Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Social exclusion wikipedia , lookup
Sociology of knowledge wikipedia , lookup
Social constructionism wikipedia , lookup
Social group wikipedia , lookup
Sociological theory wikipedia , lookup
Sociology of the family wikipedia , lookup
Doing gender wikipedia , lookup
Cristina Nicolaescu, 2nd year PhD student University of Bucharest Teaching assistant REPRESENTATIONS OF GENDER IN THE FICTION OF ALICE MUNRO Abstract "Women have served all these centuries as looking-glasses possessing the magic and delicious power of reflecting the figure of a man at twice its natural size." (Virginia Woolf, A Room of One's Own) This paper is an attempt at demonstrating the close relationship between gender and human agency as mirrored in the fiction of a renowned feminist writer, in the context of contemporary Canada. Characters’ subjectivity in making choices and taking sides as opposed to the social restrictions, in search for a constant balance, is another major issue of my analysis. My choice of the topic was determined by the increased interest of gender studies in the Western culture and its revival in my country. Furthermore, I noticed a scarcity of comprehensive criticism of the two writers on this topic, particularly from this angle. In order to pursue my aims I will employ the arguments provided by psychoanalytical feminism, social theory and cultural studies in my approach on the main research corpus of short stories. For this, I have two principal aims in view: first, to see whether the ways in which gender is regarded at the theoretical level and at the level of everyday representations, went through major changes and second, how influential gender could be on human agency in connection with their thinking, behaviour, attitudes and other components of gender identity construction. Further, I may find it intriguing to analyze how the country’s identity determines the personal, social and cultural identity of her people. The selected books are the most representative for the topic I propose, illustrating gender difference best of all, which serves my demonstration and provides me with the elements necessary for a thorough argumentation, by making reference to the innovative narrative structure (The Lives of Girls and Women), or portrayals with the gradation and variety of feelings and sensations (The Progress of Love), opening of the plot into new spatial and temporal coordinates (The Moons of Jupiter), all this being distinct from the other collections of short stories by Alice Munro. Keywords: gender, feminism, agency, identity, relationships, difference In Canada, Munro has received three Governor General's Awards for Englishlanguage Fiction (the most for any author), two Giller Prizes, the Trillium Book Award and the Canadian Booksellers Award. Internationally, she has won the WH Smith Literary Award in the UK; the National Book Critics Circle Award and the O. Henry Award for Continuing Achievement in Short Fiction in the U.S.; the PEN/Malamud Award for Excellence in Short Fiction; the Rea Award for the Short Story; and the Libris Award. She has also won the Canada-Australia Literary Prize and the Commonwealth Writers Prize Regional Award for Canada and the Caribbean. Gender identity Gender is a fundamental aspect of personal and social identity and a biological, psychological, and cultural category of paramount importance. In addition, gender is often a criterion for social stratification and different political treatment, as well as a favored symbol for expressing values and beliefs. The purpose is to foster awareness of the importance of gender in personal and public life, and how public policy is shaped on a regional, national and international level. I will include herein the outputs of my gender-related research on economic, social and humanist issues. Sandra Harding suggests that the study of gender involves three dimensions, gender symbolism (culture), the socio-sexual division of labor (social structure) and gender identities (action and agency). Within sociology different theoretical traditions conceptualize gender in different ways, usually emphasizing one or another of these dimensions. Social roles are associated with particular positions in the social division of labor and provide scripts of femininity and masculinity that are learnt through the process of socialization. With the advent of postmodernism attempts to explain apparently universal gender inequalities of power were abandoned and the focus returned to gender as an attribute of individuals constructed through cultural practice. Instead of analyzing gender in terms of social structures and social systems the construction of gendered subjectivities of self and identity became important. This can be seen as part of the ‘cultural turn’ within sociology whereby culture displaced society and the economy as a focus of theoretical concern. This shift can be understood as a move from studying socio-sexual divisions of labor to studying gender symbolism and gender identities. Michel Foucault’s theorizations of discourse and power have been very influential in the way gender is conceptualized. The process of construction of subjectivities within gendered discourses and the ways that individuals engage with this construction have become an important focus for studies of gender. Butler conceptualizes gender as a system of signs that is infused with power. Gender, sexuality and identity are all elements of the discourse of heterosexuality and it is within discourses that power is constituted. The only way of challenging or resisting this power is to disrupt the elements of the discourse by doing gender in a way which challenges the assumed link between biological bodies and social gender (queer theory). Conceptualizations of gender as performance or as part of the discursive construction of subjectivities has been criticized