Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Logo Web2.0 Impact on Language Learning Paradigm Hideto D. Harashima 原島 秀人 Logo Web2.0 is often dubbed …… Logo Web3.0 is often dubbed …… Logo Web2.0 “What is Web2.0?” Tim O’Reilly (2005) Social media Web as a platform Web for participation, not for publishing Architecture of participation Built-in ethic of cooperation Communications-oriented systems Interoperability (not one developer controlling the system) Read-Write Web Long tail =/ volunteerism Logo Web2.0 “What is Web2.0?” Tim O’Reilly (2005) Wisdom of crowds (群衆の叡智、集合知) Folksonomy <==> taxonomy Viral marketing (words of mouth 口コミ) The incremental web = live web Infoware (database management) The perpetual beta Software above the level of a single device Logo Web2.0 7 Principles (Akiyoshi) 「意外と知られていないWeb2.0の謎を解く」秋好陽介 C&R研究所 Internet. June, 2006 1.The Web as platform 2.Harnessing collective intelligence 3.Data is the next Intel Inside 4.End of the software release cycle 5.Light-weight programming models 6.Software above the level of a single device 7.Rich user experiences Logo Who is Web2.0 to do with? IT Developers Web 2.0 Business, Marketing Education Logo Web2.0 Impact on Education compathy sharing Feeding knowledge to the knowledge poor (dietitian model) Learning by creating new knowledge (social-constructionist model) collaboration communication Logo 1. Web as a platform Web browser is no longer just a tool to browse through web pages – it becomes the OS of the learning activities as a whole – Information search、reading、listening、writing、speaking、video watching、email exchange、communication (text chat, voice chat) – all of these activities are now seamlessly executable on a Web browser – Sophisticated Language Labs and “CALL” systems are losing ground for networked computers with a web browser Educational system itself migrates into Web – Educational courses are being offered through Web using LMS (learning management system) where course management, materials presentation, activity monitoring, questions and answers, peer support, etc. are all possible. Logo Logo 2. Social Media Web as a blackboard Web as a community Knowledge publishing Knowledge sharing Place for communication and socialization Social constructionism/constructivism – Learning happens through participation in social activities: Vygotsky Communication becomes the base for all activities (communications-oriented system) Logo History of Approaches and Foci in Second Language Pedagogy by Don Hinkelman Pre-1970s 1970s-1990s Post-1990s Reductionism Constructivism Connectionism Dominant Theory Structural Cognitive Sociocultural Dominant Metaphor Instruction Acquisition Socialisation Research Unit of Analysis Sentence Discourse Actions, Effects Role of Learner Imitator Processor Apprentice Accuracy & Fluency Skill & Strategy Participation & Use Pedagogical Technique Error-correction Consciousness-raising Project-creation Pedagogic Assessment Proficiency Competency Fulfillment Native Production Global Proficiency Local Accomplishment Design World Drill Task Environment/Community Design Models Fixed, Rule-based Linear, Input-Output Ecological, Semiotic Philosophical Perspective Pedagogical Goals Pedagogic Success Logo History of Approaches and Foci in Second Language Pedagogy by Don Hinkelman Pre-1970s 1970s-1990s Post-1990s Reductionism Constructivism Connectionism Dominant Theory Structural Cognitive Sociocultural Dominant Metaphor Instruction Acquisition Socialisation Research Unit of Analysis Sentence Discourse Actions, Effects Role of Learner Imitator Processor Apprentice Accuracy & Fluency Skill & Strategy Participation & Use Pedagogical Technique Error-correction Consciousness-raising Project-creation Pedagogic Assessment Proficiency Competency Fulfillment Native Production Global Proficiency Local Accomplishment Design World Drill Task Environment/Community Design Models Fixed, Rule-based Linear, Input-Output Ecological, Semiotic Philosophical Perspective Pedagogical Goals Pedagogic Success Logo Evolution of Language Learning Theories by Don Hinkelman Second Language Instruction (SLI) Second Language Acquisition (SLA) Second Language Socialization (SLS) – A second language is learned best by