Download LD5655.V856_1971.I62

Document related concepts

History of subatomic physics wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear physics wikipedia , lookup

Atomic nucleus wikipedia , lookup

Resonance (chemistry) wikipedia , lookup

Bent's rule wikipedia , lookup

Molecular orbital diagram wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Chemical bond wikipedia , lookup

Hypervalent molecule wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Nuclear Quadrupole Coupling in
Transition Metal Compounds
by
Shen-Dat Ing
'Ihesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Unlversity
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
in
Der.arlment of Chemistry
APPROVF.01
I
Thomas C. Ward
H~r.old
M. McNair
Ray" F, 1Tipswora'
November, 1971
B1acksburp,.
Virgln1~
f
>
-
- "'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
LIST OF TABLES.
t
t
t
t
t
I
UST OF FIGURES • • • • • '
I
I
t
I
I
I
......
INTRODUCTION. • • • • • • • • • • • •
•
I
I
t
I
t
I
I
I
e
I
I
I
iv
v
• • • • • • • • • • • • vii
• • • • •
REVIEW OF THEORETICAL CONCEPTS
A). NQR Energy Levels and Transl tions.
I
I
I
I
f
I
... ....
I
1
• •
4
B). Interpretation of Nuclear Quadrupole Coupling Data • •
1). Townes Dailey Empirical Approach • • • • • • • • •
2). Semiquantitative Quantum Mechanical Evaluation • •
21
21
28
'
UTERA TURE REVIEW
A).
Bis(tetracarbonylcobalt)tin Derivatives. • • • • • • •
B). Copper(I)'Ihiourea and Substituted 1biourea ComplP.xes •
1). Thiourea Complexes • • • • . • • • • • • • • , •
2). Substituted 1biour.ea Complexes • • • • • • • . ,
34
46
46
52
EXPERIMENTAL
...
54
Compounds. • • • • • • • • • • • , • • , , , • • •
54
B). Instrumentation
1). Superregenerative Zeeman-Modulated Spectrometer. •
59
59
60
C), NQ.R Data • • • • • • • • •
A) • Preparatory Work
1). Bis(tetracarbonylcobalt)tin Compounds.
2), Copper(!) Thiourea and Substituted Thiourea
2), Method of Frequency Measurement. , • • • • • , • •
54
•
• • • • • • • •
64
A). Bis(tetracarbonylcobalt)tin Compounds.
..... . .
76
• • • •
•
DISCUSSION
ii
'
I
iii
Page
B), Copper(!) thiourea and substituted thlourea
complexes •••
• • •
• •
• •
C). Molybdenum Oxyhalides.
BIBLIOORAPHY. • •
• • • • • • •
• • 109
• •
• • • • • 112
• •
..
84
• •
• • •
..
• •
• 115
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
'Ille author wishes to express his appreciation to his major
professor, Dr. Jack D, Graybeal, for his patience and help during the
courses of this investigation.
He would also like to thank his parents
for their constant encouragements and sacrifice, without that the task
of this work would be impossible.
'Ille financial support of the National Science Foundation, as
well as the Chemistry Department at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and
State University are both acknowledged with gratitude.
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Ta.ble I
Secular Equations for Nuclei with Half
Integral Spin, , • , , , • , , , , • , • • • •
16
'!able II
Fol'llulas for the Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance
Frequencies, , , , , • , , , , , • • , • , • ,
l?
Table III
Calculated Frequency Ratio for I • ?/2 , , , ,
20
Table IV
Quadrupole Coupling Constants for -f VaJues
for Diatomic Halogen Molecules , • • , • , , ,
23
Table V
Ionic Character of Diatomic HaUdes Obtained
From Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance Data , , • ,
26
Table VT
Operator for EFG Tensor Components • •
JO
Table VII
EFG Tensor Components for Cu • • , • • • • • •
31
Table VIII
Infrared Spectral of Bis(tetracarbonylcobalt)
Derivatives • • • • • • • • • • • , • • • • • •
37-38
Table IX
'!he Observed Absorbance Ratio and the Co-M-Co
Angles in Bis(tetracarbonylcobalt) Derivatives
of Sn and Ge Compounds , • , , • , , , • • • ,
44
nt.ble X
NMR Spectra.
45
nt.ble XI
Bond Angles (deg) and lengths (A) in Thiourea
and Trls(thiourea)copper(I) chloride
Th1'le XTT
Phyi=iical Properties of Bis(tetracarbonylcnbaJt) Tin Co~pound~. , . , , , •• , , ,
.....
• • • •
Elemental 'ral:ir.::is for Cnpper
Ta.l-~_e
XIV
....
C~~pnunds,
..
,
N~~ ~rP-~~ters fnr Bi~(te~t"e.~~~bonyJe~balt)­
't'ln(IV) Co111rounds. . • • • • • • • . • , • •
Frequencies for Cu(I) Complexes
51
. ..
Table XV
ObsP""."Ved
Table XVI
ObservP.d NQR ~e~uencies in Molybdenum
Com'Pounds , . • , , • , , , , , . , • ,
nt.ble XVII
Experimental O~erved Frequencies Ratio and
the AsYl1l!lletry Parameter Determined from
f.5
69
..
?4
Figure 22, • • • , • • , • , , • • • • • , • •
?8
v
.'
vi
..
Page
Table XVIII
NQR Data for Tin Compounds ••• • • • • •
Table XIX
Orbital Populations in Fe(co) 5•••• , •••
83
Table XX
Bond Direction of Cu-5 and Cu-Cl bonds w1 th
Respect to x, y, z Axis System • • • • • • • •
93
Table XXI
Angular Part of the Atomic Wave functions • •
94
Table XXII
Angular Contribution of One Electron in a
Single Atomic Orbital • • • • • • • • • • • •
96
Table XXIII
The Total Contribution of One Electron in a
Single Atomic Orbital • , •• , • • • • • , ,
97
Table XXIV
The Contribution of a Single Electron in a
Hybrid Orbital to the Z-EFG Tensor Component.
Table XXV
Estimated Orbital Population and Charge
Density • • • • • • • , • • • • • • • • • • •
99
Table XXVI
Ionic Contribution of Cl, Cu and S, to be
qzz-EFG Tensor Component • • • • • • • • • • •
101
Table XXVII
Bond D1-rection of Cu-S, Cu-s Bonds with
Respect to x, y, z Axis System • • • • •
Table XXVIII
The Contribution of a Single Electron in a
Hybrid Orbital to the Z-EFG Tensor Component,
107
Table XXIX
Estimated Or.bital Population and Charge
Densities , , •• , •••
108
•
Table XXX
•
f
•
•
•
•
Ionic Contribution of Cl, S and Cu to q
...
•
zz
• •
..
80
105
110
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1
Vectorial Representation of Nuclear
Quadrupole Coupling, • • • • • • • • • • • , •
6
Figure 2
Frequency Ratio vs As)'llJlletry Parameter • • • •
19
Figure 3
Electronegativity Difference vs Ionic Character
as Detenained by Different Investigators • • •
25
Figure 4
Effect of Halogen Substituents on the Carbonyl
Stretching Frequencies in XnRJ-nGeCo(co) 4 . • .
35
5
Schematic Representation of -Interaction
Between Ge-Co and Co-CO Groups • • • • • • • •
36
Figure
Figure 6
Infrared Spectrum of ~lSn Co(Co) 4 2-cs
Figure ?
Infrared Spectnim of ~2sn Co(Co) 4 2-c 2v
Ty'pe • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Ty'pe
t
•
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
I
t
I
t
t
t
I
...
40
41
Figure 8
A1 Mode. , , , • , • , , , • , , • , • • , , •
43
Figure 9
B Mode,
1
43
Figure 10
View Along the b-Axis Showing the Chain Type
Structure in Tris(thiourea)copper(I)
.. .. . .... . .. .....' .
chloride , . . . . . . , . . . . , , , . . . .
48
View of the Bis(thiourea)copper(I) chloride
Chain Down the b-Axis Showing the Important
Distances and Angles • • • • • • • • , • • , •
50
View Normal to Cu(l)-S(2)-CU(2) Plane of
to Make the 'Ibree Center De localized Electron Pair Bridge Bond • • • • • • •
53
Figure 13
Block Diagram of Superregenerative NQR
Spectrometer • • • • • • • , , • • • • • • • •
61
Figure 14
Spectrum of a Superregenera t1 ve Spectrometer •
6J
35c1 in c1 2sn Co(co) 4 2 • • •
66
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure
15
Orbitals Used
NQ.R Resonance of
of 59co(.5/2-? /2) in c1 2sn Co(Co) 4 2 67
Figure 16
NQR Spectrum
Figure 17
NQR Spectrum of '> 9Co(lI 2-3I 2) in c1 2sn Co(Co) 4 2 68
vii
viii
Page
Figure 19
NQR Spectrum of 63eu in Cu{etu) 2c1. • • • • • ,
NQR Spectrum of 63eu in
Cu(etu) 4 2so4 • • • •
71
Figure 20
NQR Spectrum of ?9ar in Cu(etu) 2Br • • • • • • ,
?2
Figure 21
NQR Spectrum
of Mo Isotope in Mooc14 • • • , , •
15
Figure 22
Freq~ency Ratio vs Asymmetry Parameter Plot
for 9co in c12sn Co(Co) 4 2 • • • • , , • • • •
11
Figure 23
Resonance forms of Various legends, , • • • • •
88
Figure 24
q
-EFG vs Internuclear Distance ••• , • • • •
zz
Orientation of Bonds in Cu(tu) 2c1 •. , , , , ,
90
Figure 18
Figure 2_5
?O
92
Figure 26
Structure of Tris(dimethylthiourea)Copper(!)
Chloride. • • • • , • , • , , • • • • • • , • • 103
Figure 71
Orientation of Bonds in Cu(dmtu) 3c1 • . , , • • lo6
INTRODUCTION
Since the first experiments regarding the properties of nuclei,
much interest has been centered on the interaction between the nucleus
and various environmental factors, particularly magnetic fields and
electric fields.
As a result of such studies it has been found that
nuclei can possess magnetic dipole moments, electric quadrupole moments
and higher multipole moments.
The fact that soma nuclei have an
electric quadrupole aoment that can interact with the surrounding
electric field is the basis for nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQJt)
spectroscopy.
A nucleus in any molecular environment is surrounded by electrons
and other nuclei.
'lbese electrons and nuclei are electrical in nature
and result in the production of an electric field at the nuclear site.
'Iha electric quadrupole moment of the nucleus may then interact with
the surrounding electric field in such a manner as to produce a discrete
set of energy levels.
Transl tions between these levels may be observed
directly by application of radio-frequency energy of the correct
frequency.
'lhe frequencies of these observed transitions depend on
the quadrupole moments of the nuclei and the electric field gradient
(EFG) tensor components of the surrour¥11ng electric fields.
Since
the nuclear quadrupole moment is a constant for a particular nucleus,
a knowledge of the EFG tensor components can be obtained exper!Mntally.
'lbese in turn can be correlated with the electronic distribution in
the molecule and hence with the type of bonding occuring in the molecule.
In this light, the quadrupole moment serves as a probe for
l
2
examining the internal electronic configuration of a molecule or of a
crystalline solid.
Elucidation of the bonding properties of atoms in
solids may be afforded by judicious interpretation of the results of
such experiments.
The study of insertion reactions by inserting metal containing
groups into the Co 2 (co) 8 to form. a metal-metal covalent bond was
initiated by Grahaa35,
Infrared. and nuclear magnetic resonance studies
on these compoums have shown definite trends in the infra.red stretching frequencies, the intensity of the infra.red spectra and the NMR
coupling constants.
Since the observed NQR frequency of a particular
Co nucleus is sensitive to the local electronic environment a knowledge of the NQR frequencies and the electric field gradient tensor
components derivable from it can be correlated with the electronic
distribution in the molecule and hence with the type of bonding
occuring in the molecule.
A correlation between the findings of NQR
studies and those of IR and NMR can further the understanding of the
nature of bonding in these compounds.
63cu and 65cu NQ.R resonance frequencies in cu 2o and KCu(CN) 2
were reported in the early 1950•s,
resonances have been reported.
Since then, no other copper
The reported resonance frequencies for
both compounds were within the range of the available spectrometer so
this area constituted an open field for exploration.
Due to the
inherent broadening of NQR transitions by the presence of a paramagnetic species investigatioru> of Cu NQR frequencies were restricted
to Cu(I) compounds.
A series of Copper(!) thiourea and substituted
thiourea complexes were chosen for investigation.
'nlese studies were
directed toward learning more &bout the nature of the bonding in these
compounds.
In an effort to extend the use of NQR to new systems several
molybdenwn compounds were investigated.
Resonances which are
attributable to Mo nuclei were observed but precise assignment to a
particular isotopic species is impossible due to limitations on the
operating range of the spectrometer.
'nle limited nUJllber of observations
severely restrict the relationship of the observed frequencies to
bonding properties,
.REVIBV OF THEORETICAL CONCiiPTS
Al.
NQR Energy I.eva1@ am Transitions.
The theory of nuclear quadrupole coupling in both atoms and
molecules has been extensively discussed in several general
monographs?,12,27,.54.
In this section we will present a brief review
of those aspects of the theory which are of particular appllcabill ty
to the studies discussed in this dissertation.
'nle discussion will
thus be llmi ted to interactions in solids, nuclei of half integer
spin, and the case of no external magnetic field.
When a crystal containing an electrically asymmetric nucleus is
pl.aced in an oscillating magnetic field it may absorb magnetic energy
at certain frequencies determined by the electrical interaction of
the nucleus with its surrowdings.
With an asynuaetric nucleus the
important electrical interaction is expressed as a product of the
gradient of the electric field at the nucleus am the quadrupole
moment of the nucleus.
rupole coupling.
'nlis interaction is known as nuclear quad-
The Hamiltonian, H, describing the interaction
between a nucleus azxi the surrounding electronic charge may be
written as
r
(1)
where P (n ) is the charge density external to the nucleus in the
e
e
volume element dVe at position/\.e with respect to the center of the
nucleus and Pn(Vn) is the charge density of the volume element dVn
4
.
