Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Art of Qualifying Claims Prasad M. Jayaweera [email protected] The Toulmin Model Toulmin, Stephen E. Department: Anthropology E-Mail: [email protected] http://commfaculty.fullerton.edu/rgass/stephen_toulmin.htm Claims • Claims are concisely stated assertions – they describe the focus of an argument – and describe the writers stance toward the claim • Claims are generally not self-evident – they need to be supported by evidence (data) – they need to be limited in scope – they need to have a balanced tone (not be emotionally loaded) • The terms in claims need to be carefully defined Evidence • Evidence is data presented to support the claim. – Evidence is also referred to as grounds for the argument. • Evidence is the data presented by the arguer to support their claims and can include: – personal experience – statistics – photographs and artifacts – authoritative statements, etc. Warrants • Warrants are the generalizations that link the Evidence to the claim • Warrants are usually an implicit component of an argument • Because warrants are so general, they can usually be used to justify more than one particular inference. – This means that warrants can be very slippery and need to tied down (supported or justified) Identifying Implicit Warrants Homer-Dixon and Karparin note that a good device for identifying warrants is the “if-then-because” rule – if the evidence, – then the claim – because of the warrant Argument for Paying Taxes • [if the Evidence] now is the time of year to pay taxes • [then the claim] we should all pay our taxes • [because the warrant] every citizen has a moral obligation to pay taxes • [backing of the warrant] the government acts in everyone’s best interest Graphical Argument Analysis Thomas Homer-Dixon Claim (is thesis of argument) w Warrant (explains why the evidence supports the claim) Evidence (gives the reasons for accepting the claim) Additional Evidence (can support the original evidence forming a sub-argument) Backing (gives support to warrant) "Graphical Argument Analysis: A New Approach to Understanding Arguments, Applied to a Debate about the Window of Vulnerability," with Roger Karapin, International Studies Quarterly, 33 December 1989, pp. 389-410. http://www.library.utoronto.ca/pcs/tad.htm Objections Claim (all people should pay their taxes) w Warrant (every citizen has a moral obligation to) Backing (the government acts in everyone’s best interest) Evidence (this is the time of year we are required to pay taxes) Additional Evidence (can support the original evidence forming a sub-argument) Attack2 (The government uses money to benefit special interests and commit immoral acts) Attack1 (This is not the time to pay taxes) Kinds of Objects 1. Considered and Rejected Objects & Alternatives during research 2. Known Objections that audience will bring 3. Possible Alternatives that audience might think of 4. Objections that may occur after reading Precision & Accuracy 1. Key terms 2. Oversimplified causes & effects 3. Overgeneralized 4. Counterexamples and special cases Evaluation & criticism 1. Analyze the meaning of terms in Claim, evidence. Ambiguity? 2. Evidence really support the claim? 3. Even if, strong enough? 4. Is the warrant both supportasble & applicable to the claim? Guide to Research & Reading Your Questions 1. What is the point? 2. What is the scope of your claim? 3. What evidence do you have? 4. What links evidence to claim? 5. But what about? Your Source’s Answers 6. But what if? 7. No problems here at all? 1. I claim that… 2. I limit it to… 3. I offer as evidence… 4. I offer this principle… 5. I can rebut that. First… 6. May claim stands as long as… 7. Well. I have to admit that... Multiple Dimensions of a Problem Logos—technical, specialized, scientific, professional definition of the problem. Ethos—ethical, spiritual definition of the problem. Pathos—emotional, social, interpersonal definition of the problem. Cosmos—states the problem in a larger context, as it relates to the larger system. This is Not an Article Just Some Food for Thought on How to Write One Carsten Sørensen http://is.lse.ac.uk/staff/sorensen/downloads/not/notart.pdf