Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
1 Deciphering The Communicative Rosetta Stone By MURRAY S. BLUM system, especially since it emphasizes our ignorance of the roles of natural products in plant and animal biology. From an evolutionary standpoint the consistent production of specific compounds in a plant indicates that they must be of selective advantage to those species which produce them. Schmalhasen (1949) emphasized this point when he discussed the retention of characters by animals. Furthermore, since there are compelling reasons for regarding the presence of natural products in plants as of great adaptive significance (Fraenkel 1959), no cogent grounds remain for designating these compounds with a secondary rank. To continue to do so is as biologically unsound as it is illogical. Although it has been known for years that plants and animals are remarkable natural product chemists, it has only been in the last few decades that biologists have developed some awareness of the significance of this biosynthetic versatility. Among animals, a dazzling array of organic compounds function as external stimuli which regulate a multitude of intraspecific behavioral responses. These have been heretofore described mostly in anecdotal terms. Among the invertebrates, these chemical agents, the pheromones, have been documented for so many groups that it may not be premature to speculate that the presence of these compounds constitutes an ubiquitous characteristic of these animals. Furthermore, even at this early stage in our comprehension of the modus operandi of these chemical stimuli, it is obvious that we now have a particularly powerful additional tool with which to study the evolution of animal behavior. Recently, plant and animal natural products have been divided into three categories-pheromones, allomones, and questionably, kairomones-based on the adaptive value that these compounds may possess for individuals in- volved in either intra- or interspecific interactions (Brown et a!. 1970). Pheromones-intraspecific chemical stimuli -are considered adaptive for an emitter individual as a result of favorable behavioral or developmental responses produced in a receiver individual of the same species. Allomones also produce reactions in the perceiver individuals that are adaptively favorable to the emitters, but these compounds, in contrast to pheromones, function in interspecific contexts. Allomones, often involving both plants and animals, play roles in both mutualistic and agonistic relationships. The compounds that attract pollinators and secd disseminators to flowers and fruits are allomones, as arc the gustatory stimulants that may induce these same individuals to feed on floral nectar or the fruity pulp. On the other hand, antagonistic allomones are identified either with the defensive secretions of animals or the natural products of plants which render the tissues unpalatable to a potentially predatory species. Characteristically, the allomonal functions of a wide range of compounds exploit the environment in terms eminently favorable to the producer organism. MURRAY CHEMICAL SIGNALS S. Brown et a1. (1970) have labeled a third class of compounds as kairomones or transpecific chemical messengers, the adaptive value of which falls on the perceiver rather than the emitter. Kairomones are considered to be nonadaptive or maladaptive to the producing individuals. These compounds include the phagostimulants that act as feeding triggers for specific herbivores and attractants which are responsible for attracting predators and parasites. However, it does not follow that such natural products represent a class of chemical signals distinct from allomones and pheromones. Rather, the "so called" kairomones appear to be pheromones and ailomones which have evolutionarily backfired. BLUM AND TERMINOLOGY The inexactitude of the terminology applied to natural products primarily reflects our lack of knowledge of the functions of these compounds. For example, many compounds produced by plants are sometimes referred to as secondary plant substances or metabolites, in order to contrast them with the omnipresent lipids, carbohydrates, and proteins. However, this description assigns an unnatural priority to these compounds, and as a consequence, there is no justification for utilizing such a classificatory The phagostimulants which induc£' a limited number of herbivores to feed on a