'
5
within the nucleus at a positionlln with respect to the center of the
nucleus,
Ile and
"n
'nle
vector~
is from dVn to dVe and 9en is the angle between
as shown in Figure l,
By employing the law of cosines
l • (r 2 + r 2 + 2r r Cos 9 )-l/2
r
or
e
en
n
l - (1 +(rn)2 - 2
r
re
51 Cos e
r
re
(J)
)1/2 l
en
re
re
and expanding F.quation (3) in a power series in
l • l
(2)
en
An
;z:-,
e
one obtains
[ 1 +?-Pl + ( rn) 2 P2 + .... J
e
re
where P is the Legendre polynomial, i.e.,
e
P1
Cos 9en
P • 1 (J Cos 2e -l)
2
2
en
(4)
111
(5)
etc,
Substitution of F.quation (4) into equation (1) results in a series of
terms, the first corresponding to the interaction of the surrounding
field with the nuclear charge, the second corresponding to the interaction of the field with the nuclear electric dipole moment and the
third corresponding to an interaction of the field with the nuclear
electric quadrupole moment,
'Ille third term is the one of interested
in this study.
In general a term in P,.t corresponds to a multi pole
moment of
'nle expression resulting froa substituting »1uations
zl. ,
(4) and (5) into equation (1) is,
6
7
P (r )/v
e e
e
ve vn
3J dVndVe
(6)
One must point out here that the condition for· the use of the
power series expansion to derive equation (4) is that An<\•
~uation
(6) therefore is valid only if this same condition is f'ul-
filled.
As a consequence of this condition, we have in effect
excluded all electronic charges which penetrate the nucleus.
an exclusion, however, does not pose a serious problem.
Such
It is known
that only s-electrons have a non-zero probability of penetrating the
nucleus, and because of their spherically symmetric distribution they
produce no observable interaction with the nuclear electric quadrupole
moment.
One may reexpress
~uation
(6) in terms of cartesian coordi-
nates by using the relationship
~ xix
e ni
1
(7)
to yield
JV P ( r
H •
Q
n
n
n
)( JX ix • n nJ
Si J.rn 2 ) d vn
(8)
However, if one defines ~j and ( E)ij by the relationships
~ Pn(rn)(JXnixnj - ~ijrn2 )dVn
-
vn
(9)
8
and
(vE)
1j
• -
(10)
-Then,
1
HQ
..,
-
6 ~
Cl
..
(11)
Qij(9E)ij •Qi 'IE
ij
where the double dot indicates a scalar product of two second rank
tensors,
This may be verified by direct expansion of &luation (11)
using the first form of Equation (9) and the second form of F.quation
(10).
(11) is the most generally used representation for H •
Q
It consists of two tensors Q (the quadrupole tensor) and VE (the
~uation
electric field gradient tensor) whose elements ~j and ( E)ij have
-
been defined by F.quations (9) and (10) respectively.
of F.quations (9) and (10) both
... and
Q
By inspection
VE can be shown to be traceless
tensors.
The elements of the Q tensor can also be represented by the form42
(12)
where Ii and Ij are components of the nuclear spin operator I and C is
a constant scalar quantity.
The arbitrary constant C may be expressed
in terms of a scalar nuclear quadrupole moment Q, which is a measure
of the departure of the nuclear charge distribution from spherical
symmetry.
This scalar moment is defined by
l
Q:e
(13)
9
(YE) 0
!2 Vzz
•
(vE)
l6 (Vxz!
*
(vE)+ - -
(18)
i vyz)
(V - V + 21 V )
xx
yyxy
.±2 "" GI u
Any symmetric tensor may be transformed to a principal axis
system and thus be diagonalized.
(9E)
1be diagonalized tensor components are,
• l V : l eq
2 zz 2
0
(9E)!l • 0
(tE).±2 •
(19)
J
6 (vxx- vyy)
where
q•lv
e zz
'l.·
(20)
v -v
~ v:y
zz
By using the convention
Ivxx l ~ tvyyI &Ivzz I
'l may
c21)
have values from 0 to 1.
V
xx
=
V
yy
= ..l
2
V
zz
For
...
'l• 0,
l qe
(22)
2
'Ihis corresponds to cylindrical (axial) symmetry about the z-a.xis of
the principal axis system.
vxx ...
0
vzz - -vyy -
For the ease
't. • 1,
(23)
eq
10
where the subscript m1 • I indicates the integral is carried out for
the nuclear state with the aagnetic quantum nWllber m1 •I.
It can
also be defined by
(14)
where
(.IIIQzzlII) • C (IIl3(Iz) 2 - I 2 fII)
• C (31 2 - I(I
(15)
+ l)j
• C I (2J - 1)
therefore using Equation (12)
Q
1j
•
eQ
(16)
I(2I-l)
At this point, it is of interest to point out that it is generally
considered that nuclei with spin I • O, 1/2 do not have quadrupole
moments.
'Ibis is incorrect however as Cook4 has pointed out.
Nuclei
with I ... O, 1/2 can have quadrupole moments, but it is impossible to
observe a nuclear electric multipole moment of order greater than
2.f where
l •
2I.
Let us now examine the electric field gradient tensor.
'!be EFG
tensor elements given by F.quation (10) can be expressed in terms of
the v1 j ... ~i ~X.
nucleus.
The
1
J
where V is the electrostatic potential at the
units of v1 j are cm-3.
..
Since VE is a traceless
symmetric tensor and the IaplAce condition
vxx
+
vyy
+
vzz •
0
must be satisfied,7 there are 5 irreducible tensor components
(1?)
11
nie asymmetry parameter,
'l•
is therefore a measure of the departure
of the electric field from axial symJ11etry about the principal z-axis.
Next we will relate the observed frequencies to the quantities q, and
The quadrupole energy level matrix elements will be
(24)
where m takes the values ma I,I-1,•••••••·-I. Since
(ml~lm) .. m smm'
(ml IX
(25)
.! iIYlm') .. ((Im)(I+{m+1)) 1/ 2 S m,!l, m•J
where I , I , I designate the components of the spin angular momentum
z
y
x
operator I, the only non-zero matrix elements become
(26)
and
The
energies of the quadrupolar states are then g1 ven by
e2~
E ... 41(
-1)
~
(1(1+1)-m{m+1)] 112 [(I+l)I -
(m,!l)(m.:tZ~l/2
(28)
The quantity e~ is commonly known as the nuclear quadrupole coupling
constant,
For an axially symmetry case, i.e.
'l • O,
the only non-zero
matrix elements come from F.quation (26) and the energies are given by
12
(29)
where
Inspection of nt,uation (29) shows that all levels, except that
one with m .. O, are doubly degenerate.
'Illus for half-integral spins
there are I+l/2 energy levels and for integral spins there are I+l
energy levels.
In order to observe transitions between quadrupole enerfzy' levels
one can in principle either apply an oscillating electric field, thereby
producing an electric field gradients at the nucleus which would interact
with the electric quadrupole moment of the nucleus or apply an oscillating magnetic field to obtain an interaction of the nuclear magnetic
moment and the external osci llatJ_ng magnetic fielti.
would require an electric field of 1014 volts/cm 2 8 ,
to be practical,
'Ille forrner method
'lllls is too large
'Ille second method is generally employed,
interaction involves an electromagnetic field a
Since the
time-depend~nt
Hamiltonian must be considered,
The time-denendent Hamiltonian re,resenting this interaction is given by7
H•(t)
where
= - {'fi(Hx I x +Hy-y
__ T +HI)
z z
(Jo)
f is the magnetogyric ratio, h is Planck's constant, I x , I y ,
Iz the components of the angular momentum operator I, and Hx' Hy, Hz,
the x, y, z - components of a linearly
magnetic field, 2H Cos wt,
~olarized
oscillating electro-
'Ille transition probability which 1s
proportional to the matrix element <mlH' (t) I m•> 2 can therefore
lJ
be calculated with the aid of F.quation (25).
case,
For the. axially symmetric
'l"'" o, the selection rules are •a "'" o, and
Jj
m•
±1.
For
Am• o, transitions can be produced only by the z-component of the
magnetic field and involve no change in energy and are of no interest
here.
For
4
m•
±1,
the maximum transition probe.bill ty can occur only
if the Bohr condition
(Jl)
is satisfied.
1be frequencies of the quadrupole transitions for the axially
symmetric case are thus given by
E · -E
Wm
... m+l m
'fl
., -?t
(2 m + 1)
(32)
Again there are I - 1/2 and I - 1 doubly degenerated levels for half
integer and integer nuclear spin respectively.
If I and mare known,
then e~q may be calculated from the measured absorption frequency.
If m is not known, as is often the case for spin I""J/2, the values of
m and m may be uniquely determined by the ratio
1
2
For the case, I
(33)
2 m2 + l
w2
m
J/2,
there is only one transition frequency which,
when one assumes 1(. • O, is given by
w ...
E±J/2-E±.1/2
'fl
--
6A
1i
-
(34)
,.
,,
;
..
14
'l ,
'!he problem of deriving expressions relating e~,
and v,
becomes much more complex for the non-axially symmetric case.
normal selection rules, 4 a • O,
values of
'l> 0.1,
corresponding to
'lbe
.:!: 1, no longer hold, In fact, for
the probability for observation of transitions
A 11 •
.:!: 2 becomes quite large43, 'Ibis is because
of mixing of the pure magnetic dipoles states differing in a by
.:!: 2.
Ve now not only have to consider the diagonal matrix elements Hmm •
(.m\HQtm) but also the
off~iagonal elements
Hm, m.!2
m~mlHQlm.:!:2)
I
'!bus for I • 3/2, the energy matrix has the form
0
H3/2 3/2-E
H
Q
-
0
H'.3/2,-1/2
0
0
Hl/2,-3/2
Hl/2 1/2-E
H
-E
-1/2-1/2
0
H-1/2, 3/2
H
-J/2, 1/2
0
where H
'!;J/2,"!;J/2
"' JA
H
, +1/2.±1/2
= -JA
0
and H
+1/2!)/2
(35)
0
H
-J/2-3/2
=
-E
/3A 'l•
Upon reordering of the columns and rows, this matrix has the form,
HQ
=
HJ/2 J/2-E
HJ/2,-1/2
H
-1/2,J/2
H
-E
-1/2-1/2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Hl/2 1/2-E
H+l/2-3/2
0
0
H
H
-E
-3/2-3/2
-J/2-1/2
(36)
15
'!he matrix is thus factored into two identical submatrices which
when solved given the energy levels,
E,!1/2
E
.:tJ
I
2
"" - JA (1 +
+ JA (l+
=
i
2)1/2
{37)
~)1/2
J
F.quation (J?) clearly demonstrates that the mixing of the magnetic
dipole states does not remove the m- degeneracy of the energy level.
Again, only a single frequency is observed for I • 3/2.
w {!3/2
-+ + 1/2) •
e~Q
(1 + ' 2 ) 112
(38)
In a similar manner the secular equations for I •
9/2 may be derived.
5/2, 7/2 and
They are tabulated in Table I.
The equations tabulated in Table I are not readily solvable with
the exception I
= J/2. A numerical approach is generally used to
solve these secular equations5,26,2,43,
Table II tabulates the
absorption frequencies in terms of "( , for
series expansion in
1t
'l. ~ 0. 25,
where a power
may be used.
From the ratio of the measured absorption frequencies it is
possible to obtain both
spins except for I
1l and
e~ for nuclei with half integral
= 3/2. For I
=
3/2, Zeeman splitting of the
quadrupole frequencies must be studied in order to obtain
'l...
and
e~ independently.
It was pointed out in the last paragraph that, for I • J/2,
both
1l
and e 2Qq can be independently determined from the ratio of
measured absorption fre11uencies.
Cohen 2 ha.s tabulated the eigenvalues
16
TABIE I
Secular equations for nuclei
with half integral spin
Uni ts of Energy
I
Secular F.quation
3/2
l
5/2
£2
- 7(3+ rC>E-2(1-
7/2
E. 4
- 14(J+ 1',2)
9/2
l5 - ll(J+t,2) l J-44(1- 'l..2) l 2+
2 -
3(3
+~) -o
(,
t 2) .,. o
{.
£ 2-6/.1.(1- 'l 2)l +35 (3+ 'l2)
-t48(J+ 'l.2) (1-
l
2)
Q
0
= 0
4i' (J+1()2£
-
-
E/A
E/2.A
l
= E/'JA
l.
::a
E/6A
17
TABLE II
Formulas for the Nuclear Qua4rupole
Resonance Frequencies2
I • 3/2
I • 5/2
w •
wl
w
2
I • 7/2
2fi
-
{l +
1t. 2/J)l/2
2
l.. {~) {l +o.o 26'l2 - o.6:34t 4 )
20
2
{~)
- £..
20
wl
• L
w'.3
... 1-
w2
I • 9/2
~
14
14
... L.
14
w • L
24
1
(1 + 0.2037 '{ 2 + 0,162 Jt4 )
ce~Qri)
{1 + 50.865 , 2 - 10l.29't4 )
1')
{1 - 2.8014 ~ 2 - 0.52781' 4 )
{8
{ 8 ~)
'*'
{1 - 15.867
~ 2 + 52.052 'l 4 )
{l + 9.0333 { 2 - 45.6911(_ 4 )
(~)
(1 - 1.J3811l, 2 + ll.724'l..4 )
... .1._
24
{~)
(1 .. 0.1857'l.2 - 0,1233'l,4 )
4
"4 = -24
{~-)
(1 - 0.08091(. 2 - 0,00437{.4 )
w
.. i
WJ
2
24
J8
for the equations listed in Table I for values of
intervals of 0,1.
frequency ratios vs
'l
from 0 to 1 at
Using these eigenvalues one can plot the calculated
'l
for the allowed transitions,
From the inter-
cepts of these curves with horizontal lines constructed of the observed
frequency ratios, one obtains the value of
'l
1l·
Since a single value of
gives rise to a unique set of frequency ratios, the measure frequency
ratios should intercept the calculated curves in a vertical line,
Fig, 2 shows an enlarged section of such a plot,
Table III contains
caleula ted frequency ratios for transl tions of interest in this work.
19
o. '.30
.-
..-.
- - - - - - - - - -- - - -
0.20
0.10
o.o
O.J
Figure 2
Frequency Ratio vs Asymmetry Parameter
0.5
20
TABLE III
Calculated Frequency Ratio
for I "'7/2
'l
~~=~~
~2
~2
0.1
2.89)88
1.50676
1.92059
0.2
2.63218
1.52453
1. 72655
o.J
2.)1877
1.54725
1.49863
o.4
2.02199
1.56812
1.28943
0.5
1.7662)
1.58098
1.11716
21
B.
