Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
International Environmental Law and Policy Series The Antarctic Environmental Protocol and its Domestic Legal Implementation by KEES BASTMEIJER KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL THE HAGUE / LONDON / NEW YORK Table of contents Series Editors' Preface Preface and acknowledgements List of abbreviations vii ix xix Introduction Chapter 1 Introduction to the Antarctic Treaty System and the objective of this book.... 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Introduction Characteristics of Antarctica and of the human presence in Antarctica 2.1 Facts about Antarctica 2.2 Antarctic flora and fauna 2.3 Human presence in Antarctica International management of the Antarctic: the Antarctic Treaty System 3.1 The Antarctic Treaty: history and content 3.2 The Antarctic Treaty System The Protocol on environmental protection Objective of this book Scope of the analysis 6.1 'Effectiveness'and'implementation'of an international agreement 6.2 The term 'domestic legal implementation' in this analysis 6.3 Selection of key issues 6.4 Selection of Contracting Parties Methodology 7.1 'Adequate'implementation: formulating minimum requirements 7.2 Comparative law considerations Structure 1 3 3 3 4 6 6 9 14 18 20 20 23 24 28 31 31 32 34 xii Table of contents PARTI Environmental protection in Antarctica and the domestic implementation of the Protocol General concepts Chapter 2 Environmental protection in Antarctica 1 2 3 4 5 Introduction 37 The roots of the Protocol: environmental protection in the ATS 38 2.1 Introduction 38 2.2 Protection of the terrestrial and marine living resources in Antarctica... 39 2.3 Protection and management of special Antarctic areas 42 2.4 The broader context of the protection of the Antarctic environment 43 2.5 Regulation of mineral resource activities 44 2.6 Involvement of environmental NGOs: action for World Park status 46 2.7 Antarctica as a common heritage of mankind 48 The Protocol: negotiations, added value and completeness 49 3.1 Negotiating the Protocol 49 3.2 Added value of the Protocol within the ATS 50 3.3 Completeness of the Protocol: overview of criticism 52 The relationship between the Protocol and other international agreements.... 58 Conclusion 61 Chapter 3 Introduction to the domestic implementation of the Protocol 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 37 63 Introduction 63 Factors influencing the domestic implementation of the Protocol 64 2.1 Factors related to a Contracting Party 64 2.2 Factors related to the Antarctic Treaty System and the Protocol 65 2.3 External factors 66 Domestic legal implementation of the Protocol: some general concepts 66 Practical implementation of the Protocol: some general concepts 68 International attention to the domestic implementation process since 1991... 70 The selected Contracting Parties 73 6.1 Introduction 73 6.2 The United Kingdom 73 6.3 New Zealand 77 6.4 The Republic of South Africa 81 6.5 The Netherlands 84 Conclusions 87 Table of contents xiii PART II The domestic legal implementation of the Protocol by the Contracting Parties Chapter 4 Scope: geographical area, protected values and jurisdiction 91 A. Introduction 91 B. The Protocol 92 B.I Geographical area to which the Protocol applies 92 B. 1.1 General description of the geographical area of application 92 B.1.2 The area south of 60 degrees South latitude 93 B.1.3 The area north of 60 degrees South latitude 97 B. 1.4 Minimum requirements for domestic legal implementation 97 B.2 Values protected by the Protocol 98 B .2.1 Diversity of wording in the Protocol 98 B.2.2 Categories of Antarctic values 99 B.2.3 Historic values 102 B.2.4 Minimum requirements for domestic legal implementation 103 B.3 Jurisdictional scope 104 B.3.1 Introduction 104 B.3.2 Jurisdiction over Antarctic expeditions 109 B.3.3 Regulating expeditions: are activities of all participants covered?... 119 B.3.4 Addressing the specific prohibitions and obligations of the Protocol 119 B.3.5 Article VIII of the Treaty: 'Antarctic Officials' 120 B.3.6 Overlap of jurisdiction 121 B.3.7 Minimum requirements for domestic legal implementation 122 B.4 Types of activities covered by the Protocol 122 B.4.1 'All activities' 122 B.4.2 Exceptions? 