Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Dana Rei Fukuda Rauckhorst University of Puget Sound December, 2004 Aging In Place: What is Our Role? Introduction: “The nation is aging” (AOTA, 2003). By the year 2030, it is predicted that more than 70 million Americans will be over the age of 65; demographically representing the largest portion of the national population. Projections also state that 95% of these individuals, will continue to live in the community and home environments as long as possible. As the population of older adults grows, lifespan increases, and needs change, environmental modification will becomes more of a necessity for individuals desiring to “age in place.” New challenges and opportunities of services will be presented to health professionals. “Values of autonomy, productivity, engagement, and purpose are all implied by aging in place, and these values are congruent with the philosophy of occupational therapy” (AOTA, 2003). Determination of an appropriate fit between the environment and the individual’s ability levels, require the skills and expertise of an occupational therapist. Suitable matches will allow for “aging well” within a physical context; home environment. Therefore, this report will attempt to reveal the rationale for, involvement and effectiveness of occupational therapy with aging in place. Evidence Based Practice Question: What is the role of occupational therapy in creating, addressing, and promoting contexts for geriatric individual’s home environmental interventions in order to successfully age in place? Does evidence for effectiveness of the occupational therapy role exist? Criteria for Evidence Selection: Types of Participants: ☻ Adults, specifically geriatric/elderly desiring to age in place ☻ With or without disabilities ☻ Occupational therapists/occupational therapy assistants Types of Interventions: Proactive stance: ☻ Lifestyle Redesign/Well Elderly program ☻ Home assessments/modifications, “user friendly” design criteria ☻ Home safety evaluations/behavioral strategies ☻ Fall prevention ☻ Models of service; alternatives to one-on-one service delivery ☻ Consultation, education, and organizational/group clients ☻ Advocacy: policy and program development ☻ Collaboration with other professions Types of Studies : ☻ Randomized Controlled Trials, Cross-Sectional Studies, Case Reports, ☻ Evidence levels: I, III,IV, & V Table Summarizing the Evidence: Evidence for role of OT References Study Level of Design/ Evidence Data Collection Gallup CrossLEVEL Organization. Sectional III (2003) Study (Phone survey) Trickey, F. et Case LEVEL al. (1993) Reports IV Siebert, C. (2003) Literature Review LEVEL IV Auriemma, D. et al. (1999) Literature Review LEVEL V Klein, S. et al. (1999) Literature Review LEVEL V Sample Size Outcome/Intervention Summary of Results (Conclusions & Implications) 500 adults age Questions regarding 60 or older awareness, perception, & knowledge of OT, & opinions about importance of healthcare-related activities 177 elderly Evaluated/modified housing clients (mean in relation to individual = 76.7 y.o.) of functional status (assisted by 3 home care carpenter). Installation of service grab bars, shower seats, & centers hand-held showers n/a Possible occupational therapy (OT) interventions include home establishment, modification and management, safety procedures and emergency responses, communication device use, performance patterns, address temporal & physical context Psychosocial implications for OT when dealing with individuals wishing to AIP Home inspections, modifications, & follow-up inspections Awareness of the role of OT is low. OT practitioner are generally perceived correctly, however perspectives overlap with less well-trained health care workers (not shared by physical therapists) 898 modifications completed, half modifications made to bathrooms. These modifications had highest utilization rates. Average cost of home adaptations = $150.00 per household. Aging in place (AIP) is the only feasible option for a society with 35 million people over age 65 and a subsequent generation with an 80+ year predicted lifespan. Although expectation to age in homes/communities are increasing, potential for physiological complications still exist (e.g. – aging, illness, etc.). Therefore, AIP presents opportunities & challenges for OT to contribute to programs/policies through facilitation of common OT values (autonomy, productivity, engagement, purpose). High societal value on independent living and increased need for home modifications, yield certain psychosocial implications for OT practitioners when collaborating with clients wishing to AIP. In all home repair and modification programs administered by the Housing Dept.; Philadelphia Corporation for Aging (PCA) programs, OTs assist the consumer/programs in developing useful & proper home modifications. Followup inspections yield useful information on construction specifications & on the modification process. Evidence for effectiveness of OT involvement Cumming, R.G. et al. (1999) Randomized Controlled Trial LEVEL I 530 subjects (mean = 77 y.o.) recruited before discharge from hospital Intervention included home visit/assessment for environmental hazards & facilitation of any necessary home modifications. 