Interpretation of Nuclear Quadrupole Coupling Ila.ta
A variety of techniques have been considered for the interpre-
tation of NQR data7,l2 ,27,
Two methods, the Townes-Da.iley approach
and a semiquantitative quantum mechanical calculation will be reviewed
as they will be refered to in later discussions,
'!be fundamental quantities determined by nuclear quadrupole
resonance measurements are e~ and
1l .
The nuclear quadrupole coupling
constant, e~, ls the product of a nuclear property, Q, and a molecular property, q.
Since the nuclear quadrupole moment, Q, is a
constant for a given nucleus and in most cases is known, the molecular
EFG tensor component, q, can be determined from the measured nuclear
quadrupole coupling constant.
On the other
hand~
the quantity q could
be estimated if the charge distribution over the molecule were known,
Due to the non-availability of accurate wave functions
q has been
rigorously calculated for only a few simple molecules 11 • 1 3,
1.)
Townes-Dailey Empirical Approach
Townes and Da.iley53 have proposed. that the value for eq in
a molecule can be expressed in terms of the analogous atolllic component,
(eq) a t m,
'Ibey defined (eq) t as
a m
the electric field gradient tensor
component due to an electron in the lowest p-state outside the inner
closed shells of the free atom,
'Ille relationship between these two
quantities is
(eq)mol •
(J9)
f {eq)atm
where f is a factor that depends on the electronic structure of the
molecule and is refered to as the p-electron defect,
Since Q is a
constant for a given nucleus and is independent on the electronic
22
charge distribution in the molecule, we can write
(40)
where (e~)
, and (e~) t , are the experimentally determined
mo 1
- a 11
coupling constants for the molecule and the free atom respectively,
'lhe free atom nuclear coupling constant can be determined from hyperfine splittings in atomic beam epectra21.
If f can be written in terms of bonding parameters, information
rel.a.ting to the electronic distribution within the molecule will be
available from the experiaentally determined molecular coupling
constant.
f
For a teI'llinally bonded atom f may be written
-
- (1 -
8
7
(41)
+ d - i - "")
where s and d are the fractions of s- and d-hybridization associated
with fr -bonding, i is the fraction of ionic character and -rr is the
fraction of 11" -bond or multiple bond character.
If one can reasonably
estimate or experimentally determine some of these parameters, NQR data
can be used to obtain the other,
Except for transition elements
contributions due to d-hybridization can be ignored.
Table IV lists
experimental values for the "p-electron defect" for several diatomic
halogens.
For a homonuclear diatomic molecule, one would expect the
hybridization,
-rT -bond character and ionic character would be equal
in each atom, the f-value should therefore by unity or very close to
unity.
'lhis ls true for both Br2 and c1 2 with f-values of 1.00 and
0.99 respectively.
For a hetronuclear diatomic molecule, hybridization,
2)
TABLE IV
Quadrupole Coupling Constanta 29
and •f Values for Diatomic
Halogen Molecules
Compounds
Nucleus
(e~)gas
MHz
-f
ClF
35Cl
146.o
l.)J
C1 2
35Cl
ClBr
3501
103.6
0.95
79Br
876.8
1.14
35c1
82.5
Cl I
127!
BrF
79Br
Br2
79Br
I
2
12?!
(e~)crys
MHz
-f
144.0
1.29
108.50
0.99
0.75
?4.4
o.68
29).0
1.28
)05.7
1.83
108.9
1.44
765.85
l.OO
215.6
0.94
"IT - bond character and ionic character should no longer be equal since
the electronegativity difference between the atoJlllS will cause an
unbalance in the electron distribution and the resulting f•valuea
should deviate from unity.
Thia is observed for
and f • l. :n for the Cl and I atoms respect! vely.
cu
which has f .
o.68
'lhis has been
explained.54 as resulting from a decrease of the p-electron defect on
the Cl atoms and an increase of the p-electron defect on the I atoms,
1,e. a partial Cl- I + structure.
Townes and Dailey have also postulated
that for any terminally bonded halogen that is more electronegative than
the atom to which it ls bonded by 0.25 units, one should allow for
a-hybridization.
15~
For electronegativity differences of less than 0.25
units no hybridization is allowed.
Using this concept, along with
quadrupole coupling data, the ionic character of a bond that is reasonably well not expected to exhibit any
"ft'"
-bonding can be found from
the relation
(42)
Table V lists typical NQR data for some diatomic molecules and the
resulting ionic character calculated from this data.
'!he relationship between the ionic character as calculated from
equation (42) and the electronegativity difference between the elements
involved in the bond being considered is shown in Fig. J.
Also included
in this figure are electronegativity curves due to Gordy12 and to
Paullng38.
Gordy considered. a-hybridization to be zero in calculating
ionic character from NQJI data.
Pauling used the empirical relation
25
1.0
0.8
1
o.6
Gordy
0,4
Pauling
·---
Tovnes & Dailey
0,2
1
2
FIGURE )
Electronegativlty Difference vs Ionic Character as
Determined by Different Investigators
26
TABIE V
Ionic Character of D1ato11ic Halides
Obtained fro11 Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance Data&
Molecule
e~
Ioniclty
(MHa) assWAing no
s-hybrid
a-hybrid
assumed
(Townes & Dailey)
(Gordv)
35c1 (atm)
109.74
BrCl
103.6
!Cl
1on1c1ty
calc.
electronegativity
difference
o.o
0.056
0.20
82.5
o.os
o.248
0.15
0.115
0.50
FCl
146.0
0.259
o.o
0.259
0.75
TlCl
15.8
0.856
0.15
o.831
l.?5
KCl
0.04
1.00
0.15
1.000
2.35
RbCl
0.774
0.993
0.15
0.992
2.35
Cs Cl
3
0.973
0,15
0.968
2.45
0,110
0.20
0.329
0.95
79Br (atm)
769.76
BrCl
876.8
0.110
FBr
1089.0
0.329
o.o
o.o
11.Br
37 .2
0.952
0.15
0.944
1.95
Na Br
58
0,925
0.15
0,911
2.05
KBr
10.244
0.987
0.15
0.985
2.15
DBr
533
0,308
0,15
0.186
0,75
&Reference 29.
27
1
•
(43)
1 - exp
where X and X are the electronegativity values for atoms A and B
A
B
forming the bond.
It is clear that the differences between the two
NQR data approaches are small.
A major difference exists between the
curves derived from NQR data and the curve due to Pauling.
This is
because the ionic character as calculated from electronegativity values
alone neglects such effects as polarization and hybridization.
On the
other hand, quadrupole coupling constants are related to the total
electronic structure of the molecule.
'Illus ionic character calculated
from NQR data are probably more accurate,
'lhe &llount of 'It -bonding involved in a compound increases the
p-electron defect, thereby affecting the quadrupole coupling constant
by decreasing its magnitude,
'l'o
account for this, F.quation (42) can
be rewritten as
(e2QQ.)
mo
1 = (1-i-s -1r) (e2Qq) tm
(44)
a
'Ibe p-electron defect has now been related to the quad.nlpole
coupling constant,
Since it is directly related to the population of
electrons in the p-orbitals we can next relate the quadrupole coupling
constant directly to the p-orbital populations, Nx, Ny and Nz•
For
any atom irrespective of its mode of bonding it has been shown that 20
2
e Qqxx
e2Qq
yy
--
( Nz +N7
2
(45)
(46)
28
e2Qq
Ziil
•
-{Ny ofttx - N )
z
Z
(e~)
(4?)
at
From these relations it is found that
(48)
For transition metal elements where d-electrons are involved in bonding
the populations of the d-orbi tals can be related to the quadrupole
coupling constant by
2
2).
(49)
Semiquantitative Quantum Mechanical Evaluation of Electro-
static Field Gradient Tensor Components in a Molecule
In order to accurately calculate the electrostatic field gradient
tensor components in molecules, one must have the exact wavefunctions.
At present exact wavefunctions for complex molecules are not available.
It is possible however to make some reasonable and useful estimates of
EFG tensor components by using a molecular model based on
hybrid~
za.tion schemes,
convention~l
'lhe method employed is to t"elit.te the c-ontrib,ltion
of electrons in a part.1.cular hybrid orbital to that of electrons in pure
atomic orbitals where the latter are represented by either hydrogen
like or Slater type orbitals.
'Ille contribution of a pa.rticular hybrid
orbl tal, ts then obtained by use of the conventional average value
expression
29
(50)
where gg• is a pair of cartesian coordinates and (qgg')op is the
appropriate EFG tensor component operator (Table VI).
It is noted that
these components are products of angular and radial functions, the
latter of which are generally common for all atomic orbitals involved
in the calculation,
S-orbitals will not contribute to the EFG tensor
because of their spherical symmetry,
By using hydrogen-like wavefunctions,
the radial part is given by20
(....!)
rJ av
(51)
-
where n is the principal quantum number, l is the orbital quantum
number, z• is the effective atomic number and a 0 is the Bohr radius,
using the rules given by Kauzma.nn
20
By
for calculation of screening constants
the effective atomic number of any atom can be estimated.
The EFG tensor
components for a single electron in the bonding atomic orbitals of a Cu
atom as calculated by using equations (50), (51) are tabulated in Table
VII.
Since the Cu atom will be discussed at considerable length later
it will be used as an example to illustrate the method of calculation.
As a start one employs any available bonding information to construct a
suitable model,
Consider the
<T
-bonding orbi ta.ls of the Cu atom to be
4 spJ-hybrid orbitals of the general forms
JO
TABLJr VI
Operators for EFG
Tensor Components
q
xx
• {~)(J sin29coa2f6 -1)
rJ
Clxy •
<;,> {J s1n 2ecosls1n cJ )
~z •
C!J') {J
s1n9cosecostf )
q
q
yy
yz
•
{~) (J s1n 2 es1n 2 ~ -1)
rJ
• ( 8 ~> (J s1n8cos9sinf' )
r.1
31
TABLE VII
EFG Tensor Components for Cu
Contribution of a single electron
in a single atomic orbital
Atomic Orbitals
EFG tensor component X lo- 14 esu ca·· -3
Clµ
qyy
qzz
4 p
-6.84
3.42
J.42
4 p
y
4p
J.42
-6.84
J.42
J.42
3.42
-6,84
J)d
1.16
1.16
-2,)2
3 d 2_ 2
x y
-1.16
-1.16
2.J2
3 dxy
-1.16
-1.16
2.32
3 dxz
-1.16
2.J2
-1.16
3 dyz
2.32
-1.16
-1.16
x
z
z
32
~1
~2
'¥3
'P4
..
-
a 1s
+ blPx + c 1Py + dlPz
a 2s
+ b2Px + c 2P1 + d2Pz
a s
+ b p
a4s
+ b4Px
(52)
+ c p + d p
3 y
3 z
J x
J
+ c 4Py + d4Pz
'lbese hybrid orbitals are oriented relative to an arbitrary cartesian
coordinate system which may be chosen to coincide with the crystal axis
system or may be related in some symmetrical way to the bond directions,
'!be nucleus (Cu atom) in question is located at the origin.
If the
directions of the hybrid orbitals do not coincide with bond directions
one can rewrite the hybrid orbitals in the form,
• 2
T
a
a s
2
+
b Cos J. P
2
2x
+
C Cos
2
/3
P
2y
+d
Cos { P
2
2z
(53)
where el i' /Ji, { i (i
= 1,2,J,4)
are the angles rel.a.ting the
directions of the bonds to the cartesian, axis system.
Since the
hybrid orbi ta.ls will be normalized there are eight relations
a1
2
2
+bi Cosal i
2
I a 2 • 1
\
1
2
2
2
..12
+ c1 Cosf' 1 + d 1 Cos l'i
• 1
JJ
b2 cos.C
t..
~
~- c
'
2
i
Coe pi
2
(.54)
- 1
2
- 1
Ii d 2 Cos { 1 2 ... 1
'Ihese eight equations can be solved simultaneously to yield value for
the constants.
'f'1
,
"' 2
~'3
·'f4
.
a
...
The final forn of the hybrid orbitals then becomes
a
a
1
2
I
s +bl' PX + c 1 ' p y + d 1 I p z
I
s+b• p
2
a '
S
+b
a4 '
S
+b
3
3
I
4
I
p
p
x
+c ' p +d I p
y
2
2
z
x
+c '
3
p
+
p
x
C
4
I
y
y
+d
+d
J
4
I
p
I
p
(55)
z
z
'Ihese functions are used to ca lcu late the EFG tensor components by
using equation (50) along with the appropriate EFG operators.
The EFG
tensor components due to a single electron in each hybrid orbital is
thus calculated.
Since, in most cases, an atom will contribute either
more or less than one electron to a bond with other atoms, we are
confronted with the problem of assigning the number of electrons present
in a given hybrid orbital.
TI11s is done with the aid of auxillary
infonnation such as the ionicity of the bond as calculated from electronegativity differences and the possibility of the existance "11-character,
Finally, the sum of the contributions of each hybrid orbital to the EFG
tensor components is determined and the results compared to experimental
values,
LI'I'ERA'ruRE REVIEW
A,
Bis(tetraearbonrlcobalt)tin Derivatives
The insertion of tin(II) halides into cobalt carbonyl to form a
metal-metal covalent bond was first reported by Heiber23 in 1957,
later, in a series of papers, Gre.ham 16 •18 •19 •30- 37 •45 •52 extended this
investigation to include all elements in the fourth group with a number
of transition metal carbonyls such as Mn, W, and Rh,
Most of the
compounds reported were prepared by conventional halide displacement
or by direct reaction of MX 4 with metal carbonyls, . They are crystalline
materials, stable under a nitrogen atmosphere but decompose on exposure
to air,
Infrared studies on a number of bis(tetracarbonylcoba.lt) derivatives
of tin and germanium revealed that the C!!O stretching frequency tends to
shift to higher values as the electronegativity of the halogen substituents on the metal atom increases (Table VIII),
Furthermore, if one
plots the frequencies of the A1 or A1 • CO stretching modes against the
Pauling38 electronegativity of the halogen substituent a linear relationship is obtained, Figure 4 illustrates this for the germanium compounds,
These trends are true not only for bis{tetracarbonylcobalt) compounds
of germanium or tin, but also for mono and tris(tetracarbonylcobalt)
derivatives of all elements in fourth group except carbon.
