Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
RICE UNIVERSITY Ultracold Collisions in Atomic Strontium by Sarah B. Nagel A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved, Thesis Committee: Thomas C. Killian, Chair Associate Professor of Physics and Astronomy Randall G. Hulet Fayez Sarofim Professor of Physics and Astronomy Dan Mittleman Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engeneering Houston, Texas February, 2008 Abstract Ultracold Collisions in Atomic Strontium by Sarah B. Nagel In this work with atomic Strontium, the atoms are first laser cooled and subsequently trapped, in a MOT operating on the strong E1 allowed transition at 461 nm. During the operation of this blue MOT, a fraction of the atoms decay into the 3 P2 and 3 P1 states, but can be recovered by applying light from repumper lasers at 679 nm, and 707 nm. Atoms trapped in the blue MOT are subsequently transferred into a magneto-optical trap operating on the intercombination line at 689 nm, known as the red MOT. Photoassociation experiments are carried out on these atoms using an independent tunable source of blue light at 461 nm. These experiments map out the underlying molecular potentials, and are useful in determining the atom-atom interaction strength. Additionally, atoms trapped in the red MOT can be transferred into an optical dipole trap (ODT) operating at 1064 nm, resulting in a cold dense sample suitable for collision studies, lifetime measurements, and evaporative cooling towards Bose-Einstein condensation. Acknowledgments Many thanks to my committee members, Dr Tom Killian, Dr Randy Hulet, and Dr Dan Mittleman. Their valuable feedback helped me to improve this thesis in many ways. Special thanks goes to my thesis advisor Dr. Tom Killian. Without him, this thesis would not have been possible. I thank him for his patience and encouragement that carried me on through difficult times, and for his insights and suggestions that helped to shape my research skills. His valuable feedback contributed greatly to this thesis. Thanks also to the post-docs and my fellow graduate students in the Killian lab for making the experience a memorable one; thanks especially to fellow ”neutrals” team-members Natali Martinez de Escobar, Pascal Mickelson, and Aaron Saenz, without whose collaboration this work could not have succeeded. Thanks to Dwight Dear, for design advice and the fabrication of many custom components – and for teaching me how to use a lathe. Thanks also to Carter Kittrell, whose generosity extends almost as far as his collection of spare parts. For occasionally getting me out of the lab, many thanks to the fellow members of the Houston Sinfonietta, Crosspoint Church, and my roommates Alexis and Nancy, whose monthly parties at the house on Drummond will be sorely missed. Last but not least, I thank my friends and family for their encouragement and unfailing support; I couldn’t have done it without you. SDG Contents Abstract i Acknowledgments ii List of Illustrations v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Atomic Structure: Past and Present . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Bose-Einstein Condensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.3 Optical Pumping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.4 Laser Cooling and Trapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.5 Optical Dipole Trap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.6 Atomic Structure of strontium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2 The Apparatus 14 2.1 Vacuum System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.2 461 nm Light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2.1 Seed Light for the Tapered Amplifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.2.2 Tapered Amplifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.2.3 Doubling Cavities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.2.4 Frequency Stabilization: Locking to the Atoms . . . . . . . . . 21 Repumper lasers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.3.1 679 nm Light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.3.2 688 nm Light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.3.3 707 nm light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 2.4 689 nm Light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 2.5 Photoassociation Laser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.6 ODT Laser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.3 3 Typical Performance 35 iv 3.1 Blue MOT Operation and Diagnostics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.2 Red MOT Operation and Diagnostics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.3 Dipole Trap Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3.4 Measuring The Elastic Cross Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4 Photoassociation at Long Range 53 4.1 Scientific Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 4.2 Experimental Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.3 Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 4.4 Other Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 5 Optical Pumping and Metastable States 5.1 5.2 66 Magnetic Trapping in the 3 P2 state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 5.1.1 Scientific Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 5.1.2 Experimental Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.1.3 Majorana Spin Flips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5.1.4 Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 ODT Lifetime Measurements of Metastable States . . . . . . . . . . . 80 5.2.1 Scientific Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 5.2.2 Experimental Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 5.2.3 Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 6 Conclusions Bibliography 84 88 Illustrations 1.1 Partial strontium Energy Level Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1.2 strontium Transitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.1 Vacuum Schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2 Mechanical Drawings and Photograph of the Tapered Amplifier Mount 18 2.3 Doubling Cavity Schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.4 461 nm Laser System Schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.5 Extended Cavity Diode Configurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.6 689 Laser System Schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.7 689 nm Master . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.8 689 nm Slave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.9 Injection Locking Scope Traces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.1 Absorption imaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.2 Blue MOT Absorption Image . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.3 Blue MOT Temperature Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.4 Red MOT Temperature Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3.5 Electron Shelving spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.6 ODT capture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.7 ODT Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.8 Time evolution of Number, Temperature, and η in ODT . . . . . . . 46 3.9 Fitting the curve: one- and two- body loss curves . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.10 Fitting the curve: one and two body fit parameters . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.11 σel Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 4.1 Molecular levels and Photoassociative Transitions. . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.2 Spectra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 4.3 Lifetime of1 P1 level. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 vi 4.4 PAS decay Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5 PAS Resonances in Sr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 5.1 Fluorescence Detection of 3 P2 Atoms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 5.2 Lifetime of atoms in the Magnetic Trap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 5.3 Spatial distribution of 3 P2 atoms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 5.4 3 P2 Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.5 3 P2 lifetime data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 5.6 Partial strontium Energy Level Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 5.7 Experimental Timing Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 5.8 Temperatures in the ODT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 86 61 1 Chapter 1 Introduction This chapter contains a brief summary of atomic structure, as well as a discussion of optical pumping, a review of forces applied to atoms by light, and forces applied to a specific atom: strontium. Also included is a discussion of selected applications of basic atomic physics research with this atom. 1.1 Atomic Structure: Past and Present Theories about the nature of atoms have evolved over time, driven by the desire both to understand, but also, to control the world around us. The ancient Greek philosopher Democritus, first proposed the idea that matter is made up of tiny particles that could not be subdivided or made smaller. Our word atom comes from the greek atomos, meaning ”uncuttable,” but Democritus’s theory quickly fell from popularity, and was replaced by Aristotle’s ideals for the four humors: earth, fire, air, and water. This was the prevailing view of the ”elements” that made up all other matter until about 900 years ago. The next innovations in atomic theory occurred as scientists in Europe were studying alchemy, in an effort to change ordinary materials into gold. Their work has developed into modern chemistry. In 1808, John Dalton synthesized the the ideas of Democritus and those of the alchemists, proposing atoms as tiny particles that could not be divided, and that each element was made of its own kind of atom. In 1897, an experimentalist brought empirical evidence to the table. J. J. Thompson realized that while individual atoms had a net neutral charge, they did, 2 in fact, contain electrons. Thompson proposed that electrons were smaller particles of an atom, distributed among a positively charged jelly-like substance – rather like the raisins in plum pudding. In 1911, Earnest Rutherford (a former J.J. Thompson graduate student) ran an experiment in order to test this plum pudding theory. In this experiment, a stream of alpha particles were shot at a very thin sheet of gold foil. Analysis of the scattering pattern revealed that atoms are mostly empty space, but have a dense central positive core. In 1913, to show why the negatively charged electrons in an atom are not sucked into this positively charged nucleus, Niels Bohr proposed that electrons travel in fixed paths around the nucleus. This orbit model is still often used to gain qualitative understanding of atomic structure, including quantized energy levels. In his 1922 doctoral thesis, Louis de Broglie generalized this idea of quantization by expanding it to matter. The de Broglie hypothesis states that any moving particle or object had an associated wave. The first de Broglie equation relates the wavelength λ to the particle momentum p as h h h λ= = = p γmv mv r 1− v2 c2 (1.1) where h is Planck’s constant, m is the particle’s rest mass, v is the particle’s velocity, γ is the Lorentz factor, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. The greater the energy, the larger the frequency and the shorter (smaller) the wavelength. Given the relationship between wavelength and frequency, it follows that short wavelengths are more energetic than long wavelengths. For particles with thermal velocities much smaller than 3 the speed of light in a vacuum, the de Broglie wavelength is given by λdB = ( , where ~ = h 2π 2π~2 1/2 ) mkB T (1.2) is Planck’s constant over 2π, m is the particle’s rest mass, T is the temperature, andkB is Boltzmann’s constant. That same year, a physics student named Werner Hiesenberg met Niels Bohr, and the two formed a fruitful and lifelong collaboration. In 1927, Heisenberg developed his uncertainty principle, which states that that the simultaneous determination of two paired quantities, for example: the position and momentum of a particle, has an unavoidable uncertainty. Together with Bohr, he formulated the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. After the discovery of the neutron by James Chadwick in 1932, Heisenberg proposed the proton-neutron model of the atomic nucleus and used it to explain the nuclear spin of isotopes. Current theories of atomic structure are based on quantum mechanics, the system of thought that grew from the ideas of de Broglie and Heisenberg. The uncertainty principle places bounds on how well we can simultaneously know position and momentum, which leads to a certain amount of ”fuzzyness” associated with a particle. So, rather than the electron moving in one particular fixed path around the nucleus, the uncertainty principle allows us to calculate the probability that an electron will be found in a certain region of space as well as the the shape of of the probability distribution. 1.2 Bose-Einstein Condensation In 1925, while Heisenberg and de Broglie were working on quantum mechanics, a theorist named Satyendra Nath Bose predicted a condensation phenomena while working on the 4 statistical mechanics of (massless) photons and (massive) atoms. Bose collaborated with Einstein, and the result of the efforts of Bose and Einstein is the concept of a Bose gas, governed by the Bose-Einstein statistics, which describes the statistical distribution of identical particles with integer spin, now known as bosons. Bosonic particles, which include the photon as well as atoms such as Helium-4, are allowed to share quantum states with each other. Einstein demonstrated that cooling bosonic atoms to a very low temperature would cause them to fall (or ”condense”) into the lowest accessible quantum state, resulting in a new form of matter. The transition occurs below a critical temperature, which for a uniform three-dimensional gas consisting of non-interacting particles with no apparent internal degrees of freedom is given by: Tc = n ζ(3/2) 2/3 h2 , 2πmkB (1.3) where Tc is the critical temperature, n is the particle density, m is the mass per boson, h is Planck’s constant, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and ζ is the Riemann zeta function; ζ(3/2) ≈ 2.6124. By rearranging terms, we can see that this transition temperature defines the de Broglie thermal wavelength for which nλ3dB ∼ 2.62. For temperatures below the critical temperature, this becomes nλ3dB > 2.62. This gives significant insight: the de Broglie wavelength defines a length scale, and λ3dB defines a three-dimensional volume. By multiplying the density by this volume, we are actually counting the number of particles present in that volume. So, at the critical temperature, there are more than 2.6 particles in a volume defined by the de Broglie wavelength cubed. The spatial extent of the individual atom is now significantly greater than its de Broglie wavelength. Here, the quantum mechanical 5 nature of the atom dominates the particle picture; the wavefunctions of the atoms overlap and superposition occurs: rather than behaving like a bunch of individual atoms, this collection of atoms behaves like one coherent quantum object. This parameter nλ3dB is called the degeneracy parameter, and is a metric by which progress toward Bose-Einstein condensation is measured. In 1995, the experimental observation of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) in magnetically trapped atomic vapors of rubidium [22], sodium [23], and lithium [24] opened a new field of study at the intersection of atomic and condensed matter physics, and BECs have been realized in a number of atomic isotopes. Even now, the atoms that have been Bose-condensed are those with inherent spin. A BEC of atomic strontium offers a unique zero-spin groundstate, that would assure a condensate much less susceptible to stray magnetic fields. This sort of spin-zero condensate woudl be especially useful for interferometry experiments. 1.3 Optical Pumping Optical pumping is a process in which light is used to promote (or ”pump”) electrons from a lower energy level in an atom or molecule to a higher one. It is commonly used in laser construction, to pump the active laser medium so as to achieve population inversion. The technique was developed by Nobel Prize winner Alfred Kastler in the early 1950’s. Optical pumping is also used to cyclically pump electrons bound within an atom or molecule to a well-defined quantum state. For the simplest case of coherent two-level optical pumping of an atomic species containing a single outer-shell electron, this means that the electron is coherently pumped to a single hyperfine sublevel (labeled mF ), which 6 is defined by the polarization of the pump laser along with the quantum selection rules. Upon optical pumping, the atom is said to be oriented in a particular mF sublevel, however due to the cyclic nature of optical pumping the bound electron will actually be undergoing repeated excitation and decay between upper and lower state sublevels. The frequency and polarization of the pump laser determines which mF sublevel the atom is oriented in.