plant appear to have been originally evolved to deter the vast multitude of herbivorous species in an environment from feeding on the same plant (Fraenkel 1959). These natural products certainly arc allomones which are highly favorable to the species. To consider them nonadaptive or maladaptive because a few species feed in their presence ignores their critical role in insulting the plant from indiscriminate predation by herbivores. Similarly, the same volatile natural products of plants or animals which may betray them to predators or 1 The 1973 Founders' Memorial Award Lecture. Presented at the meeting of the Entomological Society at Dallas, TX, Nov. 26, 1973. 30 Table I.-The insect species. utilizatiun of arthropod defensive compounds as pheromones by non-social, presocial, and eusocial Source Taxa Compound Family Order .. - .- Genus Formic acid Lepidoptera Coleoptera Hymenuptera !\'otodontidae Carabidae Furmicidae Dicrallura Dicaclus Formica II-Pentanoic acid Hemiptera Coleoptera Coleoptera Coreidae Carabidae Elateridae 2-IIeptanone Blattaria IIymenoptera Hymenoptera Blattidae Apidae F ormicidae ll-Dodeceny I aet'tate Lepidoptera Lepidoptera II-L:ndecane Coleoptera Hymenoptera Cossidae Noctuidae Staphylinidae Formicidae PtcYllistria PromccodcYlls LimOllius Platy::ostcria Ap';s Iridomyrmcx Zcu::cra Diparopsis Drusilla Campollolus ------------ Authority Function -- ---.------ ._--- parasites are of great selecti"e value to their producers as phl'ronHlIles, playing key roles as species recognition agl'nts. sex attractants. aggregative stimuli, etc. Therefon" unless it can be demonstrated that compounds which attract pn'dators or parasites to plants and animals are not pheromonl's or allomones, it seems wise to simply n'gard thcm as cvolutionary boomerangs. Defensive Defensive Defensive & alarm pheromone Defensive Defensive Sex attractant Defensive Alarm pheromone Alarm pheromone Defensive Sex attractant Defensive Orientationaggregation pheromone Poulton (1888) McCullough (1967) Maschwitz (1964) Baker & Kemba\1 (1967) Moore and Wallbank (1968) Jacobson et al. (1968) Wallbank & Waterhouse (1970) Shearer & Boch (1965) Blum et al. (1963) Marchesini et al. (1969) Nesbitt et at. (1973) Brand et at. (1973) Ayre and Blum (1971) PHEROMONAL ORIGINS While the presence of pheromones in plants and animals has been well established, the origins of these communicative stimuli have remained relatively obscure. Pheromones generally are low molecular-weight compounds possessing a fairly high vapor pressure and highly stimulatory olfactants. Significantly, defensive compounds have the same properties, and a plethora of evidence suggests that these antagonistic allomones may have often been direct pheromonal antecedents. \Vhik the utilization of a pheromone by members of thc same species clearly constitutes communication, some caution should be exercised in extending this definition to intl'rspl'cific. interactinns based on allomonal stimuli. To equatc communicatively the defensive discharge that a pcntatomid directs at a predatory bird with the sex attractant which brings a male moth to its ca\1ing female "C'n<krs the \\'hole concept of communication so diffuse as to be biologically meaningless. As Burghardt (1970) !ll'rsuasi\'c1y emphasizes, to regard the defensive spray of a skunk as chemical communication would then extend the concept of chemical communication to the use of l'ither kar gas or 11ace. Burghardt concludes that communication must possess the element of intent. Intent implies that it is to the real or perceived ad\'antage of the signaler or the signaler's group to transmit its message to anothcr individuaL Thus, information transfer would ha\'c becomc adaptively favorable to the transmitter or his group through natural selection. The widespread distribution of the same defensive compound in the Arthropoda demonstrates that the capacity to biosynthesize it has arisen de novo frequently in Unrelated groups of invertebrates. Thus, many of the enzymes required for the biogenesis of specific defensive compounds must be present in a variety of arthropod lines, and the biosynthesis of these a\1omones may have required relatively few mutations in order to complete the required enzymatic pathway. The subsequent use of defensive compounds as pheromones by nonsocial, presocial or eusocial species would become possible as a result of selection for emitting them, and being preprogrammed to