* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Eqecat-033011 - Insurance Information Institute
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
The Regulatory Environment and Increasing Global Uncertainty: Implications for Insurance Finance and Economics Eqecat Annual Conference Miami, FL March 30, 2011 Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & Economist Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 [email protected] www.iii.org What in the World Is Going On? Is the World Becoming a Riskier Place? 2 Uncertainty, Risk and Fear Abound Japan, New Zealand, Haiti, Chile Earthquakes Political Upheaval in the Middle East Echoes of the Financial Crisis Housing Crisis Sovereign Debt Crises Currency Crises Inflation Runaway Energy & Commodity Prices Era of Fiscal Austerity Reshuffling the Global Economic Deck Are “Black Swans” everywhere or China Becomes #2 Economy in the World does it just seem that way? Nuclear Fears Resurgent Terrorism Risk Manmade Disaster (e.g., Deepwater Horizon) Apocalypse 2012: End of the Mayan Calendar on Dec. 21 (11:11PM) 3 The Global Financial Crisis, Risk and the New World Economic Order Aftermath of Crisis Continues to Breed Insecurity Insurers’ Path to Growth Is More Challenging/Risky 4 The New World Order: A New Level of Risk for Business Best Growth Opportunities are No Longer in Low-Risk Markets (W. Europe, US/Canada, Japan) Growth Rates are 2-3 Times Higher in Developing World Business investment will remain high, much of it in need of insurance Investment conditions will remain challenging for decades Unemployment Rates Are Much Lower in Emerging Economies Establishment of a middle class and a wealthy upper class Incomes Are Rising Faster in Emerging Economies Fueling demand for goods and services Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and insurance exposure/demand Immature Institutions Raise Risk/Possible Systemic Risks Legal system, financial markets, regulation, infrastructure issues Instability in Emerging Nations Will Remain High Political instability; Corruption in some countries Economic vulnerability (trade, xrt risk, credit risk, commodities, energy) Natural Hazard Risks Are Often Elevated w/Minimal Mitigation 5 GDP Growth: Advanced & Emerging Economies vs. World, 1970-2012F GDP Growth (%) 10.0 8.0 World output is forecast to grow by 4.4% in 2011 and 4.5% in 2011, following growth of 3.0% in 2010 and a 0.6% drop in 2009. Emerging economies (led by China) are expected to grow by 6.5% in 2011 and 2012. Role of FDI in exposure growth key. 6.0 4.0 2.0 (2.0) (4.0) Advanced economies are expected to grow at a relative modest 2.5% in both 2011 and 2012. 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 0.0 Advanced economies Emerging and developing economies World Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Update, January 2011; Ins. Info. Institute. Relative Shares of Global Output, Advanced vs. Developing Economies, 2009 The gap is closing quickly. China became the world’s second largest economy in 2010 and before long the developing world’s share of GDP will exceed that of advanced economies. Developing Economies 47.1% Advanced Economies 52.9% Source: EDC Economics, “The Moment of Truth: Global Export Forecast Fall 2010, at http://www.edc.ca/english/docs/gef_e.pdf 7 Global Real (Inflation Adjusted) Nonlife Premium Growth: 1980-2009 Nonlife premium growth in emerging markets has exceeded that of industrialized countries in 26 of the past 30 years, including the entirety of the global financial crisis.. Average: 1980-2009 Industrialized Countries: 3.9% Real growth rates Emerging Markets: 9.2% 20% Overall Total: 4.2% 15% 10% 5% 0% Total Source: Swiss Re, sigma, No. 2/2010. Industrialised countries 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 -10% 2000 2001 Real nonlife premium growth is very erratic in part to inflation volatility in emerging markets as well as a lack of consistent cyclicality -5% Emerging markets 8 Distribution of Nonlife Premium: Industrialized vs. Emerging Markets, 2009 2009, $Billions Premium Growth Facts Although premium growth throughout the industrialized world was negative in 2009, its share of global nonlife premiums remained very high at nearly 86%--accounting for nearly $1.5 trillion in premiums. The financial crisis and sluggish recovery in the major insurance markets will accelerate the expansion of the emerging market sector Industrialized Economies $1, 485.8 85.7% 14.3% Emerging Markets $248.8 Developing markets now account for 47% of global GDP but just 14% of nonlife premiums Sources: NAIC; Insurance Information Institute research. 