[1] In practice, completely coherent optical pumping may not occur due to powerbroadening of the linewidth of a transition and undesirable effects such as hyperfine structure trapping and radiation trapping. Therefore, the orientation of the atom depends more generally on the frequency, intensity, polarization, spectral bandwidth of the laser as well as the linewidth and transition probability of the absorbing transition. 1.4 Laser Cooling and Trapping Over the last 30 years, laser cooling and trapping techniques have revolutionized experimental atomic physics. Because these techniques allow a significant reduction in translational energy, these systems approach the ideal ensemble of stationary atoms, allowing us to probe their interactions among themselves as well as interactions with the environment. Laser cooling has become a standard laboratory tool for producing cold (< 1 mK), dense (1010 -1011 cm−3 ) samples of atoms. Magneto-optical traps [7] are now commonplace and provide a starting point for numerous avenues of research in atomic and quantum physics. The basic mechanics of laser cooling and trapping are discussed in Metcalf and van der Straten’s book Laser Cooling and Trapping [9]. Using resonant radiation pressure to cool atoms was proposed independently by Hansch and Schawlow [11] and by Wineland and Dehmelt [12] in 1975. The basic idea, com- 7 monly known as Doppler cooling, is that atoms traveling towards an opposing laser field will preferentially absorb light that is detuned below (to the red of) the center of the atomic resonance. This preferential absorption is due to the Doppler effect which causes the light to be shifted into resonance with the atoms. On average, fluorescence is symmetrically distributed in space, which leads to a net atomic momentum loss. Momentum transfer from red-detuned light causes a damping force that opposes the motion of the atom. Balykin et al. [13] were the first to experimentally observe this effect in 1-D cooling of a Sodium atomic beam in 1979. Shortly after, Phillips et al. [14, 15] added a magnetic gradient field to compensate for the changing Doppler shift and to keep the atoms in resonance with the cooling beam as they slowed down. This cooling scheme is often called Zeeman slowing. In 1984 Ertmer et al. [16] used a swept-frequency laser chirp to track the Na atomic resonance as the atoms were slowed from an initial beam velocity to 600 m/s to a final gas cloud velocity of about 6 m/s (50 mK). By using three pairs of intersecting, orthogonal, counterpropagating red-detuned laser beams Chu et al. [17] extended Doppler cooling into three dimensions in 1985. Atoms with speeds below a certain capture velocity were rapidly cooled to a remarkable temperature of ∼240 µK. Although there was no position-dependent force, and thus the sample was not trapped, the overlap region of the laser beams confined the atoms for ∼100 ms. This configuration is known as optical molasses. Without any position-dependent restoring force, the atoms eventually random walk out of the cooling beams. The temperature limit of this molasses is found by balancing the cooling due to the damping force and the heating from the statistical fluctuations of the force caused by random absorption and emission of photons. Using a Fokker-Planck 8 semiclassical model, several theoretical treatments [18–21] yield the well-known Doppler limit for laser cooling, given by kB Td = ~Γcool , 2 (1.4) where Td is the Doppler-limited temperature, and Γcool is the linewidth of the atomic transition used for cooling. This limit says that the minimum kinetic energy of the atoms is equal to the energy width of the cooling transition. It is interesting to compare this limit to the recoil-limited temperature, which occurs when the kinetic energy of the atom is equal to the recoil energy imparted to the atom when it absorbs a single photon: kB Tr = ~2 k 2 . M (1.5) Here, k is the wavenumber of the light and M is the mass of the atom. For most experiments, this is the hard limit for laser cooling since it involves the minimum interaction with the laser field. For typical cooling transitions, the Doppler-limited temperature is 100 − 1000 times greater than the recoil-limited temperature. By adding a magnetic quadrupole gradient field whose zero coincides with the optical molasses center, Raab et al. [7] utilized the internal structure of the atom to produce a 3-D restoring force that trapped the atoms for long periods of time. By using orthogonal circular light polarizations to distinguish each counterpropagating beam, spatially-preferred absorption in three dimensions is caused by Zeeman level shifts as the atoms move away from the zero of the magnetic field gradient. This gradient field is easily generated by an anti-Helmholtz coil pair — a Helmholtz configuration with opposite circulating currents in each coil. The damping force of the optical molasses simultaneously exists with the restoring force. This apparatus, known commonly as a magneto-optical trap, or MOT, 9 provides a convenient way not only to cool atoms to very low velocities, but also to confine them to a very small volume (1 mm3 ), producing dense, ultracold atomic samples. 1.5 Optical Dipole Trap The Optical Dipole Trap (ODT), another confinement technique developed in the 1980s, is based on an effect quite different from the spontaneous scattering force described above. While the scattering force acts in the direction of laser propagation, the dipole force acts in the direction of the gradient of the laser intensity. A good review of the principles and several different applications of optical dipole traps can be found in Grimm’s 2000 Advances in Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics paper [6]. The optical dipole force was first observed in 1978 [3], when researchers co-propagated a tightly- focused laser beam with an atomic beam. They observed that when the laser was tuned close to the atomic resonance frequency, the laser beam caused deflection and focusing of the atoms. Thus the light exerted a force on the atoms perpendicular to the direction of laser propagation. The energy shift of atoms in a light field is often referred to as the AC Stark shift or the light shift, and the gradient of this energy shift gives the dipole force. The dipole force can be understood simply in terms of the atom electric polarizability. In free space, an atom in its ground state has no electric dipole moment. However, a static electric field induces a dipole moment in the atom, reducing its potential energy. Therefore a gradient in electric field draws the atom toward the region of space with higher field. This is simply the Stark shift. The AC Stark shift arises in a similar fashion; the laser light is simply an electromag- 10 netic field that reverses direction every few femtoseconds. If the laser frequency is below the atomic resonance, the dipole induced in the atom can keep up, or stay in phase with the light, and atoms are drawn to regions of highest intensity. If instead the light frequency is tuned above the atomic resonance, the dipole moment always opposes the electric field, and atoms are expelled from regions of highest intensity. The dipole force was used to demonstrate the first optical trap for atoms in 1986 [4]. In this experiment, about 500 Na atoms were confined at the waist of a focused Gaussian laser beam. The laser beam contained about 220 mW, detuned about 650 GHz below the atomic resonance frequency and focused to a 10 µm size. The trap was loaded from an optical molasses by rapidly alternating between the optical molasses and the optical dipole trap. The trap laser detuning ∆ was much larger than the width of the transition, but not large enough to completely suppress the spontaneous scattering force. Soon after this experiment, the MOT was developed and could trap many more atoms at much higher densities. Therefore dipole traps were generally abandoned until in 1993 when the far off resonance trap (FORT) was demonstrated [5]. This trap employed more power and larger detunings, and captured a few thousand atoms. The increased detunings allowed the much longer trap lifetimes than those of the original dipole traps, in order to have strong dipole forces and simultaneously have low spontaneous scattering rates that cause negative effects. The dipole trapping force that actually does the trapping scales as ∆−1 , while the spontaneous photon scattering rate scales as ∆−2 . Spontaneous scattering, although many orders of magnitude lower in the FORT than the MOT, can still cause heating, decoherence, and scrambling of the internal states. Additionally, since there is no dissipation in a FORT optical dipole trap, any cooling must occur via collisions. 11 Michael Chapman[2] in 2001 was the first to use evaporative cooling in a FORT to cool atoms to quantum degeneracy. Since then, optical dipole traps have become a standard technology in the world of atomic, molecular, and optical physics. 1.6 Atomic Structure of strontium The most commonly trapped ultracold atoms are the alkali metals, but there has been considerable interest in expanding the range of laser-trapped elements. The alkaline earth metal atoms possess an atomic and nuclear structure which makes them appealing for laser cooling studies. The most abundant alkaline earth atoms have no nuclear spin (I = 0) and therefore no complicating hyperfine structure. Furthermore, the two valence electrons can couple together anti-parallel (S = 0) to produce a singlet state or parallel (S = 1) to make a triplet state. As a consequence the ground state is a single J = 0 state, and the alkaline earth atoms approach the ideal J = 0 → J = 1 system which is commonly used to theoretically describe many laser cooling experiments. The level diagram for strontium displayed in Figure 1.1 shows this simple atomic structure [25]. Levels for the other alkaline earth atoms have a similar structure. All alkaline earth atoms offer strong cycling transitions from the singlet ground state to the first excited singlet P state. In the case of strontium, the upper state of the 1 S0 → 1 P1 461 nm cycling transition has a 5 ns lifetime [26] and allows rapid laser cooling of the atoms. If an atom falls into a lower lying D state, it becomes unaccessible for cooling, and lost from the trap. For strontium, however, the branching ratio to the lower singlet D state is small enough that atoms can be brought to near zero velocity before decaying out of the cycling transition. 12 Figure 1.1 : Partial strontium Energy Level Diagram. Decay rates (s−1 ) and selected excitation wavelengths are given. Taken from Nagel et al. [25] An important property of the structure of the alkaline earth atoms is the division of all atomic states into either singlets or triplets. From selection rules, we know that the electric dipole (E1) operator does not connect ∆S = ±1 transitions, and thus we are justified in separating the singlet from the triplet states as we have done in Figure 1.1. That is, E1 transitions can occur only between states of the same S. This picture is strictly true for low mass atoms in which Russell-Saunders LS-coupling holds [27]. However, as an atom’s mass increases, there is a progressive breakdown of LS-coupling, and spin-orbit effects will mix singlet and triplet states of the same electronic term. Thus, E1 transitions with ∆S = 1 are possible and become increasingly stronger for heavier atoms. These ∆S = 1 transitions, commonly referred to as intercombination lines, are generally much weaker than their ∆S = 0 counterparts. Because of their narrow linewidths, intercombination transitions are useful as potential optical frequency standards. Figure 1.2 compiles the characteristic numbers for the transitions used in the strontium experiment. 13 Figure 1.2 : This table[8] contains information for each of the transitions used in the Neutral strontium experiment. Equipped with the knowledge of capture velocities and Doppler temperatures limits for the two principle transitions of atomic strontium, the experimental course is clear: the experiments will start with a MOT operating on the broad transition at 461 nm, cool the sample in that MOT, then transfer the sample to a MOT operating on the narrow transition at 689 nm. From there, the sample will be further cooled in an ODT. In the next chapter, we discuss the apparatus for the experiment, including the laser systems used to generate light for these experiments. 14 Chapter 2 The Apparatus Performing experiments on an atomic system requires ultra-high vacuum equipment and several laser systems. This chapter includes a description of the vacuum system as well as several laser systems. The subsequent chapters describe each of the experiments in detail. 2.1 Vacuum System There are currently two experimental setups in the Killian lab. The first apparatus was used for early neutral experiments as well as plasma experiments. In late 2005, construction on a dedicated neutral assembly (called the ”neutrals table”) was completed, and the originally shared apparatus was designated the ”plasma table.” In many ways the two assemblies are quite similar. There is a small strontium reservoir that is heated to 550◦ - 620◦ C. This stream of strontium vapor is transversely cooled by a 2D-collimator and then travels down a Zeeman slower against a counterpropagating Zeeman beam to the MOT chamber, where three retro-reflected beams and a pair of anti-Helmholtz coils form the magneto-optical trap. Figure 2.1 shows a sketch. Notable design differences between the two systems include the orientation of the MOT chamber to allow more optical access, as well as measures to reduce the pressure in the system: the addition of a skimmer disk on the new setup, slight modifications to the nozzle design, and position of the ion pumps. With these improvements, the pressure in the 15 Figure 2.1 : Vacuum Schematic chamber has been significantly reduced. We determine the background vacuum level by measuring the lifetime of atoms in the 3 P2 state in the quadrupole magnetic trap formed by the anti-Helmholz coils during the operation of the blue MOT. The method for this measurement are detailed in Section 5.1. These lifetimes were measured both in the original setup ( 500 ms) and in the new neutrals setup (∼7 s) . The 14-fold increase in lifetime directly maps to a 14-fold reduction in background gas levels. With lower background gas levels, one body losses from the ODT will be significantly reduced, which allows much longer interrogation and evaporation times in the ODT. 2.2 461 nm Light In order to cool on the strong transition in atomic strontium, 461 nm (blue) light is produced via second harmonic generation. While these techniques are well documented in the literature [118], and in the Killian lab [125], [126], this section documents the implemen- 16 tation of tapered amplifiers (TA), which are used to produce sufficient power at 922 nm. This infrared light is then coupled into monolithic KN bO3 doubling cavities to produce blue light via second harmonic generation. The frequency of this blue light is locked to, or at a certain detuning from, the atomic resonance using saturated absorption spectroscopy. Figure 2.4 is a schematic of the optics table. 2.2.1 Seed Light for the Tapered Amplifiers The generation of blue light for cooling on the strong transition in atomic strontium begins with a source of 922 nm light. There are two such sources in the Killian lab, the Ti:Saph and a commercially available high-power diode laser from Sacher, and both have been utilized to seed the tapered amplifiers. The Ti:Saph has been used as a seed beam in the following manner. 200 mW from the Ti:Saph is coupled through a polarization-preserving fiber, and then into the tapered amplifiers. The output mode of this fiber is well known and the frequency of the Ti:Saph is locked to a strontium absorption cell on the plasma table. Because the Ti:Saph is central to the plasma setup, using it as a seed beam limits the scope of the neutrals experiments to one isotope of strontium and a fixed lock frequency. Using the high powered diode laser from Sacher as a seed beam is also straightforward. In this case, there is no fiber, just a cylindrical lens to clean up a slight astigmatism. This laser is coupled directly into the TAs. Here, the frequency is locked to a novel saturated absorption cell on the neutrals table [123], which gives the experiment much greater flexibility. This novel cell is discussed in detail in section 2.2.4. Regardless of which of these sources is used, modulation of the frequency is neces- 17 sary to produce the Pound-Drever-Hall [38] error signal for locking the doubling cavities. Sidebands written onto the seed light transfer through the TAs without trouble. When working with the Ti:Saph, an electro-optic modulator (EOM) on the plasma provides 15 MHz sidebands on the seed light, which is written onto the TA output and enables locking of the doubling cavities. When using the Sacher laser, 15 MHz sidebands are written onto the seed light via current modulation. 