123 B.4.3 Minimum requirements for domestic legal implementation 125 C Discussion of the domestic legal implementation 125 C.I Geographical area of application 125 C.2 Protected values 128 C.3 Jurisdictional scope of application of domestic legislation 132 C.3.1 Jurisdiction with regard to Antarctic expeditions 132 C.3.2 Regulating expeditions: are activities of all participants covered?... 139 C.3.3 Addressing the specific prohibitions and obligations of the Protocol 144 C.3.4 Article VEI of the Treaty: 'Antarctic Officials' 145 C.3.5 Overlap of jurisdiction 147 C.3.6 Conclusions 152 C.4 Types of activities covered by domestic implementing legislation 154 D Conclusions 157 xiv Table of contents Chapter 5 Environmental Impact Assessment A. Introduction B. The Protocol B.I Introduction: Environmental Impact Assessment within the Antarctic Treaty System B.I.I Introduction B. 1.2 Development of Environmental Impact Assessment within the Antarctic Treaty System before the Protocol was adopted B.I.3 Environmental Impact Assessment in the Protocol B.1.4 Developments since 1991 B.2 Activities subjected to Environmental Impact Assessment B.2.1 Types of activities B.2.2 Changes in Antarctic activities B.2.3 Assessment of individual activities or categories of activities? B.2.4 Plans and programs related to Antarctic activities B.2.5 Minimum requirements for domestic implementing legislation B.3 Content of the Environmental Impact Assessment B.3.1 The Preliminary Assessment B.3.2 The Initial Environmental Evaluation B.3.3 The Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation B.3.4 Elements of the Environmental Impact Assessment that need special attention B.3.5 Minimum requirements for domestic implementing legislation B.4 Consultation B.4.1 Introduction B.4.2 Consultation requirements in the Protocol B.4.3 Minimum requirements for domestic implementing legislation B .5 Level of Environmental Impact Assessment B.5.1 Introduction B.5.2 Development of the levels of Environmental Impact Assessment and terminology since 1983 B.5.3 Minimum requirements for domestic implementing legislation B.6 Monitoring B.6.1 Introduction B.6.2 Monitoring obligations in the Protocol B.6.3 Minimum requirements for domestic implementing legislation C. Discussion of the domestic legal implementation C. 1 Place of Environmental Impact Assessment in the domestic implementing legislation C.I.I General concepts C. 1.2 The selected Contracting Parties: a closer look 163 163 165 165 165 166 167 169 171 172 175 175 177 178 178 179 180 181 181 184 185 185 187 189 190 190 190 194 195 195 195 196 197 197 197 198 Table of contents xv C.2 Activities subjected to Environmental Impact Assessment procedures C.2.1 Types of activities C.2.2 Changes in Antarctic activities C.2.3 Assessment of individual activities or categories of activities? C.2.4 Plans and programs related to Antarctic activities C.2.5 Conclusions C.3 Content of the Environmental Impact Assessment C.3.1 The use of the terms PA, IEE and CEE in the implementing legislation C.3.2 The Preliminary Assessment C.3.3 The Initial Environmental Evaluation C.3.4 The Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation C.3.5 Elements of the Environmental Impact Assessment that need special atten ti on C.3.6 Conclusions C.4 Consultation C.5 Determining the level of Environmental Impact Assessment C.5.1 The levels of Environmental Impact Assessment in domestic implementing legislation C.5.2 In search of more clarity: the international discussions C.5.3 The practice of conducting Comprehensive Environmental Evaluations C.5.4 Conclusions C.6 Monitoring D. Conclusions 248 250 251 254 Chapter 6 Authorizing activities in Antarctica 259 A. B. B.I B.2 B.3 Introduction The Protocol Introduction: development of human activities in Antarctica since 1991.... The decision whether an activity may proceed Legitimacy of human activities in Antarctica B.3.1 Mineral resource activities B.3.2 Scientific research B.3.3 Antarctic tourism B.3.4 Is there a hierarchy of activities? B.3.5 Minimum requirements for domestic implementing legislation.... B.4 Domestic legal implementation of Article 3 B.4.1 Content of Article 3 B .4.2 Legal status of the environmental principles B.4.3 To whom should Article 3 be addressed? B.4.4 Minimum requirements for domestic implementing legislation 201 201 204 205 206 206 207 207 208 212 215 219 229 231 242 242 247 259 261 261 266 268 268 273 276 282 283 284 285 286 289 290 xvi Table of contents B.5 The consequences of Article 3(2)(b) B.6 The precautionary principle