* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Case presentation General Surgery
Urinary tract infection wikipedia , lookup
Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Traveler's diarrhea wikipedia , lookup
Clostridium difficile infection wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Management of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup
Staphylococcus aureus wikipedia , lookup
Multiple sclerosis signs and symptoms wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
VANCOMYCIN FAILED MY KIDNEYS: NOW WHAT? Case presentation General Surgery Rotation Rajwant Minhas NOVEMBER 2011 Outline • Learning Objectives • Case • Background: Infected knee prosthesis and vancomycin induced nephrotoxicity • Clinical Question • Results • Assessment • Plan • Monitoring • Follow up Learning Objectives 1. Understand the classification of: Prosthetic joint infections 2. Discuss alternate treatment options besides vancomycin to treat infected knee prosthesis 3. Understand 3 differences with respect to MOA and ADRs b/w daptomycin, linezolid and tigecycline Patient Information • NS 62 yo (5’3”, 92 kg) IBW = 51.9 kg • Caucasian F • Admitted Nov 1, 2011 for revision to knee arthroplasty • C/C: Knee pain • HPI: • Left Oxford hemiarthroplasty 7 years ago • Recently became hot, red & swollen • Acute pain in knee with pinching like pain, lasts for a while • Difficulty doing stairs Patient Information PMH MPTA •Left Oxford hemiarthroplasty 7 y ago •HTN x years Furosemide 20 mg PO OD Amlodipine 5 mg PO OD Ramipril 5 mg PO OD Sprinolactone 12.5 mg PO OD •Primary prevention of cardiovascular event ASA 81 mg PO OD •Dyslipidemia x years Rosuvastatin 10 mg PO OD Patient Information PMH MPTA •COPD Fluticasone 250 mcg 2 puffs BID Ipratropium 20 mcg 2 puffs QID Salbutamol 100 mcg 2 puffs QID PRN •Heartburn •OA •Migraine •Fibromyalgia •Sinus HA Ranitidine 150 mg PO BID •Seasonal allergies Cetirizine 10 mg PO OD Ibuprofen 400 mg PO PRN 6 Patient Information • Allergies: NKDA • FH: Father: HTN Mother: Type II Diabetes, HTN • SH: – – – – – – – Caffeine: 3-4 cups coffee/day No alcohol Smoking: 1 pack per day AAT Lives alone Retired Low salt diet Current Medications Infected Knee Prosthesis Vancomycin 2 g IV Q12H HTN Amlodipine 5 mg PO OD Ramipril 5 mg PO OD Furosemide 20 mg PO OD Spironolactone 12.5 mg PO OD Dyslipidemia Rosuvastatin 10 mg PO OD Nausea Dimenhydrinate 25-50 mg PO Q4H PRN Ondansetron 4 mg IV Q4-6 H PRN Knee Pain Acetaminophen 650 mg PO Q6H Oxycodone 5-10 mg PO Q3-4 H PRN Morphine 5 mg IV Q4H Hydromorphone 0.1-0.4 mg IV Q10min PRN Insomnia Zopiclone 3.75-7.5 mg PO HS PRN Review of Systems • • CNS: Temp = 36.9 C Resp: – RR = 20 • CVS: – BP = 141/59 mm Hg – HR = 71/min • Fluids/Lytes/Heme: – WBC = 8.2 – Neutrophils = 5.7 – Hgb =84 • MSK/Skin/Extremities: – Knee X ray: No signs of loosening of implant, degenerative changes at the patellofemoral joint – Muscle spasm in left knee – Immobility cast in place on left knee Review of Systems Sept 26 Aspirate knee swab Coagulase negative Staph (CoNS) Sensitive to: Cloxacillin, Vancomycin, Cefazolin Nov 4 Joint fluid culture Coagulase negative Staph Sensitive to: Vancomycin, Tetracycline, Tigecycline, Linezolid, Rifampin Resistant to: Ampicillin, Cefazolin, Cloxacillin, Penicillin, Clindamycin Aug 16: Knee arthroscopy, debridement Nov 1: Revision to arthroplasty, prosthesis removed cement with vancomycin placed Nov 7: Discontinued Cefazolin 2g IV Q8H Initiated Vancomycin 1500 mg IV Q12H Review of Systems 9/11 11/11 14/11 Creatinine 45 45 138 eGFR >120 >120 34 Vancomycin Dose 1500 mg IV Q12H 1750 mg IV Q12H 2000 mg IV Q12H Vancomycin trough 7.9 11.4 41.5 Medical Problem List • Acute Renal Failure • Infected Knee Prosthesis • DVT Prophylaxis • Pain Drug Related Problems • Actual: NS is experiencing nephrotoxicity secondary to receiving vancomycin and would benefit from reassessment of her drug therapy. • Potential: NS is at risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism secondary to not receiving medication for DVT prophylaxis and would benefit from reassessment of her drug therapy • Potential: NS is at risk of experiencing cardiovascular event (MI, stroke) secondary to not receiving ASA for primary prophylaxis and would benefit from reassessment of her drug therapy. • Potential: NS is at risk of experiencing constipation, respiratory depression, confusion secondary to receiving morphine and oxycodone together for her pain and would benefit from reassessment her drug therapy. Infected Knee Prosthesis • Heavy financial toll: $50,000 per failed prosthesis • Incidence: 1-2% TKA • Highest risk within first 3 months • Risk factors: Medical conditions – Diabetes – Obesity – Rheumatoid arthritis – Urinary tract infection – Operative technique – Prolonged operative time (> 2.5 h) Infected Knee Prosthesis • Other factors – Immunosuppressive therapy – Malnourishment – Smoking – Skin ulceration – Previous surgery Classification of Infection According to Route 1. Perioperative 2. Haematogenous 3. Contiguous Classification of Infection According to Onset of Symptoms • Early infection: • < 3 months • Acquired perioperatively • Generally caused by S. aureus • Delayed or low-grade infection: • 3-24 months • Acquired during implant surgery • Less virulent organisms (e.g. CoNS or P. acnes) • Late infection: • >24 months • Haematogenous seeding from remote infections • Most frequent foci : Skin, respiratory, dental and UTIs Treatment Options (1) Open débridement with retention (2) Single-staged or 2-staged resection & reimplantation of another prosthesis (3) Resection arthroplasty (4) Arthrodesis (5) Antibiotic suppression (6) Amputation Two-Stage Exchange • Highest success rate: >90% 1. Removal of prosthesis – Immobilizer, antibiotic therapy – If no difficult-to-treat microorganisms: • Short interval until reimplantation (2-4 wks) • Temporary antimicrobial-impregnated bone cement spacer – Difficult-to-treat: longer interval (8 wks) without a spacer 2. Implantation of a new prosthesis during a later surgical procedure Vancomycin Induced Nephrotoxicity Nephrotoxicity defined as: 1. Determined by the clinical investigator 2. An ↑ of 44.2 umol/L in SCr or >50% baseline SCr or 3. A ↓ in CrCl to < 50 mL/min or ↓ of > 10mL/min from a baseline CrCl of < 50 mL/min Vancomycin Induced Nephrotoxicity • Elimination almost exclusively renal • Onset: 4-8 days from start of therapy • Nephrotoxicity resolved in: – 50% of patients while on vancomycin – 21% within 72 hrs of discontinuation • Unclear whether high trough levels indeed cause ARF or vice-versa • Concomitant nephrotoxic agents ↑ rates to as high as 35%. Risk Factors for VancomycinInduced Nephrotoxicity High dose/trough Long duration Concomitant nephrotoxins Vancomycin Nephrotoxicity ICU stay Vasopressors High APACHE II score Obesity 22 Goals of Therapy • NS’s goals: – Restore functioning of her left knee – Prevent another infection – Go home • Healthcare team’s goals – – – – – Painless, well-functioning knee arthroplasty Cure the current infection Restore baseline