2.2.2 Tapered Amplifiers Tapered Amplifiers are commercially available solid state devices that function as optical amplifiers, rather than lasers. We use model EYP-TPA-0915-01500-3006-CNT03 from Eagleyard Photonics, whose input aperture is 3 µm, rated for 2.5 Amps and 1.5 Watts of optical power at 922 nm. These high power devices require temperature control with substantial heat-sinking, a high current source, and very stable input and output alignment. Simplified mechanical drawings are shown in figure 2.2. The aluminum block serves as a heat-sink, while three 6 Amp thermoelectric coolers keep the temperature of the copper block around 20 C. In addition to providing significant heat capacity and physical stability, the large copper mount acts as the anode for the TA and is electrically isolated from the aluminum by plastic screws. The other lead cathode of the TA is separated from the copper by a plastic spacer and secured to an electrical contact with a plastic screw. A five-axis fiber aligner from New Focus holds the input coupler (Thorlabs C330-TM-B) and allows precise placement of the input coupling lens. An additional spring-mount aligner houses the output coupler and allows for similar placement of this identical lens. As a side note, tapered amplifiers simply work as a gain medium; as such, they can be seeded by 18 Figure 2.2 : Mechanical Drawings and Photograph of the Tapered Amplifier Mount a collimated 922 nm beam. These devices are are extremely sensitive to optical feedback and must be protected from reflections by optical isolators. Maximizing the optical coupling of the seed light into the TA is critical for reliable performance. In order to do this, it is important that the seed light is collimated. The first step in aligning the TA is to center the input coupler and collimate the spontaneously emitted light coming ”in reverse” from the first face of the TA. The flexibility of the New Focus mount allows the user to move the input coupler lens not only vertically, horizontally, and longitudinally, but also to adjust tilt and yaw. Once the spontaneously emitted light 19 from the input side of the TA is collimated, this input mount is fixed and is very seldom adjusted. With the spontaneous emission of the TA collimated, coupling the seed beam into the device is achieved using the last two mirrors before the input coupler. This alignment requires daily tweaking to regain the last 10 percent of optical power. Profiling and collimating the output of the tapered amplifier is a bit tricky. The output mode of these devices is typically asymmetric and astigmatic. As a first step, it is useful to roughly collimate the fast-expanding axis using the output coupler. The slowerexpanding axis will still give the beam some astigmatism and requires beam-shaping with cylindrical lenses. Profiling the beam close to the device, and expecting Gaussian behavior, is a mistake. Inside 50 cm, non-Gaussian modes are also present and skew the measurements. At distances greater than 2 meters from the TA, however, these non-Gaussian modes have diffused, the remaining mode fits quite well to a Gaussian and is modeled quite easily. Profiling in this region while placing the cylindrical lens yields collimated spot sizes on the order of 1 mm and asymmetries under 5 percent. Once the cylindrical lenses have been placed, this output mode has been set, and it is seldom revisited. We use two of these tapered amplifiers to generate light at 922 nm. The frequency of the seed light for one TA has been shifted relative to the other by an AOM, and the output of the two TAs go to two separate doubling cavities: one to generate light for the Zeeman slower, and the other to generate light for the MOT beams, 2D collimator beams, and the imaging beam. 20 Figure 2.3 : Doubling Cavity Schematic M=mirror, DC=dichroic, passes 922 nm, reflects 461 2.2.3 Doubling Cavities Second Harmonic Generation has been used and documented extensively in the Killian lab, see especially Aaron Saenz’s master’s thesis [126]. Briefly, infrared light is mode-matched to a cavity formed by a PZT-mounted input coupler (IC) and the back face of a KNbO3 crystal, which has been coated for high reflectivity. By ramping the voltage on the input coupler PZT, the length of the cavity, and thus its resonance frequency, is changed. When the mode of the cavity is matched to the mode of the incoming infrared light, the KNbO3 generates blue light. By actively stabilizing the length of the cavity via feedback to the PZT, blue light is generated. A dichroic mirror (DC) passes the infrared light, but reflects the blue out of the cavity. With good alignment and temperature stabilization, conversion efficiencies can be as high a 45%. 21 2.2.4 Frequency Stabilization: Locking to the Atoms Once blue light has been generated, it is still necessary to stabilize the frequency of this light to the atomic transition. The locks on the doubling cavities are such that sweeping the frequency of the seed light results in a sweep of the frequency of blue light. Depending on which seed light is used, locking to the atomic frequency can be accomplished in either of the following ways: If the Sacher laser is functioning as the seed, we use a small reflection of the blue light generated by the MOT cavity as a saturated absorption beam. This beam goes through an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) running near 100 MHz. Both the first and zeroth order beams travel to a novel strontium absorption cell, wound with a variable-current solenoid [123]. The zeroth order beam functions as the pump, and the first order as the probe. As the frequency of the 922 nm laser is ramped, the current through the solenoid is dithered, thus ramping the blue frequency over the atomic resonance and generates an absorption error signal, which is fed back to the Sacher laser. By changing the offset current in the solenoid, we shift the atomic resonance, and the laser frequency follows. This capability allows dynamic ramping of the detuning of the MOT beams, thus giving the experiment much greater flexibility. If the Ti:Saph is functioning as the seed, a doubling cavity on the plasma table generates blue light . A fraction of that light travels through an AOM to a standard heatpipe absorption cell, which generates an error signal that is fed back to the Ti:Saph. Thus, with the Ti:Saph as seed, the frequency of the blue laser is simply fixed. Thus, by seeding the TAs and coupling their output into the doubling cavities, we can 22 generate more than the 200 mW of light necessary to run the blue MOT. Figure 2.4 shows a schematic of the 461 nm laser system. The dependence of the blue MOT performance on power and detuning are discussed in Chapter 3. 23 Figure 2.4 : 461 nm Laser System Schematic 24 2.3 Repumper lasers As atoms are loaded into the blue MOT, some fraction of them fall into the D state, and some fraction fall further into the 3 P2 and 3 P1 states (See Figure 1.1). The atoms that fall into the 3 P1 state can fall easily back to 1 S0 and are caught up into the blue MOT. But those that fall into the 3 P2 state are no longer optically accessible. Applying light at 707 nm, however, promotes these 3 P2 atoms to the 3 S1 state, which can then fall back to the 3P 1 and to the ground state. Unfortunately, from the 3 S1 state, atoms can also fall back into the 3 P0 . Light applied at 679 nm pumps atoms from the 3 P0 back to 3 S1 state, and now all the atoms are trapped in the blue MOT. Thus, the 707 and 679 lasers are useful for controlling atoms in the blue MOT and probing the population of the 3 P2 state. An additional laser at 688 nm, which connects the 3 P1 to the 3 S1 , allows complete control over all the 3 P levels. Using the 707 nm laser alone yields a factor of three increase in the number of atoms in the MOT; adding the 679 nm laser as well yields a factor of six increase in the number of atoms in the MOT. Because there is attrition at each step of the experiment, and each of the the traps has a finite lifetime, the use of repumpers in this early stage allows us to extend our experimental capabilities by extending the timescales on which we have a measurable signal. Diode lasers are used for generating all of the red light (679-707 nm) in the Killian lab. The frequency of light produced by a diode laser source depends on temperature and drive current, as well as optical feedback. As the temperature increases, the frequency decreases. This is not a smooth tuning; it is subject to mode hops. Likewise, as the drive current increases, the frequency decreases. This, too, is not a smooth tuning; it is also subject to mode hops. Nevertheless, these two factors yield very high flexibility, and when 25 Figure 2.5 : Extended Cavity Diode Configurations. a) In the Littrow configuration, up to 80% of the power is coupled out of the ECDL. b) In the Littman-Metcalf configuration, the output beam does not wander as the wavelength changes. working together can yield tuning ranges of hundreds of GHz. As mentioned earlier, laser diodes are extremely sensitive to optical feedback. We can use this sensitivity to our advantage by coupling the laser to an external wavelength selective element such that only a desired frequency is returned to the laser diode. Because lasers work on amplification principles, the particular frequency that is fed back gains power and eventually becomes the dominant mode. This reduces the threshold current, narrows the linewidth, and provides a broad tuning range. Any of several wavelength selective elements can be used: gratings, etalons, and high finesse cavities [39]. For many of the diode lasers in the Killian lab, we have chosen to use a grating to form an extended cavity diode laser (ECDL). Of the many ECDLs configurations, the two common optical configurations are the the Littrow and Littman-Metcalf, illustrated in Figure 2.5. A description of each configuration follows. In the Littrow configuration, the grating is aligned such that the first order diffraction returns directly to the laser diode. The coarse lasing wavelength is then determined by the angle of the grating with respect to the laser. Wavelength tunes with this angle. The output is the zeroth order reflected beam, which can be as high as 80% of the original 26 output power of the diode. The advantages of this configuration are simplicity and output power. The disadvantage is that the angle of the output beam changes slightly as the angle of the grating changes. In the Littman-Metcalf configuration, the output beam from the laser diode is aligned at grazing incidence with the grating. The first order diffracted beam is then sent to a mirror which reflects the beam back on itself. This reflected beam then hits the grating and the first-order diffracted beam couples back into the diode. Here, wavelength tuning is accomplished by varying the angle of the mirror, which changes the wavelength that the diode receives as optical feedback. The output is the zeroth order reflected beam off the grating. Since the grating in this configuration does not move, the output beam angle does not change as the wavelength is tuned. That is the advantage of the Littman-Metcalf configuration. However, since the light coupled back into the laser is be diffracted twice by the grating, a larger fraction of the power must be diffracted, leaving less power available for the output[40]. The Littman-Metcalf configuration is useful because the beam does not wander as the angle of the mirror is changed. In order to manipulate the population of atoms in the 3 P2 and 3 P0 states, we use a variety of diode-laser technologies to access the different red wavelengths. One of these lasers uses the very simple Littrow configuration, another uses a Littman-Metcalf, yet another is an original design, cooled to liquid nitrogen temperatures. Because of pending patent issues, its design will not be discussed here. 27 2.3.1 679 nm Light As mentioned above, light at 679 nm connects the 3 P0 state to the 3 S1 . A 30 mW Mitsubishi ML1012R-12 laser diode is used. The typical wavelength for this laser, free-running, is 685 nm; the maximum current is 120 mA . For wavelength selection, the diode is placed into a simple Littrow configuration extended cavity. In practice, the diode operates at the target wavelength at 75 mA current near room temperature. A fraction of the output of the laser is passed through a strontium discharge cell in order to lock the frequency to the atomic resonance. To generate an error signal, the grating PZT is dithered at 4 KHz, which coincides with a mechanical resonance in the PZT mount system. The laser is locked via PZT feedback. The power available to the experiment is 3 mW, and the linewidth of the laser is on the order of 2 MHz. 2.3.2 688 nm Light Light at 688 nm connects the 3 P1 and 3 S1 . A 35 mW Eudyna FLD6A2TK laser diode is used. The typical free running wavelength for this laser is 685 nm; the maximum current is 60 mA. For wavelength selection (and flexibility) the diode is placed in a Littman-Metcalf extended cavity. In practice, this diode run at 42 mA current and 22◦ C. The linewidth of this laser is on the order of 1 MHz and is locked to the wavemeter via mirror PZT feedback. Optical power available to the system is one the order of 1 mW. This laser serves as a ready backup to the master laser of the 689 nm system, and holds promise as a tool for future experiments, including photoassociation on the 689 nm transition. 28 2.3.3 707 nm light Light at 707 nm connects the 3 P2 and 3 S1 states. A 10 mW Qphotonics QLD-735-10S laser diode, whose free running wavelength is 735 nm and maximum current is 100 mA, is used. This novel extended cavity diode laser [124] is cooled to liquid nitrogen temperatures and locked to an discharge cell via current feedback and affords 0.5 mW of optical power to the experiment. The linewidth of this laser is on the order of 100 MHz. 2.4 689 nm Light For cooling on the inter-combination line of atomic strontium, it is necessary to have a narrow linewidth laser light source. Previously [129], we used a single extended cavity diode laser in the Littrow configuration, locked to a high finesse cavity, which was, in turn, locked to a strontium saturated absorption cell. The linewidth of that laser was 100 kHz. We have been able to further reduce the linewidth of the laser to 50 kHz by making small changes to the locking electronics, and switching to a Littman-Metcalf configuration. In this configuration, there is not enough optical power available to run the experiment, so a master/slave injection locking scheme is used. The locking schemes and example scope traces are discussed in detail in the following section, with the schematic shown in Figure 2.6. The master laser in this system (Figure 2.8) is a Littman-Metcalf extended cavity diode laser locked to a high finesse cavity via the Pound-Drever-Hall (PDH) method, as detailed in [129]. There are three servo loops: one directly to the diode, the second to the current modulation input of the current driver, and the third to the laser PZT. An EOM 29 Figure 2.6 : 689 Laser System Schematic is used to generate 50 MHz sidebands necessary for the PDH error signal. The slave laser setup is very simple (See Figure 2.8). The diode is temperature controlled and run at constant current. Of note, in order to eliminate unwanted optical feedback to the master, a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) cube and an optical isolator are between the last steering mirror and the slave laser. The polarization of the master laser is horizontal, and passes through the cube. As it travels through the optical isolator, the polarization is rotated 45◦ and injected into the slave diode. Light from the slave laser passes through the optical isolator, which rotates the polarization of the light an additional 45◦ , and at the PBS cube, the polarization of the slave light is vertical and is rejected by the cube. This polarization concern necessitates physically mounting the diode 45◦ to horizontal. In order to injection lock the slave laser to the master, alignment is crucial. It is necessary to peak up this alignment every few weeks. The steps are as follows: First, visually inspect the overlap of the seed beam and the slave beam along the optical path. Determine the threshold current of the slave laser by monitoring the rejected beam from 30 Figure 2.7 : (a) Schematic and Photograph of master Littman-Metcalf ECDL Figure 2.8 : (b) Schematic and Photograph of Slave Laser 31 the PBS cube in the absence of a seed beam. Then, set the slave laser current just below the threshold value. While still monitoring the output of the slave laser, use the two mirrors before the PBS cube to align the seed beam into the slave laser. Injection locking is assured when the observed output lases in the presence of the seed beam. Next, lower the current on the slave laser, and realign the seed beam. Do this a few times to minimize the injection-locked slave laser threshold current. Once the injection-locked current threshold has been minimized, look at the transmission modes of the diagnostic Fabrey-Perot cavity. Both the slave and the master have diagnostic beams aligned to this cavity. As the length of the cavity is changed via a PZT actuator, transmission modes appear (See Figure 1.8). In the absence of injection-locking, there are two sets of cavity modes: one corresponding to the master and one corresponding to the slave. If the injection-locking is working well, there will be one set of modes. Sometimes it is necessary to adjust the current of the slave laser a bit for the injection locking to work well. The Fabrey-Perot cavity to which the red laser is locked is an excellent diagnostic as well. With the master locked to the high finesse cavity, and the slave laser injection locked to the master, the only detail that remains is locking to the atomic absorption signal. A fraction of the output of the slave laser is aligned to an optical fiber, which carries about 300 µW of power to a saturated absorption cell [130]. Here, an AOM shifts the frequency of the pump beam relative to the probe, and by dithering the frequency of the AOM, we generate an atomic error signal, which is fed back to the high finesse cavity PZTs. Thus, we lock the 689 nm system to the atomic line. 32 Figure 2.9 : In both cases, the length of the diagnostic Fabrey-Perot cavity is ramped with both slave and master diagnostic beams present. In the upper trace, The slave laser is not injection locked, and there are two peaks in the photodiode trace, corresponding to the two lasers. In the lower trace, the slave has been injection-locked to the master, and there is a single peak in the photodiode trace, corresponding to the single frequency operation of the lasers. 