Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Civil Liberties 0 Constitutional and other legal protections against government actions 0 Bill of Rights- first 10 amendments to Constitution 0 All state constitutions had Bills of Rights 0 States would not ratify the Constitution without inclusion of a Bill of Rights to protect from the national government 0 Table 4.1 CRASH COURSE 0CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES Bill of Rights and the States 0 Every state had its own Bill of Rights 0 “Congress shall make no law….” 1st Amendment- suggests it applies only to national government 0 Barron v. Baltimore- Supreme Court decision that held that the Bill of Rights applied only to national government 0 14th Amendment- p.109- “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the priveleges and immunities of citizens of the United States.” 0 Gitlow v. New York- 1925- Court ruled that freedoms of press and speech were protected by the 1st Amendment 0 Due process clause- 14th Amendment- persons cannot be denied of life, liberty, or property without due process of law Incorporation 0 Incorporation doctrine- the Court has nationalized most of the Bill of Rights and made it applicable to the states under the 14th Amendment 0 Happened gradually 0 Today, Bill of Rights applies to state and local governments. 0 Not Incorporated- 3rd and 7th, prohibition against excessive fines and bail Freedom of Religion 0 Two parts of first amendment 0 Establishment clause- “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” 0 Free exercise clause- government may not interfere with practicing (or not practicing) of religion 0 Sometimes, these clauses conflict 0 EX: Military bases provide religious services Establishment Clause 0 Some nations have a national religion 0 Jefferson argued for a “wall of separation” 0 Lemon v. Kurtzman- 1971- Law that provide aid to church- related schools must do the following: 0 Have a secular legislative purpose 0 Have a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion 0 Not foster an excessive government entanglement with religion 0 Funds may be used for buildings, textbooks, and instructional equipment, but not for teacher salaries, field trips, etc. 0 Zelman v. Simmons-Harris- 2002- vouchers could be used to pay tuition at religious schools Religion in Public Schools 0 If schools permit student groups to use their facilities, they must provide equal access to religious clubs. 0 Court has ruled that student religious publications must be funded on same basis as other publications. 0 Court has ruled that posting of Ten Commandments in classrooms is illegal. 0 Engel v. Vitale- 1963- Court ruled that recitation of prayer over intercom violates establishment clause 0 Students may pray as much as they wish. 0 School-led prayers at graduation, football games, etc. is unconstitutional. 0 Majority of the public supports prayer in schools. Teaching Evolution 0 In 1987, Louisiana passed a law allowing teachers to teach creation science along with evolution. 0 Court said you can’t do that. 0 States cannot prohibit the theory of evolution from being taught in schools. 0 Intelligent design- belief that living things are too complicated to have resulted from natural selection. 0 Teaching intelligent design has been ruled unconstitutional. Public Religious Displays 0 A monument that has a religious message may not be against the establishment clause. 0 Texas has monument of 10 commandments alongside other historical markers around its Capitol. 0 Cities have been allowed to display nativity scenes alongside other secular displays (Santa’s sleigh, Christmas trees, etc.) 0 Court has stated that the Constitution does not require complete separation of church and state but that the government must accommodate all religions and not favor one over another. Free Exercise Clause 0 Constitution guarantees the right to practice religion or no religion at all. 0 Courts have ruled that people have the right to BELIEVE what they want but not necessarily PRACTICE it. 0 Polygamy, laws that prohibited business on Sunday 0 Many Amish remove their children from school after 8th grade. Court has upheld that people can be conscientious objectors to war on religious grounds. 0 Religious groups may appoint whomever as ministers, not subject to discrimination laws. 0 Employment Division v. Smith- Court upheld that laws that interfered with religion but not aimed at religion were constitutional. 0 YOU ARE THE JUDGE- PAGE 116 ANOTHER CRASH COURSE 0FREEDOM OF RELIGION Freedom of Expression 0 DEMOCRACY DEPENDS ON FREE EXPRESSION!! 0 Not all speech is permissible. 0 Prior restraint- Government may not prevent material from being published 0 Near v. Minnesota- 1931- Newspaper was shut down by the state to prevent it from publishing. Court ordered it reopened. 0 Expression of students in school may be limited more than those of adults. EX: newspapers 0 Classified information may be censored in times of war. Free Speech and Public Order 0 Conflict between free speech and maintaining order. 0 Schenck v. U.S.- Socialist convicted of distributing leaflets urging men to resist the draft. 0 Government can limit speech if it provokes a “clear and present danger.” 0 Smith Act- 1940- forbade advocating violent overthrow of the government 0 Dennis v U.S.- 1954- Court upheld sentences for Communists convicted under Smith Act 0 Courts have upheld the right to protests, pass out leaflets, get signatures in public places. Obscenity 0 Roth v. U.S.- 1957- Obscenity is not protected speech. 0 What is considered obscene varies from place to place. 0 Miller v. California- 1973- Materials are obscene if: 0 The work appealed to a “prurient interest in sex” 0 The work showed “patently offensive” sexual conduct 0 The work lacked “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value” 0 Based on contemporary standards of local communities. 0 Laws may vary by community. 0 You are the Judge: Page 120. Libel and Slander 0 Libel- publication of false and malicious statements that damage a person’s reputation. 