Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
1 Jan 19, 2006 How to Rescue Sick Projects Frank Howard, PMP TRSC/Robbins-Gioia, LLC 703 767-1220 [email protected] 2 Jan 19, 2006 What is a Sick Project? A Project that can not seem to get started A Project that is breaching thresholds – – – 3 Over cost Over budget Under performing A Project that is being deserted by stakeholders Jan 19, 2006 Should We Rescue this Project? Is the function still needed? Are there still sponsors? Do we have the time/resources to help? Is recovery possible? If not, Put the project out of its misery! 4 Jan 19, 2006 How can we rescue these projects? Approach the problem like a doctor! Collect project’s vital signs Form a diagnosis Prescribe a treatment Monitor progress Adjust as necessary 5 Jan 19, 2006 Vital Signs Basic measures of health – – – Stakeholders – – 6 Cost Schedule Performance Expectations Circumstances Jan 19, 2006 Symptoms Where does it hurt? – – – – – 7 Cost Schedule Performance Operations and Maintainability Stakeholders Expectations vs. Reality Jan 19, 2006 Diagnosis Core project causes – – – – – 8 Vaulted expectations Poorly defined requirements Loss of baseline Uncontrolled costs Uncontrolled schedule Poor/missing management Combinations of the above Jan 19, 2006 Vaulted Expectations Double speak – 9 White lies Tomorrow is new day The sky is the limit It slices, it dices, . . . it does windows! I know that you don’t care, but . . . Jan 19, 2006 Poorly Defined Requirements 10 Ambiguous Not testable Not documented Not sponsored Unachievable Unnecessarily complex Jan 19, 2006 Requirements An agreed upon set of needed testable functions Testable through: Test Demonstration Stakeholder Buy-in Similarity Inspection 11 Jan 19, 2006 Loss of baseline 12 Contract baseline – Casual direction Technical baseline – Uncontrolled changes Functional baseline – Stakeholder creep Test baseline – Problems upon problems Jan 19, 2006 Uncontrolled Costs Cost multipliers – – – – – 13 Uncontrolled baseline changes Administrative confusion “Club Program Office” travel We can go faster, farther, higher, lower, bigger, smaller . . . . It will just take a little longer Jan 19, 2006 Poor/Missing Management 14 No processes No decisions Tyrannical Bureaucratic bottlenecks Go with the flow Consensus rules Jan 19, 2006 15 Jan 19, 2006 Baseline Control Tools Contract baseline – Contracting Officer Technical baseline – Change Control Board Functional baseline – Change Control Board Test baseline – Structured testing – – 16 Functional Configuration Audits Physical Configuration Audits Jan 19, 2006 Cost Control Tools Cost controls – – – – – – 17 Earned value management processes Specific spending limits, no exceptions Program Office discipline Performance based reimbursement Restricted travel, each trip and traveler justified How good is enough? Jan 19, 2006 Managed Expectations Say what you mean – 18 No sugar coatings Keep your promises Limit project to achievable goals Don’t oversell goals Obtain Stockholder buy-in Jan 19, 2006 Management Use management tools – – Risk management Earned Value management – – 19 Cost performance baseline Integrated Master Schedules Configuration management Communications management Identify and track management metrics Accept the responsibility for failure Use structured testing techniques Jan 19, 2006 Treatment Strategies New Program Plan Start with the simple solutions Monitor results closely and frequently – – 20 Inch-Stones Instill schedule and cost discipline in all project participants Recognize success Make failure distasteful Jan 19, 2006 How do we determine treatment? Realistic assessment of current project status – Compare current status to expectations – 21 Is the “possible” enough in the interim Identify all gaps – What is possible? Develop logical plan to fill gaps after project is back on track Learn the “Art of the possible” Jan 19, 2006 What is the treatment? The “Art of the possible” A realistic course of action – Expectation Management – Crawl before you walk Each Small step is a big thing Effective use of management tools Risk Management Earned Value Management – – – 22 Cost Performance Baseline Integrated Master Schedules Configuration Management Communications Management Get Stakeholder buy-in before you implement Jan 19, 2006 Monitor Treatment Progress Implement treatment Keep your finger on the pulse Frequent reports to all stakeholders – – Claim success upon success – 23 Generate enthusiasm for small steps Integrate Stakeholders into the solution – Realistic Cost, Schedule, and Performance baselines It Pays to Advertise Jan 19, 2006 Release Project into Normal Management Processes The program is healthy when it has: – – – – 24 A documented achievable plan Is demonstrating successes Shows competent Management oversight Has a satisfied stakeholder base Jan 19, 2006 Take Aways Primary areas of failure – – – – Primary remedies – – 25 Vaulted expectations Requirements definition Baseline control Cost control Strong consistent management control Realistic program goals, met on time, within cost Jan 19, 2006 Any Questions 26 Jan 19, 2006