These
trends have been explained in terms of substituent effects on
1T -bonding in the molecules,
Figure 5 represents schematically the
1T -interactions between the metal a toms and the ligands.
There are
two electrophillc sites, Ge and CO, competing for the electron density
3.5
2120
A'1
2070
2020
.t X halogen
FIGURE 4
Effect of Halogen Substitutents on the Carbonyl
Stretching Frequencies in X R3 GeCo(co) 4
n
-n
36
'
Figure
5
Schematic Representation of 11'-Jnteraetion
Between Ge-Co and Co-CO Groups
TABLE
mt
Infrared Spectra of Bis(tetracarbonylcobolt) derivatives&
Compounds with c 2v
Symmetry
+
+
Al
Bl
c12ee(co(co)J 2
2117
2100
2058
20.54
2044
2026
2016
I 2Ge (Ch (C0) 4 ) 2
2113
2096
20.54
20.51
2042
2025
2013
(CH3) 2Ge [co(C0)4l2
2098
2081
2033
20-z?
2019
2006
1997
c1 2sn(Co (co)J 2
2114
2097
2056
2052
2040
2023
2016
Br 2sn (co(co) 4 ] 2
2113
2096
2055
2050
2040
2036
2016
If3n fco(co) 4 ] 2
2110
2093
20.53
2048
20Y1
2021
2012
(CH3) f3n (co(CO) 4] 2
2095
2078
2031
2024
2013
2002
1992
4> 2sn [Co(co~J 2
2095
2080
2033
2039
201B
2009
1995
(CH2-cH) 2Sn [co(C0)4] 2
2097
2080
20Y1
2028
2018
2009
1998
2Al
2Bl
B2
'.:d
TABLE VIII (con•t)
JA• + JA"
A1 '
A"
I ( CH3)Ge [co(CO) 412
2106
2089
2046
2040
20)0
2024
2014
2000
Cl(CH3)sn[Co(C0)4]2
2104
2088
2044
2038
2022
2017
200.5
1996
c115n (co(co) 4J 2
2105
2088
2045
2039
2030
2021
2014
1999
Cl(n-C4H9)Sn[Co(Co)J 2
2103
2086
2044
2037
2024
2018
2007
1996
Cl(CH2mCH)Sn [co(C0)4J2
2101
2088
2046
2040
2029
2022
2017
2000
Compounds with C
8
Symmetry
8Reference J6
~
39
in the filled cobalt 3d-11'-orbi ta.ls.
Any increase in
11"
-bonding of
either the Ge or CO must occur at the expense of the other.
the 1T -bonding between germanium and cobalt increases, the
Suppose
1'"-
bonding between carbon aonoxide and the cob&lt atom must accordingly
decrease.
Consequently, the carbon monoxide will experience an
increase in bond order and hence in the magnitude of the
frequencies.
C~
stretching
'Ille inductive effect of the subst1tuents on the germanlwn
atom will increase or decrease the electron affinity of the empty 4dgermanium orbitals.
For a highly electronegative substituent such as
chlorine, the electron affinity of the empty 4d-11"
orbitals increases.
'lhis in turn provides the germanium atom with a greater ability to
accept electrons from the cobalt atom to form a stronger
'lllis produces the effects cited above.
11"
-bond,
Graham also observed from the
infrared studies that there is a considel"l\ble coupling of the vibrational
modes of the two Co(C0) 4 groups across either a germanium or a tin atom
in the bis-compounds.
Such a coupling can be simply explained by
symmetry considerations.
For molecules of C
2v
or C symmetry, group
s
theory predicts seven infrared act1 ve bands (JA 1 + 3B 1 + B2) for the
C
?v
case and eight infrared active bands (4A 1 + 4A") for the C case,
s
However, on the basis of the "local symmetry" of the two equivalent
Co(co) 4 groups, one would expect only three or four frequencies that
are infrared active if one assumes there is no coupling between two
equivalent Co(CO)
4
groups.
'!he fact that seven or eight absorption bands were observed
(Figure 6, 7) is a clear indication of coupling between the vibrational
modes of the two Co(co) 4 groups across the germanium or tin atom.
40
100
s::
0
oM
Ill
....E
(/)
u.
s::
!:
50
ll!
0
FIGURE 6
Infrared Spectrum of r/clSn Co(co) 4 2 - C6 Type
41
too
i::
8"
0
<M
U)
U)
ort
"'
60
II)
~
~
40
~'
?O
2120
FIGURE 7
- C Type
Infrared Spectrum of ¢ Sn Co(co) 4
2
2
2V
42
From infrared intensity measurements it was found that the
intensity of the A1 mode {Figure 8), in which the CllQ dipoles of the
tend to oppose each other, was, in general, weak and
4
tended to increase as the Co-M-Co angle decreased. '!he intensity of
two Co(CO)
the B1 mode {Figure 9) where the dipoles tend to reinforce one another
increases wt th increasing Co-M-Co angle,
If one assumes collinear! ty
of the dipoles17 on the cobalt atoa and the M-Co bond then a simple
geometrical relation can be formulated,
A
;!J:. •
""Bl
Cot (~)2
(51)
2
where A ls the absorbance of the indicated band and 9 is the Co-M-Co
angle,
'!he observed absorbance ratios and the Co-M-Co angles for
bis(tetracarbonylcobalt) derivatives of germanium and tin are given
in Table IX,
It is interesting to observe, the "bond angle" tends to
increase as the e lectronega ti vi ty of the subs ti tu en ts increase,
must not take the "bond angle" 11 terally,
One
The trends, however, are as
would be expected on the basis of Bent•s rule 1 , i,e,, tha.t electronegative substituents tend to free the a-character of the tin or
germanium atom
0- -bonding orbitals for use in the metal-metal bonds,
with a resulting increase in the metal-metal bond angle.
NMR studies
of chemical shifts9,l7,lO and proton-tin coupling constants in methyl
tin derivatives suggest that this is indeed the case.
Table_X lists
the NMR results,
10
Kaesz , et.al. suggested that the coupling of the spins of the
adjacent nuclei by means of bonding electrons is expected to be propor-
,-
43
FIGURE 8
A mode
1
R
I
2
FIGURE 9
B
1
mode
·..r.i:..
• .
44
TABLE IX
1he observed absorbance ratios and the
Co-M-Co angles in Bis(tet:racarbonyl cobalt)
deri va ti vea of Sn and Ce compounds
Compounda
AAlfBl
h
Cot 9/2
e
l.04xl0- 2
0.102
169°40•
I{39 [co(co) 4 ] 2
014.1
o.64
115, 15•
(ctt3 ) 2Ge [co(co) 4] 2
0.38
0.618
117 • 28'
Clln [co(co) 4] 2
l,Olxl0- 2
0.1005
169°28 1
Br 2sn [co(co) 4
l.OJxl0- 2
0.1015
169°38•
I Sn [co(co) 4]
2
2
(CH3)2Sn [co(C0)4J 2
0.365
116°16•
0.370
o.604
o.608
(~ 2 sn [co(co) 4 ] 2
0.515
0.718
105°22•
(CH2-CH) 2Sn [co(C0)4J 2
o.460
o.678
110°16•
I(CH3)Ge [co(CO\l2
0.290
0 •.538
122°34•
Cl(CH3)Sn [co(CO\] 2
0.300
0.548
123°28•
Cl~n(Co(Co) 4) 2
0.330
0.574
120°42·
Cl(Cl-C4H9)Sn (co(C0)4] 2
O.JJO
0.574
120°42•
Cl( CH
0.4JO
0. 6.56
112°36•
Cl 2Ge(Co(C0) 4
l2
=CH)Sn [co( CO\]
2
2
116°36•
45
TABLE X
NMR Spectra&
J(ll7sn..CH )
3
Compounds
J(119Sn..CH3)
(CHJ)Jsn Co(C0)4
9.31
50.6
52.6
(CH3) 2Sn [co(C0\12
8.88
4J.6
45.7
CH Cl sn[co(CO) ]
8.48
42.2
8.98
JJ.O
3
4 2
cH 3sn (co( co)
&in
b
J3
b
cnc13 solution
Reference 33
46
tional to the densities of the bonding electrons at the respective
nuclei.
Thus, the coupling of the nuclei will be greater when there
is a larger amount of s-chara.cter in the overlapping hybrid atomic
orb! tals that form the bond between them.
For the proton-tin system,
the interaction or coupling takes place between two bonds, C-H and
Since the variation is small between J ( c1JHJ) • 129. 2 cps for
(CH 3) 2SnMn(Co) 535 and J(C lJH3)• 128.0 cps 36 for (cH 3)4sn, it is reason-
Sn-C.
able to assume that the hybriJization of the carbon atom remains
constant.
The observed change of the proton-tin coupling constants can
then be attributed to the variation of the s-chara.cter in the tin s-p
hybrid orbitals which are directed toward the methyl groups.
'Ihe
observed. decrease in the coupli:lg constants as the number of methyl
substituents decreases suggests that the tin
er-orbitals bonded to
the cobalt atom is enriched in s-chara.cter, in accordance with Bent's
rule.
B.
Cu(I) thiourea and substituted thiourea complexes
1. 'Ihiourea complexes
Cu(I) thiourea complexes were prepared in the early 1900's by
a number of German workers 40 • 41 •
It was proposed by Rathke 40 • 41 that
the bonding in these complexes was through the sulfur atoms with a
structure of the form
.'
NH
NH
2,
2
/
C
S
Cu-Cl
47
X-ray crystal structure studies have since revealed a21 number of
different types of metal-sulfur bonds in compounds of this type.
Typical of this are the observations of the occurance of an electron
deficient bond in Cu(tu) 9 ( N03) 4 and of sulfur brid$1ng in Ag(tu) 2c1.
Yamaguch1 59 and Irvtn€' 0 reached similar conclusion that the
complexes are coordinated through the sulfur atom Via infrared studies
on a number of complexes of thiourea with various metals,
Their
conclusions were based on the weakening or complete disappearance of
the band at 1083 cm-land the lowering of the frequency of the band
at 730 cm-1 • Yamaguchi suggested that the weakening of the band at
1083 cm-1 was due to the decreasing of
C=S
stretching frequency and
an increasing in N-C-N stretching frequency.
The lowering of the
frequencies was contributed. to the decrease of double bond character
of the C""5 bonds.
Their conclusicn was substantiated by subsequent
X-ray studies on Zn(tu) 2c1 2,55 Cu(tu) 3c1,5 6 and Cu(tu) 2c148 •49.
The crystal structures of both the tris and bis(thiourea)
Copper(!) chlorides are of interest for subsequent nuclear quadrupole
resonance interpretation, and therefore warrant a detail description.
21
Knobler et.al.
found that tris(thiourea) Copper{I) chloride crystallizoa
in the tetragonal system with a = 13.41 A and c = 13. 76 A. The structure
consists of long spiral chains of Cu(tu) 3 + 1.ons (Figure 10) interspersed with chloride ions.
It was found that the copper atom is
surrounded by four sulfur atoDIS, two of which are shared by two copper
atoms and serve as links to form the chain structure.
distances of the Cu-S bonds are 2.13 A,
The internuclear
2.34 A, 2.JJ A and 2.42 A, 'lbe
former two are the Cu-S distance:; of the unshared sulfur atoms and the
48
FIGURE 10
View Along the b-Axls Showing the
Chain Type Structure in Tr!sthiourea Copper(!) Chloride
49
latter two are for the shared sulfur atoms distances.
'Ihe configuration
of the copper atom is a slightly distorted tetrahedron with S-Cu-S
angles varying from 101 degrees to 108 degrees,
Table XI lists the structural parameters of the thiourea ligands
in the crystalline complex along with those of uncoordinated. thiourea.
'lbree ligands have, at least oneC-N bond length that is shorter tha.n
the C-N bond length in the uncoordinated thiourea and is closer to the
CaN double bond distance of 1.21-1.28 A, while ligand I has two almost
equal C-N distances.
'nle short c-N bond lengths were rationalized in
terms of resonance structures of the llgand 25,
NH2~H2 .._, NH2
+
s
• ~2 -
s-
NH24 • NH2
+
s-
It is not certain what the reason is for the exlstance of
unequal C-N bonds in both ligand II and III which are single coordinated,
One suggested explanation was interaction of the anions which causes
distortion of the chain,
It was further pointed out that all the ligands
lie in the same plane within experimental error,
'Ihe crystal structure of the bis(thiourea) Copper(!) chloride
was reported by Amma et, al,
48,49
Both the geometry and the bonding
were somewhat novel for Cu(I) compounds,
The Cu atom is located in a
near trigonal planar environment surrounded by sulfur atoms from three
different thioureas,
'nle sulfur atoms at two of each of the three
trigonal positions are shared by different copper atoms to form infinite
spiral chains (Figure 11) similar to the trt!l-compound,
has associated with it a long axial Cu-Cl distance,
Ea.ch Cu atom
The bonding
'iO
Figure 11
View of the Bis(thiourea) Copper (I) chloride
Chain Down the b-a.xis Showin~ the Important
Distances and Angles
.··· :···
51
TABLE XI
Bond angles (deg) and lengths (A) in
thiourea and tris(thiourea)Copper(I) chloride
C•:tf
C-N•
S-C-N
S-C-N'
Thiourea
1.705
1.313
1,313
122.5
122.5
115.0
I
1,797
1.241
1.290
114.8
114.2
129.9
II
1.820
1,287
1.398
127.4
111.4
121.1
III
1.832
1.458
1,195
109,8
123.8
124.3
52
between Cu-Cl is considered as ionic.
It was pointed out that the
Cu-Cu separation alternated between a long and a short distance with
an accoapaning "broad" and "sharp".Cu-S-Cu bridging angle,
metal~etal
'!he short
distances with the sharp bridging angle was explained by
the formation of a three-center electron pair bridging bond,.resulting
from the overlap of sp2 orbitals from each Cu atom and a p-orbital fro•
the s atom (Figure 12).
'nle formation of the "broad" bridging angle
and accompanying larger bond lengths was suggested as being due to the
overlap of
1' -bonding orbitals on both the Cu and S atoms.
