Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Mary Rossio Concordia University Week 7 As mentioned previously, the determination of whether government should regulate the behavior of individuals in the name of health requires policymakers to go beyond the questions of efficiency and political acceptability. What moral warrant is there for such intervention? Does such a warrant also impose an obligation on the part of government to intercede? Does paternalistic government oversight and interaction overshadow individual rights in a time of crisis, or for that matter, at any time? What is a right? First and foremost, policymakers must have everyone’s best interest in mind when considering a new law or regulation. The complicated part is who is best to decide what the best is, the individual or the government. I do feel that an individual should be able to make their own decisions in regards to their life/health but not if others can be impacted in a negative or harmful way. “Given the commitment to individual autonomy, state actions are difficult to justify” (Bayer & Moreno, n.d.). One’s decision of what they feel is right or justifiable, may be best for them but may directly impact the life/health of others in a not so positive way. In my opinion, this can test the moral warrants of individuals. I feel that a good reference point is the Hippocratic Oath of “to do no harm”. If we all lived in compliance with meaning of this oath, we may not feel the need to fight for individual rights. The community may have more of a focus as a whole rather than a biased opinion. If an individual’s choice puts others at risk, than I believe that this warrants an intervention. Politically speaking, the government has an obligation to keep the public safe and free of avoidable conditions/circumstances. “The goal of justifiable paternalism is to protect the individual from the consequences of actions that he or she would not choose to engage in where the capacity for free choice truly present” (Bayer & Moreno, n.d.). Yes, we live in the land of the free, but that doesn’t give us the right to inflict judgement or ill intentions on others. Without standards, laws, and policies, we would live in a world of uncertainty and chaos. So therefor, there are times where the government must step in. References Bayer, R., & Moreno, J. (n.d.). Health Promotion: Ethical and Social Dilemmas of Government Policy. Retrieved 15 April 2015, from http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/5/2/72.full.pdf. Greek Medicine - The Hippocratic Oath. (2002, September 16). Retrieved 15 April 2015, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/greek/greek_oath.html.