9 Nonlife Real Premium Growth in 2009 Latin and South American markets performed relatively well during the global financial crisis in terms of growth Source: Swiss Re, sigma, No. 2/2010. There was also growth in East and South Asia and well as Australia and New Zealand 10 Nonlife Real Premium Growth Rates by Region: 1999-2008 and 2009 Real Premium Growth Rates World Every emerging market region except Central and Eastern Europe experienced growth during the financial crisis Industrialised countries North America Western Europe Continental Europe Japan and newly industrialised Asian economies Oceania Emerging markets South and East Asia Latin America and the Caribbean Central and Eastern Europe Africa Middle East and Central Asia -12% Many emerging market economies continued to grow during the global financial crisis and continued to benefit from foreign direct investment Source: Swiss Re, sigma, No. 2/2010. -8% -4% 0% 4% 8% 12% 16% Growth rate 2009 Annual average growth rate 1999-2008 11 Commodity Price Changes in 2010-2011* Metals Food Raw Materials *data are through Jan. 20, 2011 Source: International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook January 2011 update at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/update/01/data/figure_2.csv Crude Oil 1/14/2011 12/31/2010 12/17/2010 12/3/2010 11/19/2010 11/5/2010 10/22/2010 10/8/2010 9/24/2010 9/10/2010 8/27/2010 8/13/2010 7/30/2010 7/16/2010 7/2/2010 6/18/2010 6/4/2010 5/21/2010 5/7/2010 4/23/2010 4/9/2010 Raw materials prices doubled over the course of 2010. Some other commodity prices dropped during the year but ended 20-30% higher. The upward trend has continued in to 2011. 3/26/2010 3/12/2010 2/26/2010 2/12/2010 1/29/2010 1/15/2010 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 1/1/2010 Index (Jan 1, 2010 = 100) Gold 13 U.S. Annual Inflation Rates, (CPI-U, %), 1990–2014F Annual Inflation Rates (%) Inflation peaked at 5.6% in August 2008 on high energy and commodity crisis. The recession and the collapse of the commodity bubble have reduced nearterm inflationary pressures 6.0 5.0 4.9 5.1 3.8 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.3 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.8 2.4 3.0 2.6 2.5 3.8 2.8 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.0 -0.4 -1.0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11F 12F 13F 14F The slack in the U.S. economy suggests that inflation should not heat up before 2012, but other forces (commodity prices, inflation in countries from which we import, etc.), plus U.S. debt burden, remain longer-run concerns Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 10/10 and 3/11 (forecasts). 14 P/C Insurance Claim Cost Drivers Grow Faster than even the Medical CPI Suggests Price Changes in 2010 9% 8.8% 6% Excludes Food and Energy 6.1% 4.3% 3% 3.4% 3.3% 3.1% 1.6% 1.0% 0% Overall CPI "Core" CPI Medical CPI Inpatient Hospital Services Outpatient Hospital Services Physicians' Prescription Medical Care Services Drugs Commodities Healthcare costs are a major liability, med pay, and PIP claim cost driver. They are likely to grow faster than the CPI for the next few years, at least Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute. 15 The Unfortunate Nexus: Opportunity, Risk & Instability Most of the Global Insurance Industry’s Future Gains Will be Fraught with Much Greater Risk and Uncertainty than in the Past 16 Political Risk in 2010: Greatest Business Opportunities Are Often in Risky Nations The fastest growing markets are generally also among the politically riskiest Heightened risk has insurance implications Source: Maplecroft 17 Middle East Unrest in 2011: Unanticipated Events Creating Significant Economic & Political Risk with Implications for Global (Re)Insurance Markets Most of the countries experiencing unrest are strategic allies of the US and/or major oil producers. Also, does a desperate Gaddafi raise the risk of terrorism (Libya was responsible for the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 in 1988)? Heightened risk has insurance implications Source: Wall Street Journal, March 23, 2011; Insurance Information Institute. 