sandstones based on their foraminiferal assemblages indicate that the earliest unroofing of these levels took place during late Campanian and Maastrichtian time (Fig. 8). This finding implies that intrusive bodies of the Nicoya Complex must have intruded before the late Campanian (ca. 75–71 Ma, Gradstein et al., 1994). In fact, radiometric ages of two intrusive rocks (a gabbro and a plagiogranite) from the Nicoya Peninsula as determined by the 40Ar-39Ar method indicate that intrusive magmatic activity occurred at ca. 84 Ma (Sinton et al., 1997). The unroofing of plutonic rocks probably required long periods of subaerial exposure and concomitant denudation of the forearc ophiolite complex during evolution of the Costa Rican orogen, as suggested by a marked Campanian unconformity. Relationships between crystallization and earliest erosion ages of Nicoya Complex intrusions suggest that unroofing had been effectively accomplished ;9 m.y. after the ca. 84 Ma intrusive activity on northern Nicoya Peninsula (Fig. 8). On the other hand, geochemical studies of these plutonic rocks (e.g., Wildberg, 1987) suggest that plutonic detritus originated, in part, from intermediate arcrelated intrusions. Campanian sandstones and tuff interbeds of the Sabana Grande Formation in southern Nicoya Peninsula (Lundberg, 1982), as well as Albian to Campanian pyroclastic rocks of the Loma Chumico Formation occurring within the Nicoya Complex (Calvo and Bolz, 1994), indicate that the arc was active at the time of intrusive activity. Like late Senonian carbonate reefs and platforms, which grew on both mafic and ultramafic substrates in northwestern Costa Rica (Ulloa, 1977; Seyfried and Sprechmann, 1985; Calvo, 1987), plutonic and radiolarian chert detritus in cover sandstones points to strong uplift of the Costa Rican orogen, which included the formation of emergent terranes of ophiolitic basement (Fig. 9). Therefore both grain types in these forearc sandstones can be considered as detrital paleotectonic indicators of the regional Campanian unconformity—the Figure 7. Model suggested here for the dispersion of plutonic detritus in the marine environment during relative sea-level changes, based on detrital dispersal patterns observed in (A) the neritic sequence of Calle Codornices, and (B) the slope sequences of La Tigra and Quebrada Pilas. Dispersion of plutonic detritus succeeded periods of significant uplift and subaerial erosion that likely cut deep into the basement sequence to expose the plutonic bodies (e.g., plagiogranites). U—Campanian unconformity representing an erosion surface on exposed basement areas. See text for discussion. Figure 8. Comparing crystallization and earliest erosion ages of intrusive rocks from the Nicoya ophiolite complex of northwestern Costa Rica. Radiometric age determinations of Nicoya Peninsula intrusive rocks from Sinton et al. (1997); the two rocks come from outcrops located in the northwestern part of the peninsula. Biostratigraphic ages of sandstones bearing plutonic detritus established on the basis of their foraminiferal assemblages. Time scale and planktic foraminiferal zones from Gradstein et al. (1994) and Erba et al. (1995), respectively. See text for discussion. most important Cretaceous unconformity in southern Central America and one that marks the boundary between the ophiolitic basement rocks and their sedimentary cover strata. This tectonic uplift is coeval with the onset of the Laramide orogeny in the Late Cretaceous. In terms of relative plate motions, the onset of the Laramide orogeny at ca. 75 Ma coincides with the beginning of rapid convergence Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 (.100 km/m.y.) of the Farallon plate with respect to North America (Engebretson et al., 1985). Two volcanic rock units of note are: (1) the vesicular basaltic lavas intercalated within the upper Campanian carbonate slope sequence of Bahı́a Santa Elena, located in northern Santa Elena Peninsula (Baumgartner et al., 1984), and (2) the basaltic lavas and breccias inti- 841 C. CALVO plagiogranites implies significant strong uplift and subsequent deep erosion of the ophiolite sequence. The Cretaceous megabreccia deposits containing plagiogranite boulders (Tournon and Azéma, 1980) suggest a similar profile of erosion on Santa Elena Peninsula. In contrast, framework grains derived from shallow levels of the Nicoya ophiolitic sequence principally include basaltic and tachylite grains (partly showing vesicular textures) as well as radiolarian mudstone, pelagic limestone, and tuffaceous lithic fragments. In general, the spectrum of ophiolitic grains in cover sandstones points to an ophiolitic source-rock assemblage that does not differ from that of the exposed modern forearc basement (Fig. 10). SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Figure 9. Cartoon depicting model of evolution for the Mesozoic ophiolite sequence of Costa Rican arc orogen during the late Senonian, including (A) intrusive magmatic activity, probably arc-related, in the Santonian–early Campanian (at ca. 84 Ma, Sinton et al., 1997), and (B) uplift and subsequent erosion in the late Campanian, resulting in unroofing of ophiolitic intrusive bodies: dolerites, gabbros, and plagiogranites. Both episodes were accompanied by andesitic arc and basic forearc volcanism. In late Campanian and Maastrichtian times, transgressive shallow-marine carbonate reef and platform deposits of the El Viejo Formation prograded over exposed basement. (MAT—Middle America Trench). mately commingled with hemipelagic limestones of Maastrichtian age, exposed on the western coast of Nicoya Peninsula, between Garza and Puerto Carrillo (Schmidt-Effing, 1979) (Fig. 1). These two volcanic units indicate that both uplift and unroofing of the ophiolitic sequence in the late Senonian were accompanied by mafic forearc volcanic activity (Fig. 9). These processes together attest to coeval Cretaceous subduction and erosion, probably related to rapid convergence of the Farallon plate in southern Central America also. In addition, the presence of alterite grains, indicative of tropical weathering environments (Johnsson, 1990), in cover sandstones provides strong evidence for the residence of the Costa Rican arc in low latitudes near the equator during Cretaceous time, as constrained by paleomagnetic data (de Boer, 1979; Sick, 1989; Frisch et al., 1992). Cretaceous Erosion Profile Provenance relationships recorded by detrital compositions of cover sandstones allow the 842 reconstruction of a Cretaceous erosion profile through the ophiolitic sequence (Fig. 10). On the basis of the earliest assemblage of pseudorbitoidal foraminifera present in analyzed samples, the late Campanian (ca. 75 Ma) is assumed for this reconstruction. As can be deduced from framework grain compositions, erosion at that time affected both the upper and lower parts of the Nicoya ophiolite complex. Because intrusive rocks appear in the lower part of the Nicoya Complex, plutonic rock fragments in cover sandstones record the unroofing of the Lower Nicoya Complex in northwestern Costa Rica since at least ca. 75 Ma. Such unroofing is also well constrained by the Maastrichtian cherty sandstones from the Quebrada Pilas suite, whose detrital modes (Q23F50L27 and Qp41Lvm46Lsm13; Table DR2) plot close to Dickinson’s dissected-arc and subduction-complex provenance fields, respectively (Calvo, 1998) (Fig. 3). Considering the minimum depth of formation of 4 km observed for MORB-related intrusions (S. Foley, 2002, personal commun.), the unroofing of Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 Detrital plutonic grains, previously overlooked in earlier studies, comprise accessory framework components of Cretaceous forearc sandstones in northwestern Costa Rica. Integrated petrographic, sedimentologic, stratigraphic, and field evidence clearly indicate that plutonic detritus was derived from eroded intrusive rocks of the Nicoya ophiolite complex. Moreover, the plutonic detritus corresponds, compositionally and texturally, to source rocks of basic and intermediate compositions. An important new petrologic result is the parallel increase of plutonic lithic fragments [(Lp 1 iQF)/Lt] and uralitized pyroxene grains (uralPx/Px) identified in the framework population of pyroxene-bearing arenites. This observation indicates that uralitized pyroxene grains probably also resulted from eroded intrusive rocks; the observation also reflects more clearly a predominantly intermediate composition of plutonic source rocks. In particular, significant concentrations of lithic fragments exhibiting micrographic textures and uralitized pyroxene grains are interpreted to be predominantly derived from eroded plagiogranitic intrusions. This study demonstrates, moreover, that both newly introduced parameters—i.e., (Lp 1 iQF)/Lt and uralPx/ Px—can be used as semiquantitative modal parameters to determine affinity of source rocks and detrital plutonic contributions in sandstones derived from ophiolitic sequences. Sedimentologically, dispersal patterns of detrital sediment suggest that plutonic fragments, and all ophiolitic grains in general, were deposited in shallow-water environments during rapid marine transgressions on exposed basement areas. The detritus was apparently distributed into the slope and deep-water environments by turbidity currents and sandy debris flows, principally during relative sea-level CRETACEOUS UNROOFING HISTORY OF A MESOZOIC OPHIOLITE SEQUENCE, COSTA RICA Figure 10. Cartoon showing a hypothetical profile of erosion through the ophiolitic sequence of Nicoya Complex in the Late Cretaceous (at ca. 75 Ma), deduced from framework compositions and biostratigraphic ages of forearc sandstones of the Rivas and El Viejo Formations (upper Campanian–Maastrichtian). This ophiolitic source-rock assemblage is very similar to that currently exposed in the forearc region of northwestern Costa Rica. The erosion unroofed deeper levels of the sequence, where intrusions occur. The erosional surface corresponds with the Campanian unconformity. No scale implied. lowstands. Provenance areas were apparently located on Nicoya Peninsula as well as in the area of Cerro Barbudal, north of the Gulf of Nicoya. Tectonically, Cretaceous sandstone suites containing plutonic detritus provide evidence for the unroofing of deeper levels of the Mesozoic ophiolitic sequence of Costa Rica in late Senonian time. Sandstone ages show that the earliest erosion of Nicoya Complex intrusive rocks began at least by late Campanian time (ca. 75 Ma), ;9 m.y. after cessation of the intrusive magmatic activity on northern Nicoya Peninsula. Geochemical signatures of potential plutonic sources (Wildberg, 1987; Sinton et al., 1997) suggest coeval erosion of both island arc– and oceanic plateau–related intrusive rocks. The unroofing of the ophiolitic sequence concomitant with the beginning of neritic carbonate sedimentation records strong uplift of the Costa Rican orogen, including the formation of emergent ophiolitic basement areas in the forearc. This tectonic event marks the onset of the Laramide orogeny in Late Cretaceous time. In this context, plutonic and associated radiolarian chert grains in Cretaceous cover sandstones are considered as detrital paleotectonic indicators of the prominent Campanian unconformity separating the ophiolitic basement from its sedimentary cover strata. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank A. Bolz for determination of larger foraminifera in thin section and S. Kussmaul for providing representative samples of the plagiogranites from Playa El Ocotal. M. Meschede and S. Foley provided additional data on plutonic rocks. Reviews by J. Mezger, A. Bolz, and H.-J. Gursky improved the early manuscript version. I am also indebted to R.J. Dorsey, N. Lundberg, and G.H. Girty for helpful reviews of the submitted manuscript. REFERENCES CITED Baumgartner, P.O., 1990, Mesozoic and Tertiary arcs, seamounts and accretionary terranes of Costa Rica (Central America): Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 22, no. 7, p. A338–A339. Baumgartner, P.O., Mora, C.R., Butterlin, J., Sigal, J., Glaçon, G., Azéma, J., and Bourgois, J., 1984, Sedimentologı́a y paleogeografı́a del Cretácico y Cenozoico del litoral Pacı́fico de Costa Rica: Revista Geológica de América Central, v. 1, p. 57–136. Calvo, C., 1987, Las calizas nerı́ticas de la Vertiente Pacı́fica del norte de Costa Rica y sur de Nicaragua: Épocas y sistemas asociados con la apertura y evolución del margen convergente de América Central meridional [Tesis de Licenciatura]: San José, Costa Rica, Escuela Centroamericana de Geologı́a, Universidad de Costa Rica, 165 p. Calvo, C., 1998, Kretazische Subduktionsprozesse in Südzentralamerika: Profil, v. 15, p. 1–161. Calvo, C., and Bolz, A., 1994, Der älteste Inselbogen-Vulkanismus in Costa Rica, Marine Pyroklastika der Formation Loma Chumico (Alb bis Campan): Profil, v. 7, p. 235–264. de Boer, J., 1979, The outer arc of the Costa Rican orogen (oceanic basement complexes of the Nicoya and Santa Elena Peninsulas): Tectonophysics, v. 56, p. 221–259. Dengo, G., 1962, Estudio geológico de la región de Guan- Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 acaste, Costa Rica: San José, Costa Rica, Instituto Geográfico Nacional de Costa Rica, 112 p. Dickinson, W.R., 1970, Interpreting detrital modes of graywacke and arkose: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 40, p. 695–707. Dickinson, W.R., 1985, Interpreting provenance relations from detrital modes of sandstones, in Zuffa, G.G., ed., Provenance of arenites: Dordrecht, Netherlands, D. Reidel Publishing Company, p. 333–361. Dickinson, W.R., and Suczek, C.A., 1979, Plate tectonics and sandstones compositions: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 63, p. 2164–2182. Engebretson, D.C., Cox, A., and Gordon, R.G., 1985, Relative motions between oceanic and continental plates in the Pacific Basin: Geological Society of America Special Paper 206, p. 1–59. Erba, E., Premoli Silva, I., and Watkins, D.K., 1995, Cretaceous calcareous plankton biostratigraphy of Sites 872 through 879, in Haggerly, J.A., et al., Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific results: College Station, Texas, Ocean Drilling Program, v. 144, p. 157–169. Fischer, R., and Aguilar, T., 1994, Paleontology of an evolving island arc: Profil, v. 7, p. 391–400. Frisch, W., Meschede, M., and Sick, M., 1992, Origin of the Central American ophiolites: Evidence from paleomagnetic results: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 104, p. 1301–1314. Gazzi, P., 1966, Le arenarie del flysch sopracretaceo dell’Apennino modense—Correlazioni con il flysch Monghidoro: Minerallogica et Petrographica Acta, v. 16, p. 69–97. Gradstein, F.M., Agterberg, F.P., Ogg, J.G., Hardenbol, J., van Veen, P., Thierry, J., and Huang, Z., 1994, A Mesozoic time scale: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 99, p. 24.051–24.074. Gursky, H.-J., 1989, Presencia y origen de rocas sedimentarias en el basamento ofiolı́tico de Costa Rica: Revista Geológica de América Central, v. 10, p. 19–66. Gursky, H.-J., and Schmidt-Effing, R., 1983, Sedimentology of radiolarites within the Nicoya ophiolite complex, Costa Rica, Central America: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. 36, p. 127–142. Hinz, K., von Huene, R., and Ranero, C.R., 1996, Tectonic structure of the convergent Pacific margin offshore Costa Rica from multichannel seismic reflection data: Tectonics, v. 15, p. 54–66. Johnsson, M.J., 1990, Overlooked sedimentary particles from tropical weathering environments: Geology, v. 8, p. 107–110. Kuijpers, E.P., 1979, La geologı́a del complejo ofiolı́tico de Nicoya, Costa Rica: San José, Costa Rica, Instituto Geográfico Nacional de Costa Rica, Informe Semestral Julio–Diciembre 1979, p. 15–75. Kussmaul, S., 1980, Petrografı́a de Rocas Igneas: San José, Costa Rica, Escuela Centroamericana de Geologı́a, Universidad de Costa Rica, 122 p. Lundberg, N., 1982, Evolution of the slope landward of the Middle America Trench, Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica, in Leggett, J.K., ed., Trench-forearc geology: Geological Society [London] Special Publication 10, p. 131–147. Lundberg, N., 1991, Detrital record