33 2.5 Photoassociation Laser In order to probe the molecular potentials of Sr2 via spectroscopy, an independent source of high power ( 100 mW) blue light, tunable over several GHz is necessary. For this purpose, we utilize an additional doubling cavity, and the frequency doubling techniques detailed in Section 2.2. There are several ways to realize the necessary frequency tunability for this laser. In the photoassociation spectroscopy (PAS) experiment detailed in Chapter 4, the Ti:Saph seeded the Zeeman and MOT doubling cavities, and thus its frequency was locked to the atomic strontium resonance. A fraction of the Ti:Saph power was diverted by an AOM and used to seed the additional doubling cavity. In order to achieve frequency tunability, the output of the PAS doubling cavity was shifted by a series of AOMs. By varying the AOM drive frequencies, the frequency of the photoassociation beam varied. Thus, the detuning from atomic resonance here was limited to the frequency ranges of the AOMs. In subsequent experiments [122], the Ti:Saph continued to seed the Zeeman and MOT doubling cavities, and the additional doubling cavity was driven by the 922 nm Sacher diode laser. Here, the tuning range of the photoassociation light was much larger and independent of the Ti:Saph. 2.6 ODT Laser Recently, we have implemented a crossed optical dipole trap by focusing the output of a 20 Watt IPG fiber laser to a beamwaist of 75 µm. This laser is passed through a high-powered 34 AOM, which gives us the ability to vary the power in the ODT beams. The vacuum and laser systems described in this chapter are tools to perform our research. In chapter three, I describe some typical performance values for the blue MOT, the red MOT, and the ODT. 35 Chapter 3 Typical Performance This chapter includes typical data for operating the experiments on 88 strontium. Sequentially, the atoms are trapped in the blue MOT, then the red MOT, and then the ODT. In this chapter, we only used repumpers for data in Section 3.4, but they will feature heavily in the next two chapters. I have not included a discussion of repumpers in this chapter, though they will feature heavily in the next two chapters. 3.1 Blue MOT Operation and Diagnostics The Magneto-optical trap on the 1 S0 → 1 P1 transition in strontium has been operational in the Killian lab for several years [25] and is the starting point for all the experiments. In this setup, atoms are slowed by a Zeeman beam and trapped by three orthogonal retro-reflected beams. The current in the anti-Helmholtz coils is 35A, corresponding to a field gradient at the center of 100 G/cm. We measure the number of atoms and sample temperature using absorption imaging techniques, as illustrated in Figure 3.1. These techniques involve illuminating the sample with a collimated, near-resonant beam that falls on a Charge Coupled Device (CCD) camera. The atoms absorb the beam, casting a shadow. If either the trapping lasers or the magnetic field gradient is not present, the atoms are not trapped. Starting with a cold trapped sample, we turn off the trapping lasers at a time t = 0, wait a time t, and then apply the imaging beam. During this time t, the atoms 36 Figure 3.1 : Absorption imaging. A collimated near-resonant beam illuminates the atomic sample and falls on a ccd camera. The atoms absorb a fraction of the incident power, thus casting a shadow. expand ballistically. The CCD camera records a laser intensity pattern with atoms present I(x, y)atoms , and without I(x, y)back . From Beer’s law, we define optical depth (OD) in the following manner: OD(x, y) = ln[ I(x, y)back ] = σabs I(x, y)atoms Z ∞ n0 σabs −x2 /2σx2 −y2 /2σy2 dzn(x, y, z) = √ e , 2πσz −∞ (3.1) where n0 is the peak atom density, and σabs is the absorption cross section. We have inserted a Gaussian density distribution for the atoms in the last line, which leads to the function used to fit the data. This fitting routine is identical to the one used in [43]. Figure 3.2 shows a typical absorption image, as well as the 2-dimensional gaussian fit and residuals, taken after a delay time of 3 ms. The number of atoms in the blue MOT depends upon the amount of power used and the temperature of the oven , but is typically ∼ 100x108 . This optical density fitting routine yields σx and σy , the RMS widths of the cloud. These widths expand according to the following equation: σ 2 = σ02 + v 2 t2 , (3.2) 37 Figure 3.2 : Blue MOT Absorption Image. A)The spatial distribution of the atomic sample after a delay time of 3 ms where v is given by p kb T /M [42]. By fitting our data to this equation, we extract a temperature. Figure 3.3 shows a typical blue MOT temperature near 1mK. In order to achieve good transfer efficiency from the blue MOT into the red MOT, we minimize the temperature in the blue MOT by reducing the intensity in the MOT beams by a factor of 10 for a short hold time before transferring into the red MOT. This is expected because the temperature in Doppler cooling depends on the intensity [9]. We have found that for hold times greater than 6 ms, we lose a significant number of atoms; for hold times under 4 ms, the temperature does not change much. So, we generally implement a low-intensity hold time of 5 ms before transferring into the red MOT in order to maximize transfer. 3.2 Red MOT Operation and Diagnostics The typical blue MOT sample discussed in Section 3.1 has a temperature on the order of a few mK, which results in a Doppler broadening (3-4 MHz) of the intercombination line 38 Figure 3.3 : Blue MOT Temperature Determination. The fit to the data indicates a temperature of about 1 mK. resonance at 689 nm. As mentioned earlier, in order to transfer an appreciable fraction of the atoms from the blue MOT to the red MOT, it is necessary to artificially broaden the 689 nm laser. Otherwise, the laser would be on resonance with a very small fraction of the trapped atoms and the transfer efficiency would be very small (a few percent). We broaden the laser by modulating the frequency of the red MOT acousto-optic modulator (AOM) by ∼0.8 MHz at a modulation frequency of 30 kHz. The experimental setup is very similar to the blue MOT setup; in fact, the red MOT beams follow the same three retro-reflected paths as the blue MOT beams. This beam overlap and the use of the same anti-Helmholtz coils ensure that the centers of the two MOTs overlap. Because the magnetic field gradient required for the red MOT is a factor of 30 smaller than that for the blue MOT, the red MOT is significantly more susceptible to 39 stray magnetic fields than the blue, and we use trim coils to counteract those stray fields. Experimentally, the transferring of atoms into the red MOT goes as follows: we start by trapping atoms in the blue MOT. The field gradient here is 100 G/cm. Then, we switch off the blue MOT beams, quickly ramp down the magnetic field gradient to 0.2 G/cm, and switch on the red MOT beams. The detuning of the laser here is -1.2 MHz, with a frequency modulation of ± 400 kHz. For the first 50 ms of the red MOT operation, only the magnetic field gradient ramps from 0.2 G/cm to 3 G/cm. Over the next 150 ms, the field gradient is kept constant at 3 G/cm, while the detuning is ramped to -300 kHz, and the dither reduced to ± 150 kHz. After 200 ms of red MOT operation, all trapping parameters are kept constant. To take a temperature at this point, we extinguish the red MOT beams and turn off the magnets. This is our new t = 0. After waiting a time t, the same imaging procedure is followed. Figure 3.4 illustrates that the same fitting routine yields a temperature of 3 µK. At early times, the optical density of the sample is > 2 and our fitting routines effectively undercount the number of atoms. In order to get a true value for the density of atoms in the trap, we measure size at early times and number at late ones. Generally, in the red MOT, we have cooled 30-40 ×106 atoms to the µK regime with a MOT size of under 1 mm. As mentioned before, the magnetic field gradient for the red MOT is so small that zeroing out the earth’s magnetic field is an important part of the experiment. (Even a stray magnetized allen key on the optics table can move the MOT around by as much as 1 cm.) We use electron shelving techniques in combination with trim coils as a diagnostic for zeroing out the magnetic fields. The experimental procedure is as follows: atoms are caught in the blue MOT, transferred to the red MOT, and then released. After about 2 40 Figure 3.4 : Red MOT Temperature Determination. The fit to the data indicates a temperature of 2.2 µK. ms, the red MOT beams are pulsed on for ∼ 20 µs, which pumps atoms from the 1 S0 to the 3 P1 state. The atoms are immediately imaged on the blue transition. By making the same measurement and varying the frequency of the red MOT beams only during the 20 µs, we perform electron shelving spectroscopy on the cold atomic sample [127]. If there is a magnetic field at the center of the trap, the degeneracy of the 3 P1 state will have been lifted, and the three magnetic sublevels are split according to the Zeeman effect. Zeroing the magnetic field at the center of the trap produces a single Lorentzian lineshape. By changing the current in three orthogonal sets of Helmholtz coils, the splitting of the peaks is minimized. Figure 3.5 shows the spectra with and without the field zeroed. It is also important to note that there is a tradeoff between atom number and temperature in the red MOT. In the setup described above, with 100 million atoms in the blue 41 Figure 3.5 : Upper trace: Line splitting, according to the Zeeman effect, indicates a very large magnetic field at the center of the trap. Lower trace: A single line indicates that the magnetic field at the center of the trap is close to zero, and the trim coils are doing their job. 42 MOT, we can transfer roughly 50 million atoms to the red MOT, with a temperature of 2 µK. By reducing the dither in the latter stages to ∼100 kHz, and reducing the power in the red MOT beams by a factor of 10, we can reach temperatures down to 800 nK, but the number of atoms remaining is on the order of 5-6 Million. 3.3 Dipole Trap Performance Good transfer into the dipole trap depends on the red MOT temperature being small compared to the trap depth, and on spatial overlap with the two crossed ODT beams. In this ODT, there is a single beam, which is passed through an AOM to enable switching and power control. The beam is then focused to a waist at the center of the chamber, recollimated and recycled through the chamber at 90 degrees to the first beam, with a second waist overlapping the first. Because the ODT beams are not perfectly horizontal, the trap is not perfectly symmetric, and atoms will preferentially escape from the trap in the direction of the downward-tilting beam. We calculate the trap depth based on the power in the ODT beam, and take into account the gravitational tilt of the potential. So, trap depth is measured from the minimum energy of the trap to the lower lip of the trap. In these preliminary ODT studies, the ODT beam is turned on at the beginning of the red MOT loading time, and held at constant power. After the red MOT beams and magnets are switched off, the ODT remains on for a given hold time. Then the ODT is turned off, and the atoms are imaged on the blue transition as before. Figure 3.6 shows the number of atoms trapped vs trap depth. As the power increases, so does the trap depth, and so does the number of atoms transferred from the red MOT. Figure 3.7 shows a temperature measurement for the ODT at its highest power. 43 Figure 3.6 : Number of atoms transferred from the red MOT as a function of power in the ODT beam. Figure 3.7 : ODT temperature after 200ms hold time 44 As we increase the hold time in the ODT, the temperature of the sample decreases, as does the number. This number loss can be attributed to evaporative cooling. Careful analysis of this data gives us a way to measure the atom-atom elastic cross section. 3.4 Measuring The Elastic Cross Section The density losses from the ODT are both one-body and two-body: ṅ = −Γn − g2b n2 , (3.3) where Γ is the one body loss rate, due to collisions with the background gases and g2b is the two-body loss coefficient. This coefficient takes into account both elastic and inelastic collisions. This coefficient can be modeled as g2b = (gin +f gel ) VV21 , where gin is the inelastic scattering coefficient, f is the fraction of elastic collisions that result in one atom being ejected from the trap, or the evaporation fraction, gel is the elastic scattering coefficient, and V2 and V2 are effective volumes, given by V1 = R e−U (r)/kB T d3 r and V2 = R e−2U (r)/kB T d3 r, where U (r) is the potential. Software has been developed in the Killian research group to calculate these effective volumes, which depend on the temperature of the sample, the intensity of the ODT beams, and beam geometry. Since the ground state of 88 Sr is spin zero, and inelastic collisions require an addi- tional degree of freedom for energy balance, the inelastic rates are negligible, so gin ∼ 0, and the two body loss coefficient is simply g2b = f gel VV21 . In general, η is a dimensionless parameter that measures the depth of the potential as compared to the temperature of the sample. That is , η = trapdepth/temperature. For any trap that is sufficiently deep (where η ≥ 4) the evaporative fraction f → ηe−η [37]. Expressions for f and other evapo- 45 ration parameters have been calculated for η < 4 for a linear quadrupole trap, but are not available for a crossed beam, optical dipole trap. A logical next step in our analysis would be to calculate f for the low η situation. That is beyond the scope of this study, so we will simple restrict our analysis for data for which η > 4. In the trap, we generally measure atom number, rather than density. Integrating Equation 3.4, the differential equation becomes N (t) = −ΓN (t) − g2b 2 N . V1 Any equation of this form y 0 = −αy − βy 2 has the solution y(t) = y0 (3.4) e−αt , β 1+y0 α (1−e−αt ) so the number of atoms in the trap as a function of time is given by N (t) = N0 e−Γt 1 + NΓ0 gV2b1 (1 − e−Γt ) (3.5) . Thus, by measuring the number of atoms in the ODT as a function of hold time, and measuring the temperature at each point via ballistic expansion, we can use this function to fit the data, and extract the two-body loss coefficient. Figure 3.8 shows that the number of atoms in the ODT decreases with hold time. The temperatures in each axis are also shown; it is of interest that these temperatures decrease over the first ∼ 1.3 seconds and then level out. The dimensionless parameter η shows the relationship of trap depth to temperature, and is also plotted. Because the two-body loss process is density-dependent, and the density in the trap changes over time (due to the loss of atoms), it is reasonable to expect that at long times, the losses will be dominated by one-body processes. 46 Figure 3.8 : We measure the number of atoms and temperature at varying hold times in the ODT. The dimensionless parameter η is a measurement of trap depth/temperature. 