18 Countries by Insurance Risk Tier Rating CRT-1 Australia Austria Canada Denmark Finland France Germany Gibraltar* CRT-2 Barbados* Netherlands Singapore Sweden Switzerland Malaysia Malta Ireland Mexico Netherlands Antilles* Japan Oman Liechtenstein* Poland Macau New Zealand Slovenia Qatar Saudi Arabia South Africa South Korea United Kingdom United States Spain Taiwan Belarus Kuwait Hong Kong Norway Antigua & Barbuda* Israel Cayman Islands* Luxembourg Bahamas* Cyprus British Virgin Islands* Isle of Man* CRT-5 China Bermuda Italy CRT-4 Bahrain Belgium Guernsey* CRT-3 Thailand Trinidad and Tobago United Arab Emirates Brunei Darussalam Bosnia and Herzegovina Egypt Dominican Republic India Ghana Indonesia Jamaica Jordan Kenya Kazakhstan Lebanon Mauritius Nigeria Morocco Ukraine Panama Vietnam Philippines Russia Tunisia Turkey The fastest growing markets are pose a much greater risk to an insurer’s stability, strength and performance *Denotes countries to be considered “Special Cases” by A.M. Best Source: A.M. Best., as of 4/13/10 19 Catastrophe Risk as a Contributor to Global Uncertainty 2011: Catastrophes Will Have Notable Impact on the Global Economy and Public Policy 20 Recent Major Catastrophe Losses (Insured Losses, $US Billions) $30 $25 $20 The March 2011 earthquake in Japan will become among the most expensive in world history in terms of insured losses (current leader is the 1994 Northridge earthquake with $22.5B in insured losses in 2010 dollars) $25.0 $15 $8.0 $10 $10.0 $5.0 $5 $0.5 $2.0 $0 Cyclone Yasi (Australia) Feb 2011 Australia Floods New Zealand Chile Earthquake New Zealand Japan Earthquake (Dec - Feb 2011) Quake (Sep 2010) (Feb 2010) Quake (Feb 2011) (Mar 2011)* Insured Losses from Recent Major Catastrophe Events Exceed $50 Billion, an Estimated $48 Billion of that from Earthquakes *Midpoint of AIR Worldwide estimated insured loss range of $15 billion to $35 billion as of March 13, 2011. Does not include tsunami losses. Sources: Insurance Council of Australia, Munich Re, AIR Worldwide; Insurance Information Institute. 21 Natural Catastrophes Worldwide, 1980 – 2010 (Number of events with trend) Number Increased claims paying capacity will be required on a global scale if current trends continue (as is expected) 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 1980 1982 1984 1986 Geophysical events (Earthquake, tsunami, volcanic eruption) Source: Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE. 1988 1990 1992 Meteorological events (Storm) 1994 1996 1998 2000 Hydrological events (Flood, mass movement) © 2011 Munich Re 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Climatological events (Extreme temperature, drought, forest fire) 22 Natural Catastrophes, 2010 950 loss events Volcanic eruption Island, March/April Severe storms, tornadoes, floods Severe storms, floods United States, 30 April – 3 May United States, 13 -15 March Severe storms, hail United States, 12-16 May Flash floods France, 15 June Earthquake Haiti, 12 Jan. Winter Storm Xynthia, storm surge Western Europe, 26-28 Feb. Heat wave/ Wildfires Russia, July-Sept. Landslides, flash floods China, 7 Aug. Floods Eastern Europe, 2-12 June Floods, flash floods, landslides China, 13-29 June Hurricane Karl, floods Mexico, 15-21 Sept. Insurance is a global business and claims paying ability is interconnected via reinsurance markets Natural catastrophes Selection of significant loss events (see table) Source: Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVIC.E Earthquake China, 13 April Floods, flash floods Pakistan, July-Sept. Earthquake, tsunami Chile, 27 Feb. Geophysical events (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity) Meteorological events (storm) Typhoon Megi China, Philippines, Taiwan, 18-24 Oct. Hailstorms, severe storms Australia, 22 March/6-7 March Floods Australia, Dec. Earthquake New Zealand, 4 Sept. Hydrological events (flood, mass movement) Climatological events (extreme temperature, drought, wildfire) 23 Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2010E Combined Ratio Points 8.1 8.8 2.6 3.3 2010E 1.6 2.7 2008 2002 2006 1.6 2004 1.6 2000 3.3 3.3 3.6 2.9 1.0 1998 1996 1994 5.0 5.4 5.9 3.3 2.8 2.3 2.1 1990 1992 1.2 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1.2 0.4 0.8 1.