Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Realization of Genomic Medicine HL7 Work Group September 14, 2011 Leslie G Biesecker, MD Chief and Senior Investigator Genetic Disease Research Branch National Human Genome Research Institute National Institutes of Health ™ Background Assumptions • Substantial component of common disease is an amalgamation of rare processes • Genetic testing facilitates genotypephenotype correlation • Prediction – ‘Personalized medicine’ • Limited to germline ™ Current Clinical Practice Paradigm • • • • • • Gather history Examine patient Formulate differential diagnosis Apply clinical test(s) to patient Interpret result(s), refine differential, diagnose Treat ™ Low Throughput Paradigms • Must frontload hypotheses, differentials and phenotyping because the assays or clinical tests are – Rate/time limiting – Expensive – Noisy ™ Low Throughput Paradigms • Must frontload hypotheses, differentials and phenotyping because the assays or clinical tests are – Rate/time limiting – Expensive – Noisy ™ ClinSeq™ Cohort • Enrolled >900 subjects • Primary phenotype atherosclerosis • Consented for – Full sequencing – Data sharing – Return of results – Downstream phenotyping - any • 572 exomes ™ Whole Genome Sequencing • Use read depth as a proxy for CNVs • Manually reviewed WGS data – (Note that software to do this is available) • 1.7 Mb Deletion of 17p12, including PMP22 gene -> Hereditary liability to Nerve and Pressure Palsies • Patient previously unaware of diagnosis ™ What about known disease genes? • Intersect all variants in a WGS data set with a database of ‘known’ disease-causing mutations Results of HGMD intersection • 64 variants at positions said to cause disease in HGMD – 43 >> literature review suggests not causative of mendelian trait – 17 >> reference sequence has allele HGMD says is causative – 5 >> apparently causative ™ Five disease gene mutations Mut. ID Gene Disease Subst. State CM094237 WNT10A Ectodermal Dysplasia p.Phe228Ile het CM001280 SLC26A4 Pendred syndrome p.Thr193Ile het CM990677 GALT Galactosemia p.Met336Leu Het CM094615 SEC23B Dyserythropoietic anemia p.Val426Ile Het CM012456 RP2 XL retinitis pigmentosa p.Arg282Trp hemi ™ Clinical Analysis: Cancer • 37 Cancer genes • Cancer exome: 451 Total variants • Filtered – – – – – Frequency Damaging Literature review Database review Family history • Categorized by modified IARC scheme – 5: >99% prob. pathogenic – 2: 95-99% – 3: 5-95% – 2: .1-5% – 1: <.1% – 0 Poor quality sequence call ™ Clinical Example: BRCA2 Frameshift • p.T2766NfsX11 - known pathogenic allele • Not a high-risk pedigree • Note that this paradigm does not require that the patient or their relative has suffered or died of this disease • True preventive medicine ™ Genomics and Clinical Care I • Newborn exam – normal • Genome sequenced from cord blood • Using parent and clinician key, interrogate genome for NBS gene panel • Order recommended follow-up tests • Restrict diet • Consult to metabolic expert ™ Genomics and Clinical Care II • Patient presents to clinic for asthma • History and pertinent examination • Using patient &clinician key, interrogate genome for susceptibility & pharmacogenetics • Prescribe treatment ™ Genomics and Clinical Care III • Couple presents to clinic for preconceptual counseling • Using patient, partner, and clinician key, interrogate genomes for carrier states • If one hit each in a gene, refer for counseling and consideration of PND, PGD, etc. ™ Genomics and Clinical Care IV • Patient presents to clinic for routine healthcare evaluation • Patient reviews interactive educational tool on breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility • Using patient and clinician key, interrogate genome for susceptibility alleles • If abnormal allele identified, refer to cancer genetics clinic ™ Why Not? • Infrastructure to generate, store, distribute data • Clinical research to define utility of approach • Clinician-friendly analytic software & robust databases • Changing clinician training, attitudes, & practice ™ Why Not? • Infrastructure to generate, store, distribute data • Clinical research to define utility of approach • Clinician-friendly analytic tools & robust databases • Changing clinician training, attitudes, & practice • All of these are hard to do and will take time ™ Clinician-Friendly Algorithms • Most genetics and genomics should disappear into general and non-genetic subspecialty practice • Flag mutations for which it is essential to practice highest standard of non-directive counseling • Rare, atypical, outlier cases efficiently shunted to an expert ™ But We Are Stuck • Many components to develop and test • Need to find a way forward ™ Rare Disease Challenge • How many syndromes? – Syndromes Head & Neck • >2,500 entities – London Medical Database • >4,500 entities – Many rare, few with genes, few with natural history ™ Build Out From Rare Diseases • • • • Build sequencing & data infrastructure Start with specialists using informatics tools Specialists teach generalists Learn about many ‘incidental’ findings from these families ™ Data Infrastructure • Interrogate genome once – Prediction is that doing this once will be cheaper than lifetime cost of multiple interrogations • Secondary benefit is instant availability – Consequence is that one gets much more data than anyone needs or wants • Secure storage with ready accessibility • Robust database of correlation of variants with phenotypes ™ Prognostic Tool