respond to them adaptively, in specific behavioral contexts. Furthermore, since these compounds now possess both a pheromonal and defensive function, their production by a species is exceptionally adaptive. Consequently, the interception of a signal by an individual of another species would not constitute true communication if the subsequent behavior of the receivers did not prove favorable to individuals of the emitter species. Thus, since the attraction of predatory clerid beetles to thc aggregation pheromones produced by male Ips COllil/sl/s (Wood et al. 1968) is poorly adaptive for the bark bectles, it cannot be classified as communication. On the other hand, interspecific communication can occur in certain contexts, as for example when a threatened tenebrionid beetle Jlostures on its head prior to discharging the quinonoidal mixture in its pygidial glands (Eisner 1970). This stereotyped posturing behavior constitutes a highly distinctive signal for a predator, especially since it invariably precedes the accurate discharge of a highly irritating secretion. Table 1 lists some of the defensive compounds of some nonsocial species which are also utilized as pheromones by pre-social or eusocial species. These are representati ve of a multitude of defensive compounds identical to the pheromones produced by a wide variety of arthropod species. It also illustrates the diversity in function that these compounds possess when they are utilized as communicative stimuli. Formic acid, which is produced by lepidopterous, coleopterous, and hymenopterous species, is of special interest because it accumulates in very high concentrations in the glandular reservoirs of these species. However, the enzymes required to synthesize lO-formyltetrahydrofolate, the immediate precursor of formic acid (Blakley 1969), are present in a wide variety of insects (Grzelakowska-Sztabert and Zielinska 19(7) which do not store this compound. It seems appropriate to ask why 31 Initially, plant natural products may have constituted nothing more than general membrane irritants for animal chemoreceptors. This seminal condition was probahly necessary for the ultimate evolution of highly specific receptors. Subsequent selection for chemoreceptors capable of being triggered by a narrower spectrum of compounds would result in olfactory or gustatory generalists which could perceive chemical cues emanating from food sources. Further selection for highly specific receptors which were triggered only by specific compounds would result in the evolution of olfactory or gustatory specialists -the chemoreceptors that are only fired by the attractants or phagostimulants utilized by many insects to identify their specific food plants. Obviously the evolution of a hierarchy of behavioral responses, mediated through the central nervous system as a result of perceiving these plant-derived stimuli, would occur simultaneously with selection for increasingly spccialized chemoreceptors. these species do not accumulate large amounts of formic acid as do notodontid larvae (Table 1). The highly selective distribution of formic acid-rich defensive glands in insects must reflect evolutionary adaptations that have made both the large-scale synthesis and accumulation of this compound possible. Significantly, this synthetic emphasis may have only required a single mutation in order to produce an enzyme which forms formic acid from 10-formyltetrahydrofolate, an end result which might be achieved through 10-formyl THF deacylase (Osborn et al. 1957). Whatever the ultimate morphological and enzymatic raison d'etre of formic acid in the defensive exudates of insects, a wide variety of species that do llOt utilize this compound as a defensive product already possess most of the biosynthetic machinery to do so. It has also been suggested that some pheromones may have been derived from steroidal hormones. Haldane ( 1954) has adumbrated the 'possible evolution of vertebrate pheromones from sex hormones and more recently, Kittredge and Takahashi (1972) have discussed the significance of a crustacean molting hormone, crustecdysone, functioning as a sex attractant. Kittredge et al. (1971) have demonstrated that traces of this steroid, which release typical pre-copulatory behavior in males, leak from the female crab only during the ultimate molt. Since males already possess chemoreceptors for the hormone, selection for both externalization of the receptors