* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download File
European Court of Justice wikipedia , lookup
Constitutional Court of Thailand wikipedia , lookup
Supreme Court of India wikipedia , lookup
Marbury v. Madison wikipedia , lookup
Separation of powers under the United States Constitution wikipedia , lookup
Supreme Court of Pakistan wikipedia , lookup
Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution wikipedia , lookup
William Rehnquist (October 1, 1924 – September 3, 2005) 16th Chief Justice of United States- nominated by Ronald Reagan - - - In office- September 26, 1986 – September 3, 2005 Served on the Supreme court for 33 years – started as an associate justice from 1972-86 Considered a conservative, Rehnquist favoured a conception of federalism that emphasized the Tenth Amendment's reservation of powers to the states. Rehnquist served as chief justice for nearly 19 years, making him the fourth-longestserving chief justice His father, William Benjamin Rehnquist, was a sales manager at various times for printing equipment, paper, and medical supplies and devices His mother, Margery Peck Rehnquist—the daughter of a local hardware store owner who also served as an officer and director of a small insurance company—was a local civic activist, as well as translator and homemaker Rehnquist graduated from Shorewood High School in 1942. He attended Kenyon College, in Gambier, Ohio, for one quarter in the fall of 1942, before entering the U.S. Army Air Forces. He served from March 1943 – 1946 After the war ended, Rehnquist attended Stanford University with assistance under the provisions of the G.I. Bill. In 1948, he received both a Bachelor of Arts and a Master of Arts degree in political science. In 1950, he attended Harvard University, where he received another Master of Arts, this time in government. Dates and attitudes to decisions 1985 : Wallace v. Jaffree – Liberal 1989 : Texas v Johnson – Conservative 1992 : Planned Parenthood v. Casey – Conservative 1995 : United States v. Lopez – Liberal 2005: Kelo v New London – Conservative Overall, his varied from making liberal decision to making conservative decisions on numerous cases but he was more on the conservative side of the spectrum for most of his cases Cases Gonzales v. Raich (2005): A decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court which ruled that the United States Congress could criminalize the use and production of home-grown cannabis even in states which had laws that approved its use for medicinal purposes Lawrence v. Texas (2003): A landmark Supreme Court case that struck down a sodomy law in Texas by a 6-3 ruling. In the previous case Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), the court had upheld a Georgia statute and claimed that there was no protection of sexual privacy in the constitution. The new ruling held that the previous case looked at liberty interest too narrowly Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992): A Supreme Court Case that looked at the constitutionality of numerous Pennsylvania state regulations that involved abortion. The plurality opinion of the court upheld the constitutional right to have an abortion. However, the court also examined many restrictions of the right and upheld certain portions while invalidating others. Chief Justice William Rehnquist was a part of the plurality opinion which stated that their opinion was upholding the essential precedent of Roe V. Wade, meaning that the right to abortion was a fundamental part of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. United States v. Lopez (1995): Rehnquist scored a victory against the federal government when the court ruled that a federal act that had made it unlawful to carry a gun in a school zone was unconstitutional. United States v. Lopez In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause when it passed a law prohibiting gun possession in local school zones. Alfonso Lopez Jr., a high school senior, was convicted in a federal district court for knowingly possessing a concealed handgun and bullets at his San Antonio high school. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, ruling that the law was beyond the reach of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause. The government appealed to the Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1994. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist and released in 1995, ruled that the Gun-Free School Zones Act was unconstitutional and overturned Lopez's conviction.