* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download TDE in the XMM-Newton slew survey
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
TDE in the XMM-Newton slew survey Richard Saxton S. Komossa, A. Read, P. Lira, K. Alexander, P. Esquej, P. Rodriguez, M. Wieringa, I. Steele Contents • Characteristics of soft-X-ray selected TDE focussing on the ones found in the XMM slew • Where do X-rays in TDE come from? • Galaxy types • Latest results ROSAT – the first TDE detector Theory had it that disrupted material would circularise and be accreted causing an EUV / soft X-ray flare (Rees 88 etc.) in galactic nuclei. Debris would fall back at a rate of t-5/3 and luminosity would follow the mass. Launched in 1990 Sky survey found 100,000 objects ROSAT high variability galaxies – Tidal Disruptions (TD) RXJ 1242.6-1119 Komossa & Greiner 1999 RXJ 1420.4+5534 Greiner+ 2000 Komossa 2012 Rosat discovered several quiescent galaxies with soft Xray flux variations > 100. Light curve decay roughly compatible with t-5/3 . Dropping by factors of 1000s in some cases. RXJ 1624.9+7554 Grupe, Thomas & Leighly 1999 NGC 5905 Bade, Komossa & Dahlem 1996; Gezari+ 2003 Summary of ROSAT results • • • • Decays with t-5/3 Decays by factors of 1000s X-ray spectrum is soft as expected Shown to be TDE (candidates) rather than AGN, SNR, ULX, Blazars etc. • Number counts low because nothing deep to compare against. Four new ones were found by comparing RASS with XMM pointed obs – 2% of sky hence will be hundreds found when compared with eRosita final cat. (Maksym 2014, Khabibullin & Sazonov 2014) XMM-Newton slew survey Has covered ~85% of sky in the 0.2-2, 2-12 and 0.2-12 keV bands as of Jan 2015 and found >30,000 sources Compare with ROSAT >10x limit of 3x10-13 ergs/s/cm2 - Nearby X-ray TDE. List of TDE in XMM slew SRC Z Lbol Soft Hard Radio (Log) NGC 3599 0.002 42 Y N ? SDSS 1323 0.07 44 Y N ? SDSS 1201 0.15 45 Y N N 2MAS 0619 0.07 44 Y Y N 2MAS 0740 0.02 44 Y Y 1 mJy XMM 0630-60 ?Mainetti, Campana ? Y ColpiN2016 ? and New One 0.029 43 Y ? ? Slew – temporal characteristics Overall index -5/3 SDSS 1201+30 SDSS J1323+43 XMM 0630-60 2MASS 0740-85 NGC 3599 2MASS 0619-65 Slew – UV temporal characteristics 2MASS 0619-65 2MASS 0740-85 Slew – temporal characteristics t-5/3 Soft X-ray t-1.2 t-5/3 0740-85 uvw2 (2246Å) – GALEX NUV Slew – dips Strong dips, due to what ? SDSS 1201+30 Swift 1644 0740-85 Curtis Saxton et al. 2012 Slew – dips : 0740-85 Dips are not caused by neutral absorption. Could be ionised absorption or intrinsic emission drop Slew – slow rise Slow rise sometimes ? 18 months 5 months NGC 3599 0619-65 Tidal stripping of red giant: MacLeod, Guillochon & Ramirez-Ruiz 2012 Delayed TDE : Guillochon & Ramirez-Ruiz 2015 Slew – spectral characteristics Brem=0.3 keV SDSS 1201+30 Bbod = 66 eV SDSS J1323+43 Γ=2, Bbod=86 eV Bbod = 95 eV 0740-85 NGC 3599 Disk_bbod = 59 eV 0630-60 Γ=2, Bbod=114 eV 2MASS 0619-65 Slew – spectral characteristics 0740-85 Power-law + Disk black-body Modelling X-ray spec with multicoloured disk black-body underpredicts the UV. Slew – spectral characteristics Fit UV, soft and hard X-rays Optxagn – Done et al. 2011 - Thermal for UV - Comptonised thermal – soft - Power-law for hard - With strongly-ionised absorber - cf ASSASN 14li (Miller et al. 2016) Where do X-rays in TDE come from ? • Kara et al. 2016 – Swift 1644 reflection from accreting matter - M_BH a few x 10^6 - 400s doubling = <70 Rg 0740-85 soft X-ray light curve • 0740 – variability , hence from within 70 Rg Galaxy Types Arcavi et al. 2014; French et al. 2016 - E+A galaxies disproportionately represented in optical TDE samples 0740-85 starburst ~2 Gyr ago H_delta (ew) ~3 Ang, H_alpha (ew) < 1 Ang 0740-85 – also resides in a post-starburst host galaxy New source z=0.029 15x brighter than ROSAT upper limit Summary • • • • • • • • • Soft X-ray TDE rate about 10-4 /gal/year. 7 events found in slew survey, 3 are well monitored Mix of soft and soft+hard – don’t know how many just hard Index=5/3 over long-term curve but highly variable in detail. Unsure if variability intrinsic or ionised absorption or both. At least one found in E+A galaxy Hard emission most likely from Compton rather than a jet Open question why hard component sometimes not present. Radio usually not present but weak emission in 0740-85.