joining a community that uses that language for specific purposes. – It happens through purposeful projects and tasks inside that community. – Teaching is by designing and facilitating a community that is full of reallife projects for students to do. Logo Blending of LMS and SNS Social Networking Services (Mixi, MySpace, Vox, openBC, etc.) are now adopted into LMS A case with Nihon Fukushi University by Prof. Shinichi Sato - blending of Elluminate and Second Life with LMS Logo Logo 3. Collective intelligence for knowledge creation (衆知創発) From specialist knowledge (専門知) To collective intelligence (集合知) (wisdom of crowds) The paradox of knowledge-oriented society – “knowledge-oriented society” is a society where “knowledge” becomes worthless. – Knock, and the door will be opened; search, and the answer will be found; ask, and somebody will be able to answer your question in web communities. (Community solution) – Wikipedia – Blogosphere Logo 3. Collective intelligence for knowledge creation (衆知創発) Then what is the role of a teacher? A leader with charisma – who can attract attentions and maintain solidarity among the students A good planner – who can keep proposing a common purpose/project and motivate students A good coordinator -- who can invite all students into discussions and urge them to create something meaningful Logo 4. Perpetual Beta (永遠の未完) From commercial software packages To open source/public domain resources Unstable and not very reliable Lively and incremental content Teaching materials shift from “stock” to “flow” – Textbooks, CD-ROMs, – Online materials, Open Source systems Logo 5. Power shift and collaboration/co-creation (主客融合と協働・協創) Authority, Subordinate The Powers That Be broadcaster producer companies teachers collaboration audience consumer clients students Prosumer-style development Logo New Learning Style by Reiko Ikeda, 池田玲子 (former) Bank Account Style Teacher-led Broadcasting Competition Individual learning Goal seeking 東京海洋大学海洋科学部 (now) Collaborative Learning Learner-centered Participation Collaboration Group learning Creation-oriented Logo Collaborative Leaning in a Narrow Sense Group Work Team-based Learning Co-operative Learning Collaborative Learning Peer Education Cohort Learning Logo Collective Leaning Styles Group work A task that is done by a group of people Team-Based A carefully managed pedagogical system that Learning relies on small permanent classroom groups. It maximizes the helping and co-operative behaviour of individual students and directs that behaviour towards specific learning goals. Team-Based Learning is central to the entire course design and goes beyond the conventional and occasional use of randomly selected groups for class discussion. http://www.tag.ubc.ca/programs/PBLOverview.ph p Logo Collaborative Leaning in a Narrow Sense (cntd) Cooperative Learning Collaborative Learning A specific kind of collaborative learning. In cooperative learning, students work together in small groups on a structured activity. They are individually accountable for their work, and the work of the group as a whole is also assessed. Cooperative groups work face-to-face and learn to work as a team. http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/coopcollab/index.html Collaborative learning is a method of teaching and learning in which students team together to explore a significant question or create a meaningful project. A group of students discussing a lecture or students from different schools working together over the Internet on a shared assignment are both examples of collaborative learning. http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/coopcollab/index.html *consensus building through cooperation Ted Panitz (1996) *get students to work with faculty to create knowledge together Saltiel and Russo (2001) *build up an intelligence to co-live in a society Kajiura (2007) Logo Other collective learning styles Peer Education Peer Education (PE) is all about empowering and training local volunteers from local communities, so they can then go back to ‘grass roots level’ and informally teach their friends and neighbours. By St. John Training eNews http://www.orderofstjohn.org/pdf/Training%20 News%20v2.1.pdf Cohort Learning A group of individuals who enter a program at the same time, proceed through all classes and academic program requirements together, and complete the program as a group. Saltiel and Russo (2001) Logo 「個別学習」との対比として 「「学べる力」を伸ばす授業」梶浦 真、教育報道出版社、2006 合同作業 みんなで一緒に作業をしないと実現できない課題をクリアする為に行 う。