2. Substituted thiourea Copper(!) CO!!lplexes
Morgan and Bursta11 29 prepared a variety of Copper(!) ethylene
thi ourea salts • 'lhese include 1
Cu(etu) 4No3 --- Colorless prismatic crystaµ>
eu2 (etu) 5 (No3) 24H 20 --- White, six-sided prismatic
Cu(etu) 3 2so4 --- Colorless, three-sided prismatic
Cu(etu) 3Ac --- Colorless, eloagated plate
Cu(etu) Cl --- Colorless, rhombic
2
Cu(etu) 0 --- Floculent, white
2
etu • ethylene thiourea
'nle structure of these compounds was considered to involve Cu-S bonding.
A limit of four-fold coordination was recognized.
In the limit of four
coordinated ligands per Cu the Cu will have acquired eight electrons,
giving it a krypton structure.
Neither crystal structure analysis
nor infrared spectroscopic studies been done on any of the ethylene
25
thiourea complexes, except Cu(etu) 4No3 •
53
N----- - -
I
Curi)_,...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
-------- -- ----- - 2. 98
A
\
\
--.~~--
FIGURE 12
View normal to Cu(l)-s(2)-cu(2) plane of
orbitals used to make the three center
delocalized electron pair bridge bond.
Cut&)
EXPERIMENTAL
A,
Preparatory work
1. B1s(tetracarbonxlcoba.lt)t1n Compounds
All of the compounds studied were prepared by the procedure
g1 ven by Patmore and Graham.
All reactions were carried out under a
static nitrogen atmosphere and the solid products were sealed in screw
cap vial.8 using teflon tape to 1111.nimize exposure to air,
'!able XII
lists the physical properties of the compounds prepared along with
the results given by Graham.
In ad.di ti on to the use of color and
melting points to ascertain the composition of the products the infrared
spectra of all three compounds were found to be in complete agreement
with those published by Graham.
2, Copper(!) thiourea and substituted thiourea complexes
a. Tris(N.N. 1 -dimethylthiourea)copper(I)chloride1. 'lhis compound
was prepared by dissolving 5.25g N,N 1 -d1methylthiourea (Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc,, Cat, ID18,870-0) in a minimum amount of methanol
and reacting this solution with a solution of 8.55gm CuC12 ·2H20 prepared
in a similar manner,
'!he mole ratio of the two components was 411.
'Ille solution was concentrated by boiling until a yellow precipitate
of sulfur formed,
'Ibis was removed by suction filtration,
Further
concentration yielded a yellow viscous liquor which on cooling and
stirring very slowly formed creamy white crystals.
'lhe crystals were
filtered by suction, washed with acetone and air dried,
'lhe resulting
solid was recrystallized with some difficulty and loss from methanol,
Table XIV list the C,H,N, elemental analysis for this and other copper
compounds,
55
TABLE
xn
Physical properties of
bis(tetracarbonylcoba.lt)tin compounds
Melting Point
Color
'lhis work
Graham
This work
Co(C0) 4 ) 2 SnC1 2
orange-red
orange-red
104
105
Cl</Sn Co(Co) 4 2
yellow
yellow
128-1:32
128-131
71-?3
71-73
f 2Sn
Co(Co) 4 2
yellow-orange ye How-orange
Graham
56
TABLE )([II
Elemental analysis for
copper compounds
Cale.
Found
c
H
N
c
H
N
eu 2(etu) 6so4
25.62
4.29
19.99
25.53
4.'.33
19.96
Cu(etu) 2Br
20,80
3.50
16.4
21,18
).64
17 .35
Cu(etu) 2c1
25.15
4,22
20.02
24.25
4,03
19.87
Cu(tu) 2Br
8.10
2,69
18.70
8.15
2.93
18.00
Cu(tu)lo3
8.62
2.87
24.12
8 •.54
2,96
23.97
Cu(tu) 2Cl
9.45
3.52
22.02
9.87
3.63
21.87
Cu(etu) 2c104
20,6;
4.85
16,10
20.51
4.55
15,88
Cu(mtu) Cl
20.94
5,21
24.41
20,66
5,11
24.35
Cu(dmtu) Cl
26.Z?
;.as
20,43
26,36
6.oo
20.26
4
3
etu • ethylenethiourea
tu - thiourea.
dmtu
m
dimethylthiourea
mtu • aethylthiourea
57
b, Tetra.kis(N-methylthiourea)copper(I)chloride1
was prepared by the method described by Urbanik,
(A.c.c. M8460-7) (o.04
N-methylthiourea
This compound
A solution of O.J6g
mole) in a minlmwn amount of
methanol was to a solution of 1.71g CuC1 2 •2H 2o (0,01 mole) in a minimum
amount of methanol,
'Ihe procedure for concentration described in
(a) above was followed,
Concentration yielded pale-creamy white crystals.
These were filtered by suction, washed with methanol and air dried,
This
complex was insoluble in most common organic solvents, including ethanol,
acetone, benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and chloroform,
It was also
insoluble in water, but was very slightly soluble in methanol,
The
melting point range of this compound was 145-147.
c, Bis(ethxlenethiourea)copper(I)chlor1de1
This compound was
prepared by a method suggested by Morgan and Burst.all,
o.04
moles of
ethylene thiourea (EKC-No, 5950Jwas in dissolved in 100 ml of water,
0,01 moles of cupric chloride was added to the aqueous ethylenethiourea
solution,
'!he solution was concentrated by boiling-until crystals
began to fomr.
'Iha solution was cooled to room temperature filter.
'!he compound was recrystallized from water.
d. Bis(ethylenethiourea)copper(I)bromide1
'll"lis compound was
prepared by the lllllnner described in (c) above with the substitution of
CuBr2 for CuC1 2 •
e. Tetrakis(ethylenethiourea)copper(I)nitrate1
This compound
was prepared by the manner described in (c) above with the substitution
of Cu(No3) 2 for CuCI 2 •
f
1
Tris(ethylenethiourea)copper(I)sulfatea
'!his compound was
prepared by the method described in (c) above with the substitution of
Cuso4 for CuC1 2 •
g, Tris(thiourea)copper(I)chloride1
A
minimum amount of boiling
water was used to dissolve 0.45 mole of thiourea,
(EKC No,
~9~5
).
'Ibis solution was added to a solution of 0,1 mole Cuc12 °2H 20 prepared
in an identical manner,
'!be resulting reaction mixture was filtered
hot to remove sulfur and cooled in an ice bath.
'!be white crystals
which foraed were filtered by suction, and recrystallized from hot
water,
h, Bis(thiourea)chloride. bromide and nitrates
All of these
compounds were prepared by the procedure described in (g) with the
amount of ligand being limited to 0.35 mole,
59
B.
Instrumentation
1, Superregenerat1 ve Zeeman-Modulated Spectrometer
In order to provide a suitable means for searching for nuclear
quadrupole resonance lines, a source of radiofrequency power which is
both reasonably stable and sensitive over a wide frequency range is
needed.
For searching purposes a superregenerative oscill.Ator-
detector system is usually employed,
'nle underlying principle of the superregenerative spectrometer
has been described by a number of authors 28 ' 14 • 'nle system used has
been described by Croston6.
reviewed,
'Ihe general operation will be briefly
'ftle unique characteristic of a superregenerati ve oscillator
ls the periodic quenching of the oscillations.
This results in there
being a period of time during which the oscillations are cut off
followed by a period when the oscillations build up from a low level
to some maximum value,
Such repetitive build-up of oscillations is
accomplished by means of either large negative pulses being applied
to the grid of an ordinary cw oscillator tube (external quenching) or
the RC time constant in the grid circuit is made sufficiently large
to allow the necessary negative voltage to develop on the grid before
the capacitor is discharged (internal or self-quenching).
When these
periodically quenched oscillations are subjected to absorption by the
sample, the maximum oscillation amplitude is decreased.
At the same
time, if the relaxation time for the nuclear signal in the sample is
shorter than the quench period, oscillations build up from the noise
rather than the decaying nuclear signal and incoherent operation
results.
On the other hand, if the relaxation time for the nuclear
60
signal is longer than the quenching period, the oscillations then build
up from the tail of the dying nuclear signal and coherent operation
results,
'!he maximum amplitude of the oscillation is then effectively
determined by the nuclear absorption.
In order to be able to detect the difference in oscillation
amplitude between absorbing and nonabsorbing conditions, Zeeman modulation is provided.
A. periodic magnetic field created by a square wave
of current is applied to a Helmholz magnet surrounding the sample coil
of the oscillator system.
The absorption of a powdered sample will be
broaden and its intensity reduced to zero by the magnetic field if the
magnetic field is on and the nuclear absorption will be present if the
magnetic field ls off.
'llle effect of the modulation is to amplitude
modulate the rf-signal.
'!he oscillator output is then filtered to
remove the rf- and quench frequencies and the remaining component,
which is at the modulation frequency is amplified and recorded,
A block diagram of the spectrometer circuit is shown in Figure
13.
2. Method of frequency measurements
Two methods have been used for frequency measurements and have
given consistent results on both the samples studied and known compounds,
(1) Frequency measurements were ma.de by setting the oscillator
on the center of a resonance line and converting the oscillator to cw
operation by the imposition of a large de voltage to the control grid.
The oscillator frequency was then measured with a Hewlett Packard
52451 frequency counter,
For known resonance this method gives
61
Frequency
Counter
Ref.
_ _.,. Oscillato
PreAmplifier
Oscillator
Detector
l
Filter
Monitor
Modulator
Phase-sensi-
ti ve
315 Hz Oscillator
Detector
1
Recorder
FIGURE 13
Block Diagram of Superregenerative NQR Spectrometer
62
agreement to .:!.Q.002MHz,
(2) The resonance frequencies were also
measured by using a system involving an external reference oscillator
and a spectrum analyzer.
The multiple sideband spectrum of the super-
regenerative oscillator which results from the quenching action, and
is illustrated in Figure 14, is observed on the screen of a high
resolution spectrum analyzer which ls coupled to the oscillator,
The
center frequency, f , is the frequency to which the oscillator ls
c
tuned and is the frequency of interest in any measurement, The sidebands are separated from f
by multiples of the quench frequency, f ,
q
and exhibit decreasing amplitude as the order of the sideband increases,
c
A vartable frequency oscillator (VFO) is also coupled to the high
resolution spectrum analyzer and serves as a reference frequency source.
When the reference frequency fr is coincidental with the frequency fc,
as observed on the analyzer oscilloscope, the former frequency is
measured with the frequency counter.
The limitation on the frequency
measurements is that of setting the spectrometer on the peak of an
absortion line,
or .:!.Q,002MHz.
This is of the order of
l~
of the quench frequency
63
Amplitude
l'Jl
i
i
()
0
H)
Sit
tll
r::
i
a §~
'rd
~
al
Plc+
.....
~
CJ)
"d
C1I
()
c+
'1
0
;;I
al
c+
l"f
Ill
l"l
~
C,
NQR Data
1. nie bis{tetracarbonylcobalt)tin compound were searched for the
nuclear quadrupole resonance frequencies over a range of 5-40 MHz at
room temperature.
Table XV gives the compounds investigated and the
resonances found,
Figures 15 through 17 show typical resonance patterns
obtained.
nie cuprous oxide resonance at 26,020MHz was used to check
the sensitivity and the resolution of the spectrometer.
'Ihe lowest
pair of resonances for the chlorophenyl and diphenyl compounds could
not be found due to their low intensity,
had very low intensities.
All of the compounds studied
In order to improve the observed intensities
the sample coils were wraped tightly around the samples to maximize
the coil filling factor.
Also very low scanning speed and long time
constants were used to obtain maximum response,
2, nie copper(!) coordination compounds were searched for nuclear
quadrupole resonance frequencies over a range of l0-60MHz at room
temperature,
nie compounds studied along with the observed frequencies
are g1 ven in Table XVI.
varied,
'Ihe intensities of the observed frequencies
Both Cu(etu) 2c1 and Cu(etu) 4 2(so4) were also searched at
liquid nitrogen temperature by using a cold finger dewar.
18 through 20 show typical resonance patterns obtained,
Figures
TABIE XIV
NQR Parameters for Bis(tetra.carbonylcobalt)t1n (IV) Compounds
590
o
Resonance Frequencies
Compound
Cl2Sn [co( CO\] 2
c1¢;n [co(co)J 2
¢2sn{Co(co) 4J2
(MHz)
Not observed,
:35c1
Resonance
Fr{uency (MHz)
S/N)
1 (s/N)
2(s/N)
J(S/N)
10.85:3 (5)
21.24:3 (8)
31.926 (8)
17. 676 (3)
10.516 (5)
20.607 (8)
J0.988 (8)
17 .150 ('.3)
lB.356 (2)
27.500 (2)
b
18,100 (2)
27.250 (2)
b
16.075 (2)
24,219 (2)
b
16.0JO (2)
24.089 (2)
b
aExperlmenta.l error for all frequencies is !_(),004 MHz,
b
a
b
°'
\J\
66
FIGURE 15
NQR Spectrum of 35c1 in c12sn Co(co) 4 2 , 2_5°C,
0.2MHz/hr Scan Speed, 3 sec. Time Constant
67
FIGURE 16
NQR Spectrum of 59co(5/2-7/2) in
O. 2MHz/hr Scan Speed,
c12sn Co(co) 4 2, 25°c,
3 sec. 'l'lme Constant
FIGURE 17
NQR Spectrum of 59co (1/2-J/2) in c1 2sn Co(co) 4 2 25°c,
0.2MHz/hr Scan Speed, 3 sec. Time Constant
69
TABLE XV
Observed NQR frequencies for Cu(I) Complexes
63Cu
65cu
S/N(63Cu)
Cu (tu) 2No,t
25,088 MHz
23.280
5/1
Cu(etu) 2Br
32.010
29.620
20/1
Cu(etu) 2Cl
'Z?.860
25. 753
50/l
:u.562
29.250
20/1
22.115
19.296
20,40
Cu(etu) 4 2so4
b
Cu(tu) Cl
2
Cu(etu) 2c104
22.881
3/1
Cu(tu) Br
16,443
16.181
3/1
Cu(dmtu) 3c1
38.804
2
3/1
J6,825
5/1
atu • thiourea; etu = ethylenethiourea.1 dmtu • N,N•dimethylthiourea
bG,L, McKown & E, Swiger, Private Communication.
