* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Homework #3
Polynomial ring wikipedia , lookup
System of polynomial equations wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
Birkhoff's representation theorem wikipedia , lookup
Factorization wikipedia , lookup
Commutative ring wikipedia , lookup
Field (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup
Group (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup
Factorization of polynomials over finite fields wikipedia , lookup
Due Friday, 15 July 1. Homework #3 Math 4400 Consider the two integers n = 210 and n = 225. For each n, find all of the divisors of n, compute ϕ(d) for each divisor d of n, and then compute the sum of all of the ϕ(d), i.e., compute X ϕ(d). d|n 2. Repeat #1 for the integer n = pqr, where p, q, r are three distinct prime numbers. [Hint: there are 8 divisors of n.] 3. Suppose d, n are positive integers such that d | n. Prove that ϕ(d) | ϕ(n). 4. Compute the last three digits of 31215 . [Hint: compute ϕ(1000) and use Euler’s theorem.] 5. Compute the last three digits of 61215 . [Hint: compute it modulo 8 and modulo 125, then use Chinese Remainder Theorem.] 6. Let F be a field and n a natural number. Define µn to be the subset of F× given by µn = a ∈ F× : an = 1 . Prove that µn is a group under the multiplication inherited from the field. [Hint: recall the group axioms about closure, associativity, identity, and inverses.] Answers 1. X ϕ(d) = 210: d|210 d ϕ(d) X 1 1 2 1 3 2 5 4 6 2 7 6 10 14 15 4 6 8 21 30 35 12 8 24 42 70 105 12 24 48 210 48 ϕ(d) = 225: d|225 d ϕ(d) 2. 1 1 3 2 5 4 9 6 15 25 45 8 20 24 75 225 40 120 The divisors of n = pqr are 1, p, q, pq, r, pr, qr, pqr, so X ϕ(d) = ϕ(1) + ϕ(p) + ϕ(q) + ϕ(pq) + ϕ(r) + ϕ(pr) + ϕ(qr) + ϕ(pqr) d|n = 1 + (p − 1) + (q − 1) + (p − 1)(q − 1) + (r − 1) 1 + (p − 1) + (q − 1) + (q − 1) = 1 + (r − 1) 1 + (p − 1) + (q − 1) + (pq − p − q + 1) = r pq = pqr. 3. Suppose that d | n and that the prime factorization of d is d = pe1 1 pe2 2 · · · per r , where the pi are distinct primes and the exponents satisfy ei > 1. Since n is a multiple of d, the prime factorization of n must include all of the primes dividing n, with possibly larger exponents, as well as possibly additional primes. In other words, the factorization of n is of the form n = m pf11 pf22 · · · pfrr , where fi > ei and m is relatively prime to each of the pi . Now we compute: ϕ(d) = (pe1 1 − pe1 1 −1 ) · · · (per r − per r −1 ), and ϕ(n) = ϕ(m)(pf11 − p1f1 −1 ) · · · (pfrr − prfr −1 ). Since fi > ei > 1, each pei i − piei −1 term divides the corresponding pfi i − pfi i −1 term. This proves that ϕ(d) divides ϕ(n). Alternatively, consider the set P of primes dividing n. We can write this as the disjoint union P = Q ∪ R, where Q is the set of primes dividing d and R is the set of primes which divide n but not d. Then Y n (1 − p1 ) ϕ(n) nY p∈P = Y = (1 − p1 ). ϕ(d) d d (1 − 1 ) p p∈R p∈Q We know that n/d is an integer, but the product over p ∈ R of (1 − 1/p) is a rational number. The denominator of this rational number is the product of all the primes in R. Luckily, Qthe integer n/d contains at least one copy of each prime in R, so the number (n/d) p∈R (1 − 1/p) is indeed an integer, proving that ϕ(d) divides ϕ(n). 4. We compute ϕ(1000) = ϕ(8)ϕ(125) = 4 · 100 = 400. Since 3 is relatively prime to 1000, Euler’s theorem says that 3400 ≡ 1 (mod 1000). Therefore, 31215 ≡ (3400 )3 · 315 ≡ 13 · 315 ≡ 315 2 4 (mod 1000). 8 We have 3 ≡ 9, 3 ≡ 81, and 3 = 6561 ≡ 561, so 315 ≡ 38 34 32 3 ≡ 561 · 81 · 9 · 3 ≡ 907 1215 So, the last 3 digits of 3 5. (mod 1000). are 907. This is similar to the last problem, except that 6 is not relatively prime to 1000. Instead, we will separately compute 61215 modulo 125 and modulo 8. Once we know these two values, the Chinese Remainder Theorem will guarantee a unique solution modulo 1000. We start modulo 8 because it’s so simple: 63 ≡ 0 (mod 8) → 61215 ≡ 63 61212 ≡ 0 (mod 8). 1215 Now we compute 6 modulo 125. Since ϕ(125) = 100 and 6 is relatively prime to 125, we know that 6100 ≡ 1 (mod 125), so 61215 ≡ (6100 )12 · 615 ≡ 11 2 · 615 ≡ 615 2 4 (mod 125). 8 We have 6 ≡ 36, 6 ≡ 46, and 6 ≡ 116, so 615 ≡ 68 64 62 6 ≡ 116 · 46 · 36 · 6 ≡ 76 (mod 125). So, we know that 61215 is congruent to 0 modulo 8 and congruent to 76 modulo 125. This means it must be of the form 8u and of the form 76 + 125v. Setting these equal, we get 8u − 125v = 76. A first solution is u0 = −53 and v0 = −4, so all solutions are of the form u = −53−125t and v = −4−8t. In particular, 8u = 8(−53−125t) = −424−1000t. When t = −1, we get 8u = 576, so 576 are the last 3 digits of 61215 . 6. We need to prove that the set µn is closed under multiplication, that multiplication is associative, that there is an identity element in µn , and that each element of µn is invertible. Closure: suppose that a, b are two elements of µn . We want to prove that the product ab is an element of µn ; that is, we want to prove that (ab)n = 1. We raise ab to the nth power and use the fact that multiplication in a field is commutative to get (ab)n = an bn . Since a ∈ µn , we know that an = 1; and since b ∈ µn , we know that bn = 1. Therefore, (ab)n = an bn = 1 · 1 = 1, which means that ab ∈ µn . Associativity: for a, b, c ∈ µn , we want to prove that a(bc) = (ab)c. Since a, b, c are also elements of the field, and multiplication in a field is associative by definition, multiplication in a subset of the field is also associative. In other words, associativity is inherited from the multiplication in F. Identity: we already know that F× has an identity element which we call 1; that is, 1a = a for all a ∈ F. In particular, 1a = a for all a ∈ µn ⊂ F. And, since 1 is the identity, we know that 1n = 1, which shows that 1 ∈ µn . Therefore, µn contains the multiplicative identity. Inverses: we want to prove that each element a ∈ µn has an inverse in µn . Since µn ⊂ F× , we know that a is invertible in F× ; that is, there exists a−1 ∈ F× such that aa−1 = 1. Since (a−1 )n = a−n = (an )−1 = 1−1 = 1, we can say that the inverse of a is actually in µn , which is exactly what we needed to prove.