for its lack of attention to systemic power relations which, it is argued, derives from Foucault’s apparent denial of an extra-discursive, material reality in which power is based. Many feminist sociologists continue to assert the importance of a materialist analysis of gender and sexuality. This new materialism sees gender as a constitutive part of the material basis of society and, like Judith Butler, argues that sex, as well as gender, is fundamentally social and that sexed bodies are socially constructed. Gender has also been conceptualized in terms of social practice and here the theories of Pierre Bourdieu, particularly his concepts of habitus and disposition have been influential. Bourdieu’s theory provides a materialist alternative to the idealism of Michel Foucault and post-structuralism. For him social reality exists, notwithstanding its social construction. This sets him apart from the idealist formulations of those who argue that social reality has no existence outside discourse. His concepts of disposition and habitus can be used to understand how it is that gendered social actors come into being and are predisposed to maintain (or to challenge) social relations as they have become familiar to them. These concepts can also be used to understand how gender differences are embodied through the acquisition of a gendered (and classed and ‘raced’) habitus. Thus a gendered habitus is reproduced through daily social practices such as sharing food and learning how to sit, move, dress and talk; gender is thereby conceptualized as embodied practice. And it is through social practice that gender relations are reproduced and/or transformed. This sort of approach can be found in the work of Cynthia Cockburn who explores the way in which gender identities, as well as having cultural meaning, are dependent on the continued existence of particular material social relations, and shows how gendered social actors reinforce or challenge gender relations through the social practices of their daily lives. Feminist becoming In order to remain useful to feminists one must stress its deliberate agency and the worth of lived experience. Feminist becoming, then, is a term to describe the complex process of women's diverse lived experience as women live it and as women structure it. Sociological theorizations of gender are therefore marked by a tension between idealist and materialist theories and between those which see gender as difference and those which take gendered power as fundamental to gender relations. For all, however, sex, sexuality and the body as well as gender have come to be seen as socially constructed. Interaction and influence In terms of relationships with the opposite sex (couple’s factors of stability/instability), less concern has been devoted to the effect of a person’s gender on the ability to influence other people. Being more influential, men exert their power on women’s agency through the roles they typically fill in a certain context of interaction. I will also analyze the communication style of interactants. Identity and Positioning A fundamental point is that each embodied female subject represents a complex network of identities and positions, and must be conceived of as a process in a constant state of dynamic transformation rather than a static entity. People interact and are influenced in their decisions on how to act/react, particularly when emotions are involved. I will address Hutcheon's, Butler's, and Irigaray's pioneering "notions of positionality". The social body As Turner (1991: 5) argues, forming the backdrop to sociology is an assumption that “the body is the central metaphor of political and social order”. Thus, talk of the body is always a talk of the social context, social practices and ideological processes that produce bodily matters. Cultural inscription models moved as far as possible away from biological explanations that were viewed as essentialist, reductionist and universalistic in the attempt to overcome the dualism between the mind and body and support the idea of the self as constituted through symbolic interaction. One of the key proponents of a view of the body as a socially constructed body is the French poststructuralist philosopher, Michel Foucault. As Turner (1984) argues, in the work of Foucault, we see a central commitment to a view of the human body as an effect of power and discourse. Now, the collection of work that Foucault produced throughout his life is vast, and shifted and changed from his earlier work on the disciplining of the body through to his later work on self-production contained within the three published volumes of The History of Sexuality. The concept of subjectification is linked to the work of Michel Foucault, which we will explore later in this chapter, and refers to the processes through which subjects are made, and make themselves into, particular kinds of subject. This leads discussion to the role of social structures in the formation of human subjectivities. As Shilling (1993: 81) argues, ‘the body is affected by discourse, but we get little sense of the body reacting back and affecting discourse’. There is assumed to be a tight fit between what is often termed the social body – that is, the body that is constructed within ideological and social processes – and the physical body. The social body is seen to mesh tightly with the physical body to the extent that they are seen to be copies or mirrors of each other. The term that is often used in the literature is ‘homology’, meaning that there is no separation between self and social identity. Because of the homology assumed within the literature a problem is set up: how to theorize agency? The concept of agency refers to the individual’s capacity to resist, negotiate or refuse the workings of disciplinary power, for example. This is usually spoken of as the structure/agency dichotomy and is often the starting