Download PPT

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Main sequence wikipedia, lookup

Standard solar model wikipedia, lookup

Redshift wikipedia, lookup

Weak gravitational lensing wikipedia, lookup

Metastable inner-shell molecular state wikipedia, lookup

Nuclear drip line wikipedia, lookup

Gravitational lens wikipedia, lookup

Stellar evolution wikipedia, lookup

X-ray astronomy detector wikipedia, lookup

X-ray astronomy wikipedia, lookup

First observation of gravitational waves wikipedia, lookup

History of X-ray astronomy wikipedia, lookup

P-nuclei wikipedia, lookup

Star formation wikipedia, lookup

Astrophysical X-ray source wikipedia, lookup

Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
The Neutron Star Equation of StateElectromagnetic Observations
Frits Paerels
Columbia University
GWPAW, UW Milwaukee, January 26, 2011
Planets: an Analogy
Measurements of mass and radius
Model M-R relation,
based on Equation of State
Courtesy Dimitar Sasselov/Harvard
Nature, 2008
Phase Diagram of H2O
Courtesy Dimitar Sasselov
Neutron Star Masses
single/double-lined binaries
+ optical vrad spectroscopy
of distorted star
Black Widow:
MPSR = 2.40 ± 0.12 MO
single/double-lined binaries
+ relativistic effects
single-lined binaries
+ relativistic effects
J1614-2230:
MNS = 1.97 ± 0.04 MO
Diagram from Lattimer&Prakash ‘What a Two Solar Mass Neutron Star Really Means’, 1012.3208v1
J1614-2230:
PSR + WD, i = 89°.17 (!!)
spectacular Shapiro delay:
clean mass measurement
(*) WD is point mass
DeMorest, Pennucci, Ransom, Roberts, Hessels, Nature, 467, 1083 (2010)
Neutron Star Radii
Neutron Star Radius
radio: X (radio emission not associated with NS surface)
If ~ blackbody:
optical: T = 5800 K, R = 10 km: MV 24 mag fainter than Sun;
at 100 pc: mV = 4.82 + 24 + 5 = 33.8 …
T = 106 K: gain 22 magnitudes; a few NS can be seen
If hotter, will be an X-ray source:
X-ray: Emax ~ 250 eV (T/106 K); L ~ LEdd for T ~ 107 K (for 1MO)
RX J1856.5-3754: indeed, sort of like a blackbody (kT ~ 60 eV)
Chandra LETGS: Drake et al., Ap.J., 572, 996 (2002)
Measuring the Mass and the Radius
1. Absolute Photometry: fν/Fν = (R/D)2 ; need Fν(Teff, log g, composition, B, …)
Need the distance D!
Also need to know what fraction of the stellar surface radiates!
The Magnificent Seven: seven soft X-ray sources with a ‘stellar’ spectrum and a
distance estimate
from Kaplan: 0801.1143
The interpretation of the photospheric spectrum is non-trivial:
from Kaplan: 0801.1143
Other attractive idea: use neutron stars in Globular Clusters (known D)
2. X-ray Burst Sources: go up to LEdd for 10 seconds, at T ~ 107 K
3. Periodically variable (spinning) X-ray bursters (‘hot spot’):
combine spin period, Doppler shift;
plus GR effects (lensing) on pulse shape: mass AND radius!
Currently, constrains (1 – RS/R)1/2 ; in future, M and R.
Burst oscillations in EXO0748-676
Galloway et al., Ap.J.(Letters), 711, L148 (2010)
Photospheric emission easily detectable.
If D known: same as previous.
4. Photospheric Spectroscopy
Most sensitive way to measure parameters: absorption line spectroscopy
a replay of classical stellar spectroscopy, with strong twists!
Ongoing accretion ensures ~ solar abundances
Expect: metals highly ionized, so focus on Fe
Line profiles sensitive to Doppler broadening, lensing, Lense-Thirring, …
Spin frequency 400 Hz
Full stellar surface
R/M = 4.82 G/c2
Özel and Psaltis, Ap.J.(Letters), 582, L31 (2003)
Line Profiles and Equivalent Widths
Doppler broadening of Fe: v/c = (kT/Mc2)1/2 = 1.3 x 10-4 (T/107 K)1/2
Absorption lines saturate, very hard to detect unless
spectroscopic resolving power > 5000
(NB. Stellar rotation does not affect [increase] the line contrast)
Easy to show that Stark broadening should easily be detectable:
ΔE ~ pE ~ (a0 e/Z) (e/r2) ~ n2/3 ~ g2/3
which is sensitive to density, hence to gravity!
Combine gravitational redshift with g, get M and R.
In practice, bursters spin rapidly, so cannot be done with current instruments
Baryonic EoS
So how far along are we?
typical,
somewhat
modeldependent
M/R constraint
from X-ray
observations
From Demorest et al., 2010
Free Quarks
Hyperons,
‘Exotic’ condensates
Other techniques:
Precession of NS spin axis in binary: constrains moment of inertia I
PSR 0737-3039 A+B: binary pulsar, known masses;
geodetic precession of S around L with 71/75-yr period;
LS coupling introduces additional periastron advance
Hypothetical:
10% accuracy on I
Lattimer&Prakash: Phys.Reports, 2007
Prospects: spin-phase resolved photospheric spectroscopy with
the International X-ray Observatory IXO
Fe XXVI Hα
Fe XXVI Lyα
And this will be multiply-redundant in M and R (also get redshift and g !)
XMM/RGS: Cumulative spectrum of 30 X-ray bursts
If correct identification: gravitational redshift!
z = 0.35
(Cottam, Paerels, & Mendez, 2002, Nature, 420, 51)