and a preprogrammed responsiveness (attraction) to crustecdysone would guarantee the functionality of this pheromonal system (Kittredge and Takahashi 1972). CO-E\'OLUTION Chemical communication systems predicatcd on using defensive compounds which functioncd as pheromones may have evoh"ed in a manner essentially identical to that suggested for the evolution of spccializcd chemoreceptors for plant natural products. After the ability to biosynthesize a defensive compound has evolved by mutation, selection for more specific. but still broadly tuncd chemoreccptors (generalists), would occur. At this juncture, relatively small numbers of these receptors would be present, resulting in a rather limited signal and consequently, a lo\\' sensitivity to the stimulus. The concurrent evolution in the species of a responsivencss to this chemical stimulus would result in selection for new behavioral traits adaptively favorable for the species. Subsequent selection for very specific chemoreceptors (specialists) in large numbers would culminate in a maximally sensitive receiver which is able to discriminate between the pheromone and even closely related compounds. OF THE SIGNAL AND THE RECEPTOR SYSTEM Kittredge et al. (1974) have emphasized the improbability of an animal co-evolving the ability to both synthesize a compound and exhibit a stereotyped reaction after perceiving it with great olfactory specificity. Based on the utilization of crustecdysone as a sex pheromone, they persuasively suggest that chemical communication evolved in a stepwise manner. This conclusion is evolutionarily sound, but the specific example of crustecdysone cannot be compared with the cases of most pheromones whose geneses and chemoreceptor sensitivities do not appear to have been derived from any known endocrine products. Perhaps the main driving force for the evolution of a variety of pheromonal chemoreceptors was supplied by the natural products of plants. ADAPTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RECEPTOR SYSTE~l The functionality of the pheromonal L'mwelt of arthropods reflects their ability to process rapidly the information encoded in highly psecific molecules which impinge on their batteries of specializcd chcmoreceptors . The remarkable adaptiveness of such a communicative system is especially evident when the characteristics of sex pheromone perception by male silkworms are analyzed in some detail. A recent discussion (Schneider 1970) of the biophysical events that occur when a threshold concentration of the sex pheromone, bombykol, is detected by the olfactory receptors on the male antennae illuminates some of the adaptive qualities of this chemosensory system. Each antenna contains 25,000 specialist receptors and these cells provide an intrinsic input (background) of 1,600 impulses/second to the hrain. At a behavioral threshold level of 3 X 10-6 p.g of bombykol, 120 additional impulses/second/ antenna are theoretically required to overcome this background signal. However, it has been determined that 300 cells hit by bombykol molecules actually generate 200 impulses at a behavioral concentration (Schneider 1970). Extraordinarily, it can be calculated that at a signal to noise ratio of 0.075 (120 bombykol impulses/1,600 background impulses/antenna), a behavioral threshold is reached, whereas present day electronic detectors used in analytical instrumentation usually optimize on a signal to noise ratio of 2: 1 to minimize detection time while obtaining statistically valid data. The frequent congruity of plant and animal natural products is striking, as is the fact that the same classes of low molecular weight compounds are often emphasized by both groups of organisms. Thus, mono terpene aldehydes and hydrocarbons, quinones, Ct, ,B-unsaturated aldehydes, and aliphatic acids have a widespread distribution among both plants and animals. In plants, these compounds generally function as feeding deterrents, while in specialized instances, they act as gustatory or olfactory stimulants. In animals these same compounds are generally utilized as weapons of defense, but some species employ them as key elements in their communicative systems. If the chemoreceptors of animals have been constantly challenged by the natural products of plants, then animals have had an extended period of time in which to have evolved specialized chemoreceptors capable of reacting specifically to these compounds while