* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Fiscal Policy
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
The Federal Budget and Fiscal Policy Ch 5: pg 84-87 Ch 12: All Ch 18: Pg 342-350 Ch 31: pg 618 - 620 Chap 5, 12, 31 Vocabulary Spillover costs Spillover benefits Transfer payments Personal income tax Payroll taxes Corporate income tax Fiscal policy Crowding out effect Supply side fiscal policy Employment Act of 1946 Expansionary fiscal policy Contractionary fiscal policy Built in stabilizers Budget deficit Budget surplus Progressive tax system Political business cycle Public Debt U.S. Securities A Look at the Debt http://www.usdebtclock.org/ These chapters will explain how we got a debt, why it continues to grow, and what are some of the effects. The American Way of Debt Why do we have a Deficit? Structural Debt (the government spends more than it takes in 5 Government Spending and Tax Revenue for Some High-Income Countries in 2006 FISCAL POLICY These chapters study how governments can use fiscal policy(or changes in taxes and government spending) to affect the level of GDP in order to stabilize the economy (to achieve particular economic goals, such as low unemployment, price stability, and economic growth.) In later chapters we will evaluate monetary policy (concerned with the money supply and interest rates). You MUST be able to distinguish between Fiscal and Monetary policy. The Federal Budget (Chap 5 pg 84-87) The federal budget—the actual document that describes what the federal government spends and how it pays for it— it provides the framework for fiscal policy. The last time congress passed a budget was in 2009. We now fund the government as it is needed (why we have issues like sequestration, or emergency funding bills in Congress). In 2003, total federal spending approximately was 19.9 percent of GDP, or $2.15 trillion. Federal taxes were 16.5 percent of GDP. The government runs its budget on a fiscal year basis, from October 1 to September 30. Federal Spending for Fiscal Year 2003 Category Total outlays Discretionary spending Outlays (billions) % of Budget $2,158 825 38 405 420 19 19 1,179 55 Medicare and Medicaid 470 535 22 25 Other programs 174 8 153 7 Defense Non-Defense Entitlements and mandatory spending Social Security Net interest (also mandatory spending) Federal Spending Discretionary spending constitutes all the programs that Congress authorizes on an annual basis, which are not automatically funded by prior laws passed by Congress. This constitutes approximately 38% of the total budget (50% of this 38% is defense spending. Mandatory (Entitlement) spending constitutes all spending that Congress authorized by prior laws. This is the single largest component of the federal budget. Federal Spending (Continued) Examples of mandatory spending (entitlement programs): • Social security provides retirement payments to retirees, as well as a host of other benefits to widows and families of disabled workers. • Medicare provides health care to all individuals once they reach the age of 65. • Medicaid provides health care to the poor, in conjunction with the states. Sources of Federal Government Revenue, Fiscal Year 2003 Category Receipts % of (billions) revenues Total revenue $1,720 Individual income taxes 794 45 Social insurance taxes 713 40 22 1 132 7 Excise taxes and customs duties 87 5 Miscellaneous receipts 34 2 Estate and gift taxes Corporate income taxes Federal Revenues The single largest component of federal revenue are individual income taxes. During the year, the federal government collects some of the taxes due in advance by withholding a portion of workers’ paychecks. The second largest component of federal revenue are social insurance taxes (FICA) which are taxes levied on earnings to pay for Social Security and Medicare. Another tax paid directly by individuals and families are estate and gift taxes. Federal Revenues (Continued) The corporate tax is a tax levied on the earnings of corporations. This tax raised less than 7.5% of total federal revenues during fiscal year 2003. The other sources of government revenue are relatively minor. Federal excise taxes are taxes levied on the sale of some products, e.g. like gasoline, tires, firearms, alcohol and tobacco. Custom duties are taxes levied on goods imported to the United States such as foreign cars or wines. The budget deficit as a percentage of GDP tends to rise during recessions (indicated by shaded areas) and fall during expansions. The budget deficit as a percentage of GDP moves closely in tandem with the unemployment rate. Stability Pact—or ? In 1999 a group of European nations adopted a common currency, the euro, to replace their national currencies. Governments of member countries signed on to the European “stability pact.” This agreement required each government to keep its budget deficit below 3% of the country’s GDP or face fines. The stability pact, however, limited a country’s ability to use fiscal policy. In 2002 both France and Germany were experiencing rising unemployment and also running budget deficits in excess of 3% of GDP. In March 2005 the stability pact was rewritten to allow “small and temporary” breaches of the 3% limit. In 2003 Government Spending was: • $2,158 Billion Government Revenues were: • $1,720 Billion Or in other words, the government