kidney function Prevent complications: renal failure Minimize ADRs Clinical Question • P: In a 62 yo Caucasian F with infected knee prosthesis & vancomycin induced nephrotoxicity • I: which antibiotic is safer vs. • C: vancomycin • O: in order to cure the knee prosthesis infection caused by CoNS Search Strategy & Results • Pubmed • Ovid Embase • Google • Search Terms: Infected knee prosthesis, treatment, tigecycline, daptomycin, linezolid, prosthetic joint infection • • • • • Results: Case reports Literature review Retrospective observational studies 1 SR for daptomycin Alternatives to Vancomycin Daptomycin Linezolid Tigecycline Active against Gram +ve Bactericidal, conc. dependent killing, significant post-antibiotic effect Gram +ve Bacteriostatic enterococci, staphylococci Bactericidal: streptococci MRSA, VRE Gram +ve, gram –ve, anaerobic & aytpicals Bacteriostatic Indicated for cSSIs, Bacteremia, rightsided native valve endocarditis caused by MSSA or MRSA SSIs, cSSIs without concomitant OM due to S. aureus cSSIs, cIAIs SEs reversible dose-related myalgias & weakness (<1.0%), anemia, edema, GI adverse effects, hyper or hypotension neuropathy, serotonin syndrome Myelosuppression: thrombocyopenia, anemia: 6-7% of patients, more common after 2 wks of therapy Leukopenia:3-4% N, V, diarrhea, HA, dizziness, increase in hepatic enzymes Daptomycin • Faster killing of S. aureus (including MRSA) & Enterococci (including VRE) vs. vancomycin. • In vitro: Clinical association b/w vancomycin exposure & daptomycin heteroresistance in S. aureus • Conc. in bone lower than vancomycin, probably due to high protein binding (92%) • Inactive & nontoxic metabolites, 53-59% excreted in urine • Overlapping musculoskeletal toxicity b/w statins & daptomycin advised not to use concomitantly. Daptomycin: Systematic Review of Case Reports & Case Series – – – – Patients with bone or joint infections Most failed on another antibiotic before Cure in 12/20 (60%) with total joint arthroplasty Case report (Antony et al.): • 7 patients with reduced renal function tx with 4mg/kg Q 48H, all cured – Effective against MDR gram +ve OM & joint infections even in cases where other first line agents have failed – Frequent emergence of resistance Alternatives to Vancomycin Daptomycin Linezolid Tigecycline Active against Gram +ve Bactericidal, conc. dependent killing, significant post-antibiotic effect Gram +ve Bacteriostatic enterococci, staphylococci Bactericidal: streptococci MRSA, VRE Gram +ve, gram –ve, anaerobic & aytpicals Bacteriostatic Indicated for cSSIs, Bacteremia, rightsided native valve endocarditis caused by MSSA or MRSA SSIs, cSSIs without concomitant OM due to S. aureus cSSIs, cIAIs SEs reversible dose-related myalgias & weakness (<1.0%), anemia, edema, GI adverse effects, hyper or hypotension neuropathy, serotonin syndrome Myelosuppression: thrombocyopenia, anemia: 6-7% of patients, more common after 2 wks of therapy Leukopenia:3-4% N, V, diarrhea, HA, dizziness, increase in hepatic enzymes Linezolid • F=100% • Excellent penetration into bone, fat, muscle, periarticular structures • Elimination: – Nonrenal: 65% – Renal: 30% – Fecal: 5% – No dosage adjustment in renal insufficiency Linezolid • Documented case reports showing success in bone prosthesis infections • 1. Retrospective study for chronic OM: – Cure rate 85% @ 12 wks, 78.8% at follow-up • 2. Retrospective, nonrandomized observational study – 14 patients with infected total joint arthroplasty – Treated by 1 or 2 stage revision & linezolid course – Result: Infection resolved 100% • 3. Prospective observational study: – – – – – 9 patients: OM 2 patients: periprosthetic infections Pathogen: Multiresistant CoNS 6 wks therapy Result: 100% remission at mean follow-up of 24 months Tigecycline No human trials found involving OM Animal studies: May have a role in bone infection – 28 days of treatment in rabbits with OM – Tigecycline/oral rifampicin: 100% infection clearance – Alone: 90% Jaksic et al.: Febrile neutropenic patients with cancer Vancomycin more nephrotoxic (2.3% vs 0.3%, p=0.04) Alternatives to Vancomycin Daptomycin Linezolid Tigecycline Active against Gram +ve Bactericidal, conc. dependent killing, significant post-antibiotic effect Gram +ve Bacteriostatic enterococci, staphylococci Bactericidal: streptococci MRSA, VRE Gram +ve, gram –ve, anaerobic & aytpicals Bacteriostatic Indicated for cSSIs, Bacteremia, rightsided native valve endocarditis caused by MSSA or MRSA SSIs, cSSIs without concomitant OM due to S. aureus cSSIs, cIAIs SEs reversible dose-related myalgias & weakness (<1.0%), anemia, edema, GI adverse effects, hyper or hypotension neuropathy, serotonin syndrome Myelosuppression: thrombocyopenia, anemia: 6-7% of patients, more common after 2 wks of therapy Leukopenia:3-4% N, V, diarrhea, HA, dizziness, increase in hepatic enzymes Summary • Limitations of studies: – – – – – – No RCTs Very few patients with MRCoNS Different patient characteristics Mixed bone/joint infections vs. prosthetic infections Trials of other antibiotics vs. first trial DAP coadministered with other antibiotics • Bactericidal vs. static • More information on DAP vs. linezolid, tigecycline • DAP: Some resistance Initial Assessment • Prosthetic knee infection improved since admission • Renal function worse over past 24 hours • Do not agree with current drug therapy for knee infection • Patient compliant in hospital Plan • Drug: Hold Vancomycin therapy • Review DAP vs. linezolid vs. tigecycline • Non-drug: Hydration • Monitor: – Urine output x 48 hours – SCr, eGFR, BUN – Ototoxicity, N,V, diarrhea Follow-Up • Vancomycin dose held on Nov 14/11 • Daptomycin started on Nov 18/11 : 6mg/kg IV q48h Monitoring parameter 15/11 16/11 17/11 21/11 24/11 Creatinine 165 183 168 133 128 eGFR 27 24 27 35 37 CRP 75 Random vancomycin 15.5 <10 Final Assessment & Plan • Agree with current therapy of DAP • Hold statin while on DAP • Renal function improved over past 24 hours • Patient compliant in hospital • Continue monitoring renal function and signs/symptoms of myopathy Monitoring Monitoring point What Who When Infection Temperature Nurse, Pharmacist, Physician Ongoing Nurse, Pharmacist Ongoing WBC, neutrophils, CRP BP, HR Pain Monitoring Monitoring point What Who When GI adverse effects N, V, diarrhea, constipation Nurse Ongoing Renal function eGFR, SCr Pharmacist, Physician Every 2 days until back to baseline Edema Swelling in limbs Nurse, Pharmacist, Physician Ongoing Anemia Hgb Physician, Pharmacist Ongoing Hypokalemia K+ levels Physician, Pharmacist Ongoing Myopathy ↑in CPK (>5 times ULN or 1000 units/L) or in asymptomatic patients CPK > 10 x ULN, muscle, joint pain Nurse, pharmacist CPK weekly Muscle pain: every day Follow-Up • Discharged on: Nov 28/11 • On outpatient IV therapy Follow-Up Monitoring parameter 30/11 Creatinine 81 eGFR 62 CRP <10 CPK 78 Review of Case • Learning Objectives • Case • Background: Infected knee prosthesis and vancomycin induced nephrotoxicity • Clinical Question • Results • Assessment • Plan • Monitoring • Follow up