70
FIGURE 18
NQR Spectrum of 65cu in Cu(e.tu) 2c1,
25°c,
0.05MHz/hr Scan Speed, 1 sec, Time Constant
71
FIGURE 19
NQR Spectrum of 65eu in Cu(etu) 4 2so4 , 25°c,
O. lMHz/hr Scan Speed, l sec. Time Constant
72
FIGURE 20
NQR Spectrum of 79ar in Cu(etu) 2Br, 25°c,
0,lMHz/hr Scan Time, 1 sec, Time Constant
73
), The range of 5-95MHz was searched using the molybdenum
oxyhalides (Clim.ax Molybdenum Co, - used as received),
The compounds
studied and the resonance frequencies found are tabulated in Table
XVII,
The intensities of the resonance frequencies are low due to
the low natural abundances of both
r-5/2
isotopic species of Mo,
Figure 21 shows the broad Mo resonance in Mooc14 •
TABLE XVI
Observed NQR Frequencies in Molybdenum Compounds
Mo
Compound
l - J.
2
17. 243
16.127
2
MHz
Cl
J. - 5.
2
36.562
35.877
2
MHz
19.)19 MHz
75
FIGURE 21
NQ.Jt Spectrum of a Mo Isotope in MoOC14
25°c, 0.05MHz/hr Scan Time, l sec, Time Constant
DISCUSSION
A,
Bis(tetracarbonylcobalt)tin compounds
The obsei-ved resonances are g1 ven in Table XV for 59Co, which
has a nuclear spin I • ?/2,
Both e 2Qq zz and
"\, were obtained from
"II
the experimental frequencies by use of the series approximations for
the transition frequencies given in Table II.
These values were
further confirmed by using the frequency ratio plot of the type discussed earlier and shown in Figure 22.
't • 0.1
to 0.5 are given in Table III.
The frequency ratios for
The asymmetry parameters
for 59co and the frequency ratios as experimentally determined are
given in '!able XVIII.
The occurance of two closely spaced resonances for each
compound indicated two nonequivalent crystallographic sites for the
Co atoms in each.
The crystal structure of SiC1 3co(co) 4 is known
The Co atom occupies a site having trigonal (CJv ) point symmetry in
this compound.
If we assume that this trigonal environment is retained
in the cobalt atom in the bistetracarbonyl compounds then the symmetry
parameter,
observed
1t. ,
be equal to zero.
The fact that the experimentally
1l values are not equal to zero but have some small values
indicate that the 3-fold symmetry has been distorted slightly,
Such
a distortion might be due to non-trigonally symmetric intermolecular
forces in the crystalline solids, intramolecular effects, or crystal
packing eliminating the strict c3v symmetry of the Co sites.
If
distortion of the intramolecul.ar bonding caused deviations of the
cobalt sites from
c3v
SYlllJletry then all inequivalent sites should have
76
77
0.)0
0.20
0.10
o.oo
0,1
0.3
0.5
FIGURE 22
Frequency Ratio vs AsYJftJlletry Parameter Plot for 59co in
c1 2sn Co(C0) 4 2
78
TABIE XVII
Experimental Observed Frequency Ratio and the Asymmetry
Parameter Determined From F1gure22
'l
Compounds
c1 2sn [co(co)J 2
Cl~Sn (co(co) 4] 2
{>2sn [co( CO) 4] 2
1,9565
1.50J6
2. 9420
0.065
1.9491
1.5038
2. 9382
0.074
1.5055
0.051
1.4981
0.089
1.5008
0.094
1.5035
0.063
?9
'l values. '!he observed 1l values are different for inequi-
the same
valent sites in the same compound and the differences are of the same
order of 11111.gnl tude as the value of
'l .
'Ibis leads one to conclude
that intermolecular forces rather than intramolecular effects causes
the occurance of multiple resonances in each compound.
'l
occurance of the low values of
In effect, the
leads to the conclusion that the
cobalt site symmetry can be considered as
C)v'
'!here are two methods one can use to discuss the chemical
bonding in these compoundss
l,
compounds,
Compare the experimental para111eters with those of similar
'Ibis method serves to point out chemical trends and
substitution effects,
2,
Consider the quadrupole coupling constants in terms of the
occupancy of atomic orbitals,
This method allows one to formulate the
quadrupole coupling constants in terms of the contribution of electrons
in the different types of bonding orbitals and to vary the electron
denstties in the bonding orbitals to get the best possible agreement
between calculated and observed eoupltng constants,
2
'l
values for
ra1~te~
compounds,
'!able XIX lists the e Q.qzz and
studied slong with those of several
be useod for a comparison of' the tYJ>(' ,1ust mentioned,
th~
compounds
This dat.a can
The t nducti ve
effect of a Cl atom bonded to a Sn atom will increase the electron
affinity of the empty 4d orbitals of the Sn atom,
This will tend to
drain electron density from the filled Jd-orbitals and in turn
?"Pmove electron density from the CO II' *-orbi ta.ls.
~ill
The net effect will
be to (a) free some of the a-electron density of the tin atom from the
TABLE XVIII
NQR Ila.ta for 'l'ln Compounds
elqq
Compound
EZ
(59co)a
(MHz)
e~
zz
(l5c1 )a
(MHz)
(Co)
JO.Of
0.070
Cl 2Sn(Co(CO)J 2
146.9
Cl~ SnfCo(CO)J 2
12?.7
; 2 sn[co(C0)4J 2
112.9
c1 3snCo(Co) 4
163.45
; 3snCo(C0) 4
104.11
o.o
o.os
ClSn {Co(C0)4 ] 3
l.J5.9
0.09
-
(Cl)
Ref,
0.070
0.078
J9.76f
b
b
g
SnC14
47.7
0.25
c
Cl 2Sn(CHJ) 2
30.8
0.34
d
Cl 2Sn, 2
'35.7!
a.
b.
c.
d,
e.
f'.
g,
-
Average for multiple resonances.
T.L. Br01fll, P.A. l!Hwards, C.B, Harris and J.L. Kirsch, Inorg. Chem.,§., 763 (1969).
J,D, Graybeal and P,J, Green, J. Phys, Chem,, Zl, 0000 (1969).
J .D. Graybeal and B.A. Berta, Proceedings 2nd Materials Research Symposium, National Bureau
of Standards, 196?, p. 383.
P,J. Green and J.D. Graybeal, J. Am, Chem. Soc,, !2.2,, 4305 (1967).
Assumed 'L • O.
D.D. Spencer, J.J. Kirsch and T,L. Brown, J. Inorg, Chem., i, 237 (1970).
e
CX>
0
81
Sn-Cl bond and make it more available in the Sn-Co bond,
(b) decrease
the net electron population of the Co atom, and (c) strengthen the C:O
bond.
These effects will result in (a) an increase of the Co-Sn-Co-bond
angle, (b) an increase in e~zz(Co), and (c) an increase in the C-0
stretching frequency with increased Cl substitution.
'!he first and third
points have been substantiated by Patmore and Graham 35 while this w<>rk
confirms the second.
2.
'!he replacement of a Co(CO\ group by a Cl atom show a
substantial increase in the coupling constant of cobalt atom further
confirming the concept of reduced electron density on the Co atoms due
to halogen inductive effect.
J,
The
value of e~zz(Cl) increases going from c1 2sn(Co(Co) 4 ) 2
to Snc14 rather than decreases as one might expect if the Cl atom gained
electron density.
'lhis observed change indicates that the net electron
density change on the Sn atoms is relatively small and is insufficient
to provide any net increase of electron density on the Cl atoms in view
of increased competition of the large nwnber of Cl atoms,
4.
Substitution of a phenyl group for the Co(Co) 4 , results in a
increase of e~ zz (Co) at the remaining cobalt atom, BrOlnl47 has pointed
out that the substitution of a methyl group for a phenyl group has the
same effect on the remaining Co""8.tom.
On the basis of the e 2qq
(Co)
zz
values, the Co(co) 4 group is a better electron withdrawing group than
either the phenyl or the methyl groups.
'lbe following series, in order
of decreasing electron withdrawing ability, can be established for
compounds of the type studied.
Cl
)C
Br
> Co(C0) 4 )
>
CH
3
82
'lbe magnitude of the observed coupling constant can be rationalized on the basis of a simplified calculation of the EFG tensor
components and the use of an electronically analogous system to estimate
orbital electron populations.
'!be molecular field gradient, qzz• can
be expressed in terms of the various type of Jd and 4p electrons by using
the relationship of the field gmdient to angular momentum.
valence bond
In either a
or molecular orbital approach, qzz arising from the Jd
and 4p electrons can be expressed in terms of atomic orbital populations,
The coupling constant is
g1 ven
by
e 2Qqzz -= eQq320 [N 2 +1/2(Nd
dz
x
(Nd
xy
+Nd 2
x -v
.
:) ]
+Nd
)
-
Yz
z
+N
+ e2Qq410 [ -(N
PX
Py
)
+ N ]
(58)
p2
2
46
A,F. Schreiner has calculated the electron densities for Fe(CO) •
'lbese are given in '18.ble XX,
'Ibis is an isolectronic and iaostructural
compound to the bis(tetracarbonylcobalt)tin compounds,
By
using the
electron densities calculated by Schreiner, hydrogen-like wave functions
and an effective atomic number of Co given by Korol•kov and Makhanek 23 ,
5
8'.3
TABLE XIX
Orbital Populations in Fe(co) 5
Orbit.al
Jd 2
z
Population
1,23
Orbital
4p
z
Population
0,0?
'.3d:xz • 3d yz
4p • 4n-y
x
0.17
3dxz• 3dx2-y2
4s
O,Z?
84
the atomic coupling constant, e2Qq 320 , is estimated to be 192 MHz. 'lhe
46
magnitude of ~ 10 is less than one-fifth that of q 320 • 'lhe atomic
coupling constant e 2Qq410 , is estimated to be 12 MHz,
constant as found by using
'lhe total coupling
58 is 204MHz.
~uation
This calculated value is related to the observed value by
•
2
(l-R) (e ~zz>calc,
where R is the Steinheimer shielding factor for an open-shell system,
Calculations to date show -0,J < R
< 0.2. When onn considers that the
lOlfflr electronegati v!ty of tin, as compared to cnrhon, would probab1y
rAsul t in Nd 2 being largP,r in these compounds as compared to the l"omp lt'!te ly
z
?
symm.et~ic tY-re, the estim&te of e Qq_zz is re~sonable,
r.opner(r) thio11r-ea. an1 s1i"bstH•1t,...r\
H,
'fable XVI
s+.urliP.d.
A
f.,.~queT1ctes
observed
11~ts
the
r-~erved
f'requenc~es
1)
re~rdinf"
tliese observt-d
There is an:preciab 1P variation amonp; the
of those compounds which
belonging to an isomornhous series.
viclnity of the reported values for
(JJ,468 MHz),
comiilexes
frequencies of the CO!!!p·'.'i'mds
number of interest1 n17 ohservati ons
can be made,
tM~urea
mi~ht
be con::>Mered
a~
2) 'Ihe frequencies are in the
cu 2o
(26.02 MHz) and KCu(CN) 2
3) There are two absorption frequencies for the bis-
compounds of thiourea with copper halides and one frequency for the other
compounds,
4) The observed absorption frequencies for substituted thio-
urea complexes, in general, are higher than the thiourea complexes.
5)
There is a reversal of the order of the frequencies between the pair,
bis(thiourea)Copper(I) chloride and bromide and the pair, bis(ethylenethtourea)Copper(I)chlor1de and bromide,
8.5
2)
Since all of the atomic orbitals to be considered fall into
groups having the same principal quantum numbers the radial parts are
common, and the angular and the radial parts are seperable, the radial
part is g1 van by an expression originally developed by Pa.ullng20 ,
-
2
ze 3e
(60)
n • principal quantum number
where
1 • azimuthal quantum number
A0
•
the Bohr radius
Ze • effective atomic charge • Z-s, s is the screening constant,
and the angular part,
3)
The radial contribution is evaluated for Cu(I), which has
an electronic configuration 4s 0 3d.10 , by using the slater rules given by
Ka.uzmann 20 in order to evaluate the necessary screening constant.
screening constant is calculated to be 25.3, with the effective
The
at~mic
charge being
Ze
The
~
29 - 25.3
Q
3.7.
radial contribution is then
,
~--'--)
e rJ
4)
Table XXII,
3
10
2X(J.z)
----·- x 4,8
- x 10• 43 x (5.3 X 10-9) 3 X (1+1)(2+1)
The
~
8.56xlO14 esu cm- 3
angular part of the atomic were functions are given in
The angular contribution to qrs can be calculated as shown
by the following examples
86
Having enumerated the pertinent features regarding this work
possible explanations will now be considered,
1) The variations that
are observed among compounds such as Cu(etu) 2c1, Cu(etu) 2Br and
Cu(etu) 2No 3 are of sufficient magnitude to indicate that there is an
appreciable anion effect operable.
This is concluded since the magnitudes
of the differences are greater than normal differences due to non-equivalent
crystallographic sites.
2) The occurance of the observed resonance frequencies in the
vicinity of those of cu 2o and KCu(CN) 2 , lead one to conclude that the
bonding is probably similiar,
Prior work on these compounds by other
investigators indicate predominantely covalent bondin8 in Cu 2o and
predominant~ly covalent bonding in the Cu(CN) 2- ion of KCu(CN) 2 •
This
evidence for covalent bonding forms the basis of later discussions of
the bonding,
3) The reason for the occurance of two frequencies for the
bis-compounds is different from that which gave rise to the two closely
Sl>IJ.Ced frequencies which were discussed in the cobalt compounds,
For
the copper compounds their appearance is due to the occurance of two
distinctly inequivalent chemical sites and not to intermolecular interactions or crystal pa.eking effects.
This point is substantiated by
crystal structure studies on the bis(t~iourea)Copper(I) chloride, 'Ihe
+
Cu(tu) 2 species form infinite spiral chains with the Cu-CU separations
alternating between a long and a short internuclear distance with
accomp&nying "broad" and "sharp" Cu-S-CU aneles,
This alternation of
bond distances along with that of the angles is a strong indication that
the coprer atoms are situation in two different chemical sites.
On the
87
basis of the crystal study of the bis(thiourea)chloride and the observation
of two frequencies for each bis-compounds one is lead to conclude that all
of the
bis-compounds h&ve structures similar to bis(thiourea)Copper(I)
chloride, 1,e, they form infinite spiral chains with the copper atoms
situated in tetrahedral sites with alternate broad and sharp angles.