spent about $438 million more than it took in (or a deficit of $438 million which was added to the debt) In 2011 Government Spending was: • $3.8 Trillion Government Revenues were: • $2.6 Trillion The deficit was: • -$1.3 Trillion The total debt was: $14+ Trillion Budget and Debt • See section 7 and 15 of document Types of Taxes Pg 618 - 620 Progressive Tax: the tax rate increases as a person’s taxable income level rises. A progressive tax is usually capped at some tax rate. The income tax in the U.S. is a progressive tax. Proportionate Tax: the same tax rate is used for all levels. This is sometimes called a flat tax; e.g. property taxes Regressive Tax: the tax rate decreases as a person’s taxable income level rises; e.g. a sales tax Chapter 12 EMPLOYMENT ACT OF 1946 GAVE GOVERNMENT THE POWER TO STABILIZE THE ECONOMY • • • • PROMOTE ECONOMIC GROWTH REDUCE UNEMPLOYMENT CONTROL PRICES CREATED THE PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISORS Fiscal Policy Government efforts to promote full employment and price stability by changing government spending (G) and/or taxes (T). Recession is countered with expansionary policy. ) • Increase government spending (G • Decrease taxes (T ) Inflation is countered with contractionary policy ) • Decrease government spending (G • Increase Taxes (T ) “Keynesian” Fiscal Policy (or “Obamanomics” - really) Keynesian economic theory was developed in the 1930s and suggests that governments need to intervene in the economy to end or minimize recessions or slow growth if inflation should occur. John Maynard Keynes supported active Fiscal Policy. The recent bailout/stimulus package by the government is an excellent example of Keynesian Economics. A change in consumption, investment, government purchases, or net exports can change aggregate demand and therefore shift the aggregate Demand (AD) curve. A change in taxes can affect consumption or investment or both and therefore can affect AD. Investment Tax Credits An investment tax credit is a tax break given to firms based on their investment spending. This increases the incentive for investment spending. Investment tax credits are often temporary, applying only to investment spending within a specific period. Like department store sales that encourage shoppers to spend a lot while the sale is on, temporary investment tax credits tend to generate a lot of investment spending when they’re in effect. Even if a firm doesn’t think it will need a new computer server or lathe for another year or so, it may make sense to buy it while the tax credit is available, rather than wait. Investment Tax Credits were extensively used to end the March 2001 Recession. Business were able to deduct an entire technology purchase in “one” year rather than spread the purchase out over several tax years. TYPES OF DISCRETIONARY FISCAL POLICIES Expansionary Fiscal Policy: Increases in government expenditures and/or decreases in taxes to achieve particular economic goals. The purpose of this policy would be to cause an increase in aggregate demand. Typically consumers have more money and the dollar depreciates. Exports increase and imports decrease. Contractionary Fiscal Policy: Decreases in government expenditures and/or increases in taxes to achieve macroeconomic goals. This policy is implemented to decrease aggregate demand. Amount of money in circulation declines and dollar appreciates; exports decline, imports increase Contractionary Fiscal Policies (to counter Demand Pull Inflation) Decrease government spending • Intended to halt further price increases or inflation Increase taxes • to slow consumption and business spending Budget moves toward a surplus Contractionary Fiscal Policy (to counter Inflation) LRAS PL SRAS P P1 AD AD1 YF Y This AD/AS graph represents an economy exceeding full employment and experiencing inflation. GDPR A decrease in G or an increase in T causes AD to decrease from AD to AD1 and causes employment to return to Full Employment And reduces inflation. Expansionary Fiscal Policies (to counter a slowing economy) Increase Government Spending • Effect depends upon the “Multiplier” • The “balanced-budget multiplier” states that G increase/decrease equal to a similar change in T = a multiplier of 1 Tax Cuts Government spending is MORE expansionary than tax cuts due to the effects of the MPC (Remember the 2008 Tax Rebates – we spent $20 billion of the $80 billion tax rebates. The government could have spent the entire $80 billion to stimulate the economy. Budget moves toward a deficit Expansionary Fiscal Policy in Japan Japan turned to expansionary fiscal policy in the early 1990s. At the end of the 1980s Japan’s bubble burst— stock and land values plunged. During the years that followed, Japan relied on large-scale government purchases of goods and services, mainly in the form of construction spending on infrastructure, to prop up aggregate demand. This spending was scaled back after 2000, but at its peak it was truly impressive. In 1996 Japan spent about $300 billion on infrastructure. Expansionary Fiscal Policy in Japan Was this policy a success? Yes and no. Many economists believe that without all that government spending, the Japanese economy would have slid into a 1930s-type depression after the bursting of the bubble economy. Instead, the economy suffered a slowdown but not a severe