Download made several recommendations for the future B20 strategy

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Ideas for the B20 Strategy for the Next Three Presidencies
TF 7 meeting
Moscow, 22 March 2013
About ICC and the G20
• Conveyed global business
priorities to governments
since 1919
• Provided input from world
business to the G8 since
1990
• Offered recommendations
to the G20 since 2009
• Started ICC G20 Advisory
Group in 2010 to amplify
efforts on behalf of ICC
member companies
worldwide
A few caveats
• Referring to B20 as acronym representing business
engagement in G20 process
• Assuming a partnership relationship
• Recognize we can accomplish more by working together
more closely
• Refer to ICC products throughout, but only as examples of
actions we can begin collaborating on
• ICC’s work plan
Ideas for the B20 Strategy
I. Task forces and
recommendations
Less drafting, more talking
Trends
• Most recommendations are already developed
• Company deputies tiring of too much process
Actions
• Streamline drafting process
• More “outside” sessions:
–
–
–
–
Investment TF meeting during Investment Summit in Berlin
Trade TF meeting during ICC World Trade Congress in Doha
Anti-corruption TF meeting with OECD in Paris
RSPP Business week in Moscow
Streamline drafting process
Trends
• Starting from ground zero on process/format
• 250+ recommendations, maybe 120 actionable
• Little understanding of past recommendations
Actions
• Standardize the approach
–
–
–
–
Chapeau
Status & opinion: draw from ICC Scorecard / HSE catalog
Aggregate rolling/recurrent recommendations: TF7
Add new recommendations incrementally
Greater continuity: TFs
Trends
• 37 task forces (Korea to Moscow)
• 250+ recommendations, maybe 120 actionable
Actions
• Concentrate on core
• Group “other priorities”
• Use ICC Scorecard / HSE Catalog to guide choices,
consolidations and recommended task force structures to
future hosts, i.e., Australia & Turkey
Ideas for the B20 Strategy
II. CEOs and Summits
Let’s not forget the CEOs
Trends
• CEOs make time for two reasons:
– Strategic: They understand the “leverage” G20 engagement can
deliver to ongoing corporate lobby efforts (e.g. UNFCCC)
– Political: They value tangible “face time” with HOS
• Interest is waning
Actions
• Provide option for more than one TF (Russia)
• Option to stay in a TF, rather than starting over (continuity)
• 2 cycle term for co-chairs
• More speaking opportunities (more talking)
• More host country opportunities (business development)
Preserve the B20 Summit “Hallmark”
Trends
• HOS participating has declined steadily since Seoul
• CEO interest is waning
Actions
• Change the format to model APEC Business Summit
• B20 Coalition assistance for securing HOS
• Include a media strategy
Ideas for the B20 Strategy
III. It’s about business
B20 needs to be more international
Trends
• Not representative of global business
– 100-200 companies/20-30 per task force
– SMEs are largely not present
• Significant turnover in CEO participation
Actions
• Allow companies multiple TFs
• Roll over TF participation and grow membership
• Reach out to SMEs
• ICC Global Survey of Business Policy Priorities for G20 Leaders
• ICC Regional Policy consultations
B20 needs to be more pure
Trends
• Increasing participation by consultants, associations, NGOs, think
tanks and IGOs
• Companies are competing on recommendations before they even
reach the public domain
• Non-business parties with more time/resources can overshadow
business (deputy) input
Actions
• Eliminate non-business participation
• Hold a B20-stakeholder forum (i.e., with Lowy/CSIS) once drafts
have been prepared (i.e., after production of “Green Book”)
Ideas for the B20 Strategy
IV. Outside the box, inside the
tent
Reaching Sherpas
Trends
• Sherpas are increasingly engaging publically
• Limited attention to Sherpas and official G20 working
groups
• Sherpas are increasingly aware of Business engagement, but
also of L20, Y20, C20 etc.
Actions
• Russia trade task force presentation to Sherpas (March)
• ICC regional consultations
• Scorecard excerpts
Reaching “official working groups”
Trends
• Many issues of interest to business handled by official working
groups
• Mexico integrated some into task forces (e.g., anti-corruption)
• Limited so far
Actions
• Concentrate on the G20’s work load and areas where they have
committed to delivering achievements
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Task Force on Employment (ETF)
Development Working Group (DWG)
Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion (GPFI)
Anti-Corruption Working Group (ACWG)
The Framework Working Group (FWG)
Financial Stability Board (FSB)
Energy Sustainability Working Group (ESWG)
Study group on Climate Finance (CFSG)
Reaching media
Trends
• G20 is of interest to media!
• B20 has had limited public
engagement
Actions
• “Utilize CEOs”
• More aggressive Summit media
strategy
• Between-summit events (RSPP
meetings, ICC consultations)
• PRs on transmissions to Sherpas
(Russia Trade TF)
• Publish associated reports
Associated reports
Trends
• Limited policy work beyond
compendium of recommendations
Actions
• Develop/commission products to
leverage business recommendations
– USCC: G-20 and the Real Economy
– ICC Open Markets Index
– HSE/Toronto reports
Ideas for the B20 Strategy
V. It’s about business (again)
Less time on “infrastructure” issues
Trends
• Different “organizing committee” approach in each of last 4
years
• Confusing to companies
• Too much time spent “positioning”
Actions
• Formally integrate national strengths of B20 coalition with
international strengths of ICC (and other international
business associations)