課題を多人数で合理的に解決する場合に有効な活動形態。 同調学習 教師が与える価値や学習の方向に同調させることを目的とする。また、 自己を主張するよりも、自分の意見や主体性を制御して従うことを目 指す。個人よりも集団と歩調を合わせるタイプの学習形態。 協調学習 学習課題に対して子ども個々の個性や能力を発揮させながら、解決 協同学習 を図ることを目的とする。共通の課題にグループで取り組む様な学習 形態のこと。主に学習の形態に着目した言葉。 共同学習 協働学習 他の学習者と共に働きかけ合うことを通して「知を確かなものにする」 「知的に他者と関わる能力を育てる」ということが目的である。単に、 「複数の人間が関わる」という形態を目指すものではない。協働という 働きかけ合いの作用に着目して、学習の成立を捉える。また、「協働 を可能にする資質や能力」も学力と捉える。他者の意見を聞くことで、 自分の意見と比較したり、思考したりする知性を育てる。また、他者に 説明すること(言外化)によって、既知の知識を確かにする。つまり、 “社会を共に生きる力としての知性”を子どもに育てることを目指す。 Logo Collaboration among Schools Using ICT CSCL = Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Students at different schools participate in a common project via the Internet E.g. Osaka University and Keio University Educators are tying to go over the walls of LMS domains and get united E.g. Monkasho special grant in aid program (Harashima and others, 2007.) Logo Collaboration among Schools Using ICT CSCL = Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Similar notions: Personal Learning Environment (PLE) -- connect a student with a network of teachers, other students, and resources. by Stephen Downes Connected Learning by Cornwell and Cornwell Logo Wikinomics –- How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything -Don Tapscott and Anthony D. Williams, 2006 “These changes, among others, are ushering us toward a world where knowledge, power, and productive capability will be more dispersed than at any time in our history – a world where value creation will be fast, fluid, and persistently disruptive. A world where only the connected will survive. A power shift is underway, and a tough new business rule is emerging: Harness the new collaboration or perish. Those who fail to grasp this will find themselves ever more isolated – cut off from the networks that are sharing, adapting, and updating knowledge to create value.” --p.13 Logo Wikinomics –- How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything -Don Tapscott and Anthony D. Williams, 2006 “The losers built a web site; the winners built a lively community. The losers built a garden with walls around it; the winners built a plaza where everybody is welcome. The losers tried to innovate by themselves; the winners tried to innovate with users. The losers tried to keep the data and software interface to themselves; the winners made them public.” English translation by Harashima Adopted from p. 64 of the book’s Japanese edition Logo Bibliography Cornwell, W. R. and J. R. Cornwell, (Retrieved 2007) “Connected Learning: A Framework of Observation, Research and Development to Guide the Reform of Education,” Online: Available http://tcfir.org/whitepapers/Connected%20Learning%20Framework.pdf Don Hinkelman (2007) “Blended Learning Communities and Socio-cultural Theory,” Slides presented at JALTCALL 2007 at Waseda University. Don Tapscott and Anthony D. Williams, “Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything,” Portfolio, USA. 2006. Downes, S. (2007) Personal Learning the Web 2.0 Way. Online: Available http://www.slideshare.net/Downes/personal-learning-the-web-20-way O’Reilly, T. (2005) “What is Web2.0” Online: Retrieved August 4, 2007 from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-isweb-20.html Panitz, T. (1996) “A Definition of Collaborative vs Cooperative Learning,” Online: Retrieved on August 4, 2007 from http://www.city.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/collab.learning/panitz2.html Sltiel, I.M, C.S.Russo (2001) Cohort Programming and Learning, Malabar: Krieger Publishing Company. Logo Bibliography (2) 秋好陽介(2006)『意外と知られていないWeb2.0の謎を解 く』C&R研究所 池田玲子(2007)『協働と協働学習』2007年(財)交流協会 日 本語教育冬季研修会スライド 梅田望夫(2006)『ウェブ進化論』ちくま新書 梶浦 真(2006)『「学べる力」を伸ばす授業』教育報道出版社 ケネスJ.ガーゲン(2007)『あなたへの社会構成主義』ナカニ シヤ出版 佐々木俊尚(2006)『グーグル Google』文春新書501 田坂広志(2007)『これから何が起るのか』、PHP研究所 ドン・タプスコット&アンソニーD.ウィリアムス(2007)『ウィキノミ クス』、日経BP社 日野公三(1999)『インターネット教育革命』PHP研究所 Logo Open up! Share! Collaborate! Logo Thank you for listening. [email protected]