slump. The most recent recession in the U.S. is a very close parallel to the situation in Japan in the 90s. About That Stimulus Package . . . In early 2008 there was broad bipartisan agreement that the U.S. economy needed a fiscal stimulus. There was, however, sharp partisan disagreement about what form that stimulus should take. Republicans favored tax cuts on general political principles. Democrats, by contrast, preferred transfer payments, especially increased unemployment benefits and expanded food stamp aid. The eventual compromise gave most taxpayers a flat $600 rebate, $1,200 for married couples. How well designed was the stimulus plan? Many economists believed that only a fraction of the rebate checks would actually be spent, so that the eventual multiplier would be fairly low. Differences in the Effect of Expansionary Fiscal Policies Is Deficit Spending Good or Bad? Republicans would like to cut taxes and reduce government spending. • Tax rates in the U.S. are at the lowest levels since the 50s and the U.S. has one of the lowest tax rates of any Industrialized country. • How should we bring government spending under control • Denmark and Germany have some of the highest growth rates but also have some of the highest tax rates. China, South Korea, Germany, and Canada have all used government intervention to promote job growth. In the 50s, 60s, and 70s, the U.S. invested heavily in infrastructure promoting job growth. How will the health care plan affect the economy? Will it boost growth; reduce growth; extend life expectancy??? Expansionary Fiscal Policy LRAS PL SRAS This AD/AS graph represents a recession (less than full employment) P P1 AD1 AD Y YF GDPR Increase in G or a reduction of T causes AD to move from AD to AD1 and restores full employment. Non-Discretionary Fiscal Policy Taxes and transfer payments that stabilize GDP without requiring explicit actions by policymakers are called built in (or automatic) stabilizers. During an economic boom, transfer payments fall, taxes increase and government revenues increase. During a recession, running a government budget deficit (increasing government spending) offsets part of the decrease in AD thus helps stabilize the economy. The Federal Deficit and Fiscal Policy The federal government runs a budget deficit when it spends more than it receives in tax revenues. For FY 2008 the deficit was approximately $480 billion (this was added to the Federal Debt). In FY 2009, the deficit was $1.8 trillion; 2010 deficit was $1.6 trillion; 2011 it is projected to be $1.3 trillion If the government collects more in taxes than it spends, it will run a budget surplus. The last years for a surplus were 1998, 1999 and 2000. The total of all annual deficits is the Federal (or Public) Debt. The current debt is over $14 trillion. Currently, approximately 7% of the Federal Budget is spent paying only the interest on the debt – the principal of the debt (the $16 trillion) is not being paid. Debts and Deficits In 2000, the public (national) debt was $5.6 Trillion. Today it is ??? http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Debt concerns: • Debt versus economic growth (GDP) • Paying the interest on the debt • Crowding out may hinder capital development; i.e. government spending may not improve long term economic growth as much as investment spending. Financing a Deficit To finance a deficit the government can: • Borrow by selling bonds This may “crowd out” private investment by raising interest rates. By borrowing money, the government essentially shrinks loanable funds and causes interest rates to increase, thereby slowing new investment spending. Crowding out is a disputed economic phenomena. • Can create “new” money. This is more expansionary than borrowing Loanable Funds Market The Loanable Funds Market is the total money in the global economy that is available for loans. For example, $100 in a savings account is part of the Loanable Funds; $100 cash in your pocket is not. The market where savers and borrowers exchange funds at the real rate of interest (r%). The demand for loanable funds, or borrowing, comes from households, firms, government and the foreign sector. The supply of loanable funds, or savings, comes from households, firms, government and the foreign sector. Increase in the Demand for Loanable Funds r% SLF r1 r DLF q q1 DLF .: r% ↑ & QLF ↑ QLF DLF 1 Expansionary Fiscal Policy Side-effect: ‘Crowding-out’ SLF r% r% Investment Demand Curve ID r1 r DLF 1 DLF $q $q1 QLF I1 I As the interest rate rises as a result of G borrowing, the amount of investment spending decreases in response to higher interest rates. IG Changes in the Demand for Loanable Funds Remember that demand for loanable funds = borrowing (i.e. selling bonds) More borrowing = more demand for loanable funds Less borrowing = less demand for loanable funds Examples • Government deficit spending = more borrowing = more demand for loanable funds As supply of funds <, the interest rates > • Higher Interest Rates = less investment demand = less borrowing Final thoughts on Loanable Funds Loanable funds market determines the real interest rate. Loanable funds market relates saving and borrowing. Changes in saving and borrowing create changes in loanable funds and therefore the interest rate changes. When government acts with fiscal policy it will affect