point for contemporary work on the body across the humanities that are attentive to the body’s capacities for agency. I will explore different responses to the structure/agency dichotomy in the corpus under analysis. separations between the biological and the social, structure and agency, passivity and activity and the body and the self will be envisaged throughout the presentation, denying to view the body as socially determined in a way that removes from it any sense of agency or affectivity. The study of the body involves the use of its related key terms, such as: embodiment, corporeality, affect, emotion, materiality, discipline, process, practice and technique. Conclusions The discourse of psychoanalysis uses sexuality as the means by which we discover our true selves – of course just as these discourses promise to liberate, they set up strata of normalizing forces which inevitably restrict. Feminism’s early relationship to psychoanalysis was largely a critical one. The image of women as ‘castrated’ men who must prepare themselves for a passive sexual role conveys the idea of their secondary status to men – that their lack of the penis is translated in social terms as lack of power, status and authority. Luce Irigaray’s work on Freud, as well as Julia Kristeva’s, picked up on a more maternal model of psychoanalytical thinking and their appropriations of Freud owe a debt to the work of Jacques Lacan. They were drawn to Lacan’s reworking of Freud and then possibilities for theorizing identity within the sphere of language and challenging the phallic order. They suggest that one can be freed from the patriarchal stranglehold of the symbolic order through the use of poetic language, more associated with the unconscious, and therefore challenging to the male-identified symbolic. Several feminist readings of Munro have likewise described her narrative structure in terms of l'ecriture feminine. Rasporich, for example, states that her resistance to linear narrative gives rise to "multiple climaxes" and multiple epiphanies: a denial of the transcendent One through the divergent many (461-62). Her emphasis on alternating perspectives and contingent arrangements undermines any definite position, among those being the authority of patriarchy and its gender stereotypes. The reference to the ‘feminine’ principle of the unconscious at least suggests a space beyond the phallus and the possibilities of resistance, if not transformation o social realities based on the positioning of woman as other. Kristeva’s concept of the ‘abject’ represents that which is marginalized in society in the pre-Oedipal stage, which she calls the ‘semiotic’. Her emphasis on the maternal as against lesbian or other female identities has, however, led to some criticisms of her work. Theorists such as Irigaray are especially interesting because of the way they attempt to destabilise the masculine imagery of the phallus by using imagery based on the female anatomy. For Irigaray, female sexuality is seen as hidden and multiple in the experience of jouissance of the whole body rather than genitally expressed. (50 Key Concepts in Gender Studies) Munro’s stories persistently explore the ways in which contemporary society confers adult status on women and men as they accomplish certain tasks like finding jobs, getting married, having children, and accumulating property. She uses the old meaning of life as a journey, using as metaphors terms related to travel: arrival, destination, progress. "What are those times that stand out, clear patches in your life what do they have to do with it? They aren't exactly promises. Breathing spaces. Is that all?" (The Progress of Love 273). Many of Munro’s stories involve issues of love and sexual relationships that sweeps women’s private lives away, a good reason why they can be called psychological fiction. Munro is of the intricate interplay between desires and external forces the characters cannot really control. Mystery and surprise are basic components of every single story and Munro of the mystery in women’s emotional life. In Munro’s stories, you don’t know what’s going to happen next. She is interested in questions of authenticity. Lives of Girls and Women, is a coming-of-age story. Munro demonstrates what happens when the gulf between the sexes is such that each is isolated in its own discrimination both personally and socially. The Moons of Jupiter is an artistic achievement by the use of flashbacks in approaching the acts of loving and letting go, between connection and separation. Bibliography Primary sources Munro, Alice. Lives of Girls and Women. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971. -. The Moons of Jupiter. Toronto: Macmillan, 1982. -. The Progress of Love. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1986. Secondary sources Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge: New York. Connell, Bob (2005) Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press. Durkheim, E. (1960), ‘Le Dualism de la nature humaine et ses conditions sociales’ translated in K. H. Wolffe (ed.) Essays on Sociology and Philosophy. New York: Harper. Rasporich, Beverly. "The Short Story Writer as Female." Dance of the Sexes: Art and Gender in the Fiction of Alice Munro. Edmonton: U of Alberta P, 1990. 159-92. Shilling, C. (1993), The Body and Social Theory. London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: Sage, 2003 (2nd ed.) Turner, B. (1984), The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. 1st edn. Oxford and New York: Blackwell. Turner, B. (1991), ‘Recent Developments in the Theory of the Body’ in M. Featherstone, M. Hepworth and B. S. Turner (eds.), The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory. London, Newbury Park, New Delhi: Sage. Turner, B. (1996), The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. 2nd ed. London,Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.