B.7 Authorizing activities in specially protected or managed areas B.7.1. Introduction B.7.2 Antarctic Specially Protected Areas B.7.3 Antarctic Specially Managed Areas B.7.4 The value of the AS MA and ASPA in view of the increased human activities in Antarctica B.7.5 Minimum requirements for domestic implementing legislation.... B.8 The decision whether an activity may proceed: consultation and access to justice C. Discussion of the domestic legal implementation C.I Introduction C.2 The decision whether an activity may proceed: general characteristics C.3 Legitimacy of human activities in Antarctica C.3.1 Mineral resource activities C.3.2 Scientific research C.3.3 Tourism and other types of human activities C.3.4 Is there a hierarchy between types of Antarctic activities? C.3.5 Conclusions C.4 The domestic legal implementation of Article 3 C.5 The consequences of Article 3(2)(b) C.5.1 The consequences of Article 3(2)(b) for activities subjected to a CEE C.5.2 The consequences of Article 3(2)(b) for activities subjected to a PA or IEE C.5.3 An example: exploitation of Antarctic meteorites C.5.4 Conclusions C.6 The precautionary principle in Antarctica C.6.1 The implementing legislation and the precautionary principle C.6.2 An example: the Lake Vostok drilling project C.6.3 Conclusions C.7 Authorizing activities in specially protected or managed areas C.8 The decision whether an activity may proceed: consultation and access to justice D. Conclusions 291 293 298 298 299 301 301 305 305 309 309 309 313 313 320 322 328 329 330 336 336 337 340 343 344 344 346 348 349 352 357 Table of contents Chapter 7 Supervision and enforcement A. B. B. 1 B.2 B.3 B.4 C. C.I C.2 C.3 C.4 D. xvii 363 Introduction 363 The Protocol 365 Introduction: supervision and enforcement in the Protocol 365 Encouraging compliance: education, self-regulation and other instruments.. 367 B.2.1 Education 367 B.2.2 Encouraging compliance through self-regulation mechanisms 369 B.2.3 Other instruments 371 Supervision 373 B.3.1 Supervision 'from behind the desk' and the 'watch-dog role' of NGOs at the domestic level 373 B.3.2 The 'gateway check' 374 B.3.3 Inspections in the Antarctic Treaty area 375 B.3.4 Reports of Antarctic activities 380 Sanctions 381 Discussion of the domestic legal implementation 382 Introduction 382 Encouraging compliance: education, self-regulation and other instruments.. 383 C.2.1 Education 383 C.2.2 Encouraging compliance through self-regulation mechanisms: the relationship with the domestic implementing legislation 388 C.2.3 Other instruments 393 Supervision 395 C.3.1 Supervision 'from behind the desk' and the 'watch-dog role' of NGOs at the domestic level 396 C.3.2 The'gateway check1 398 C.3.3 Inspections in the Antarctic Treaty area 401 C.3.4 Reports of Antarctic activities 408 Sanctions 410 Conclusions 413 PART ffl Conclusions and recommendations Chapter 8 Conclusions The Protocol and its domestic legal implementation: joint protection of a natural reserve? 1 2 Legal protection of the Antarctic environment: two key questions The domestic legal implementation of the Protocol by the selected Contracting Parties: an overview 421 421 423 xviii 3 4 5 Table of contents 2.1 Differences between the implementing legislation: some general concepts 2.2 Did the Contracting Parties adequately incorporate the key provisions of the Protocol into their domestic legal systems? 2.3 Is the domestic legislation stricter? 'Comprehensive protection' of Antarctica through the complex of domestic legal systems 3.1 Introduction 3.2 The scope of application of the Protocol's regime: 'joint jurisdiction' ? 3.3 Environmental Impact Assessment 3.4 Authorizing activities in Antarctica 3.5 Supervision and enforcement 3.6 Will the complex of the domestic legal systems of the Contracting Parties adequately ensure a 'comprehensive protection' of the 'natural reserve' of Antarctica, as specified by Article 2 of the Protocol? Strengthening joint management in Antarctica 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Searching for a solution: institutionalisation of the Antarctic Treaty System? 4.3 Strengthening 'joint management' by improving the existing management system 4.4 Recommendations Final remarks 423 426 433 434 434 434 438 441 445 446 449 449 450 452 455 472 Annex, Bibliography and Index Annex: Domestic Antarctic legislation and selection of documents 477 Bibliography 491 Index 513