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.5 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.8 1.1 0.6 1.4 2.0 1.3 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.7 1968 0.4 1966 1962 1964 3.0 3.6 1960s: 1.04 1970s: 0.85 1980s: 1.31 1990s: 3.39 2000s: 3.52 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.1 0.9 1960 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Avg. CAT Loss Component of the Combined Ratio by Decade The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades Notes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers. Source: ISO; Insurance Information Institute estimate for 2010. 24 Natural Disasters in the United States, 1980 – 2010 Number of Events (Annual Totals 1980 – 2010) Number There were a record 247 natural disaster events in the US in 2010 Geophysical (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity) Source: MR NatCatSERVICE Meteorological (storm) Hydrological (flood, mass movement) Climatological (temperature extremes, drought, wildfire) 25 Top 12 Most Costly Disasters in US History (Insured Losses, 2009, $ Billions) $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 Hurricane Katrina Remains, By Far, the Most Expensive Insurance Event in US and World History $45.1 $22.2 $22.7 $11.3 $12.6 Wilma (2005) Ike Northridge Andrew (2008) (1994) (1992) 9/11 Attacks (2001) $17.2 $4.2 $5.2 Jeanne Frances (2004) (2004) $6.2 $6.6 $8.1 $8.5 Rita (2005) Hugo (1989) Ivan (2004) Charley (2004) Katrina (2005) 8 of the 12 Most Expensive Disasters in US History Have Occurred Since 2004; Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments. 26 P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview Fitful and Possibly Fragile Recovery is Underway 27 $28,311 $3,043 $37,748 $65,777 $44,155 $38,501 $30,029 $20,559 $20,598 $10,870 $3,046 $10,000 $19,316 $20,000 $5,840 $30,000 $14,178 $40,000 $24,404 $50,000 $21,865 $60,000 2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.3% 2009 ROAS1 = 5.8% 2010:Q3 ROAS = 6.7% $30,773 $70,000 P-C Industry profits were up ion 2010 mainly to a swing to significant capital gains from several years of realized capital losses $36,819 $80,000 $62,496 P/C Net Income After Taxes 1991–2010E ($ Millions) $0 -$10,000 -$6,970 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 * ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 7.7% ROAS for 2010:Q3 and 4.6% for 2009. 2009:Q3 net income was $29.8 billion excluding M&FG. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute 09 10E ROE: Property/Casualty Insurance, 1987–2010E* (Percent) P/C Profitability Is Both by Cyclicality and Ordinary Volatile 20% Katrina, Rita, Wilma 15% 10% Sept. 11 Hugo 5% Andrew 0% 4 Hurricanes Lowest CAT Losses in 15 Years Northridge Financial Crisis* -5% 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 * Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guarantee in 2008 - 2010. Sources: ISO, Fortune; Insurance Information Institute figure for 2010 is actual through 2010:Q3. 04 05 06 07 08 09 10E 29 PRICING TRENDS If Pricing/Reserving Are Inadequate, History Suggests Problems Ahead 30 Soft Market Persisted in 2010 but May Be Easing: Relief in 2011? (Percent) 1975-78 1984-87 2000-03 25% Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since 1930-33. 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% NWP was up 0.5% in 2010 (est.) with forecast growth of 1.4% in 2011 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10E 11F -5% Shaded areas denote “hard market” periods Sources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute. 31 Auto & Home vs. All Lines, Net Written Premium Growth, 2000–2010E While homeowners insurance has grown faster than auto over the past decade, auto is generally more profitable 15.3% 15% Private Passenger Auto Homeowners All Lines 14.5% 13% 11% Average 2000-2009 Auto = 2.9 Home = 6.5% All Lines = 3.4% 9.2% 9% 7% 5.7% 6.0% 5% 3% 5.0% 1% 2.2% 3.0% 0.9% -0.9% 0.5% -1% -3% -4.9% -5% 00 01 02 03 Sources: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute. 04 05 06 07 08 09 10E 32 5% 0% -5% -10% Sources: ISO, Insurance Information Institute. 