Download Water Quality and Copano Bay Watershed Efforts

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Water Quality and Copano Bay
Watershed Efforts
ALLEN BERTHOLD
TEXAS WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE
Copano Bay and Its Watershed
Purpose for Today: The Clean Water Act
 Federal Clean Water Act (CWA)
 Main goal is to “restore and maintain the biological, chemical
and physical integrity of the Nation’s waters.”
 Goal of CWA is to provide water quality suitable for
the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish and
wildlife while providing for recreation in and on the
water
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
administers and implements CWA

Requires individual states to set water quality standards
Bacteria in Texas Waters
 Texas sets water quality standards on the amount of
bacteria that a water body can contain
 2 types of use in Copano Bay


Contact Recreation
Oyster Harvesting
 Bacteria Geometric Mean (GM) standards for E. coli in
freshwaters are:
 Primary Contact Recreation (126 cfu/100 mL)

Involves a significant risk of water ingestion
Wading children
 Swimming
 Whitewater kayaking/canoeing/rafting
 Waterskiing, diving, tubing, surfing

Bacteria in Texas Waters
 Secondary Contact Recreation 1 (630 cfu/100 mL)
 Commonly occur but have limited body contact incidental to
shoreline activities that pose less significant risk of water
ingestion
Fishing
 Motorboating
 Incidental body contact from shore

 Secondary Contact Recreation 2 (1,030 cfu/100 mL)
 Activities that occur less frequently than Secondary Contact
Recreation 1 due to physical characteristics of the waterbody
and limited public access
Bacteria in Texas Waters
 Noncontact Recreation (2060 cfu/100 mL)
 Activities that do not involve a significant risk of water
ingestion such as those with limited body contact incidental to
shoreline activity
Birding
 Hiking/biking
 Where Primary and Secondary Contact Recreation should not
occur due to unsafe conditions such as ship and barge traffic

Tidal and Oyster Water Standards
 Bacteria Geometric Mean (GM) standards for tidal
waters are:

Enterococci (tidal waters) – 35 cfu/100mL
Bacteria standards for Oyster harvesting waters are:

Fecal Coliform (oyster harvesting waters) - 14 cfu/100mL*
* Applies to the median value of observed data
Sources of Bacteria
 Fecal material from warm-blooded animals
 In other words, anything with hair, fur, or feathers
 Bacteria are naturally occurring in the intestinal
tract
How does Bacteria get into Creeks?
 Direct deposition
 Animals directly deposit fecal material into the water

Birds above water, ducks on water, livestock & wildlife drinking
 Non-Point Sources
 Storm water runoff from landscape
 Fecal material runoff from landscape


Pet waste, livestock, wildlife
Failing septic systems
 Point Sources
 Improperly treated waste water treatment discharge
 Illegal dumping
 Storm water from cities
What Happens When Water has Too Much
Bacteria
 CWA requires that all waterbodies exceeding
standards be identified
 Those identified are placed on the Texas Integrated
Report for Clean Water Act Sections 305(b) and
303(d)
 Water quality monitoring has shown elevated levels
of bacteria within various waterbodies in the
watershed
 Copano Bay/Port Bay/ Mission Bay first listed in
1998
Methods to Address Bacteria Impairments
 Recreational Use Attainability Analysis
 Ex. one currently in progress on Aransas Creek
 Developing a Plan
 Total Maximum Daily Load and Implementation Plan
 Watershed Protection Plan
Attempts to Address the Bacteria Impairment
 Seven Public Meetings from November 2005 –
December 2010
 Covered various topics including:





Overview of TMDLs
Bacterial Source Tracking (phases I and II)
Modeling results (and revised results)
Additional monitoring results
Attempts to form a Watershed Advisory Group (WAG)
Notes and presentations available at http://www.tceq.texas.gov/waterquality/tmdl/42-copano.html#info
Today’s Meeting
 Goal – to deliver information to local stakeholders
so that an informed decision on how to best
approach the impairment can be made
 Next presentation will be about:
 An overview of alternatives to addressing water quality
impairments
 An explanation of the TMDL and I-Plan process
 An explanation of the WPP process
Questions?
Kevin Wagner
Texas Water Resources Institute
[email protected]
979-845-2649
Allen Berthold
Texas Water Resources Institute
[email protected]
361-318-8780