Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Eight Week Randomized Trial of Treatment with Pa-824, Moxifloxacin, and Pyrazinamide in Drug Sensitive and Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Daniel Everitt, MD For the NC-002 Collaborators July 21, 2014 20th International AIDS Conference 2014 International AIDS Conference 1 NC-002 Pa-M-Z Trial: First Novel Combination Study In patients with TB sensitive to Pa, M, and Z Participants with newly diagnosed smear positive DS and MDR Pulmonary TB Pa(200mg)-M-Z N=60 DS Pa(100mg)-M-Z N=60 2 months of treatment H-R-Z-E N=60 Randomize DR Pa(200mg)-M-Z N= up to 50 Serial 16 hour pooled sputum samples for CFU Count Pa = PA-824 M = moxifloxacin 400 mg Z = pyrazinamide at 1500mg 2014 International AIDS Conference 2 Investigational Sites and Laboratories South Africa • • • • • • TASK Applied Science, Cape Town Lab University of Cape Town Lung Institute Helen Joseph Hospital Tembisa Hospital, Tembisa Klerksdorp Tshepong Hospital KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and HIV (K-RITH), Durban Lab Tanzania • Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo • NIMR- Mbeya Medical Research Programme 2014 International AIDS Conference Lab Lab 3 Enrolment Demographic Characteristics Treatment group Age (years) Males (%) Weight (kg) HIV-infected (%) Ethnicity Black (%) Mixed ethnicity (%) 2014 International AIDS Conference Total (N=207) 31 65 56 20 71 29 4 Estimates of Mean Serial Log(CFU) Count Over Time Joint Bayesian NLME Regression 2014 International AIDS Conference 5 Daily Log CFU Reduction – 1o Endpoint Study Arm PA200-M-Z* (N=56) Log CFU Reduction per Day Over 56 Days 0.155 CI [0.133; 0.178] PA100-M-Z (N=54) 0.133 CI [0.109; 0.155] PA200-M-Z-MDR (N=9) 0.117 CI [0.070; 0.174] H-R-Z-E (N=54) 0.112 CI [0.093; 0.131] *p < 0.05 vs H-R-Z-E No differences from above when adjusted for site, HIV status or baseline CFU as baseline covariates 2014 International AIDS Conference 6 Estimates of Mean Serial log(TTP) Over Time Joint Bayesian NLME Regression 7 Time to Culture Conversion – 2o Endpoint Culture Conversion is the Time when Culture is First Negative Study Arm PA200-M-Z Median Time to Culture Conversion (Days) Solid Liquid 28* 49* PA100-M-Z 28 42 PA200-M-Z MDR H-R-Z-E 35 56 35 56 *Statistically significant differences compared to HRZE for both solid and liquid culture 2014 International AIDS Conference 8 Eight Week Culture Conversion – 2o Endpoint Study Arm PA200-M-Z Conversion to Negative Day 56 (%) Solid Liquid 94.3 71.4* PA100-M-Z 82.9 65.7* PA200-M-ZMDR Rifafour 62.5 50.0 87.5 37.8 *Statistically significant difference from HRZE for liquid culture only 2014 International AIDS Conference 9 Log CFU Daily Decreases and Pearson Correlation Coefficients Data from Participants Enrolled in the EBA Substudy Study / Arm H-R-Z-E Log CFU Daily (Days 7-14) Log CFU Daily (Days 7-56) Correlation Coefficient 0.13 0.12 0.98 0.16 0.13 0.90 0.14 0.14 0.96 (N=15) Pa100-M-Z (N=16) Pa200-M-Z (N= 13) 2014 International AIDS Conference 10 Summary of Safety Findings Grade 1 to 4 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Severity Grade I Grade II Grade III Grade IV Statistic* % % % % PA100M-Z PA200M-Z (N=60) (N=62) PA200M-Z MDR 77 50 32 15 (N=26) 69 50 23 8 72 42 30 5 H-R-Z-E (N=59) 78 46 25 10 Total (N=207) 75 46 29 10 * % = Percentage of patients with at least one AE in each category 11 NC-002 Summary of Key Results and Next Steps • Pa-M-Z Regimen was statistically significantly better than the H-R-Z-E control for the primary and 3/5 key secondary endpoints – Greater reduction in colony counts over 56 days – More rapid time to culture conversion – Higher conversion to negative at 8 weeks – Nearly twice the number converted in liquid culture • No significant difference in response for HIV infected patients • Similar effects for patients with MDR-TB, albeit with small numbers • Safety comparable to control • Next Step: The STAND Phase 3 Trial 2014 International AIDS Conference 12 The STAND Trial - Phase 3 Trial of Pa-M-Z “Shortening Treatment by Advancing Novel Drugs” Participants with newly diagnosed smear positive DS- and MDR-TB Pa(100mg)-M-Z N=300 4 months of treatment Pa(200mg)-M-Z N=300 DS 12 & 24 mos f/u after randomization Pa(200mg)-M-Z N= 300 Randomize DR H-R-Z-E N=300 6 months of treatment Pa(200mg)-M-Z N= up to 300 Z = pyrazinamide at 1500mg Pa = PA-824 2014 International AIDS Conference M = moxifloxacin 400 mg 13 Sincere Acknowledgments: To the Patients with Tuberculosis who Participated, volunteer Community Advisory Boards, and Lead Investigators and Colleagues: • Robert Schall • Rodney Dawson – University of the Free State, and Quintiles Biostatistics, Bloemfontein, SA – University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, SA • Andreas Diacon – Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, and TASK Applied Science, Bellville SA • Christo Van Niekerk – TB Alliance, Pretoria, SA • Almari Conradie • Divan Burger – University of the Free State, and Quintiles Biostatistics, Bloemfontein, SA – TB Alliance, Pretoria, SA • Carl Mendel – TB Alliance, New York, USA 2014 International AIDS Conference 14 TB Alliance Supporters Thanks to all those who support our mission for better, fast TB drugs Australian AID Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases United States Agency for International Development UNITAID AIDS Clinical Trial Group European Commission United States Food and Drug Administration Irish Aid Global Health Innovative Technology Fund UK aid 2014 International AIDS Conference 15