2010:Q4 2010:Q3 2010:Q2 2010:Q1 2009:Q4 2009:Q3 2009:Q2 2009:Q1 2008:Q4 2008:Q3 2008:Q2 2008:Q1 2007:Q4 2007:Q3 2007:Q2 2007:Q1 2006:Q4 2006:Q3 2006:Q2 2006:Q1 2005:Q1 -1.8% -0.7% -4.4% -3.7% -5.3% -5.2% -1.4% -1.3% -1.9% -1.6% -4.6% 2005:Q2 -4.1% 2005:Q3 -5.8% 2005:Q4 -1.6% 2004:Q4 2004:Q3 2004:Q2 2004:Q1 2003:Q4 2003:Q3 2003:Q2 2003:Q1 2002:Q4 2002:Q3 1.3% 2.3% 3.0% 0.5% 2.1% 0.0% 10.3% 10.2% 13.4% 6.6% 15.1% 16.8% 16.7% 12.5% 10.1% 9.7% 7.8% 7.2% 5.6% 2.9% 5.5% 10% 2002:Q2 15% 10.2% 20% 2002:Q1 P/C Net Premiums Written: % Change, Quarter vs. Year-Prior Quarter The longawaited uptick: mainly personal lines Finally! Back-to-back quarters of net written premium growth (vs. the same quarter, prior year) 33 Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2010:Q3 Percentage Change (%) Peak = 2001:Q4 +28.5% Pricing Turned Negative in Early 2004 and Has Been Negative Ever Since Market has Been Soft for 6+ years and Remains Soft as Capital is Restored and Underwriting Losses Remain Modest KRW Effect Trough = 2007:Q3 -13.6% Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute. 34 UNDERWRITING Cyclicality is Driven Primarily by the Industry’s Underwriting Cycle, Not the Economy 35 P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2010:Q3* As Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned Premiums Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net Losses Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases Cyclical Deterioration 120 115.8 110 Lower CAT Losses, More Reserve Releases Best Combined Ratio Since 1949 (87.6) 107.5 100.1 100 101.0 100.8 98.4 99.3 99.7 2009 2010:Q3 95.7 92.6 90 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 * Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010:Q3=101.2 Sources: A.M. Best, ISO. 36 Calendar Year Combined Ratios by Segment: 2008-2011F Personal lines combined ratio is expected to remain stable in 2010 while commercial lines and reinsurance deteriorate 110 108 106 104 102 100 98 96 94 92 90 108 106 104.5 103.8 102.4 100 99.5 98.9 Personal Lines Commercial Lines 2008 2009 2010P 2011F Overall deterioration in 2011 underwriting performance is due to expected return to normal catastrophe activity along with deteriorating underwriting performance related to the prolonged commercial soft market Sources: A.M. Best . Insurance Information Institute. 37 P/C Reserve Development, 1992–2011E $25 $20 Impact on Combined Ratio (Points) $15 $10 $5 23.2 13.7 11.7 2.3 9.9 7.3 1 -2.1 -$10 -2.6 -4.1 -6.6 -8.3 -5 -6.7 -9.5 -9.9 -9.8 -$15 -2 -6 11E 10E 09 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98 97 96 95 94 -$20 93 4 -4 -14.6-16 -15 92 6 0 $0 -$5 8 2 08 Prior Yr. Reserve Release ($B) Prior Yr. Reserve Development ($B) Impact on Combined Ratio (Points) $30 Prior year reserve releases totaled $8.8 billion in the first half of 2010, up from $7.1 billion in the first half of 2009 Reserve Releases Are Remained Strong in 2010 But Should Begin to Taper Off in 2011 Note: 2005 reserve development excludes a $6 billion loss portfolio transfer between American Re and Munich Re. Including this transaction, total prior year adverse development in 2005 was $7 billion. The data from 2000 and subsequent years excludes development from financial guaranty and mortgage insurance. Sources: Barclay’s Capital; A.M. Best. 38 Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2008 Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing Are the Leading Cause of Insurer Impairments, Underscoring the Importance of Discipline. Investment Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role Reinsurance Failure Sig. Change in Business 3.7% 4.2% Misc. 9.1% Investment Problems Affiliate Impairment 7.0% 38.1% Deficient Loss Reserves/ Inadequate Pricing 7.9% 7.6% Catastrophe Losses 8.1% Alleged Fraud 14.3% Rapid Growth Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2008 Impairment Review, Special Report, Apr. 6, 2009 39 INVESTMENTS: THE NEW REALITY Investment Performance is a Key Driver of Profitability Does It Influence Underwriting or Cyclicality? 