simultaneously develOping a preprogrammed responsiveness. Significantly, if animals subsequently produce the same or similar compounds, the archetypal chemosensory elements for their discrimination and transduction may already be present. Thus, at a behavioral threshold, the bombykol receptor system of the male silkworm possesses adaptive characteristics which do not appear to have a parallel in any 32 pods, notwithstanding their relatively weak organoleptic properties. Indeed, the independent evolution of n-undecane as a chemical deterrent by species of phalangids and insects in several orders, provides strong evidence for regarding hydrocarbons as exocrine products of high adaptiveness. It seems evident that the members of this class of compounds possess some physiological properties that justify their widespread occurrence in defensive exudates. detector system which has been similarly analyzed. The specialist cells which detect the sex pheromone molecules exhibit greater elllciency at very low concentrations of homhykol; the male antennae must constitute an extraordinarily selective filter. At the very low signal to noise ratio of 0,075. the male moth is nevertheless able to behaviorally respond, notwithstanding the fact that few bombykol impulses are present at a negligible confidence len'!. However, the remarkable adaptive favorabi1ity of this detector system becomes particularly evident when viell'ed as a function of the vi rtually instantaneous reaction time of the male in the presence of so few integratahle impulses. Indeed, a male moth will exhibit a sexual response 100 milliseconds after detecting as little as 20 bomhykol hits. The exhibition of such a rapid behavioral response in the presence of such a negligible sensory input must be regarded as a major evolutionary developnwnt. Consequently, if the pheromonal receptor system of the male silkll'orm is typical of that of other arthro]lOd spl'cies, it indicates that the relatively high resting signal frequencies (background) associated with the inordinately large number of evolved specialist cells do not l'lll1stitute a nl'urophysiological liability. Blum and Brand (1972) have suggested that hydrocarbons may function as antagonistic allomones by temporarily altering the generator characteristics of the olfactory chemoreceptors present on a predator's antennae, In essence, this defensive modus operandi of hydrocarbons could permit the molested arthropod to "hide" from its aggressor, since the disruption of the normal olfactory processes of the latter could effectively neutralize its predatory behavior. Hydrocarbons may thus constitute some of the cryptic odors of Haldane (1955), and m••y represent a large number of defensive compounds that "jam" the chemosensory systems of predators. Kittred!;'e et a!. (1974) regard these cryptic odors as either "negative odors", which alter the dendritic membrane potenti ••1 and block its generator potential, or as the chemical equivalent of a "white noise" capable of generating an "uncoded" array of spikes in the chemosensory neuroml. Significantly, the complex defensive secretions of many arthropods may constitute ideal agents with which to overstimulate the chemoreceptors and thus trigger bursts of uncoded information into the central nervous system. Certainly, the Dufour's gland secretion of the formicine Camponotus ligHiperda, enriched with at least 41 compounds including alkanes, alkenes, esters, alcohols, and ketones (Bergstrom and Lofqvist 1971), should be eminently capable of stimulating simultaneously several classes of olfactory generalists, thereby generating a sensory input which is very maladaptive for the predator. Consequently, the chemical diversity identified with so many defensive secretions may actually represent a cryptic odor unleashed at the chemosensory neurons of an antagonist in the form of a highly disruptive chemical overload. It may II'dl be that the sophistication of arthropod olfaction not only reflects the existence of olfactory specialists, but also the presence of these cells on two antennae instead of one. Hangartner (1967) has demonstrated that whl'n a worker of the formicine ant Lasius !uligiHosus folloll's a chemical trail, each antenna is alternately moved in and out of the plane of the odor field. Significantly, the antl'nnae may be utilized as a nulling device, so that wl1l'n one antenna moves out of the odor field, it nulls the signal to the other antenna, At the same time, the sensitivity of the "out" antenna may be increased as it falls to bl'lolI' threshold in the absence of a strong stimulus. The alternate insertion of the antennae in and out of the odor fidd would also diminish the possibility of residual olfactory effects and thus guarantee the maintenance of maximal sensitivity of the target cells to the pheromone molecuks, Such a nulling system would also be particularly adaptive since it would provide an orientation axis to the signal path which might not be achieved if both antennae lI'ere continuously maintained in the odor field and habituation of the specialist receptors occurred. Since Farkas and Shorey (1973) have presented evidence that moths, orienting to a sex pheromone, similarly alternately insert an antenna in and out of the odor plume generated by the chemical stimulus, it is possible that antennal nulling may represent a common device for maximizing the efficiency of the olfactory chemoreceptor system. CRYPTIC DEFENSIVE THE SPECIFICITY IS THE BLEND While the chemical variegation of defensive secretions may effectively "conceal" arthropods, diversity in pheromonal secretions may constitute the primary means by which individuals of the same species facilely locate each other. Although many species of arthropods synthesize common pheromones, it appears that their chemical signals are generally insulated from deciphering by foreign species. This is because these pheromones are secreted in admixture with other compounds which confer an element of great specificity on the chemical signal. It thus appears that the specificity is the blmd. Precise intraspecific communication appears to reflect the evolution of a complex of olfactory specialists capable of discriminating multicomponent pheromones, the function of which is to modulate the informational content encoded in a chemical message. CO~IPOt.:NDS Although the specialist receptors can usually be fired only by the highly specific molecules to which they react, the same cannot be said for the cells which constitute the so-called olfactory generalists. The latter sensory eletlll'l1ts exhibit varying degrees of specificity to a spectrum of compounds and it is probable that the deterrent effectiveness of many antagonistic allomones is a consequence of their ability to stimulate these generalist receptors. Thus, whereas the highly stimulatory lJuinones and shortchain carboxylic acids characteristic of many defensive sl'cretions would seem to constitute ideal repellents, a priori, many of the other major antagonistic allomones could hardly be considered as potent olfactants. Hydrocarbons, for example, have been emphasized as major constituents in the chemical defense arsenals of arthro- Many sympatric lepidopterous species produce the same primary sex pheromones (Roelofs and Comeau 1971), but the presence of additional secondary components is often required for atlractancy to be exhibited (Hummel et al. 1973) and in some cases, these minor concomitants may actually inhibit the response of related species (Ganyard and Brady 1971). Kullenberg et al. (1970) have demonstrated that the territorial pheromones utilized by 19 spe- 33 Eisner, T. 1970. Chemical defense against predation in arthropods, Pages 157-217 in E. Sondheimer and J. B. Simeone, eds. Chemical ecology. Academic Press, N. Y. Farkas, S. R., and H. H. Shorey. 1973. Chemical trailfollowing by flying insects: a mechanism for orientation to a distant odor source. Science 178: 67-8. Fraenkel, G. S. 1959. The raisOll d'etre of secondary plant substances. Science 129: 1466-70. Ganyard, M. C, Jr., and U. E. Brady. 1971. Inhibition of attraction and cross-attraction by interspecific sex pheromone communication in Lepidoptera. Nature 234: 415-16. Grzelakowska-Sztabert, B., and Z. M. Zielinska. 1967. The transfer one of one-carbon units in insect metabolism. Pathways of folate coenzyme synthesis. J. Insect Physiol. 13: 1207-19. Haldane, J. B. S. 1954. La signalisation animale, Annee BioI. 30: 89-98. Haldane, J. B. S. 1955. Animal communication and the origin of the human language, Sci, Prog. 43: 385-401. Hangartner, W. 1967. Spezifitiit und inaktivierung des spurpheromons von Lasius fuliginosus Latr. und orientierung der Arbeiterinnen im Duftfeld. Z. Vgl. Physio!. 57: 103-36. Hummel, H. E., L. K. Gaston, H. H. Shorey, R. S. Kaae, K. J. Byrne, and R. M. Silverstein. 1973, Clarification of the chemical status of the pink bollworm sex pheromone. Science 181: 873 :5, Jacobson, M., C E. Lilly, and C Harding. 1968. Sex attractant of the sugar beet wireworm: identification and biological activity. Science 159: 208-9. Kittredge, J. 5., and F. T. Takahashi. 1972. The evolution of sex pheromone communication in the Arthropod. J. Theor. BioI. 35: 467-71. Kittredge, J. S., F. T. Takahashi, J. Lindsey, and R. Lasker. 1974. Chemical signals in the sea: marine allelochemics and evolution. U. S. Fish. Bull. (in press) , Kittredge, J. S., M. Terry, and F. T. Takahashi. 1971. Sex pheromone activity of the molting hormone, crustecdysone, on male crabs. U. S. Fish. Bull. 69: 337-43. Kullenberg, B., G. Bergstrom, and S. Stallberg-Stenhagen. 1970. Volatile components of the cephalic marking secretion of male bumble bees. Acta. Chem. Scand. 24: 1481-3. McCullough, T. 1967. Compounds in the defensive scent fluid of Diacaelus sp/elldidus and D. ai/atatus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 60: 861. Marchesini, A., L. Garanti, and M. Pavan. 1969. Sulla natura chimica del secreto delle glandole mandibolari della larva Zcu;;cra pyrina L. Ric. Sci. 39: 874-7. Maschwitz, U. 1964. Gefahrenalarmstoffe und Gefahrenalarmierung bei sozialen Hymenoptera. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 47: 596-655. Michael, R. P., E. B. Keverne, and R. W. Bonsall. 1971. Pheromones: isolation of male sex attractants from a female primate. Science 172: 964-6. Moore, B. P., and B. E. Wallbank. 1968. Chemical composition of the defensive secretion in carabid beetles and its importance as a taxonomic character. Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. B37: 62-72. Nesbitt, B. F., P. S. Becvor, R. A. Cole, R. Lester, and R. G. Poppi. 1973. Sex pheromones of two noctuid moths. Nature 244: 208-9. Osborn, M. J., Y. Hatefi, L. D. Kay, and F. M. Huen- cies of male bumblebees, while they contain many common components, constitute qualitatively distinct blends that can serve as highly specific chemical messengers. Similarly, while closely related species of Trigona produce trail pheromones enriched with complex mixtures containing many identical compounds, the specific integrity of these blends appears to be guaranteed by their qualitative distinctiveness (Blum 1970). Vertebrate pheromones are also characterized by the presence of blends (Michael et a!. 1971) as further testimony to the widespread utility of multicomponent chemical signals in the animal kingdom. Thus, if we are to comprehend both the evolution and elegance of chemical communication, it will be necessary to analyze these topics in considerably more depth than heretofore. Although a compound isolated from a female moth may readily attract males of the same species, this phenomenon hardly illuminates the communicative mechanisms employed by this species to maintain its reproductive integrity in the presence of sympatric forms that may produce the same compound. On the other hand, a recognition of the potential richness of the vocabulary of pheromonal signals may eventually enable us to decipher the communicati ve Rosetta Stone whose message contains both the behavioral and neurophysiological legacies of a species. REFERENCES CITED Ayre, G. L., and M. S. Blum. 1971. Attraction and alarm of ants (CampollOtlls spp.-Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by pheromones. Physiol. Zool. 44: 77-83. Baker, J. T., and P. A. Kemball. 1967. Volatile constituents of the scent gland reservoir of the coreoid P tcnristria bispina (Hemiptera). A ust. ]. Chern. 20: 395-8. Bergstrom, G., and J. Liifqvist. 1971. Campollotns /ignipcrda. Latr.-A model for the composite volatile secretions of Dufour's gland in formicine ants. Pages 195-223 in A. S. Tahori, ed. Chemical releasers in insects. Proc. 2nd. Int. IUPAC Congr., 1971. Vol. 3, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Gordon & Breach, N. Y. Blakley, R. L. 1969. Enzymic interconversion of THF derivatives. Pages 188-218 in A. Neaberger and E. L. Tatum, eds. The biochemistry of folic acid and related pteridines. North Holland Pub!. Co., Amsterdam, Blum, M. S. 1970. The chemical basis of insect sociality. Pages 61-94 in M. Beroza, ed. Chemicals controlling insect behavior. Academic Press, N. Y. Blum, M. S., and J. M. Brand. 1972. Social insect pheromones: their chemistry and function. Am. Zool. 12: 553-76. Blum, M. S., S. L. Warter, R. S. Monre, and J. C Chidester. 