Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Project Selection and Portfolio Management 03-01 Chapter 3 Learning Objectives After completing this chapter, students will be able to: Explain six criteria for a useful projectselection/screening model. Understand how to employ checklists and simple scoring models to select projects. Use more sophisticated scoring models, such as the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Learn how to use financial concepts, such as the efficient frontier and risk/return models. Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-02 Chapter 3 Learning Objectives After completing this chapter, students will be able to: Employ financial analyses and options analysis to evaluate the potential for new project investments. Recognize the challenges that arise in maintaining an optimal project portfolio for an organization. Understand the three keys to successful project portfolio management. Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-03 Project Selection Screening models help managers pick winners from a pool of projects. Screening models are numeric or nonnumeric and should have: Realism Capability Flexibility Ease of use Cost effectiveness Comparability Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-04 Screening & Selection Issues Risk – unpredictability to the firm Commercial – market potential Internal operating – changes in firm operations Additional – image, patent, fit, etc. All models only partially reflect reality and have both objective and subjective factors imbedded Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-05 Approaches to Project Screening Checklist model Simplified scoring models Analytic hierarchy process Profile models Financial models Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-06 Checklist Model A checklist is a list of criteria applied to possible projects. Requires agreement on criteria Assumes all criteria are equally important Checklists are valuable for recording opinions and encouraging discussion Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-07 Simplified Scoring Models Each project receives a score that is the weighted sum of its grade on a list of criteria. Scoring models require: agreement on criteria agreement on weights for criteria a score assigned for each criteria Score (Weight Score) Relative scores can be misleading! Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-08 Analytic Hierarchy Process The AHP is a four step process: 1. Construct a hierarchy of criteria and subcriteria 2. Allocate weights to criteria 3. Assign numerical values to evaluation dimensions 4. Scores determined by summing the products of numeric evaluations and weights Unlike the simple scoring model, these scores can be compared! Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-09 FIGURE 3.1 Sample AHP with Rankings for Salient Selection Criteria Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-10 Profile Models Show risk/return options for projects. X7 X6 Maximum Desired Risk Criteria selection as axes Risk X2 X4 X5 Efficient Frontier X3 X1 Minimum Desired Return Rating each project on criteria Return Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Figure 3.4 03-11 Efficient Frontier Figure 3.5 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-12 Financial Models Based on the time value of money principal Payback period Net present value Internal rate of return Options models All of these models use discounted cash flows Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-13 Payback Period Determines how long it takes for a project to reach a breakeven point Investment Payback Period Annual Cash Savings Cash flows should be discounted Lower numbers are better (faster payback) Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-14 Payback Period Example A project requires an initial investment of $200,000 and will generate cash savings of $75,000 each year for the next five years. What is the payback period? Year Cash Flow Cumulative 0 ($200,000) ($200,000) 1 $75,000 ($125,000) 2 $75,000 ($50,000) 3 $75,000 $25,000 25, 000 3 2.67 years 75, 000 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Divide the cumulative amount by the cash flow amount in the third year and subtract from 3 to find out the moment the project breaks even. 03-15 Net Present Value Projects the change in the firm’s stock value if a project is undertaken. Ft NPV I o (1 r pt )t where Ft = net cash flow for period t Higher NPV values are better! R = required rate of return I = initial cash investment Pt = inflation rate during period t Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-16 Net Present Value Example Should you invest $60,000 in a project that will return $15,000 per year for five years? You have a minimum return of 8% and expect inflation to hold steady at 3% over the next five years. Year 0 Net flow Discount -$60,000 1.0000 NPV -$60,000.00 1 2 3 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 0.9009 0.8116 0.7312 $13,513.51 $12,174.34 $10,967.87 4 5 $15,000 $15,000 0.6587 0.5935 $9,880.96 $8,901.77 -$4,561.54 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall The NPV column total is negative, so don’t invest! 03-17 Internal Rate of Return A project must meet a minimum rate of return before it is worthy of consideration. t ACFt IO n 1 (1 IRR )t where Higher IRR values are better! ACFt = annual after tax cash flow for time period t IO = initial cash outlay n = project's expected life IRR = the project's internal rate of return Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-18 Internal Rate of Return Example A project that costs $40,000 will generate cash flows of $14,000 for the next four years. You have a rate of return requirement of 17%; does this project meet the threshold? Year Net flow Discount NPV 0 -$40,000 1.0000 -$40,000.00 1 $14,000 0.9009 $12,173.91 2 $14,000 0.8116 $10,586.01 3 $14,000 0.7312 $9,205.23 4 $14,000 0.6587 $8,004.55 -$30.30 This table has been calculated using a discount rate of 15% The project doesn’t meet our 17% requirement and should not be considered further. Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-19 Options Models NPV and IRR methods don’t account for failure to make a positive return on investment. Options models allow for this possibility. Options models address: 1. Can the project be postponed? 2. Will future information help decide? Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-20 Project Portfolio Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall FIGURE 3.6 GE’s Tollgate Process 03-21 GE Tollgate Review Process Flow Map Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Figure 3.7 03-22 Project Portfolio Management The systematic process of selecting, supporting, and managing the firm’s collection of projects. Portfolio management requires: decision making, prioritization, review, realignment, and reprioritization of a firm’s projects. Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-23 Pharmaceuticals Development Process Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Figure 3.8 03-24 Keys to Successful Project Portfolio Management Flexible structure and freedom of communication Low-cost environmental scanning Time-paced transition Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-25 Problems in Implementing Portfolio Management Conservative technical communities Out of sync projects and portfolios Unpromising projects Scarce resources Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-26 Summary Explain six criteria for a useful project-selection screening model. 2. Understand how to employ checklists and simple scoring models to select projects, including the recognition of their strengths and weaknesses. 3. Use more sophisticated scoring models, such as the Analytical Hierarchy Process. 4. Learn how to use financial concepts, such as the efficient frontier and risk/return models. 1. Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-27 Summary 5. Employ financial analyses and options analysis to evaluate the potential for new project investments. 6. Recognize the challenges that arise in maintaining an optimal project portfolio for an organization. 7. Understand the three keys to successful project portfolio management. Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-28 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 03-29