Download EMBS 2004 Conference Presentation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
Transcript
FDA Medical Device Rules
Robert F. Munzner, Ph.D.
www.DoctorDevice.com
“The Law”
F. D. & C. Act (1938)
 Radiation Health and Safety Act (1968)
 Medical Device Amendments (1976)
 Safe Medical Devices Amend. (1990)
 FDA Modernization, User Fees

Legal Interpretation:
LAW
(Act of Congress)
Regulations
(FDA)
FDA Orders
(by letter)
What is a Medical Device ?
Defined by Law
Definition of Device
 --
Physical Device (Hardware)
 -- Intended Use (Medical)
 -- but not a drug
Hardware







instrument,
apparatus,
implement,
machine,
contrivance,
and etc.,
or any part, accessory ...
Intended :



for diagnosis of disease
for treatment of disease
to affect structure/function of the body
FDA Mandate:
Assure that Medical Devices
are Safe and Effective
What is “Safe”

Risk
 Benefit
Safe:
Benefits outweigh Risks
Benefit:
-- implies effectiveness can be measured
Effectiveness:
-- for what need or condition
(Indications)
-- for whom & what circumstances
(Intended Use)
Device Classes
Class I -- General Controls (apply to all)
Class II -- Special Controls
(aka Standards)
Class III -- Premarket Approval
To Sell:
New Device
Similar to
another device
REALLY
New
NEW DEVICES
REALLY
NEW
(not substantially equivalent)
IDE
(Clinical Data)
Premarket Approval
Application
(PMA)
“New” but Similar
Device
Similar to Others
510(k)
Notification
FDA
Determination:
"Substantially
Equivalent"
MARKET
“Substantially Equivalent”

Submit a 510(k) notice to FDA that
shows “new” device is comparable to
marketed devices
 FDA
examines 510(k) and makes the
determination of SE
510(k)

Notice of intent to market

Description of the Device

Comparison with a “Predicate” Device
510(k) Contents




there is no “form” per se
generally described in 21 CFR 807.87
FDA provides specific “guidance”
Checklist is available
21 CFR 800
Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations
 Parts 800 – 1200, medical device rules
 Every classified device described
 www.access.gpo.gov
/su_docs/aces/aces140.html

FDA Guidance Documents

Are not legal requirements
Intended to help 510(k) prep
Not available for every device

www.cdrh.fda.gov/guidance


Check List



Used for “Refuse to File”
Includes some necessary administrivia
Hard to find from web site
(see hard copy)
FDA Response






May take up to 90 days
SE Letter allows marketing
“More Info Needed” Letter
May take another 90 days after reply
“Cannot Determine” Letter:
clinical data required
NSE Letter: PMA may be required
Device Classification



Same as the “equivalent” predicate
If not SE to predicate, de novo
classification is possible
If NSE and Class III, PMA required
Class I Devices

Typically manual instruments, etc.

May be exempt from 510(k)
May be exempt from GMP
Few Site Inspections
Subject only to General Provisions



General Provisions






Premarket Notification – 510(k)
510(k) for modifications
Good Manufacturing Practice Rules
Inspections for GMP Compliance
Truth in Labeling
“Adequate Instructions” or Rx
Class II Devices
May be subject to special requirements
(specified in FR or CFR)
 Performance Standard may apply
(few)
 Site inspections every two years
 General Provisions Also Apply

Class III Devices




Frequent, Thorough Site Inspections
Class I and Class II Rules Apply Also
May be required to file PMA
Reclassification possible