40 Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Gain: 1994–2010:Q31 2009:Q3 gain was $29.3B ($ Billions) $70 $64.0 $58.0 $60 $52.3 $40 $55.7 $51.9 $48.9 $47.2 $50 $59.4 $56.9 $45.3 $44.4 $42.8 $39.0 $39.5 $36.0 $35.4 $31.7 $30 Investment gains in 2010 are on track to be their best since 2007 $20 $10 $0 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 10:Q3 In 2008, Investment Gains Fell by 50% Due to Lower Yields and Nearly $20B of Realized Capital Losses 2009 Saw Smaller Realized Capital Losses But Declining Investment Income Investment Gains Recovered Significantly in 2010 1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses. * 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B. Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute. Treasury Yield Curves: Pre-Crisis (July 2007) vs. February 2011 6% 5% 4.82% 4.96% 5.04% 4.96% 4.82% 4.82% 4.88% 5.00% 4.93% 5.00% 4.42% 4% 3% Treasury yield curve is near its most depressed level in at least 45 years, though longer yields rose in late 2010/early 2011 as economy improved. Investment income is falling as a result. 5.19% 4.65% 3.58% 2.96% 2.26% QE2 Target 2% 1.28% 0.77% 1% 0.11% 0.13% 0.17% 0.29% 1M 3M 6M 1Y February 2011 Yield Curve* Pre-Crisis (July 2007) 0% 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 20Y 30Y The Fed’s Announced Intention to Pursue Additional Quantitative Easing Could Depress Rates in the 7 to 10-Year Maturity Range through June Sources: Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve Bank; Insurance Information Institute. 42 2011 Financial Overview About Half of the P/C Insurance Industry’s Bond Investments Are in Municipal Bonds Bond Investment Facts as of 12/31/09 As of December 31, 2009 Investments in “Political Subdivision [of states]” bonds were $102.5 billion Investments in “States, Territories, & Possessions” bonds were $58.9 billion Investments in “Special Revenue” bonds were $288.2 billion All state, local, and special revenue bonds totaled 48.2% of bonds, about 35.7% of total invested assets 31.0% Special Revenue Political Subdivisions 11.0% 33.3% Industrial U.S. Government 0.9% 15.5% 6.3% 2.0% States, Terr., Foreign Govt etc. Sources: NAIC, via SNL Financial; Insurance Information Institute research. 43 CAPITAL MANAGEMENT & LEVERAGE Excess Capital is a Major Obstacle to a Market Turn; Capital Management Decisions Will Impact Market Direction 44 Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2010:Q3 ($ Billions) 2007:Q3 Previous Surplus Peak Surplus set a new record in 2010:Q3* $560 $544.8 $540.7 $540 $530.5 $512.8 $520 $460 $440 $515.6 $511.5 $505.0 $500 $487.1 $480 $521.8 $517.9 $496.6 $490.8 $478.5 The Industry now has $1 of surplus for every $0.77 of NPW—the strongest claimspaying status in its history. $463.0 $455.6 $437.1 $420 06:Q4 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 Quarterly Surplus Changes Since 2007:Q3 Peak *Includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a non-insurance business in early 2010. Sources: ISO, A.M .Best. 09:Q1: -$84.7B (-16.2%) 09:Q2: -$58.8B (-11.2%) 09:Q3: -$31.0B (-5.9%) 09:Q4: -$10.3B (-2.0%) 10:Q1: +$18.9B (+3.6%) 10:Q2: +$8.7B (+1.7%) 10:Q3: +$23.0B (+4.4%) 45 Shifting Legal Liability & Tort Environment Is the Tort Pendulum Swinging Against Insurers? 46 Over the Last Three Decades, Total Tort Costs as a % of GDP Appear Somewhat Cyclical ($ Billions) $300 Tort Sytem Costs 2.50% Tort Costs as % of GDP $250 Tort System Costs $200 $150 2.00% $100 1.75% Tort Costs Have Remained High but Relatively Stable Since the mid-2000s. As a Share of GDP they Should Fall as the Economy Expands $50 $0 Tort Costs as % of GDP 2.25% 1.50% 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 Sources: Towers Watson, 2010 Update on US Tort Cost Trends, Appendix 1A 08 10E 12E 47 Insurance Information Institute Online: www.iii.org Thank you for your time and your attention! Twitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwig