Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Illinois Institute of Technology Physics 561 Radiation Biophysics Lecture 13: The Linear Non-threshold Hypothesis 15 July 2014 Andrew Howard 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 1 of 15 Lecture 16 Plans u The LNT hypothesis – – – – – u What it says Evidence for it Evidence against it Scientific Consequences of it Regulatory Consequences What do we do with it? 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 2 of 15 Linear non-threshold hypothesis u u u Asserts that the population dose-response to a toxicant at low doses is linear from the origin up to the lowest value for which reliable data can be derived On the causal side, this hypothesis can be applied to chemical toxicants as well as ionizing radiation On the effect side, this is usually applied to cancer risk but it can apply to other (usually chronic) conditions 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 3 of 15 Dose-response curves: LNT hypothesis Risk Experimental or Epidemiological Data LNT Risk with No Exposure Average dose to population, mSv 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 4 of 15 Dose-Response Curves: Weak-Form Hormesis Risk Experimental or Epidemiological Data LNT Risk with No Exposure Hormesis: Weak Form Average dose to population, mSv 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 5 of 15 Dose-Response Curves: Strong-Form Hormesis Risk Experimental or Epidemiological Data Risk with No Exposure LNT Hormesis: Weak Form Hormesis: Strong Form Average dose to population, mSv 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 6 of 15 Is this a new idea? Of course not… It underlies much of the regulatory machinery in this country and elsewhere for ionizing radiation and other risks Goes back to before WWII In recent years it’s been called into question 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 7 of 15 American Nuclear Society 2001 report Emphasizes lack of evidence for any deleterious effects of ionizing radiation below 1 Sv Brings forward numerous studies that suggest beneficial effects at low doses and harm from artificial lowering of background Authors assert that LNT is unlikely for cancer given cancer’s multi-step, complex causality Numerous references 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 8 of 15 ICRP Publication 99: a 2005 report Committee includes many researchers whose work we have cited in this course: Little, Kellerer, Ullrich Considers epidemiological, mechanistic, and animal studies Explicitly takes error analysis into account Concludes that there is no universal threshold but is willing to concede that there might be thresholds for cancers of specific tissues, maybe all of them 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 9 of 15 The ALARA concept Advocated by ICRP itself as well as by NRC, DOE As low as reasonably achievable: But who decides what is reasonable WNS points out that one should take economic and social factors into account Is that what really happens, though? 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 10 of 15 Rutherford’s discussion A patient pedagogical approach Already organized into a PDF that is PowerPoint-like, so I will simply show it to you directly 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 11 of 15 World Nuclear Society 2013 report This is a trade organization, not a governmental body Report looks at risks associated with radiation in the context of other risks Specifically examines Fukushima and argues that the aggressive measures taken to protect the public from radiation at Fukushima caused considerable suffering (physical and psychic) and several deaths Discusses Chernobyl and suggests that most of the health effects arose from fear and dislocation 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 12 of 15 Regulatory consequences of LNT Clearly the prospect of a threshold would relax the exposure limits, i.e. they’d be higher than they are now As it is: – – – Nuclear power plants have difficulties operating Researchers have to jump through hoops to use radionuclides or X-ray generators Hospitals have to keep extremely careful records of the nuclides they use and the X-ray sources they employ Clearly there are costs associated with this! 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 13 of 15 Acceptable Risk: LNT Experimental or Epidemiological Data LNT Acceptable Risk Risk with No Exposure LNT-based dose limit Average dose to population, mSv 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 14 of 15 Acceptable Risk: LNT vs Hormetic Models Experimental or Epidemiological Data LNT Acceptable Risk Risk with No Exposure LNT-based dose limit Hormesis-based dose limit Average dose to population, mSv 7/8/2017 Linear Non-Threshold p. 15 of 15