47 Figure 3.9 : Both fits exclude the first two points, since η is below 4. The one-body fit is restricted to times > 2 seconds. The two-body fit is restricted to times < 1.3 seconds. At long times, the data fits well with a one-body loss rate; at short times, a two-body loss comes into play. Figure 3.9 shows the fits to the data and the residuals. At later times, the data is well fit by a simple exponential curve N (t) = N0 e−Γt , where Γ is the one body decay rate is is numerically equal to 0.57 s−1 . This implies a one-body lifetime of ∼1.8 seconds. For early times (t < 1.3s), the data is not well fit by a single exponential, but requires the two body loss curve. Here, the fit function is simply N (t) = N0 the fit parameter C containing all the relevant physics. e−Γt 1+ N0 C (1−e−Γt ) Γ , with 48 Figure 3.10 : The values for Γ are in good agreement; values for other parameters differ slightly Because the model is based on η > 4 we restrict the fits to timest > 0.4 seconds, and both the fits are quite good. Notebly, the residuals from the 2-body fit are closer to zero than those from the 1-body fit at early times, showing that this method is valid. Also, the value of the one-body loss rate Γ, which is a free parameter in both functions, agrees. The values and uncertainties are shown in Figure 3.10. We use the fit parameter C to extract a measurement of the elastic cross-section 49 √ where gel = σel v 2. Solving for σel and q 8kB T substituting in the average velocity for a Boltzman distribution v = πM , the elastic σel . The fit parameter C = g2b V1 = cross section, can be rewritten σel = V2 1 V1 f gel V1 , 2 C V1 √ 1 f V2 4 kB T /πM . Uncertainties in the fit parameter map directly to uncertainties in σel . And while this fit parameter C is independent of temperature, the effective trap volume V1 , the effective two-body volume V2 , and the evaporative fraction f all depend upon the temperature of the sample. It should be noted that one assumption of this model is that the temperature of the atoms, and thus η does not change over time. This is not strictly true for the data. To place bounds on the uncertainty introduced by the changing temperature, we assume a constant temperature and extract values for σel for the maximum, minimum, and average temperature observed during the portion of data that is fit to extract the parameter C. These uncertainties are shown in Figure 3.11A. For comparison purposes, I have chosen the values that bound the temperature evolution during the time spanned by the data. Thus, this data reveals an elastic scattering cross section of 1.1 × 10−18 m2 < σel < 1.0 × 10−17 m2 . In Figure 3.11B, we compare the value of σel determined in this study with other experimental results. Previous measurements of the scattering length of 88 Sr via photoas- sociative spectroscopy performed in the Killian lab [122]Micklson have bounded the elastic cross section 0 < σel < 1.2 × 10−17 m2 . In that experiment, we directly observed the position of the node of the 86 Sr ground state wave function. The location of the node allowed us to determine the s-wave scattering length for this isotope. Although we did not directly observe the node in to use the result from scattering length of 86 Sr 88 Sr 88 Sr, a fit-parameter-free mass-scaling relationship allowed us to fit the88 Sr PAS data taken, and to determine the s-wave as well. In comparison, the PAS measurement in Katori’s group 50 bounds the elastic cross section 2.0 × 10−17 < σel < 4.9 × 10−17 ( [82] Katori). In this paper, Katori performed PAS on 88 Sr, measuring PAS rates on either side of the node, but excludes the ∼ 15 transitions closest to the node. In the analysis, the author assumes that the wavefunction is linear as it crosses the node; the validity of that assumption is in question. Additionally, an ODT thermalization measurement in Tino’s group found that σel = (3 ± 1) × 10−17 m2 ([83] Tino). In this experiment, atoms are loaded into an optical trap, which is subsequently perturbed. The thermalization time at a given density and temperature is then related to the elastic cross section. It is of interest that the agreement between values taken in the Killian lab is quite good, and that the agreement between values taken elsewhere is also good. To verify the value set for σel in the ODT experiment described in this section, it would be useful to take similar ODT lifetime data under conditions with larger trap depths, so that that the constraint η > 4 is true for the entire dataset. We might also consider utilizing a technique identical to Tino’s: perturbing the ODT and measuring thermalization times. Treating each of these values for σel as valid, we can say is that 0 < σel < 4.9 × 10−17 m2 . This implies that the absolute value of the s-wave scattering length is less than 26a0 , which is still rather small, especially when compared to the value for 86 Sr, which is bounded by 610a0 < a86 < 2300a0 , according to our direct measurement of the position of the node. Please note: for all other data in this chapter, we have not used repumpers. For the data presented in this section, where we look at very long hold times in the ODT, we used repumper lasers to boost our signal. Thus, in the absence of repumpers, the blue MOT captures about 50 M 88 Sr atoms and cools them to about 1 mK. The atoms are then transferred to the red MOT, which 51 Figure 3.11 : Upper plot: Values for σel from this experiment. The temperature along the x-axis is the temperature assumed in the fit. For comparison I have chosen values that bound the temperature evolution during the time spanned by the data. Lower Plot:Comparison of this work with other measurements of σel . Values from this set compare favorably with those determined via photoassociative spectroscopy [122]. There appears to be a discrepancy with values from an additional ODT evaporation experiment[83] and PAS experiment [82] 52 captures about 25 M and cools them to about 2 µK. . The atoms are then transferred to the ODT, which initially captures 2 million atoms at temperatures near 12 µK. Due to two-body collisions, though, the number of atoms in the ODT decays in a matter of seconds. Careful study of those decay rates yields a value for the elastic cross section of 88 Sr on on the order of σel ∼ 2 × 10−17 m2 . This information is useful for planning further experimental work. 53 Chapter 4 Photoassociation at Long Range When two atoms collide in the presence of light, there is a probability that they will form a molecule. The probability of molecule formation depends upon the collision energy of the two atoms and the frequency of the light. If the collision energy is small, and the frequency of the light is such that it promotes the two atoms into an excited molecular state, a molecule is formed. By varying the frequency of the light over these molecular resonances and counting the number of atoms in the MOT, the frequencies of these resonances can be observed – thus, photoassociative spectroscopy. By carefully noting the frequency and spacing of several subsequent levels, we can map out the underlying atom-atom potential curves, and thus learn about the underlying physics, which may guide further scientific investigation. The experiment detailed in this chapter was performed in the shared apparatus, and the discussion here draws heavily on the paper ”Photassociative Spectroscopy at Long Range in UltraCold strontium” published in 2005, in collaboration with Robin Côté and Phillipe Pelligrini. [119] 4.1 Scientific Motivation Photoassociative spectroscopy (PAS) in laser-cooled gases [44] is a powerful probe of molecular potentials and atomic cold collisions. It provides accurate determination of ground state scattering lengths and excited state lifetimes [115]. Photoassociation occurs naturally in laser cooling and trapping experiments in which the lasers are red-detuned from atomic 54 resonance, so characterizing the process is also important for understanding and optimizing the production of ultracold atoms (e.g. [87]). PAS of alkaline earth atoms differs significantly from more common studies of alkali metal atoms. The most abundant isotopes of alkaline earth atoms lack hyperfine structure, making these systems ideal for testing PAS theory. Recent theoretical work [102] emphasized the ability to resolve transitions at extremely large internuclear separation and very small detuning from the atomic asymptote. The finite speed of light modifies the potential in this regime through relativistic retardation [48–50]. There is also great interest in alkaline-earth-atom cold collisions because of their importance for optical frequency standards [51–54] and for the creation of quantum degenerate gases [57, 86, 89]. In addition, collisions involving metastable states [58, 60, 61, 85] display novel properties that arise from electric quadrupole-quadrupole or magnetic dipole-dipole interactions. PAS red-detuned from the principle transitions in calcium [62] and ytterbium [63] is well characterized, resulting in accurate measurements of the first excited 1 P1 lifetimes and the ground state s-wave scattering lengths. In spite of its importance for potential optical frequency standards, before this work, little was known about strontium. The photoassociative loss rate induced by trap lasers in a 1 S0 → 1 P1 magneto-optical trap (MOT) has been measured [87], and preliminary results from more extensive spectroscopy were recently reported [64]. Ab initio strontium potentials have been calculated for small internuclear separation (R < 9 nm) [65]. In this chapter, we explore PAS of 88 Sr near the 1 S0 → 1 P1 atomic resonance at 461 nm (Fig. 4.1). The simple spectrum allows us to resolve transitions as little as 600 MHz 55 Figure 4.1 : Resonant excitation occurs near the outer molecular turning point of states of the 1 Σu potential, and it can lead to trap loss through two processes. The molecule can radiatively decay at smaller internuclear separation to two ground state atoms with kinetic energies exceeding the trap depth. This is known as radiative escape (RE). In a state-changing collision (SC), at small internuclear separation the molecular state changes to one corresponding at long range to a lower-lying electronic configuration of free atoms. The atoms exit the collision with greatly increased kinetic energy and escape the trap. detuned from the atomic resonance, which produces molecules with greater internuclear separation than in any previous PAS work. Our determination of the first excited 1 P1 lifetime resolves a discrepancy between experiment and recent theoretical work, and provides an importance test of atomic structure theory for alkaline earth atoms. 4.2 Experimental Sequence The most common form of PAS involves resonantly inducing trap loss in a MOT, although early work was also conducted in optical-dipole traps [115]. Recent experiments have also studied spectroscopy of atoms in magnetic traps, especially in Bose-Einstein condensates [66, 67]. The experiments described in this article were performed in a MOT, but the MOT 56 operated on the 1 S0 → 3 P1 intercombination line at 689 nm [90], rather than an electricdipole allowed transition. This results in lower atom temperature, a shallower trap, and higher atom density than a standard MOT. Atoms are initially trapped in a MOT operating on the 461 nm 1 S0 → 1 P1 transition, as described in [69]. During the loading phase, the peak intensity in each MOT beam is 6 mW/cm2 , and the axial magnetic field gradient generated by a pair of anti-Helmholtz coils is 56 G/cm. The intensity is then reduced by about a factor of 8 for 3.5 ms to reduce the atom temperature. After this stage the MOT contains about 150 million atoms at 2 mK. The 461 nm laser cooling light is then extinguished, the field gradient is reduced to 2.1 G/cm, and the 689 nm light for the 1 S0 → 3 P1 intercombination line MOT is switched on. This MOT also consists of three retro-reflected beams, each with a diameter of 2 cm and an intensity of 400 µW/cm2 . The frequency of the 689 nm laser is detuned from the atomic resonance by 0.5 MHz and spectrally broadened with a ±400 kHz sine-wave modulation. Transfer and equilibration take about 50 ms, after which there are 15 million atoms at a √ temperature of 5 µK, peak density of about 5 × 1011 cm−3 , and 1/ e density radius of about 100 µm. The intercombination-line MOT operates for an adjustable hold time before measuring the remaining number of atoms with absorption imaging using the 1 S0 → 1 P1 transition. The lifetime of atoms in the MOT is approximately 350 ms, limited by background gas collisions. To detect photoassociative resonances, a PAS laser is applied to the atoms during hold times of 300 − 400 ms. When the PAS laser is tuned to a molecular resonance, photoassociation provides another loss mechanism for the MOT, decreasing the number of atoms. 57 Light for photoassociation is derived from the same laser that produces the 461 nm light for laser cooling. Several acousto-optic modulators (AOM), detune the light 600 to 2400 MHz to the red of the atomic transition. The laser frequency is locked relative to a Doppler-free saturated-absorption feature in a vapor cell, with an uncertainty of about 2 MHz. The last AOM in the offset chain, in a double-pass configuration, controls the power of the PAS laser and scans the frequency up to 200 MHz with minimal beam misalignment. PAS light is double-passed through the MOT in a standing wave, with a 1/e2 intensity radius of w = 3 mm. Thermal broadening (kB T /h ≈ 100 kHz) is negligible. Only s-wave collisions occur, so only a single rotational level (J = 1) is excited. For higher intensity, the observed line is broadened slightly because, on resonance, the signal saturates if a large fraction of atoms is lost. Figure 4.2B shows a complete spectrum of the 14 different PAS resonances observed in this study. Center frequencies for each transition are determined by Lorentzian fits. The typical statistical uncertainty is 2-3 MHz, but there is approximately 2 MHz additional uncertainty arising from the lock of the laser. The Condon radius for the excitation varies from 20 nm for the largest detuning to 32 nm for the smallest. These extremely large values exceed the internuclear spacing of molecules formed in photoassociative spectroscopy to pure long-range potentials [49, 70]. The region of the attractive 1 Σ+ u molecular potential probed by PAS corresponds to large internuclear separations, and is typically approximated by V (R) = D − C3 ~2 [J(J + 1) + 2] 3~λ3 + , C = , 3 R3 2µR2 16π 3 τ (4.1) 58 Figure 4.2 : (a) Spectrum for photoassociation to the v = 60 molecular state. Detuning is with respect to the atomic 1 S0 − 1 P1 resonance. The PAS laser intensity is 1.4 mW/cm2 . The Lorentzian fit yields a FWHM linewidth of 70 ± 7 MHz. (b) Representative spectra for all transitions observed in this study. Lines connect the data points to guide the eye. Conditions vary for the individual scans that make up the full spectrum, so amplitudes and linewidths should not be quantitatively compared. The baseline has been adjusted to match the expected curve for overlapping Lorentzians. (c) Differences between experimental and calculated positions of the 14 measured levels. Taken from [69] 59 where D is the dissociation energy, µ the reduced mass, and λ = 461 nm. However, at very large separations, the atom-atom interaction is modified by relativistic corrections. This retardation effect is well understood [48] and can be included in the analysis of the spectrum through C3 → C3 [cos(u) + u sin(u)], where u = 2πR/λ. Machholm et al. [102] discussed this in the context of PAS of alkaline earth atoms. To extract molecular parameters from the positions of the PAS resonances, we constructed a potential curve by smoothly connecting the long range form (Eq. (4.1)) to a short range curve at a distance of 1.5 nm. The short range ab initio potential was obtained using a semi-empirical two-valence-electron pseudopotential method [65]. To account for uncertainty in the short range potential, the position of the repulsive wall was varied as a fit parameter. The rovibrational levels in the 1 Σ+ u potential were found by solving the radial Schrödinger equation using the Mapped Fourier Grid Method [71] with a grid size typically larger than 500 nm containing about 1000 grid points. We found that the observed levels range from 48 to 61, starting the numbering from the dissociation limit. The best fit of the data was achieved with a value of C3 = 18.54 a.u., with a reduced chi-squared value of χ2 = 0.79 (See Fig. 4.2C). χ2 varied by less than 10% for a change of level assignments of ∆v = ±1, so we consider our assignment to be uncertain by this amount. The value of C3 changed by ±0.5% as the assignments changed, which is much larger than the statistical uncertainty for a given assignment. We thus take ±0.5% as our uncertainty in C3 . A fit to the level spacings, as opposed to the absolute positions, yielded the same value of C3 . From C3 , we derive a natural decay rate of the atomic 5p 1P 1 state of τ = 5.22 ± 0.03 ns. Decay channels other than 1 P1 → 1 S0 can be neglected at this level of accuracy. The most recent experimental determinations of τ use the Hanle 60 Figure 4.3 : Comparison of experimental (exp.) and theoretical (th.) values for the lifetime of the 1 P1 level. Adapted from [69] effect [72, 73]. Our result agrees well with recent theoretical values [75, 76, 107] (Fig. 4.3). Retardation effects shift the levels by approximately 100 MHz in this regime, which is similar to the shift seen in a pure long range potential in Na2 [49]. If retardation effects are neglected and the data is fit using the simple LeRoy semiclassical treatment [77], the level assignments change significantly, and C3 changes by more than 10%, putting it outside the range of recent theoretical results. Center frequency shifts due to coupling to the continuum of the ground state have been ignored as they are less than 50 kHz for typical experimental temperatures. 