1963. Chemical releasers of social behavior. 1. Methyl-n-amyl ketone in Iridolll)'r111cx pruiJloslls (Roger). J. Insect Physiol. 12: 419-27. Brand, J. M., M. S. Blum, H. M. Fales, and J. M. Pasteels. 1973. The chemistry of the defensive secretion of the beetle, Drusilla. cana/iw/ata. J. Insect Physiol. 19: 369-82. Brown, W. L., Jr., T. Eisner, and R. H. Whittaker. 1970. Allomones and kairomones: transspecific chemical messengers. Bioscience 20: 21-2. Burghardt, G. M. 1970. Defining "communication". Pages 5-18 in J. W. Johnston J r., D. G. Moulton, and A. Turk, eds. Advances in Chemoreception. Vo!. 1. Communication by chemical signals. Appleton-Century-Crofts, N. Y. 34 nekens. 1957. Evidence for the enzymic deacylation of X'''-formyl tetrahydrofolic acid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 26; 20R-10. Poulton, E. B. 1HRR The secretion of pure aqueous formic acid hy lepidopterous larvae for the purpose of ddence. Brit. Assoc. A(I\>. Sci. Rept. 5: 765-6. Roelofs, W. 1., and A. Comeau. 1971. Sex attractants in Lepidoptera. Pages 91-114 iJl A. S. Tahori, ed. Chemical releasers in insects. Proc. 2nd int. IUP AC Congr. 1971. Vol. 3, Tel-Aviv. Israel. Gordon & Breach. X. Y. Schmalhasen, I. I. 1949. Factors of evolution. The theory of stabilizing selection. Blakeston, Philadelphia, Pa. Schneider, D. 1970. Olfactory receptors for the sexual attractant (bombykol) of the silkmoth. Pages 511-8 in F. O. Schmitt, cd. The neurosciences: sccond study program. Rockefeller Univ. Press, N. Y. Shearer, D. A., and R. Boch. 1965. 2-Heptanone in the mandibular gland secretion of the honey bee. Naturc 206: 530. Wallbank, B. E., and D. F. Waterhouse. 1970. The defensive secretions of Poly:::ostcria and related cockroaches. ]. Insect. Physiol. 16: 2081-96. Wood, D. 1., 1. E. Browne, W. D. Bedard, and P. E. Tilden. 1968. Response of Ips cullfusus to synthetic sex pheromones in nature. Science 159: 1373-4. FIRST NATIONAL :Memoir, Papers can be read in either English or Afrikaans. Accommodation for attendants and their associates can be arranged in a University hostel at a reasonable tariff (at present R4 per person per day, fully inclusive). The Annual General Meeting of the Society will coincide with the Congress. Exhibitions as well as an excussion to various experimental sites will be arranged. Sight-seeing excussions for associates of attendants will also be arranged if sufficient interest is shown. A Registration fcc (to include refreshments) of R4 (R1 for associates) will be payable at a later stage. For further details write to: ]. H. GU.IOMEE (Chairlllall. Western Cape Branch) Dept. of Entomology, Univcrsity of Stellenbosch, STELLD.JBOSCH, South Africa, 7600 ENTOMOLOGICAL CONGRESS The Entomological Society of South Africa announces the First Xational Entomnlogical Congress will be held at Stl'lknbosch from i.!onday, 30th September 1974 to Thursday, 3rtl October 1974. lking the first Congress to be arranged by the Society it was decidl'd not to limit the attendance to members of the Sllcidy nor the subject mattcr of the Congress to any specific theme, and papers are invited on any aspect of entomology as well as acarology and nematology. l'apers with re1atl'cl subject matter will be grouped into sl'ssions; a special session on apiculture will be arranged. A maximum of 40 minutes (lecture and discussion) will Ill' allowed pl'r speaker (except for invited papers) ; short communications (10 minutes) will also be acceptable. Papers [l'ad at the Congress can be submitted during the Congress for publication in a special Congress \.~., ARE YOU INTERESTED IN INSECTS?YOU Will INSECT • ... WANT TO READ AND SAVE YOUR OWN COPY OF: WORLD ,.. \Q\~ I W 0 DIGEST FULL COLOR I LLUSTRATIONS OF INSECTS • INTERESTING ARTICLES ABOUT INTERESTING INSECTS • FEATURES, including: Digestsof articles (catch-up on the literature); helpful information; news; • Editorials; identification aids; books; new products, etc., etc. First issue dated: January/February, SAVE 15% SEND CHECK 1973 (bimonthly) Mail to: WORLD DIGESTS, INC., Rural Route 1, Box 161, Tallahassee, Florida 32303, U.S.A. Pleaseenter my subscription to INSECT WORLD DIGEST to begin immediately. WITH ORDER: ] 1 yr. $10.00 Name & 2 yrs. $17.00 ] 2 yrs. $18.00 Address 3 yrs. $25.50 ] 3 yrs. $27.00 1 yr. $8.50 ) Check enclosed, save 15% -------------------_____________ ) Please send invoice All NEW prepaid subscriptions 35 .Zip _ are sent on approval.