Download Causes of the Civil War

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Slavery in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Virginia in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Union (American Civil War) wikipedia , lookup

Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution wikipedia , lookup

Lost Cause of the Confederacy wikipedia , lookup

Hampton Roads Conference wikipedia , lookup

Secession in the United States wikipedia , lookup

United States presidential election, 1860 wikipedia , lookup

Border states (American Civil War) wikipedia , lookup

Tennessee in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Alabama in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Georgia in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Mississippi in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

United Kingdom and the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Origins of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

South Carolina in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Issues of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Causes
of the
Civil War
Despite some claims to
the contrary, there is
much evidence that
controversy about
slavery caused the
secession and the
subsequent Civil War.
(1) Comments by Robert Toombs, Sec. of State of the CSA, in 1849 while a US Senator from
Georgia, in the Senate, when debating slavery in the western territories
(2) Nashville Convention, 1850
(3) Statements made by leading Confederates before the secession
a. Jefferson Davis’ six resolutions in the Senate in 1860, and his final speech to the US
Senate in January 1861
b. Alexander Stephens’ Cornerstone Speech
(4) Crittenden Compromise (rejected by Lincoln)
(5) Statements Confederate commissioners made to southern states that had not yet seceded
(6) Declarations of secession by seceded states
Generally speaking, southern counties with few slaves voted to stay in the Union;
counties with many slaves voted to secede.
If the dispute was about slavery, why didn’t they just pass laws against it, like other nations did?
Britain did eliminate slavery this way, but there were few slaves in England itself when Parliament
abolished slavery in England in 1808; Parliament then in the 1830s abolished slavery in its Caribbean
colonies—colonies that had no representation in Parliament. When the US elected a President on a
platform of merely preventing slavery in the territories, the South seceded. There would have never
have been a way for the government to abolish slavery by passing a law—at least, not until the South
seceded.
Wasn’t the South about to end slavery, without a war? Wasn’t slavery becoming obsolete?
Slavery for agricultural work was not obsolete, and is even done to this day in certain locations around
the world. Certainly, slavery continued in other locations in the Americas for decades after the Civil
War, on sugar plantations. Nor is it easy to see the South as peacefully freeing slaves, when you look
at the Black Codes created in the South after abolition was forced upon them.
Did the South secede over “States Rights”?
The question must be asked: why was the Union imperiled to begin with? What rights did southern
states insist on, and want to defend against the federal government? Those having to do with slavery.