If
one accepts this conclusion, one would expect two frequencies for the
bis(thiourea)Copper(I) nitrate also.
'Ille experimental result however
shows only one frequency and therefore indicates one chemical site for
the copper atom.
'Ille reason for this is not known.
A possible explanation
could be that the size of N0 3- ion is such that the compound cannot form
the same type structure as the halides and may possibly form a discret
structure similar to the tris(N,N'dimethylthiourea)copper(I) chloride.
4)
'!he higher NQR resonance frequencies for the substituted
compounds ca.n be rationalized in terms of the inductive effect of the
substituents on the thiourea ligand.
Figure 22 shows the resonance
forms of thiourea, ethylene thiourea and N,N•-dimethylthiourea.
It was
pointed out by Dr. Philip Hall in a private discussion, that the
o~er
of stability of the resonance form having charge separation are I
III.
II
On the basis of the resonance forms, one would expect that I will
contribute more electrons to the copper atom to form a complex than
either II or III.
Consequently, the copper atom will have the least
p-electron defect if it forms complexes with I.
Since the higher the
p-defect, the higher the frequency, the observed frequencies are then
in good agreement with this concept.
5)
'!he reversal of the frequencies of the halogen complexes is
difficult to explain on the basts of the electronegativity of chlorine
88
FIGURE 23
Re;onance Forms of Various Ligands
89
or bromine,
Since chlorine is more electronegative than bromine, one
would expect the chlorine atoa to withdraw electrons away froa the
copper atoa more than the bromide ion if the Cu-X bond were subtaintally
covalent,
Consequently, the coupling constant or the resonance frequency
should be lower for the chlorine compound in both cases,
For those
co11pounds whose structures have been determined the Cu-Cl bond length
is such that appreciable ionic character is indicated,
An approxbiate
calculation, based on the assumption that all four compounds have the
same structural configuration as the bis(thiourea)copper(I)chloride,
1,e. the copper ato111 is situated at a tetrahedral site, with three
covalently bonded ligands at three corners of the tetrahedron and the
chloride or bromide ion at the fourth corner, shows that the contribution
to the EFG tensor component, q
zz , varies with the internuclear distance
between Cu and Cl as shown in Figure 23. At a particular internuclear
distance, q
that q
zz
goes through a minimum.
'Ibis calculated minimum indicates
zz can increase with either a decrease or an increasP. of the inter-
nuclear distance of Cu-X,
It is therefore believed that the electro-
negativity of the chlorine or bromine has relative little or no effect
on the reversal of the order of the coupling constants.
'!be reversal is
probably due to the particular values of the Cu-X distances 1n the comp'>unds.
In view of the lack of th'!'! crystal st:ructure data, the above
explanation at it best, a speculation.
Finally, the observed ?9Br and 81Br resonance at JB,828 and
46.588 MHz respectively, for bis(ethylenethiourea)eopper(I) bromide are
worth of mentioned.
A simple Townes Dailey calculation using Br2 as a
base, shows that the Cu-Br bond with
the suggestions of AllUll8. and Knobler,
?8%
ionic character is in line with
.0
ct
0
::z
en
i::s
i11
0
.....
0...,
Iii
~
:t
~
c:
~
~
ID
c+
::s
H
ta
"I
~
N
N
-
I
.._
06
0
.0
N
N
91
.6
1he pure quadrupole resonance frequencies of Jcu and
bis(thiourea.)copper(I)chloride were first reported by Sw1ger5 1 .
65
Cu in
'Ihe
crystal structure revealed a pnlymeric chain of alternating copper at.m11s
48
and th1ourea molecules with chloride 1.nterper.::ed. AMma
proposed a
dist~rted sp 2-hybrjd bond s~~em~ for the Cu-S bonds and an ionic Cl.
!f this scheme is adopted for the his(tu}Cnpper(I}chloride, the bond
directions with respect to an arbitrary x, y, z axis eygtem, (Figure 24)
with +,he Cu-atom at thn or\v,1r. a.re given in Table XXI.
Following the
plan~r
described on page 28
m~thod
• and assumtng a
configuration, the choice hybrid orbitals for Cu-S bonds can be
expressed in the following forms,
'/' l • 0.49358
4> 2 - 0.61559
41') • 0,6215s
+ 0,8651 Px
-
o.4255
-
0,4101 px
Px
-
0.708lp
y
+ 0.7055 p •
y
These hybrid orbi ta.ls are both normalized and orthogonal.
In order to
determine the values for this contribution of a single electron to the
principle z-EFG tensor component the EFG contribution due to one electron
in each atomic orbital must first be evaluated,
1)
This is done as followsa
The contribution due to one electron in an atomic orbital
described by a wave function,
r n. is found by the conventional quantU!ll
mechanical average method,
2
'/'nl• II. ein
e drd~
(59)
where fqrsJop is the EFG operation (!able VI.)
92
I
...
s.
.......
'.,...... ..•
--.
'
s,
FIGURE 25
Orientation of Bonds in Cu(tu) 2c1
93
TABLE XX
Bond direction of eu-s and Cu-Cl bonds
with respect to x, y, z axis system
x
y
z
Cu-Sl
90°
17°
107°
eu-s 2
29°29'
120°
95°
Cu-s 3
30°19•
119°19•
87°
Cu-Cl
90°
90°
00
TABIE XXI
Angular part of the atomic wave functions
Pz
• ( ./3/2 ·hr )
- /J/41t'
-
sin
./15/16T
•
cos
e
9 sin
(sin 29 Cost/> )
• /3/4 Tr
Py
d z2
-
d
•
y
z
sin 9 Cos~
./5/16 If
()Cos 2e-1)
./15/16"11 (sin 29 sinf' )
95
q
xx
__3_1•1.br [3 sin 9 cos e -1J sin e sin ;
~
Px
2
•
2
2
2
(62)
sin9 ded;
•
'!able XXIII sU11UD&rizes the angular contributions.
5)
'Ihe tota.l contribution of one electron in a single atomic
orbital is the product of the two individual contributions.
'Ihe values
are tabulated in Table XXIV.
6)
'Ihe values for the contributions of single electrons in each
hybrid orbital to the principal Z-EFG tensor component are calculated and
given in Table XXV.
7)
It is estimated from the electronegativity difference between
the Cu and the S-e.toms that the ionicity of the Cu-S bond is
13.5%.
Consequently, the S-atom would contribute 0.87 electron to the Cu-a.tom
if each of the three hybrid orbitals has an equal electron density,
In
view of the recent detailed crystal structure analysis done by Amma 48 ,
the change density on the Cu- and the S-atoms are estimated and tabulated
in Table XXVI,
It was pointed out that one of the sulfur-a.toms forms a
three-center, two -electron-bridge bond with two Cu-a.toms while the other
two sulfur atoms each forms a Cu-S covalent bond with a Cu-atom.
If one
assumes equal electron density for these two Cu-S hybrid orbitals, the
charge density on these two hybrid orbitals should be
l/1 2
~
0,87 electrons respectively.
"1 1 = 0.87
and
For the three-center, two electron
bridge hybrid, the S-atom must supply both electrons to form the bridge
bond,
If this is indeed the case, the charge density of
0.4) electrons.
t; 3 should
be
96
TABIE XXII
Angular contribution of one electron in
a single atomic orbital
Atomic orbital
q
xx
q
yy
q
zz
qxy
qxz
q
yz
PX
-0,8
-+o.4
-+o,4
0
0
0
p
-+o.4
-o.a
-+o,4
0
0
0
i().4
-+().4
-0,8
0
0
0
p
y
z
TABLE XXtII
'!he total contribution of one electron
in a single atomic orbital
Atomic orbital
4p
4p
y
z
-6.84
'3.42
+:3.42
-6.84
+J.42
3.42
-6.84
98
TABLE XXIV
'!he Contribution of a single electron in a
Hybrid Orbital to the Z-EFG Tensor Component
Orbital
q
zz
2,22 x 10
"' 1
14
esu cm
-3
2.33 x 10lli. esu cm-3
99
TABLE XXV
Estimated Orbital Populations and Charge Density
No d1T - d....,
6161
'/J2
'PJ
Bonding
D,,. - dr Bonding assumed
0.87
o.87
o.87
o.87
0,41
0.43
JJ 1
0.5
11 2
0.5
s•cs1)
1 •cs )
2
'•cs3)
0.87
O.Y/
1.74
1.74
o.86
0.36
I -(Cl)
-1.00
-1.00
j -(Cu)
-1.17
-0.67
100
'Ihe (q
esu cm
-'3
zz
)
~v
and 4. 08xl0
14
bonding respectively.
for the Cu-a.tom is then calculated to be 4.94x10
esu cm.
-3 for no d1r - d..- bonding and with d,.. -
~
~
'laking into consideration the shielding effect
for an open shell system, the observed (q
(q
zz
)C is therefore expressed as
zz u
Cov
)ob
- 4.94 x (1 + 0,2)
•
J.95 x 10
14
esu cm
-3
'!'he Sternheimer shielding constant for an open shell system, R00 , for
Cu + is not known,
The value R .. -0,2 is estimated from the calculated
co
value of the group IA elements.
(R co )K+ •
-o .188,
Since
cu• is isoelectron with
K+ and
it is therefore reasonable to assume RoJcu + .. -0, 2,
8) We have so far neglected ionic contributions from the
chloride, sulfur and Cu-a.toms,
By using
espress1on
(
qr;z
) ionic
the classical electrostatic
e(Jcos 29-l)
=
r3
(64)
where r is the internuclear distance of Cu-X and 9 is the angle between
the Cu-X bond and the Z""8.Xis (X =Cl, S, Cu),
'!he ionic·Z-EFG tensor
components were calculated and are tabulated in Table XXVII,
The
observed EFG Z-component due to ions is related to the calculated value
by
the Sternheimer shielding constant for a closed shell system, ( 00 , by
(q
l'
;
)ionic •
zz obs
(q
)ionic
zz cal
<1- r00 >
(65)
101
TABLE XXVI
Ionic Contribution of Cl, Cu and S to the qzz-EFG
Tensor Component
with d
- d
assumption
Cur
-0,154 x 1014
Cu II
-0.06 x
without d
- d
-0.2:1 x io 14 esu/cm3
io 14
-0.06 x 1014
-0.15 x 1014
-0,)4 x io 14
J •cs 3)
-0, 68 x 10 14
-0,68 x 10 14
-0.15 x 10 14
-0,)4xJO
J-(Cl)
-0,42 x 1014
-0,42 x
-1,61 x 10 14
-1.99 x 1014
S +cs 1>
J +cs 2 )
Total
assumption
14
io 14
102
The best calculated
{
00 value
for Cu+ is -17 .o57 •
The calculated
nuclear quadrupole coupling constant due to both ionic and covalent
contributions is given by
(e~zz) obs • (e2Qqzz)ionic (1-./J + (e2Qclzr)cov (1-Roo)
m
-10
-24
14
14
4.8xl0 x0.16xlO
((1.2)3.95xl0
-(18)xl.99xl0
6. 627xl0-'Z?
• -36.o MHz
for no d1J'- d11" bonding and•30.53 MHz for the assumed d-r- d1"' bonding
case,
It was also observed that there were two resonance frequencies
for the Cu-a.tom.
Following the same procedure, the nuclear quadrupole
coupling constants for the Cu-atom having rCuCl • 3.16 were calculated
to be•J3.6 MHz and•28.03 MHz without d.,,. - d1'"' bonding and with
d1t'- d'fr bonding respectively.
The experimentally oooerved values for
the Cu coupling constants are 44.28 and 40.22 MHz.
In view of the
uncertainties of both the d.,.- d1Y bonding contribution and the Sternheimer effect, the calculated values are in good agreement with the
observed values.
One must finally point out that the difference between
the calculated and observed values for two different sites are in excellent
agreement, and indicate that the model used is a reasonable one,
The resonance frequency for both
eu 63 and 65eu
in tris(N•,N-
dimethylthiourea)copper(I)chloride were observed at 38.804 and 36.825 MHz.
The crystal structure has been determined by Amma48 •49 , Figure 2.5.
It
revealed a discreet tetrahedral structure with the Cu atom at the
tetrahedral site.
The bond lengths of the Cu-S bonds are the same and
0
they form angles of 112 with the Cu-Cl bond,
'Ihe bond directions in
103
Figure 26
Structure of Bonds in Cu(dmtu) 3c1
104
an arbitrary x, y, z axis are given in Table XX VIII, and shown in
Figure 26,
An sp3 hybrid scheme is adopted in evaluating the EFG tensor
com"Ponents at the Cu-a.tom in this system.
The four hybrid orbitals
are obtained by em"Ploying the same method as was used for the bis{thiourea)Copper(I)chloride and are given by
tifJ l • 0,5 s + 0.866 Pz
'IJ 2 ... 0. 5 s + 0. 66 p
d~
.... 3
•
- 0. 317 p
x
0.5s - 0.245 p
x
+ 0,707
z
p
y
- 0.)17 p
z
l/J4 - 0,5 s - 0,245 px - 0,707 p y - 0,317 p z
The values for the contribution of a single electron to the principal
Z-EFG tensor component in each of the hybrid orbitals were calculated as
before and are given in Table
xxrx.
From the electronega.tivity differences,
Cu-S bond is estimated to be
estimated to be
3~.
'nle ionicity of the
13.5% and that of the Cu-Cl bond is
Assuming an equal distribution of electron density
in each of the Cu-hybrid orbitals bonded to sulfur atoms, the charge
densities of the Cu and S-orbitals are estimated and given in Table XXX.
cov
The (q )
for the Cu-atom is then calculated to be
' zz cu
(-0.94) x io 14 esu cm-3. Using the same Sterheimer shieldin~ constant
cov
for the Cu-open shell system, the ob~~rverl (qzz)cu is e~~?"Pssed,
(q
)Cov
zz obs
) Cov
qzz cal
(
=
(
~
1.2 x (-0.04)
1 - Roo
~
JO
)
14
.. -1 •.1..,) x ,,, 0 1 4- "".. Sil,~cm J
-1
esu cm ·
10.5
TABLE XXVII
Bond Direction of Cu-Sand Cu-Cl Bonds With Respect
to x, y, z Axis System
x
y
z
eu-s 1
98.54
109.5?