of the early Central American magmatic arc: Petrography of intraoceanic forearc sandstones, Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 103, p. 905–915. Minster, J.B., and Jordan, T.H., 1978, Present-day plate motions: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 38, p. 5331–5354. Posamentier, H.W., and Vail, P.R., 1988, Eustatic controls on clastic deposition II—Sequence and systems tract models, in Wilgus, C.R., et al., eds., Sea-level changes: An integrated approach: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 42, p. 125–154. Protti, R., 1981, Geologı́a de la planicie costera desde Jicaral, Puntarenas hasta Santa Rita, Nandayure, Penı́nsula de Nicoya, Costa Rica: San José, Costa Rica, Informe Técnico del Servicio Nacional de Aguas Subterráneas (SENAS), 12 p. 843 C. CALVO Rivier, F., 1983, Sı́ntesis geológica y mapa geológico del área del Bajo Tempisque, Guanacaste, Costa Rica: San José, Costa Rica, Instituto Geográfico Nacional de Costa Rica, Informe Semestral Enero–Junio 1983, p. 7–30. Schmidt-Effing, R., 1975, El primer hallazgo de amonites en América Central meridional y notas sobre las facies cretácicas en dicha región: San José, Costa Rica, Instituto Geográfico Nacional de Costa Rica, Informe Semestral Enero–Junio 1974, p. 53–61. Schmidt-Effing, R., 1979, Alter und Genese des NicoyaKomplexes, einer ozeanischen Paläokruste (Oberjura bis Eozän) im südlichen Zentralamerika: Geologische Rundschau, v. 68, p. 457–494. Seyfried, H., and Sprechmann, P., 1985, Acerca de la formación del puente-istmo centroamericano meridional, con énfasis en el desarrollo acaecido desde el Campaniano al Eoceno: Revista Geológica de América Central, v. 2, p. 63–87. Sick, M., 1989, Paleomagnetism of the ophiolite complexes from southern Middle America land bridge (Costa 844 Rica and Panama): Tübinger Geowissenschafliche Arbeiten, v. 4, p. 1–108. Sinton, C.W., Duncan, R.A., and Denyer, P., 1997, Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica: A single suite of Caribbean oceanic plateau magmas: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 102, p. 15,507–15,520. Tournon, J., and Azéma, J., 1980, Sobre la estructura y la petrologı́a del macizo ultrabásico de Santa Elena (Provincia de Guanacaste, Costa Rica): San José, Costa Rica, Instituto Geográfico Nacional de Costa Rica, Informe Semestral Enero–Junio 1980, p. 17–54. Tröger, W.E., 1967, Optische Bestimmung der gesteinsbildenden Minerale, Teil 2: Textband: Stuttgart, Germany, Schweizerbart, 822 p. Ulloa, F., 1977, Aspectos de la Geologı́a de la parte este de la Penı́nsula Santa Elena (desde Cuajiniquı́l a Santa Rosa de la Cruz de Guanacaste) [Tesis de Licenciatura]: San José, Costa Rica, Escuela Centroamericana de Geologı́a, Universidad de Costa Rica, 76 p. von Huene, R., Bialas, J., Flue, E., Cropp, B., Csernok, T., Fabel, E., Hoffman, J., Emeis, K., Holler, P., Jeschke, G., Leandro, M.C., Perez-Fernandez, I., Chavarria, S., Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 2003 Florez, H.A., Escobedo, Z.D., Leon, R., and Barrios, L.O., 1995, Morphotectonics of the Pacific convergent margin of Costa Rica, in Mann, P., ed., Geologic and tectonic development of the Caribbean plate boundary in southern Central America: Geological Society of America Special Paper 295, 291–308. Wildberg, H.G.H., 1984, Der Nicoya-Komplex, Costa Rica, Zentralamerika: Magmatismus und Genese eines polygenetischen Ophiolith-Komplexes: Münsterische Forschungen für Geologie und Paläontologie, v. 62, p. 1–123. Wildberg, H.G.H., 1987, High level and low level plagiogranites from the Nicoya ophiolite complex, Costa Rica, Central America: Geologische Rundschau, v. 76, p. 285–301. Zuffa, G.G., 1980, Hybrid arenites: Their composition and classification: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 50, p. 21–29. MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED BY THE SOCIETY 30 APRIL 2001 REVISED MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED 24 SEPTEMBER 2002 MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED 12 NOVEMBER 2002 Printed in the USA