the loanable funds market. Changes in the real interest rate will affect Investment/business spending (remember: C+I+G+(X-M) = AD How Surpluses and Deficits Occur Revenues Government Expenditures, G, and Tax Revenues, T T An “actual Budget” Surplus Deficit GDP1 GDP2 GDP3 Real Domestic Output, GDP The Full G Employment Budget FULL-EMPLOYMENT DEFICITS Government Expenditures, G, and Tax Revenues, T (billions) Full employment budget is represented by “G”. $500 475 450 425 b a T1 G c GDP in year 2 has decreased resulting in a decrease in government revenues (from $500 to $450 billion) due to increased unemployment. An “actual budget” deficit of $50 Billio will occur. GDP2 GDP1 Year 2 Year 1 Real Domestic Output, GDP FULL-EMPLOYMENT DEFICITS Government Expenditures, G, and Tax Revenues, T (billions) Full employment budget is represented by “G”. $500 475 450 425 b a Tax increase T1 Tax Cut G c You can see how the deficit is changed based Upon and increase of decrease in the tax rate. GDP2 GDP1 Year 2 Year 1 Real Domestic Output, GDP Government Expenditures, G, and Tax Revenues, T (billions) FULL-EMPLOYMENT DEFICITS $500 475 450 425 Discretionary Fiscal Policy A tax decrease (T1 to T2) in response to slowing GDP e f d h g T1 T2 G As the GDP decreases (with increasing unemployment), the government reacts to increase aggregate demand, specifically, consumer spending. The government adds $25 billion to the $50 billion deficit it will incur as a result of lowered revenues. GDP2 GDP1 Year 2 Year 1 Real Domestic Output, GDP FULL-EMPLOYMENT DEFICITS Government Expenditures, G, and Tax Revenues, T (billions) Full employment budget is represented by “G”. $500 475 450 425 b a T1 An increase in G spending G c GDP in year 2 has decreased resulting in a decrease in government revenues (from $500 to $450 billion) due to increased unemployment. An “actual budget” deficit of $50 Billio will occur. GDP2 GDP1 Year 2 Year 1 Real Domestic Output, GDP EVALUATING FISCAL POLICY Full-Employment Budget Cyclical Deficits Recent U.S. Deficits & Surpluses Year Actual Deficit or Surplus 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 -3.9% -4.5 -4.7 -3.9 -2.9 -2.2 -1.4 -0.3 +0.8 +1.4 +2.4 Full-Employment Deficit or Surplus -2.1% -2.6 -3.0 -2.6 -2.0 -1.9 -1.2 -0.9 -0.4 +0.3 +1.1 How the Gov. can dispose of a surplus It can retire/payoff debt with the surplus • This might increase AD when the economy is near a peak in the business cycle and the increase may cause inflation. It can impound or idle the surplus • This action would have no effect on AD. This is what the U.S. did with our late 90’s surpluses and rapidly spent the surplus in response to 9/11. O B A M A 6 + T r i L li o n Deficit For 2014 Was $483 billion Debt increased $6.8 Trillion Under President Obama Deficits and the Public Debt Cyclical deficit: the part of the budget deficit that is a result of a downturn in economic activity. Structural deficit: the part of the budget deficit that would exist even if the economy were operating at full employment. Total Budget Deficit = Cyclical Deficit + Structural Deficit Public debt): the total amount the federal government owes its creditors (domestic and foreign banks, foreign countries, individuals, etc.). This is the total of yearly deficits. Who Holds the U.S. Debt? //www.cnbc.com/id/29880401/The_ Biggest_Holders_of_US_Government _Debt?slide=1 Current http://www.treasury.gov/resourcecenter/data-chartcenter/tic/Documents/mfh.txt Supply Side Fiscal Policy Designed to increase AS (rather than affecting AD like Keynesian approach) According to Supply Side Economics, lower taxes “actually” increase government revenues and promote growth of businesses and an increase in Aggregate Supply. Supply Side economics was tried during the Reagan Administration. Laffer Curve Fig 16.10, pg 318 is one of the fundamental concepts of this theory. THE LAFFER CURVE Tax rate (percent) 100 n m m Maximum Tax Revenue l 0 Tax revenue (dollars) Federal Taxes, Spending, and Deficits, 1992-2003 Problems with Fiscal Policy Recognition Lag: timing from the beginning of a recession to becoming aware of being in a recession. Administrative Lag: time between recognition and taking action Operational Lag: time between passing legislation and the implementation of that action. “Political Business” cycle may affect actions; e.g. tax hikes easier after elections and tax cuts easier during election year. Balanced Budget Multiplier Remember: Government spending is more expansionary than a tax cut; consequently the balanced budget multiplier says: An increase in G equal to an increase in T will result in an increase in the GDP. Political Approaches Liberal (Democrat??) Economist • Increased Government spending to combat a recession • May increase the size of the Government and affect personal freedoms Conservative (Republican??) Economist • Smaller Government; tax cuts to combat a recession Pg 239 Leading Indicators How can we predict the future? 10 variables that have historically predicted changes in GDP Three successive monthly decline in the Index of Leading Economic Indicators may forecast an impending recession; but may also be a false warning Some indicators are: • • • • New orders for consumer goods Stock prices Consumer Confidence Building permits What does your (yes, you) future hold? Future Demands on the Federal Budget