61 Figure 4.4 : (a) Number of atoms as a function of time for atoms in the intercombination-line MOT. The PAS laser is tuned near the v = 59 molecular resonance. In one data set the PAS laser is on resonance, and in the other it is tuned to the blue of resonance by 42 MHz, and loss due to photoassociation is small. (b) β as a function of PAS laser intensity for several molecular resonances. Error bars denote statistical uncertainties. Taken from [69] Figure 4.4A shows an example of the number of atoms, N , in the intercombinationline MOT as a function of time. The density in the MOT varies according to ṅ = −Γn−βn2 . Integrating this equation over volume and solving the differential equation yields N (t) = N0 e−Γt 1+ N0 β √ (1 Γ(2 2πσ)3 − e−Γt ) 2 /2σ 2 where we approximate the density as n(r) = n0 e−r , (4.2) , and Γ is the one-body loss due primarily to background gas collisions. β is the two-body loss rate and it contains important information about the dynamics of photoassociation and trap loss. Even with photoassociation, the deviation of N (t) from a single exponential decay is small, making it difficult to independently extract β and Γ with high accuracy from a single decay curve. To address this problem, we take advantage of the fact that when the PAS laser is not on a molecular resonance, the photoassociation rate is small (See Fig. 4.2B), and within the accuracy of our measurement it can be neglected. All other processes, however, 62 such as off-resonance scattering from the atomic transition, are the same. We thus take data in pairs of on and off-resonance, and fit off-resonance data to N (t) = N0 e−Γt . The on-resonance data is then fit with Eq. (4.2) with Γ fixed to the value determined from the off-resonance data. The resulting two body decay rates are shown in Fig. 4.4B. For the relatively small intensities used, β is expected to vary linearly with laser power [78]. At the time, we imaged along the direction of gravity and lacked the additional diagnostic required to obtain information on the third dimension of the atom cloud. Gravity can distort the equilibrium shape of the intercombination-line MOT because the light force is so weak. However, we operate the MOT in the regime where the laser detuning is comparable to the modulation of the laser spectrum, and, as shown in [79], in this regime the effect is small. Based on the range of distortions we observe in the imaged dimensions for various misalignments of the MOT beams, we allow for a scale uncertainty of a factor of two in the volume of the MOT. This contributes an identical uncertainty in the measurements of β. Measurements of MOT size suggest that as the PAS laser power increases, the cloud radius increases slightly (20% for the highest intensities), decreasing the atomic density. This is expected because off-resonance scattering from the atomic transition should heat the sample. The data quality does not allow a reliable correction for this effect, however, and we use the average of all observed σ as a constant σ in Eq. 4.2. This contributes another approximately 50% uncertainty in our determination of β. Overall, we quote a factor of three uncertainty due to systematic effects, which dominates the statistical error. The measured values of β ≈ 1×10−11 cm3 /sec for 1 mW/cm2 in the intercombinationline MOT are comparable to theoretical [102] and experimental [87] values of β for atoms 63 in a MOT operating on the 461 nm transition. This provides some insight into the typical kinetic energy of the resulting atoms after radiative decay of a molecule to the free-atom continuum. A MOT based on an electric-dipole allowed transition would typically have a trap depth of about 1 K. In our experiment, the transfer efficiency of atoms from the 461 nm MOT places a lower limit of 0.5 mK on the depth of the intercombination-line MOT. Using the formalism of [79] and the parameters of the intercombination-line MOT, we calculate a trap depth of 2 mK. As described in Fig. 4.1, photoassociative loss requires excitation to a molecular state followed by decay to a configuration of two atoms with enough kinetic energy to escape from the trap [102]. The fact that the observed linewidths are close to the theoretical minimum of 1/(πτ ) suggests that radiative escape dominates in this regime, as predicted in theoretical calculations of PAS rates for magnesium [102]. If β is similar for trap depths of 1 K and 1 mK, then the energy released during radiative decay must be on the order of 1 K or greater. Extensive calculations of radiative escape in lithium [80] also led to an estimate of a few Kelvin for the energy released in this process. 4.3 Implications This PAS study elucidated dynamics of collisions in an intercombination-line MOT and provided an accurate measurement of the lifetime of the lowest 1 P1 state of strontium. This result resolved a previous discrepenancy between experimental and theoretical values of the lifetime. We have also taken advantage of the simple structure of the spectrum to measure transitions at very large internuclear separation where the level spacing and natural linewidth are comparable and retardation effects are large. It should be noted that 64 an additional PAS experiment was performed the following year [82] with an even more precise lifetime of 5.263(4) ns. 4.4 Other Work Further experiments along these lines [122], using the Sacher diode laser as the seed for the additional doubling cavity, allowed tuning of the PAS beam over several additional PAS resonances in both 88 Sr and 86 Sr. Variations in PAS linestrength are indicative of the shape of the groundstate wavefunction (Figure 4.5), and the experimental location of the node allows subsequent determination of the s-wave scattering length of the two most abundant bosonic isotopes of strontium. The analysis for this data was performed by Pascal Mickelson, in collaboration with Robin Côté and Phillipe Pelligrini, and makes up the majority of Pascal’s master’s thesis [128]. 65 Figure 4.5 : PAS resonances in 86 Sr. An independent seed for the PAS laser allows variable detuning over several hundred GHz; the linestrength vanishes at -500 GHz, indicating a node in the wavefunction. 66 Chapter 5 Optical Pumping and Metastable States Experiments that begin with a stable, cold sample of atoms can illuminate underlying physics. Two such experiments are detailed in this chapter. The first experiment is magnetic trapping of the 3 P2 atoms in the quadrupole field generated by the MOT magnetic coils. In addition to providing an alternative cold sample to the blue MOT, measuring the decay of the number of atoms in the trap over time is a convenient means of testing the background vacuum level of the apparatus. A second experiment involves transferring atoms from the blue MOT into the red MOT and then into the ODT. With careful sequencing, we can use the repumper lasers to efficiently transfer atom population in the ODT from the 1 S0 state to the 3 P2 or 3 P0 states. By measuring the decay of the number of atoms in the ODT over time, we can probe the elastic scattering cross-sections of these states, which may be large and therefore favorable for evaporative cooling to quantum degeneracy. Discussion of magnetic trapping in the 3 P2 state draws heavily on the paper , Magnetic trapping of 3 P2 strontium atoms, published in 2002 [25]. The data for was taken in the shared apparatus. To compare the effective background pressure in the new apparatus to the old one, we compare the liftetimes of the3 P2 atoms in those magnetic traps and find a marked improvement in the new apparatus. Discussion of experiments with metastable states in the ODT is fairly preliminary and illustrates our ability to pump atoms into the the upper 3 P states. 67 5.1 Magnetic Trapping in the 3 P2 state In the course of operating the blue MOT, some atoms decay into the 3 P2 state, which is magnetically trappable and has no direct decay channel to the ground state. Atoms are recovered by applying repumping lasers, and the loading and loss rates of the magnetic trap are studied. The lifetime of the magnetic trap is a useful diagnostic for determining the background gas level. Comparison of trap lifetime measurements in the shared apparatus to those made in the newer neutral apparatus reveal a 14-fold improvement in vacuum level, which can be attributed to apparatus design improvements. 5.1.1 Scientific Motivation Laser-cooled alkaline earth atoms offer many possibilities for practical applications and fundamental studies. The two valence electrons in these systems give rise to triplet and singlet levels connected by narrow intercombination lines that are utilized for optical frequency standards [105]. Laser cooling on such a transition in strontium may lead to a fast and efficient route to all-optical quantum degeneracy [89, 90], and there are abundant bosonic and fermionic isotopes to use in this pursuit. The lack of hyperfine structure in the bosonic isotopes and the closed electronic shell in the ground states make alkaline-earth atoms appealing testing grounds for cold-collision theories [87, 102, 117], and collisions between metastable alkaline-earth atoms is a relatively new and unexplored area for research [85]. In this section, we characterize the continuous loading of metastable 3 P2 atomic strontium (88 Sr) from a magneto-optical trap (MOT) into a purely magnetic trap. This idea was discussed in a theoretical study of alkaline-earth atoms and ytterbium [100]. 68 Katori et al. [91] and Loftus et al. [101] also reported observing this phenomenon in their strontium laser-cooling experiments. Continuous loading of a magnetic trap from a MOT was also described for chromium atoms [113]. This scheme should allow for collection of large numbers of atoms at high density since atoms are shelved in a dark state and less susceptible to light-assisted collisional loss mechanisms [87, 92, 102]. It is an ideal starting place for many experiments such as sub-Doppler laser-cooling on a transition from the metastable state, as has been done with calcium [88], production of ultracold Rydberg gases [111] or plasmas [94], and evaporative cooling to quantum degeneracy. Optical frequency standards based on laser-cooled alkalineearth atoms, which are currently limited by high sample temperatures [105], may benefit from the ability to trap larger numbers of atoms and evaporatively cool them in a magnetic trap. 5.1.2 Experimental Sequence Here, we first describe how the operation of the blue MOT loads the magnetic trap with 3 P2 atoms. Then we characterize the loading and decay rates of atoms in the magnetic trap. This decay rate depends only on the collisions between strontium atoms and background gases, and so provides a direct measurement of the background pressure in the apparatus. Finally, we present measurements of the 3 P2 sample temperature. As detailed in Chapter 3, strontium atoms are loaded from a Zeeman-slowed atomic beam [108] and cooled and trapped in a standard MOT. [109]. The repumper lasers at 679 nm and 707 nm are not used during the operation of the MOT, but serve to repump atoms from the 3 P2 level to the ground state via the 3 S1 and 3 P1 levels for imaging diagnostics. 69 In the shared apparatus, a 30 cm long Zeeman slower connects a vacuum chamber for the Sr oven and nozzle to the MOT chamber. Each chamber is evacuated by a 75 l/s ion pump. When the Sr oven is operated at its normal temperature of about 550◦ C, the pressure in the MOT chamber is about 5 × 10−9 torr, and the oven chamber is at 4 × 10−8 torr. The quadrupole magnetic field for the MOT is produced by flowing up to 80 A of current in opposite directions through two coils of 36 turns each, with coil diameter of 4.3 cm and separation of 7.7 cm. The maximum current produces a field gradient along the symmetry axis of the coils of 115 G/cm. Such a large field gradient, about 10 times the norm for an alkali atom MOT, is required because of the large decay rate of the excited state (Γ1 P1 = 2π × 32 MHz) and the comparatively large recoil momentum of 461 nm photons. Typically 107 −108 atoms are held in the MOT, at a peak density of n ≈ 1×1010 cm−3 , with an rms radius of 1.2 mm and temperatures from 2 − 10 mK. The cooling limit for the MOT is the Doppler limit (TDoppler = 0.77 mK) because the ground state lacks degeneracy and thus cannot support sub-Doppler cooling. Higher MOT laser power produces higher MOT temperature, but also a larger number of trapped atoms. These sample parameters are measured with absorption imaging of a near resonant probe beam. The temperature is determined by monitoring the velocity of ballistic expansion of the atom cloud [116] after the trap is extinguished. Atoms escape from the MOT due to 1 P1 − 1 D2 decay as discussed in [100]. From the 1 D2 state atoms either decay to the 3 P1 state and then to the ground state and are recaptured in the MOT, or they decay to the 3 P2 state, which has a lifetime of 17 min [85]. 70 The decay rates are given in the energy diagram, Figure 5.6. The resulting MOT lifetime of 11 − 55 ms was measured by turning off the Zeeman slowing laser beam and monitoring the decay of the MOT fluorescence. The lifetime is inversely proportional to the fraction of time atoms spend in the 1 P1 level, which varies with MOT laser power. Light-assisted collisional losses from the MOT [87] are negligible compared to the rapid 1 P1 − 1 D2 decay. The mj = 2 and mj = 1 3 P2 states can be trapped in the MOT quadrupole magnetic field. Such a quadrupole magnetic trap was used for the first demonstration of magnetic trapping of neutral atoms [103], but in that case atoms were loaded directly from a Zeemanslowed atomic beam. Near the center of the trap, the magnetic interaction energy for 3 P2 atoms takes the form p Umj = −µmj · B = gµB mj b x2 /4 + y 2 + z 2 /4, (5.1) where mj is the angular momentum projection along the local field, g = 3/2 is the g-factor for the 3 P2 state, µB is the Bohr magneton, and b ≤ 115 G/cm is the gradient of the magnetic field along the symmetry (y) axis of the quadrupole coil. For the mj = 2 state and the maximum b, gµB mj /kB = 200 µK/G and the barrier height for escape from the center of the magnetic trap is 15 mK. Gravity, which is oriented along z, corresponds to an effective field gradient of only 5 G/cm for Sr and is neglected in our analysis. Typical data showing the magnetic trapping is shown in Figure 5.1. We are unable to directly image atoms in the 3 P2 state, so we use the 679 and 707 nm lasers to repump them to the ground state for fluorescence detection on the 1 S0 −1 P1 transition. The details are as follows. The MOT is operated for tload ≤ 1300 ms during which time atoms continuously load the magnetic trap. The MOT and Zeeman slower light is then extinguished, and after 71 Figure 5.1 : Magnetic trapping of 3 P2 atoms. Ground state atoms are detected by fluorescence from the MOT lasers. If the quadrupole magnetic field is left on during thold (black trace), large numbers of 3 P2 atoms are magnetically trapped until the 707 nm laser returns them to the ground state. The residual fluorescence after thold for the gray trace arises from background scatter off atoms in the atomic beam. Reloading of the MOT from the atomic beam is negligible with the Zeeman slower light blocked. There is a 1 ms delay between the MOT and 707 nm laser turn on to allow the MOT light intensity to reach a stable value. Taken from [25] 72 Figure 5.2 : (a) The lifetime of atoms in the magnetic trap is limited by collisions with background gas molecules. The linear fit extrapolates to zero at zero pressure within statistical uncertainties. Inset: A typical fit of the decay of the number of trapped atoms to a single exponential. (b) The magnetic trap loading rate is plotted against the MOT loss rate. Data correspond to various MOT laser power and slow-atom fluxes from the atomic beam. Taken from [25] a time thold , the MOT lasers and repump laser at 707 nm are turned on. The 679 nm laser is left on the entire time. Any atoms in the 3 P2 state are cycled through the 3 P1 level to the ground state within 500 µs of repumping, and they fluoresce in the field of the MOT lasers. If the magnetic field is not left on during thold , Fig. 5.1 shows that a negligible number of ground state atoms are present in the MOT when the lasers are turned on. If the magnets are left on, however, the MOT fluorescence shows that 3 P2 atoms were held in the magnetic trap. The maximum number of 3 P2 atoms trapped is about 1 × 108 , and the peak density is about 8 × 109 cm−3 . To determine what limits this number, we varied thold and saw that the number of 3 P2 atoms varied as N0 e−γthold . The fits were excellent and the decay rate was proportional to background pressure as shown in Figure 5.2a. This implies that for our conditions, the trap lifetime is limited by collisions with residual background gas molecules, and strontium-strontium collisional losses are not a dominant effect. 