112°
Cu-52
98°.541
109° .57 1
112°
Cu-SJ
98°.54 1
109°.571
112.0
Cu-Cl
900
90°
00
106
FIGURE~
Orientation of Cu(dmtu) 3c1
107
TABLE XXVIII
The Contribution of a Sin~le Electron in a Hybrid
-orbital to the Z-EFG Tensor Component
Bond (orbital)
Cu-s 1 (I/I 2 )
0,7 x 10 14 esu/cm'3
cu-s 2 (I/' 3)
1. 24 x 1014
eu-s 3 ( , 4 )
Cu-Cl ('11)
1.24 x
io 14
- 6.13 x 10
2.32 x 10
d
yz
d
xy
-1.16 x 10
14
J4
14
-1.16 x io 14
108
TABLE
xxrx
Est1mated Orbital Populations and Charge Densities
No - d1r -dfJ'" bonding
with cir - d'1'" bonding
0.87
0.87
0,87
o.87
0,87
o.87
0.70
0,70
J•cs 1 )
o.87
O.J?
J+(S )
0.87
0.37
J +(s3)
o.~7
-+o.J7
'/' 1
.,,, 2
"' 3
'1'4
2
J-(Cl)
-0.3
-0,3
J-(Cu)
-2.31
-1.31
71'1
1i 2
0,5
0.5
109
Again, the ionic contr1bution of the sulfur and chlorine atoms
must be considered. The ionic contributions to q)zz are calculated by
using the same procedure used for Cu(tu) 2c1 and are
in Table
t~bulated
XXXI.
The observed EFG-Z components due to ions is
calculated value as followss
ionic
ionic
{
= qcal
(lQ.zz)obs
rel~ted
to the
a> )
= 18 x ( -0.764)
a
For no d Tt
-
-13.75 x 1014 esu/cm3
14
J
d 11"' and -7. 9 x 10 esu/cm for d,,. - d11' respectively. The
nuclear quadrupole coupling constant due to both ionic and covalent
contributions is
2
ionic
cov
=e Qq ( qobs
+ qobs )
• 4.8 xlOlO x 0.16 x lo- 24 (-13.71 - 1.1'3 )
6.6'2:1 x 10-'Z'l
• -17 .'2:1 MHz
·.
for no d11' -d'Tt' and -10.45
values are considerable
NH~
for dw - dn respectively. These estimated
lon~r
than the experimentally observed value,
77.6 MHz. The reason for the difference is not yet known. Further information regarding the details of the crystal structure is needed
before any conclusions can be drawn.
C)
Molybedenum Oxyhalides
Table XVII tabulated the observed frequencies for Mo
95 or
Mo97 a.lonp; with the obst..:::·:cd. c135 frcc;,uencies for Mooc14 and Moo2c12.
For one of the Mo ~.&o<.opes, both of which have a nuclear spin, I=5/2,
110
TABLE XXX
Ionic Contribution of Cl, S and Cu to q zz )
w1 th no -d
with -d -d
-d
-0 .186 x 10 14 esu/cm 3
-0,079 x 10 14 esu/cm3
J •cs 2)
-0.186 x 10 14 esu/cm 3
-0.079 x 10 14
S •cs
-0.186 x 10 14 esu/cm3
-0. 079 x 10 14
1
-0,204 x 10 14
)
3
A-(Cl)
d
d
xy
-0,204 x 10
14
-f4,64 x 10 14
+J,48 x 10 14
-1.74
yz
-2.32 x 10 14
x 10 14
-l.74xl0
14
-4, 64 x 10 14
d 2
z
.+4.64 x 10
Total
esu/cm
-o. 764
x
14
io 14
i4.64 x 10
14
-o.441 x 10 14
111
2
the values of (e Qq)zz and
cies by
u~e
~were
obtained from the experimental frequen-
of the series approximation for the transition frequencies
given in Table II. NMR studies
54
.
hav~
shown the
~tic
of the moments ,
Mo95; Mo 97 to be equal to 9.J. From this ratio and the observed Mo frequencies, one should expect to observe the other pair of frequencies
at either approximately 300 MHz or 3 MHz, both of which are beyond the
operating range of the spectrometer, The: assignment of the observed
frequencies to a particular isotopic species is therefore impossible
at the present time, We have also investigated a number of other Mocompound and were unable to observe any resonances, The limited number
of observation severely restrict the discussion of any relationships
of the observed frequencies to the bonding properties. We have, however opened up an interesting field for further studies,
·'
112
1.
H. A. Bent, Chem, Rev., 61, 290 (1961).
2.
R. Bersohn, J, Chem, Phys,, 5.Q., 1505 (1952).
3.
T. L. Brown, P. A, F.chrards, C. B. Harris and J. L, Kirsch, Inorg,
4,
Chem,, §., ?63, 1969.
c.
Sharpe Cooke, Strticture of Atomic Nuclei
Inc., New York, 1964).
(D. van Nostrand Co.,
5. Cohen, M. H., Physical Rev,, 2§., 12?8 (1954).
6.
R, Croston, "Noise Control and Frequency Measurer.ient of the Superregenerative Nuclear Quadrupole Spectrometer," M.S, Thesis, West
Virginia University (1967).
7. Das, T, P, and E, L. Hahn, "Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance Spectroscopy",
Academic Press, New York, 1958.
8,
Dean, C, , Thesis, Harvard University through ref, 6.
9.
M, A. El-Sayed and H. D, Kaesz, J. Mol. Spectre., §., 310 (1962),
§2,
10.
N, Flitcroft and H, D. Kaesz, J, Am, Chem, Soc,,
1377 (1963).
11.
Gordy, W,, "Quadrupole Coupling, Dipole Moments and the Chemical
12.
Gordy, W., W. V, Smith and R, F. Tramba.rlo, "Microwave Spectroscopy",
13.
Gordy, 'I,, "Interpretation of Nuclear Quadrupole Coupling in Molecules",
J, Chem, Phys., 12., 792 (1951),
14.
Graybeal, J. D, and C, D, Cornwell, "Nuclear Quadrupole Spectra of the
Choloroa.ctoni tri les", J. Phys. Chem, , 62, 483, ( 1958) •
Bond", Discussion Fara.day Soc., 12., 14, (1955).
John Wiley, New York (1951),
15. ~P.iber A,J,, .J, Am
~hel'I,
Soc,. 81.• PQ? (19{1
z.,
16,
w.
17.
J, R. Holms and H, D. Kaesz, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
18.
W. Jetz, P. B. Simmon, J. A. J, Thompson and W. A. G, Graham, Inorg,
Chem., ,i, 2217, 1966,
19.
W. Jetz and W, A. G, Graham, J, Arn. Chem. Soc., §2, 2773 (1967),
20.
Kauzmann, "Quantum Chemistry", Academic Press, Inc,, New York,
York, 1957, p. 333, 8731.
A. G, Graham, Inorg. Chem.,
315 (1968),
§1, 3903
(1961).
Nell
113
c.
B., Yokazz and Pepinsky,
z.
Krist,, 111, 385 (1959).
21.
Knobler,
22,
Kohlsohuller, V,, Ber., .J.Q., 1151, (903).
23. V, s. Korol•kov and A, G. Makhenek, opt. spektrask,
~, 87 (1962).
24,
Kunoher, N, R, and M, R, '!'ruler, J, Am. Chem, Soc,, 80, 3478 (1958),
25,
!&ne, T, J,, D, N. Sen and J, V. Ouagll&no, J. Chem, Phys.,
1885 (1954).
26,
R, Livingston &nd H, 7.eides, ORNL-1913, 1955,
27,
28.
E, A, C, :Woken, "Nuclear Quadrupole
Press, Inc,, 1969.
~'
Coupling Constants", Academic
McKnown, G,L,, "Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance Zeeman Spectra of
KCu(CN) 2 (r), Ph.D. 'lhesis (1965), West Virginia University,
29. McKnovn, R, J,, Ph,D, 'lhesis, West Virginia University,
JO,
H, R. H, Patil and W, A, G, Graham, J, Am. Chem, Soc., §1, 673, (1965).
31. H, R, H, Patil &nd V, A, G, Graham, Inorg. Chem,, 5_, 1401 (1966),
32,
D, J, Patmore and W, A, G, Graham, Inorg, Chem,, 5_, 1586 (1966),
33. D,
)4,
J, Patmore and W, A, G, Graham, Inorg. Chem,, 5_, 2222, (1966).
D, J, Patmore and W, A, G, Graham, Inorg, Chem,, .2,, 1405, (1966),
35. D,
J, Patmore and
w.
A, G, Graham, Inorg, Chem,,
Q,
z.,
981, (1967).
)6,
D, J, Patmore and r-1, A, G, Graham, Inorg. Chem,,
37,
D, J,
38,
Pauling, L, , "Nature of the Chem, Bond," Corne 11 University Press,
Ithaca, New York, 1939.
39.
Pratorius-Seidler, G,, Prakt. Chem., 21, 129 (1880).
40,
Rathke, B., Ber., 14, 1774 (1884).
41,
Rathke, B., Ber,, 11, 1294 (1884),
42,
Ramsay, N, T, , "Nuclear Moments", John
York, 1953.
771, (1968).
Patmore and V, A, G, Graham, Inorg, Nucl, letters, £., 179 (1966) •.
~1 ley
and Sons, Inc. , New
43. A, H, Reddoch, Atomic Energy Col!IJll,, reported UCRL, 8972, 1959.
114
44,
Rosenheim, A. and W. !Dwensla.inum, Z. Anorg, U, Allegem. Chem,,
1!:,, 62 (1903).
45.
P .. L, Simmons and v. A, G, Graham, J, OrganometalUc Chem,,
(Amsterda.111), ~. 479 (1967).
46,
A, F, Schreiner and T. L. Brown, J, Ana, Chem, Soc.: .2Q., 3366 (1968).
47.
Diane D. Spencer, J, L. Kirsch and T, L, Brown, Inorg. Chem,, (1970).
48,
W. A, Spofford, Text and E, L. Anuna, Chem, Colll!I,,
49.
w.
405, 1968.
A, Spofford, Text and E, L. Amma, Acta Cryst,, B26, 1474, 1970.
50. Swaminathan, K, and H.M,N,H, Irving,
1291 (1964).
J, Inorg, Nucl, Chem,,
~.
51.
E, Swiger and G, L, McKnown, 22nd Richmond Region ACS Meeting,
52,
J, A, J, 'lhompson and W, A, G, Graham, Inorg, Chem,,
53.
C. H, Townes and B, P, Iarley, J, Chem, Phys,,
,54.
C, H, Townes and A, L, Schawlow, "Microwave Spectroscopy", McGraw
Hill, New York, 1955.
55,
Urenka, R, G, and E, L, Amma, J, Am, Chem, Soc,, 5§., 4270 (1966),
56.
Vizzini, E, A, and E, L, Anuna., Dissertation Abstra,, .6,1, 3654 (1963).
57. R, E, Watson and A.
J, Freeman, Phys, Review,
58. Yamazuchi, A,, R, B. Penland, S, Mizuchima, T,
Q,
1365 (1967).
rz_, 782, (1949).
1.Jl, 250 (1963).
J, lane, C, Curran,
and T, V, Quagliano, J, Am. Chem, Soc,, 80, 527 (1958),
The vita has been removed from
the scanned document
ABSTRACT
The work described in this dissertation represents an effort to
extend the application of Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance spectroscopy to
the study of transition element compounds. Using a conventional noise
controlled superregenerative spectrometer compounds of cobalt, copper
and molybdenum have been investigated.
Three biscobalt(tetracarbonyl) tin(II) compounds were investigated
and the 59co resonances measured in each. Each compound exhibited a
doublet indica.Uve of two crystallographic inequvilent sites. The asymm.etry parameters were all between 0.005 and 0.10 indicating little distortion of the cobalt enviroments from the expected C3v SYlllJl\etry. The
coupling constants as obtained by use of a series approximation for
the transition frequencies and confirmed by a frequency ratio plot were
Clz Sn (Co(C0)412 -146.9MHz, (C6H5)ClSn (co(C0)4)2 -137.? MHz,
(C6H5) 2sn(Co(C0)4]2 -112.9 MHz. The observed coupling constants correlate
with the inductive effects of the substitutents in the tin.
The study of several Copper(!) coordination compounds represents
the first known attempt at using Cu nuclear quadrupo1e coupling constants
to study ond.1ng in a situation other than an isolated compound. Aasuming zero asymmetry parameters the following 63cu couplin~ constants
were observed; Cu(tu) 2Nor ':i0.18 MHz, Cu(tu) 2c1 - 41.41 MHz, Cu(tu) 2Br-
J2.62 MHz, Cu(etu) 2c104- 45.76 MHz, [cu(etu)4J 2 SOq.- 63.12 MH~,
Cu(etu) 2c1 - 55.72 MHz, Cu(etu) 2Br- 64.02 MHz, Cu(dll!tu) 3c1 - 7?.60MHz~
The ligands used were tu-thiourea, etu-ethylene thiourea, and dmtu•
N,N• dimethylthiourea. 'nle crystal structures of only Cu(tu) 2c1 and
Cu(dmtu)3Cl are known making direct comparison difficult. The general
increase of the coupling constants with ligand substitution correlates
w1 th
the partial charge on the sulfur atom of the free ligand. The re-
versal of the order of the coupling constants between the thiourea and
ethylen thioure& halides indicates an an appreciable ion contribution
to the coupling constant from the halogen. The obserim.tion of ?9Br
resonance at JB.83 MHz in Cu(etu) 2Br also confirms this point. By
using sp2 and sp 3 hybridization schemes for Cu(tu) 2c1 and Cu(dmtu)jll
the cou-pling constants were calculated to be 36.0MHz and 17.2? MHz
respectively. This represents resonable agreement in view of the uncertainties in the Sternheimer factor used and the approximate nature of
the model. The allowance
for~
- dtr bonding between the Cu and S ato111s
decreases the calculated constants indicating that such bonding probably
is of little importance.
Resonance were observed for Mo isotope in both
~ooc14
and Mo02C12.
Both possible Mo resonances as well as the CJ.resonances were observed.
ThP. particular 1sotope to which the ,..esona.nces bPlong
1s
as vet undeter•
l!li ned since tho"3e belonging t-:> the other Mo tsoto,,es w~ th. T~ 1 will