Download Alcoa Amendment - Chelan County Public Utility District

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Chelan County PUD
Alcoa Power Sales Agreement
Credit Rating Premium Amendment
December 15, 2014
Background and Purpose
• The District and Alcoa entered into a Power Sales Agreement
dated July 14, 2008
• The Agreement is a “cost-plus” slice of the combined output of
Rocky Reach and Rock Island Hydro Systems
• District staff and Alcoa have been evaluating opportunities to
provide cost certainty for Alcoa and the District and reduce risk
for District customers
• Two areas being currently proposed
–
Refinement of Performance Assurance Provisions
•
–
No Board Action Required - Informational Only
Amendment to the Credit Rating Premium
•
Board Action Required – Resolution for Amendment
2
Performance Assurance
Information only – no action on this item
• In May 2013, Moody’s downgraded Alcoa to Ba1 from Baa3, thus
triggering performance assurance requirements in the agreement
• Alcoa executed a Collateral Deposit Agreement (“CDA”) with the District
and provided performance assurance through a letter of credit (“LC”)
• In November 2014, Alcoa and the District agreed to amend the collateral
process from a monthly calculation to annual, requiring an amendment
to the CDA
• Change benefits both parties:
– Alcoa can eliminate the LC surplus amount required to accommodate potential
monthly fluctuations, effectively saving them the LC cost of the surplus
– Alcoa and the District realize process efficiencies and reduced administration
costs by performing the collateral requirement one (1) time per year rather than
twelve (12) times
• Amendment reverts back to original language if performance assurance is
returned to Alcoa per triggering events stated in the contract
3
Credit Rating Premium
Action Required
• The Credit Rating Premium is a component of the
Alcoa Agreement
• The purpose is to compensate the District for the
value of its high credit rating and management of
the debt associated with Rocky Reach and Rock
Island
• Computed based upon the differential between
Alcoa’s credit rating and the District’s and then
applied to the associated hydro system’s debt
• It is reset in January of each year
4
Historical Spread Differential
5
Current Status
• Credit rating premiums and revenues
2011*
2012*
2013
2014
Budget 2015
Percentage
1.73%
1.83%
1.84%
1.24%
1.0%
Dollar
$ 217k
$2.35M
$3.22M
$2.06M
$1.57M
*Based on partial years, Rocky Reach contract effective 11/1/11, Rock Island effective 7/1/12.
• The 2015 budget was adopted assuming a conservative
rate of 1%
• The revenues contribute to meeting the District’s key
financial metrics
6
Proposed Amendment
• Fix the Credit Rating Premium differential at 1.45% per year for
2015-2019 which provides:
– certainty in revenues
– reduces risk by eliminating the downside if actual differential is less
– conversely, foregoes benefit if actual differential is greater
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Percentage
1.45%
1.45%
1.45%
1.45%
1.45%
Dollar
$2.28M
$2.14M
$2.00M
$1.87M
$1.75M
• The fixed rate period does not have a negative impact on
forecasted revenues for 2015-2019
• For 2020, the Credit Rating Premium charge would revert to
the annual computation provision in the Agreement
7
Decision Evaluation Criteria
1. What is the impact on our Customer-Owners?
+
+
+
–
=
Provides revenue certainty for five years
Reduces downside risk of revenue reduction
No negative impact to forecasted revenue
Foregoes upside potential of increased revenue
Overall neutral impact on customer-owners
2. What are the implications for the environment?
•
None
3. What are the legal implications?
• Requires contract amendment
• Provision to revisit the rate should either party’s rating
change
8
Decision Evaluation Criteria
4. What are the workforce/operations implications?
•
•
Establishing the fixed rate will reduce the need for as indepth annual monitoring
Simplifies forecasting efforts
5. What are the other stakeholder implications?
•
•
Alcoa will see benefit of cost certainty
No impact to other Power Purchasers
9
Recommendation/Resolution
• Fix the Credit Rating Premium at 1.45% per year for the five
year period 2015-2019
• Benefits include:
•
•
•
•
Cost certainty for Alcoa
Revenue certainty for the District
Neutral impact on our customer-owners
Revisit the rate should either party’s rating change
• In January 2020 and thereafter, the Credit Rating Premium
charge will revert to the original Agreement provision and be
computed on a variable, annual basis
• Alcoa staff is also seeking approval of this recommendation
10
Request Board Approval
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT
THREE TO THE LONG-TERM POWER SALES
AGREEMENT WITH ALCOA DATED JULY 14, 2008
TO AMEND THE CREDIT RATING PREMIUM
11