73 The magnetic trap loading rate was determined by holding thold constant and varying tload . The loading rate correlates with the atom loss rate from the MOT (Fig. 5.2b). At low MOT loss rates about 10% of the atoms lost from the MOT are captured in the magnetic trap. Using the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients to calculate the probability of decay from the 1 P1 state, and the magnetic sublevel distribution for atoms in the MOT, one expects that about 40% of the atoms decaying to 3 P2 enter the mj = 1 or mj = 2 states. This is significantly higher than the largest observed efficiencies, and we may be seeing signs of other processes, such as losses due to collisions with MOT atoms, which dominated dynamics during loading of a magnetic trap from a chromium MOT [113]. At larger MOT loss rates (corresponding to higher MOT laser intensities, MOT temperatures, and trapped 3 P2 atom densities), the efficiency of loading the magnetic trap decreases by about a factor of two. MOT temperatures approach the trap depth for the largest loading rates and we attribute the decreasing efficiency to escape of atoms over the magnetic barrier. The 500 µs required for repumping is fast compared to the time scale for motion of the atoms, so absorption images of ground state atoms immediately after repumping provides a measure of the density distribution of the magnetically trapped sample. For these measurements, the magnetic trap is loaded for 1.3 s. Then the magnetic field is turned off and the repump lasers are turned on. After 500 µs, an 80 µs pulse of a weak 461 nm probe beam (I Isat ), 12.5 MHz detuned below resonance, illuminates the atom cloud and falls on a CCD camera. We record an intensity pattern with atoms present, I(x, y)atoms , and a background pattern with no atoms present, I(x, y)back . To analyze the 74 Figure 5.3 : Distributions of 3 P2 atoms extracted from absorption images of ground state atoms shortly after repumping. The fits, which assume thermal equilibrium and a pure sample of mj = 2 atoms, yield number (1.2×108 ), peak density (8×109 cm−3 ), and temperature (1.3 mK) of the atoms. Taken from [25] data, we plot Z S(x) = image Z = σabs dy ln[I(x, y)back /I(x, y)atoms ] Z ∞ dy dz n(x, y, z), image (5.2) −∞ and the analogously defined S(y), where σabs is the absorption cross section and n(x, y, z) is the atom density (Fig. 5.3). Because we do not know the distribution of magnetic sublevels, we make the simplifying assumption that all atoms are in the mj = 2 state, and the density is given by n(x, y, z) = n0 exp[−U2 (x, y, z)/kB T ], (5.3) A numerical approximation to Eq. 5.2 fits the data very well, see Figure 5.3. Our assumption for magnetic sublevel distribution means that the extracted temperatures are upper bounds, but one would expect the mj = 1 level to be less populated. Due 75 Figure 5.4 : The 3 P2 temperature is significantly lower than expected from a simple model that is described in the text. The inset shows that the temperature tracks the magnetic trap depth, as expected for evaporative cooling. The scatter of the temperature measurements is characteristic of our statistical uncertainty, and there is a scale uncertainty of 25% due to calibration of the imaging system. The magnetic trap depth is 15 mK for the main figure. Taken from [25]. to the smaller magnetic moment, the trapping efficiency for mj = 1 atoms decreases substantially as the MOT temperature increases, dropping by about a factor of 5 for a MOT temperature of 12 mK compared to only a factor of two for mj = 2 atoms. Atoms with mj = 1 can also be lost from the trap through spin-exchange collisions, which are typically rapid in ultracold gases. Calculated rates for spin exchange collisions for alkali atoms in magnetic traps are typically 10−11 cm3 /s, although they can approach 10−10 cm3 /s [96]. We have assumed thermal equilibrium in our analysis, but this is reasonable. Thermal equilibration would need to occur on less than a few hundred ms time scale. Using a recently calculated s-wave elastic scattering length for 3 P2 atoms of a = 6 nm [86], the collision rate for identical atoms is nv8πa2 ≈ 9 s−1 for n = 1010 cm−3 and v = (T = 3 mK). p 2kB T /M = 1 m/s 76 The most interesting parameter obtained from the fits is the temperature, which is plotted in Fig. 5.4 as a function of MOT atom temperature. The values are significantly colder than what one would expect from the simple theory developed in [113] and plotted in the figure. The expected temperature is determined by assuming the kinetic energy and density distribution in the MOT are preserved as atoms decay to the metastable state. The 3 P2 potential energy distribution is then given by the magnetic trap potential energy corresponding to the density distribution of the MOT. Actual 3 P2 atom temperatures cluster around 1 mK for a 15 mK trap depth, while the expected temperature approaches 4.5 mK for the hottest MOT conditions. We confirmed these measurements by determining the 3 P2 atom temperature from ballistic expansion velocities, as is done to measure the MOT temperature. As shown in the inset of Fig. 5.4, the temperature decreases with decreasing trap depth as would be expected for evaporative cooling of the sample [93]. For this data, the magnetic trap depth is held constant during the entire load and hold time. Confirmation of this explanation could be achieved with measurement of the collision cross section and thermalization rate in the trap. If evaporative cooling is working efficiently, it should be possible to use radio-frequencyinduced forced evaporative cooling to further cool the sample and increase the density. Majorana spin-flips [103] from trapped to untrapped magnetic sublevels at the zero of the quadrupole magnetic field will eventually limit the sample lifetime. Even if the sample temperature were 100 µK, this lifetime is still 10 seconds. A short semi-classical calculation of the Majorana lifetime follows. 77 5.1.3 Majorana Spin Flips Three important features of the quadrupole magnetic trap are that 1) the magnetic field direction changes as one crosses the zero point 2) the magnitude of the magnetic field decreases the closer one gets to the center and 3) the magnetic field direction changes faster near the origin than far away from it. This is important because atoms have an intrinsic spin, which, in the presence of an external magnetic field, will precess around this ~ external field at the Larmor frequency: ωLarmor (r) = µ ~ · B(r)/~. If this external magnetic field changes direction slowly in comparison to the Larmor frequency, then the interaction of the magnetic moment with the magnetic field will create a torque that keeps the atoms aligned with this local magnetic field. If the magnetic field changes faster than the Larmor frequency, the atoms will not be able to keep up and will lose alignment with the local magnetic field, flip their spins, and be lost from the trap. As long as an atom in our trap moves in a region where the field magnitude is sufficiently large, the Larmor precession period will be short compared with the time in which the atom sees a signicant change of field direction (which is inversely proportional to the velocity of the atoms). The atom will then remain in the Zeeman sublevel that is trapped. This is relatively easy for atoms that are far away from the center of the trap (where the magnetic fields are larger) than it is for atoms near the center. Therefore, higher energy atoms (which predominantly spend most of their times away from the trap center) will remain in the trapped state while lower energy atoms will have a higher probability of undergoing spin flips.[120] Thus, this loss will occur when the Larmor precession frequency is less than the rate 78 of change of the magnetic field direction, and the loss rate can be easily estimated[121] An atom with velocity v and mass m, passing within a distance b of the center of the trap (with radial gradiant dBr /dr = B 0 ), can undergo a nonadiabatic spin flip if the Larmor frequency ∼ µB 0 /~ is smaller than the rate of change of the magnetic field direction v/b. Loss then occurs within an ellipsoid of radius b0 = (v~/µB 0 )1/2 . The loss rate is given by the flux through this ellipsoid, that is, the density of atoms n times the area of the ellipsoid (b20 ) ~ times the velocity v. Thus the Majorana loss rate can be expressed as ΓM ∼ nb20 v = nv 2 µB 0 We should note here, that when the de Broglie wavelength of the atoms, λdb = q 2π~2 M kB T , is smaller than the size of the Majorana hole, b0 , the atomic motion can be treated classically (particles falling through a hole). However, when the de Broglie wavelength is larger than b0 , the entire process must be treated quantum mechanically. Under the experimental conditions described in this paper, (n ∼ 1010 cm−3 , v = 1m/s (T = 3mK), µ = 3 2 µb , B 0 = 115 G/cm where µb is the bohr magneton), the de Broglie wavelength of the atoms is λdb = 3.39 × 10−9 m and the size of the Majorana hole, b0 = 2.22 × 10−6 m . Thus it is safe to use a semiclassical picture. The loss rate ~ −4 s−1 , which implies a lifetime of ∼ 2000 seconds, or 33 ΓM ∼ nb2o v = v 2 µB 0 = 5 × 10 minutes. Thus, the losses from the magnetic trap due to Majorana flips are negligible on the ∼2 second timescale of the experiment. 5.1.4 Implications The experiment described above was performed in 2002 using the shared apparatus, and revealed a 3 P2 magnetic trapped lifetime on the order of 500 ms. In 2007, the experiment was repeated in the new neutrals assembly. Figure 5.5 shows a 3 P2 magnetic trap lifetime 79 Figure 5.5 : 2007 Magnetic Trap lifetime Measurement. The number of atoms in the magnetic trap decreases as a function of hold time, and is well fit with a single exponential with a lifetime on the order of 7 seconds. of 7 seconds in the new apparatus. This is a factor of 14 increase in trap lifetime, which indicates a proportional reduction in the background gas level, due to design improvements in the new assembly. This is an encouraging result for future experiments which require lower vacuum levels, including evaporative cooling in the ODT. 80 Figure 5.6 : Partial strontium Energy Level Diagram. Decay rates (s−1 ) and selected excitation wavelengths are given. Taken from Nagel et al. [25] 5.2 5.2.1 ODT Lifetime Measurements of Metastable States Scientific Motivation Measuring the lifetime of the atoms in the 3 P0 state trapped in the ODT gives an experimental means of measuring the elastic scattering cross section, which may be useful as a means to achieving BEC. Currrently, we have demonstrated the ability to promote atoms in the 1 S0 state trapped in the ODT to the 3 P0 state, trap them in the ODT, and recover them, using repumper lasers. Because the experimental sequence is a bit complicated, I’ve re-included the energy level diagram (Figure 5.6). 5.2.2 Experimental Sequence It should be noted that the 707 nm repumper laser is always on for this experiment. As detailed in Chapter 3, atoms are first captured in the blue MOT, then transferred to the red MOT, then transferred to the ODT. Once the atoms have thermalized in the ODT, 81 the trap is released for 2 ms, during which the 689 and 688 nm lasers are pulsed on. This drives atoms from the 1 S0 state (which was trapped in the ODT) to the 3 P1 state on the intercombination transition, and then to the 3 S1 via the 688 nm repumper. From the 3 S1 state, atoms can decay to all three 3 P sublevels. Any atoms that fall into the 3 P2 state are repumped by the always-on 707 laser. Likewise, any atom that fall into the 3 P1 state are repumped by the 688 laser. Thus, with three repumpers in play, the atoms are forced into to the 3 P0 state. Then, the ODT is switched back on. After a variable time thold , the ODT is again released, and this time the 679 nm is pulsed on, which promotes atoms from the 3 P0 state to the3 S1 state. Again, any atoms that fall into the 3 P2 state are repumped by the always-on 707 laser, so the combination of these two repumpers forces the atoms into the 3 P1 state, which decays to the 1 S0 state. The repumpers (679 and 707) remain on during the following 2 ms delay, and ground state atoms are imaged on the blue transition at 461 nm. This sequence is illustrated in Figure 5.7. Figure 5.8 shows the temperature of the atoms in the 3 P0 ODT-trapped state, after athold time of 200 ms. Comparing this to the ODT temperature of 15 µK , we see that atoms in the 3 P0 state are at a lower temperature than the atoms in the ODT. This is suggestive of thermalization of the 3 P0 but more data is necessary for definitive measurements of the collision cross-section. 5.2.3 Implications Using repumpers, we have successfully transferred atoms to the 3 P2 , 3 P1 , 3 P0 states. Lifetime studies on each of these states in the ODT may reveal long lifetimes that are would be useful in evaporative cooling. 82 Figure 5.7 : Experimental Timing sequence for trapping 3 P0 atoms in the ODT 83 Figure 5.8 : (a) 1 S0 ODT Temperature (b) 3 P0 ODT Temperature Note that for the same amount of hold time, atoms in the 3 P0 state are colder. This is suggestive of thermalization. 84 Chapter 6 Conclusions I began graduate school convinced that BECs were terribly interesting and that working with lasers in the Killian lab would be fun. My plan was to reach quantum degeneracy in atomic strontium and then graduate. Experimentally realized BEC’s have been around for over 10 years. So it’s not as if reaching quantum degeneracy in strontium will garner any sort of high praise for being ”first.” However, all of the atoms that have been bose-condensed to date have intrinsic spin, and strontium does not. Without intrinsic spin, strontium in its ground state is not magnetically trappable, so an all-optical route is necessary. This means the combination of two magneto-optical traps with an optical dipole trap, and then evaporation within the ODT. You may well ask, what does a spinless BEC get you? Answer: decreased sensitivity to stray magnetic fields, much simpler collision physics, leading to the possibility of interfereometers that are an order of magnitude larger. Also, there are some other interesting things you can do with strontium, again, because there are two outer electrons, you can take one off and still have one to play with; so optical imaging on ultracold neutral plasmas has proven to be a fantastic tool for measuring the plasma’s evolution. I worked on some of the very early plasma experiments as well. But back to the neutral atoms. People have been working on strontium, with a view 85 toward quantum degeneracy, for a long time. But they have always stopped just shy of bose-condensation, unable to get that last factor of 10 decrease in temperature (or increase in density, either way). What matters for BEC is the phase degeneracy parameter, basically the number of atoms inside a volume defined by the de Broglie wavelength. If that number is> 2.62, a transition to BEC occurs. To date, it hasn’t been done. We began the experiments by implementing a blue MOT. But, instead of looking at ground state atoms, the first experiment we published was a study of strontium atoms, in a metastable atomic state, trapped in a magnetic trap. Specifically, we trapped atoms that were in the 3 P2 state in the quadrupole magnetic trap that was a direct result of running the anti-Helmholtz coils for the blue MOT. It was interesting to see that these atoms appeared to thermalize, and we were able to get a rather dense sample in this trap. About that time, a theoretical paper came out with predictions concerning the 3 P2 state: at densities necessary for BEC, inelastic loss rates dominated the elastic ones, meaning, the pursuit of evaporation in the magnetic trap was yet another formula for getting close to BEC without achieving it. Because of this prediction and some technical issues with the 707 nm repumper laser, the magnetically trapped 3 P2 sample was dropped as a route to quantum degeneracy. We began developing the technology for the next stage in cooling: the red MOT. The transition that this MOT works on is narrow (∼7 kHz), and requires a laser whose linewidth is on the same order. My master’s thesis was all about developing this laser system. Transfer efficiency from the blue MOT to the red can be as high as 70% in the early stages of red MOT operation. There is a tradeoff, though, between number and temperature. In general we allow the sample to thermalize in the red MOT, producing 86 colder, more dense samples. The parameter that really holds all the information about a certain atom (how long it will take to thermalize in a trap, how atoms in that interact with each other) is the s-wave scattering length a. The scattering cross section σel is given by σel = 8πa2 . Randy Hulet’s group at Rice was the first group to use photoassociative spectroscopy to extract scattering length information on Lithium, and we were happy to follow in his footsteps. In order to achieve the densities necessary for detectable signals, we performed photoassociative spectroscopy on atoms held in the red MOT. These experiments led to several results. First, an improved measurement of the lifetime of the 1 P1 excited state. Second, information about the scattering length. Until that time, everyone working with strontium was working with the most abundant bosonic isotope, 88 Sr. After weeks of unsuccessfully searching for the amplitudes of the PAS resonances to go through a minimum, we decided to trap a less abundant bosonic isotope,86 Sr. Performing PAS here, we saw the strength of the resonances decrease to zero and then increase again as we increased the detuning from the atomic reasonance. With this precise knowledge of the position of the node, we collaborated with Robin Côté and Phillippe Pelligrini to calculate the s-wave scattering length of 86 Sr. Even better, we could use a simple mass-scaling relationship to fit the data that we already had for 88 Sr, and the fit is very good without any free parameters. So, in these PAS experiments, we found that the s-wave scattering length for 88 Sr, the issotope that everyone had been working with, is somewhere between -1 and 13 bohr. In contrast, the scattering length for 86 Sr is bounded by 600 and 2300 bohr. This is a very powerful result: now we know why people have been having such trouble getting that last factor of 10 – the timescales for thermalization are 87 enormous. Even in the red MOT, though, the degeneracy parameteter, nλ3dB is still too low to realize quantum degeneracy. Just for fun, here are the numbers: with the rempumpers on, in the blue MOT, nλ3dB = 1.6e-8; in the red mot, nλ3dB = 0.01. To increase the degeneracy parameter even further, we implemented the use of a crossed-dipole trap. The initial value of the parameter here, without evaporation is nλ3dB = 0.02. Experiments in the ODT are ongoing: measuring the lifetimes of metastable states, exploring high-intensity effects in PAS, and trying our hand at evaporative cooling. In this thesis, we have been able to use the two-body loss rates from the ODT to verify our value for the 88 Sr elastic cross-section, and the data agree rather well. There is some discrepancy with values from other experiments, and it is likely that more data is necessary for a definitive answer. So, while I did not achieve my original goal (BEC in atomic strontium) during my graduate career, the work that I have done contributes significantly toward that goal; we are optimistic that with this knowledge, strontium BEC will be achieved. 