0 Slander- spoken defamation 0 NY Times v. Sullivan- 1964- statements about public figures are libelous only if made with malice and reckless disregard for the truth. 0 Private individuals have a lower standard to meet. 0 Only have to show the that the statements were false and author was negligent. 0 Parody has been protected as free speech. 0 Hustler Magazine v. Falwell Symbolic Speech 0 Tinker v. Des Moines-1965 Court held that students had right to wear black armbands to protest Vietnam War. 0 Freedom of speech does not just include spoken words 0 Texas v. Johnson- 1989- a state law banning burning the American flag was ruled unconstitutional. 0 Symbolic speech includes nonverbal actions that expresses an opinion. Another Crash Course 0Freedom of Speech Free Press and Fair Trials 0 Press wants to print what it wants but courts must hold a fair trial. 0 The Court has never upheld a restriction on the press in the interest of a fair trial. 0 Trials must be open to the public. 0 Courts may sequester a jury and isolate it from the media. 0 Zurcher v. Stanford Daily- 1978- a search warrant may be applied to a newspaper without violating the First Amendment. Commercial Speech 0 Includes advertising 0 May be restricted more that other types of speech 0 Federal Trade Commission regulates content of advertising. 0 Ensures that advertisers do not make false claims. 0 Federal Communications Commission- regulates radio and TV broadcasting 0 Issues licenses 0 FCC v. Pacifica Foundation Campaigning 0 Federal Election Campaign Act 1971- placed limits on campaign contributions 0 Buckley v. Valeo- 1976- ruled that spending money on elections is a form of free speech, voided parts of law 0 McCain-Feingold Act- 2002- banned unrestricted soft money 0 Citizens United v FEC-2010- Court ruled that limits on campaign advertisements by corporations and unions was unconstitutional Another Crash Course 0Freedom of Press Freedom of Assembly 0 Allows people to form interest groups, political parties, professional associations/unions, picketing and protesting 0 Governments may place limits on time, place, and manner of a protest. 0 Westboro Baptist Church protests military funerals 0 You Are The Judge Page 128 0 Courts have set limits on distance that abortion protesters must be from clinics Right to Associate 0Right to associate with people who share a common interest 0NAACP v. Alabama- 1958- State requested that NAACP turn over its membership list. Court said nope, they have the right to associate. Right to Bear Arms 0 Court has rarely dealt with gun control. 0 District of Columbia v. Heller 2008- Court ruled that 2nd Amendment protected an individual’s right to possess a firearm for selfdefense. 0 DC had passed a law that restricted residents from owning firearms, except police and military 0 States may pass laws concerning concealed weapons, felons and mentally ill, and areas such as government buildings and schools. Defendants’ Rights 0Most of Bill of Rights concerns protecting people accused crimes. 0Figure 4.1 Stages of Criminal Justice System 0Protection has gradually been extended to state courts through the incorporation doctrine. Searches and Seizures 0 Probable cause- police must have reason to believe a person committed a crime before making an arrest 0 Unreasonable searches and seizures- prohibited by 4th Amendment 0 Courts may issue search warrants- must specify area to be searched and materials being sought 0 Courts have approved aerial searches, roadblocks, searches following routine stops 0 SEARCHES OF K-12 STUDENTS REQUIRE ONLY A REASONABLE SUSPICION OF WRONGDOING, NOT PROBABLE CAUSE. 0 Exclusionary rule- Illegally seized evidence is not admissible in court (Mapp v. Ohio 1961) Another Crash Course 0Search and Seizure Self-Incrimination • 5th Amendment forbids forced self-incrimination. • Miranda v. Arizona- 1966Court set guidelines for policed questioning of suspects to protect against self-incrimination and right to counsel. Right to Counsel 06th Amendment guarantees right to counsel in Federal courts. 0Gideon v. Wainwright 1963- anyone accused of a felony where imprisonment may be imposed has the right to an attorney Trials 06th Amendment- right to a fair and speedy public trial by an impartial jury 0Habeas Corpus- those detained have a right to be informed of the charges against them 0Most criminal cases end with a guilty plea 0Plea bargaining- lawyer and prosecutor agree to plead guilty to a lesser crime 0 Saves the state money for a trial War on Terror and Habeas Corpus 0After 9/11, US withheld the names of detainees 0Court held that detainees had the right to be informed of why they were being held 0Boumediene v Bush- 2008- Court ruled that detainees have the constitutional right to challenge their detention in US courts Cruel and Unusual Punishment 08th Amendment 0What’s “cruel and unusual”? 0 Overcrowded prisons, sentencing juveniles to life in prison, death penalty? 0Furman v. Georgia 0Gregg v. Georgia 02008- Court upheld lethal injection 0Figure 4.2 Decline of Executions Another Crash Course 0Due Process of Law Right to Privacy 0Not mentioned in Bill of Rights, implied though. 0Griswold v. Connecticut 1965- CT had passed a law forbidding use of contraceptives. Court ruled that husband and wife had the right to privacy in family planning Abortion 0 Roe v. Wade 1973- Texas had passed a law allowing abortion only to save the life of the mother. Court ruled that privacy implied by the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extends to a woman’s right to an abortion. 0 No state control of abortion during first trimester 0 2nd trimester- states may regulate abortion 0 3rd trimester- states may ban abortions, except when mother’s life is in danger 0 More than 50 million abortions since Roe 0 3 in 10 women will have had an abortion by age 45 Abortion 0 Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 1989- states may forbid use of state funds in performing abortions 0 Planned Parenthood v Casey- 1992- Abortions Another Crash Course 0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyHWRXAAgm Q&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOfse2ncvffeelTrqvhrz8H&index =28