88 Bibliography [1] Demtroder, W. (1998). Laser Spectroscopy: Basic Concepts and Instrumentation. Berlin: Springer. [2] M.D. Barrett, J.A. Sauer, and M.S. Chapman, “All-optical formation of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010404 (2001). [3] J. E. Bjorkholm, R. R. Freeman, A. Ashkin, and D. B. Pearson. Observation of Focusing of Neutral Atoms by the Dipole Forces of Resonance-Radiation Pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 136164 (1978) [4] S. Chu, J. E. Bjorkholm, A. Ashkin, and A. Cable. Experimental observation of optically trapped atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 3147 (1986) [5] J. D. Miller, R. A. Cline, and D. J. Heinzen, Far-off-resonance optical trapping of atoms, Phys. Rev. A 47, R456770 (1993). [6] R. Grimm, M. Weidemuller, an Y.B. Ovchinnikiv. Optical Dipole Traps for Neutral Atoms. Advances in Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Vol. 42, 95-170 (2000) [7] E. L. Raab, M. Prentiss, A. Cable, S. CHu, and D. E. Pritchard. Trapping of neutral sodium atoms with radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59 (23): 2631-2634. 1987 [8] Calculated by Jose Castro in the Killian Lab. 89 [9] H.J. Metcalf anf P. van der Straten. Laser Cooling and Trapping, SpringerVerlag New York (1999) [10] K.R. Vogul. Laser Cooling on a Narrow Atomic Transition and Measurement of the Two-Body Cold Collsion loss rate in a Strontium magneto-optical trap. University of Colorado. Boulder, CO 1999 [11] T.W. Hansch and A.L. Schawlow. Cooling of gases by laser radiation. Opt. Commun., 13(1): 68-69, 1975. [12] D. Wineland and H. Dehmelt. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 20: 637, 1975. [13] V.I. Balykin, V.S. Letokhov, and V.I. Mushin. Observation of the cooling of free sodium atoms in a resonance laser field with a scanning frequency. JETP Lett., 29(10): 560-564 1979. [14] W.D. Philllips and H. Metcalf. Laser deceleration of an atomic beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(9): 596-599, 1982. [15] J. Prodan, A. Midgall, W.D. Phillips, I. So, H. Metcalf, and J. Dalibard. Stopping atoms with laser light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54(10): 992-995,1985 [16] W. Ertmer, R. Blatt, J.L. Hall, and M. Zhu. Laser manipualtion of atomic beam velocities:demonstration of stopped atoms and velocity reversal. Phys. Rev. Lett., 54(10): 996-999,1985. 90 [17] S.Chu, L. Hollberg, J.E. Bjorkholm, A. Cable and A. Ashkin. Threedimensional viscous confinement and cooling of atoms by resonance radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett.,55(1): 48-51,1985 [18] J.P. Gordon and A. Ashkin. Motion of atoms in a radiation trap. Phys. Rev. A21(5): 1606-1617, 1980 [19] R.J. Cook. Quantum-mechaincal fluctuations of the resonance-radiation force. Phys. Rev. Lett44(15): 976-979, 1980 [20] S. Stenholm. The semiclassical theory of laser cooling. Rev. Mod. Phys.58(3): 699-739, 1986 [21] P.D. Lett, W.D. Phillips, S.L. Rolston, C.E. Tanner, R.N. Watts, and C.I. Westbrook. Optical Molasses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B,6(11): 2084-2107, 1989 [22] M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Science 269, 198 (1995). [23] K. B. Davis, M.-O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995). [24] C. C. Bradley, C. A. Sackett, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 985 (1997); see also C. C. Bradley, C. A. Sackett, J. J. Tollet, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1687 (1995). 91 [25] S.B. Nagel, C.E. Simien, S. Laha, P. Gupta, V.S. Ashoka, and T.C. Killian. Magnetic trapping of metastable 3 P2 atomic strontium.Physical Review A, 67, 011401(R) (2003) [26] H. G. C. Werij, C. H. Greene, C.E. Teodosiou, and A. Gallagher. Oscillator strengths and radiative branching ratios in atomic Sr. Phys. Rev.A. 46(3): 1248-1260, 1992. [27] E.U. Condon and G.H. Shortley. Theory of Atomic Sepctra. Cambridge University PRess, London. 1963 [28] P.D. Lett, W.D. Phillips, S.L Rolston, C.E. Tanner, R.N. Watts, and C.I. Westrook. Optical Molasses J. Opt. Soc. Am. B,6(11): 2084-2107, 1989 [29] J. Dalibardand C. Cohen-Tannoudji. Laser cooling below the Doppler limit by poarization gradients: simple theoretical models. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 6(11): 2023-2045, 1989 [30] W. J. Meath, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 227 (1968). [31] Semiconductor Diode Lasers, R.W. Fox, L. Hollberg, and A.S. Zibrov Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics: Electromagnetic Radiation,(ed. F.B. Dunning and R.G. Hulet, Academic Press) 77-102 (1997) of 29C series Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences. [32] A.Schoof, J. Grunert, S.Ritter, and A. Hemmerich, Opt. Soc. of America, 26, 92 20 (2001) [33] B.C. Young, F.C. Cruz, W.M Itano and J.C. Bergquist. Visible Lasers with subhertz linewidths. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82: 3799-3802 1999 [34] C.E. Wieman and L. Hollberg.Using Diode Lasers for Atomic Physics,Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62: 1-20, 1991. [35] H.Katori, T. Ido, Y. Isoya, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami. Magneto-Optical Trapping and Cooling of Stronitum Atoms down to the Photon Recoil Temperature.Phys. Rev. Lett. 82: 1116 1999 [36] T.H. Loftus, T. Ido, A.D. Ludlow, M.M. Boyd, and J.Ye. Narrow Line Cooling:From Semiclassical to Quantum Dynamics. arxiv:physics/0401055 (2004) [37] R.d Carvalho, J. Doyle Phys. Rev. A,70, 053409 2004 [38] R.W.P. Drever, J.L. Hall, F.V. Kowalski et al, Applied Phys. B, 31: 97-105 1983 [39] B.Dahmani, L. Hollberg, R. Drullinger, Optics Letters12: 876-879, 1987 [40] http://www.bldrdoc.gov/timefreq/ofm/lasers/ecdls.htm, accessed 03/16/2004 [41] Y.N.Martinez, high finesse cavity work, 2003 [42] D.S. Wiess, E. Riis, Y. Shevy, P.J. Ungar, and S. Chu. Optical Molasses and mulitlevel atoms: experiment.J.Opt. Soc. Am. B,6(11): 2072-2083, 1989 93 [43] C.E. Simien, Y.C. Chen, P. Gupta, S. Laha, Y.N. Martinez, P.G. Mickelson, S.B. Nagel, and T.C. Killian. Using Absorption Imaging to Study Ion Dynamics in an Ultracold Neutral Plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett92(14): 143001 2004 [44] P. D. Lett, P. S. Julienne, and W. D. Phillips, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 423 (1996). [45] J. Weiner et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1 (1999). [46] T. P. Dinneen et al., Phys. Rev. A 59, 1216 (1999). [47] M. Machholm, P. S. Julienne, and K.-A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. A 64, 033425 (2001). [48] W. J. Meath, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 227 (1968). [49] K. M. Jones et al., Europhys. Lett. 35, 85 (1996). [50] W. I. McAlexander, E. R. I. Abraham, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. A 54, 5 (1996). [51] G. Wilpers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 230801 (2002). [52] E. A. Curtis, C. W. Oates, and L. Hollberg, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B - Opt. Phys. 20, 977 (2003). [53] T. Ido and H. Katori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 053001 (2003). [54] M. Takamoto and H. Katori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 223001 (2003). 94 [55] A. Derevianko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 063002 (2003). [56] T. Ido, Y. Isoya, and H. Katori, Phys. Rev. A 61, 061403 (2000). [57] Y. Takusa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 040404 (2003). [58] R. Ciurylo,et al., http://arXiv.org/physics/0407109. [59] A. Derevianko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 023002 (2001). [60] V. Kokoouline, R. Santra, and C. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 253201 (2003). [61] R. Santra and C. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 67, 062713 (2003). [62] C. Degenhardt et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 043408 (2003). [63] Y. Takusu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 93, 123202 (2004). [64] M. Yasuda et al., in XIX International Conference on Atomic Physics, Rio de Janeiro (2004). [65] N. Boutassetta, A. R. Allouche, and M. Aubert-Frécon, Phys. Rev. A 53, 3845 (1996). [66] I. Prodan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 080402 (2003). [67] C. McKenzie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 120403 (2002). [68] H. Katori et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1116 (1999). 95 [69] S. B. Nagel et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 011401 (2003). [70] A. Fioretti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4402 (1998). [71] V. Kokoouline et al., J. Chem. Phys. 110, 9865 (1999). [72] F. M. Kelly and M. S. Mathur, Can. J. Phys. 58, 1416 (1980). [73] A. Lurio, R. L. DeZafra, and R. J. Goshen, Phys. Rev. 134, 1198 (1964). [74] S. G. Porsev et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 012508 (2001). [75] I. M. Savukov and W. R. Johnson, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042503 (2002). [76] J. Mitroy and M. W. J. Bromley, Phys. Rev. A 68, 052714 (2003). [77] R. J. LeRoy, in Semiclassical Methods in Molecular Scattering and Spectroscopy, edited by M. S. Child (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, 1980), pp. 109–126. [78] K.-A. Suominen et al., Phys. Rev. A 57, 3724 (1998). [79] T. Loftus et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 073003 (2004). [80] R. Côté and A. Dalgarno, Phys. Rev. A 58, 498 (1998) [81] The Sr atomic beam is not blocked, but without the Zeeman slower beam reloading of the MOT from the atomic beam is negligible. 96 [82] M. Yasuda, T. Kishimoto, M. Takamoto, H. Katori Wave-Function Reconstruction for the Determination of the Scattering Length of Sr arXiv:physics/0501053v2 (2006) [83] G. Ferrari, R.E. Drullinger, N. Poli, F. Sorrentino, and G.M. Tino Cooling of Sr to high phase-space density by laser and sympathetic cooling in isotopic mixtures Phys. Rev. A, 73, 023408, 2006 [84] M. Bode, I. Freitag, A. Tunnermann, and H. Welling. Frequency-tunable 500mw continuous-wave all-solid-state single-frequency source in the blue spectral region. Opt. Lett., 22(16):1220, 1997. [85] A. Derevianko. Feasibility of cooling and trapping metastable alkaline-earth atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87(2):023002, 2001. [86] A. Derevianko, S. G. Porsev, S. Kotochigova, E. Tiesinga, and P. S. Julienne. Prospects for quantum degeneracy with meta-stable alkaline-earth atoms. preprint http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0210076. [87] T. P. Dinneen, K. R. Vogel, E. Arimondo, J. L. Hall, , and A. Gallagher. Cold collisions of sr*-sr in a magneto-optical trap. Phys. Rev. A, 59:1216, 1999. [88] J. Grunert and A. Hemmerich. Sub-doppler magneto-optical trap for calcium. Phys. Rev. A, 65(4):041401, 2002. [89] T. Ido, Y. Isoya, and H. Katori. Optical-dipole trapping of sr atoms at a high 97 phase-space density. Phys. Rev. A, 61(6):061403, 2000. [90] H. Katori, T. Ido, Y. Isoya, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami. Magneto-optical trapping and cooling of strontium atoms down to the photon recoil temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82:1116, 1999. [91] H. Katori, T. Ido, Y. Isoya, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami. Laser cooling of strontium atoms toward quantum degeneracy. In E. Arimondo, P. DeNatale, and M. Inguscio, editors, Atomic Physics 17, page 382. American Institute of Physics, 2001. [92] W. Ketterle, K. B. Davis, M. A. Joffe, A. Martin, and D. E. Pritchard. High densities of cold atoms in a dark spontaneous-force optical trap. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70(15):2253, 1993. [93] W. Ketterle and N. J. van Druten. Evaporative cooling of trapped atoms. Adv. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys., 37:181, 1996. [94] T. C. Killian, S. Kulin, S. D. Bergeson, L. A. Orozco, C. Orzel, and S. L. Rolston. Creation of an ultracold neutral plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83(23):4776, 1999. [95] T. C. Killian, M. J. Lim, S. Kulin, R. Dumke, S. D. Bergeson, and S. L. Rolston. Formation of rydberg atoms in an expanding ultracold neutral plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(17):3759, 2001. 98 [96] S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, H. M. J. M. Boesten, and B. J. Verhaar. Role of collisions in creation of overlapping bose condensates. Phys. Rev. A, 55(3):1589, 1997. [97] S. Kulin, T. C. Killian, S. D. Bergeson, and S. L. Rolston. Plasma oscillations and expansion of an ultracold neutral plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85(2):318, 2000. [98] T. Kurosu and F. Shimizu. Laser cooling and trapping of calcium and strontium. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 29:2127, 1990. [99] P. J. Leo, E. Tiesinga, P. S. Julienne, D. K. Walter, S. Kadlecek, and T. G. Walker. Elastic and inelastic collisions of cold spin-polarized 133cs atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81(7):1389, 1998. [100] T. Loftus, J. R. Bochinski, and T. W. Mossberg. Magnetic trapping of yttterbium and the alkaline-earth metals. Phys. Rev. A, 66:013411, 2002. [101] T. Loftus, X. Y. Xu, J. L. Hall, A. Gallagher, and J. Ye. Magnetic trapping of metastable strontium. International Conference on Atomic Physics 2002, Cambridge, MA. [102] M. Machholm, P. S. Julienne, and K. Suominen. Calculations of collisions between cold alkaline-earth-metal atoms in a weak laser field. Phys. Rev. A, 64(3):033425, 2001. 99 [103] A. L. Migdall, J. V. Prodan, W. D. Phillips, T. H. Bergeman, and H. J. Metcalf. First observation of magnetically trapped neutral atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 54(24):2596, 1985. [104] C. J. Myatt, E. A. Burt, R. W. Ghrist, E. A. Cornell, and C. E. Wieman. Production of two overlapping bose-einstein condensates by sympathetic cooling. Phys. Rev. Lett., 78(4):586, 1997. [105] C. W. Oates, F. Bondu, R. W. Fox, and L. Hollberg. A diode-laser optical frequency standard based on laser-cooled ca atoms: Sub-kilohertz spectroscopy by optical shelving detection. Eur. Phys. J. D, 7:449, 1999. [106] S. G. Porsev and A. Derevianko. High-accuracy relativistic many-body calculations of van der walls coefficients c6 for alkaline-earth-metal atoms. Phys. Rev. A, 65(2):020701, 2002. [107] S. G. Porsev, M. G. Kozlov, and Y. G. Rakhlina. Many-body calculations of electric-dipole amplitudes for transitions between low-lying levels of mg, ca and sr. Phys. Rev. A, 64(1):012508, 2001. [108] J. Prodan, A. Migdall, W. D. Phillips, I. So, H. Metcalf, and J. Dalibard. Stopping atoms with laser light. Phys. Rev. Lett., 54(10):992, 1985. [109] E. L. Raab, M. Prentiss, A. Cable, S. Chu, and D. E. Pritchard. Trapping of neutral sodium atoms with radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59(23):2631, 1987. 100 [110] A. Robert, O. Sirjean, A. Browaeys, J. Poupard, S. Nowak, D. Boiron, C. I. Westbrook, and A. Aspect. A bose-einstein condensate of metastable atoms. Science, 292(5516):461, 2001. [111] M. P. Robinson, B. L. Tolra, M. W. Noel, T. F. Gallagher, and P. Pillet. Spontaneous evolution of rydberg atoms into an ultracold plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85(21):4466, 2000. [112] F. P. D. Santos, J. Leonard, J. Wang, C. J. Barrelet, F. Perales, E. Rasel, C. S. Unnikrishnan, M. Leduc, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji. Bose-einstein condensation of metastable helium. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(16):3459, 2001. [113] J. Stuhler, P. O. Schmidt, S. Hensler, J. Werner, J. Mlynek, and T. Pfau. Continuous loading of a magnetic trap. Phys. Rev. A, 64(3):031405, 2001. [114] E. Tiesinga, S. J. M. Kuppens, B. J. Verhaar, and H. T. C. Stoof. Collisions between cold ground-state na atoms. Phys. Rev. A, 43(9):5188, 1991. [115] J. Weiner, V. S. Bagnato, S. Zilio, and P. S. Julienne. Experiments and theory in cold and ultracold collisions. Rev. Mod. Phys., 71(1):1, 1999. [116] D. S. Weiss, E. Riis, Y. Shevy, P. J. Ungar, and S. Chu. Optical molasses and multilevel atoms: experiment. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 6(11):2072, 1989. [117] G. Zinner, T. Binnewies, F. Riehle, and E. Tiemann. Photoassociation of cold ca atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85(11):2292, 2000. 101 [118] Please see Clayton and Aaron’s Master’s Theses [119] S. B. Nagel, P. G. Mickelson, A. D. Saenz, Y. N. Martinez, Y. C. Chen, T. C. Killian, P. Pellegrini, and R. Cote .Photoassociative Spectroscopy at Long Range in Ultracold Strontium PRL 94, 083004 (2005) [120] Bergemann, JOSAB 6, 2249, 1989. [121] Petrich, PRL 74, 3352, 1995. [122] P.G. Mickelson, Y.N. Martinez, A.D. Saenz, S.B. Nagel, Y.C. Chen, T.C. Killian, P.Pellegrini, and R.Cote. Spectroscopic determination of the s-wave scattering lengths of [sup 86]sr and [sup 88]sr. Physical Review Letters, 95(22):223002, 2005. [123] A. Shashi, T. Killian, S. Nagel, P. Mickelson, Y. Martinez and A. Traverso Frequency Stabilization of Lasers using Tunable Atomic Vapor Laser Lock in preparation 2007 [124] A. Dunn, T.C.Killian Novel diode laser design for use at liquid nitrogen temperatures in preparation 2007 [125] C.E. Simien Master’s Thesis Rice University 2004 [126] A.D. Saenz Master’s Thesis Rice University 2005 [127] Y.N. Martinez Master’s Thesus Rice University 2006 102 [128] P.G. Mickelson Master’s Thesss Rice University 2006 [129] S.B. Nagel Master’s Thesis Rice University 2005 [130] Josh Dorr summer research project Rice University 2005