36% of subjects in intervention group had at least one fall compared to 45% of controls (P = .050). The intervention was effective only among subjects (n = 206) who reported having one or more falls during the year before recruitment into the study; in this group; was 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.83). Similar results attained with survival analysis techniques (proportional & multiplicative hazards models) & fall rates (mean number of falls per person per year). About 50% of home modifications were in place at a 12-month follow-up visit. Modifications by OTs can prevent falls, but home visits may also affect behavior, allowing safer living in the home/external environment. Gitlin, L. et al. (2001) Randomized Controlled Trial LEVEL I Randomized Controlled Trial (Large-scale) LEVEL I Five 90 minute home visits by OTs who provided education & physical/social environmental modifications. 3 groups: one with OT/Well Elderly Treatment Program, one with social activities, on with no treatment. OT group 2 hour per week; social activity group 2 ¼ hour per week (w/o professional guidance) Compared to controls, intervention caregivers reported fewer declines in patients’ instrumental activities of daily living/self-care & fewer behavioral problems 3 months posttest. Intervention spouses reported lower incidence of being upset, women reported enhanced self-efficacy in managing behaviors/functional dependency (same w/minorities). Clark, F. et al. (1997) 171 caregivers (aged 2392) of dementia patients 361 elderly (ages 6089) residents of Los Angeles - After nine months, OT intervened group showed significantly positive differences from other groups. While control group declined in all eight measured categories of health/well-being, the OT group advanced in five areas and declined considerably less in other three areas. The social activities group was synonymous with the control group - Group sessions were a cost-effective method of enabling the participants to maintain a healthier/more independent lifestyle, however individualization was key to success of OT intervention. - Adding preventive OT programs for seniors to health plans could delay reliance on more expensive nursing home care, and loss of independence - Shift in OT from reactive to proactive/preventative Results indicate that OT provides a health advantage for seniors. Summary of Evidence: ♥ Apparent existence of and need for the role of OT in AIP. ♥ General description of OT role in AIP include: - home assessment/inspection, visits for safety precautions (e.g. – fall prevention) - evaluation of “fit” between person’s ability & environment for maximum independence - physical/social environmental modifications (e.g. - in bathroom, kitchen, hallways/doorways, living room, bedroom, etc.) - advocacy for programs & policies - establishing alliances with other disciplines involved with AIP - developing contexts (physical, social, etc.) for geriatric individuals desiring independent living ♥ Aside from indications/outcomes of efficacy in OT intervention with fall prevention & the Well Elderly Treatment Program, evidence for effectiveness of OT’s role within the specific domain/contexts of AIP, was lacking. No substantial evidence was found. Implications for Consumers: AIP can help: maintain social network: aging in place promotes self-sufficiency, encourages cost-saving interdependence between friends & neighbors in community, offsets social isolation, doesn’t involve costly professional support unless necessary limit the negative effects of relocation & dramatic transitions [Lawler 2001] Implications for Practitioners: Target caregivers & older adults with consumer-oriented message & guidelines about the important role OT can play in maintaining independence, self-care, & safety Develop more robust partnerships with service organizations for the aging & providers at both the national & community-based levels Awareness of OT is low, therefore provide OT practitioners with communication tools that make it clear how the specific service being delivered to clients connects with the larger goal of helping individuals successfully age in place. [Gallup Organization, 2003] Implications for Researchers: More research is required to determine the effectiveness of occupational therapy intervention and involvement with aging in place. Utilization of the newly developing occupational science field should be considered for its ability to supplement the realm of public health through examination of how daily activities contribute to physical health & well-being Recommendations for Best Practice: Image of OT needs to be defined by training/professional knowledge to be distinguished from other healthcare providers Promotion of proactive use of OT to assist with: Reduction of healthcare cost to families, increase quality of life for independent older Americans, prevent accidents in the home This will further serve to define & identify OT personnel as essential & important healthcare professionals having both reactive & proactive solutions for healthy independent living Outreach programs to both the well-elderly & their families should seek to identify OT services with independent living through proactive offerings of OT services References: ☺ AARP. (2000). Fixing to stay: A national survey on housing and home modification issues. Retrieved November 20, 2004 from http://research.aarp.org/il/home_mod.pdf ☺ American Occupational Therapy Association. (2004). AOTA & Rebuilding Together - Strategies for success: Stories from the community. Retrieved November 30, 2004 from http://www.promoteot.org/AI_Stories.html ☺ Auriemma, D., Faust, S., Sibrian, K., & Jimenez, J. (1999). Home modifications for the elderly: Implications for the occupational therapist. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 16, 135-144. ☺ Baum, C. (2002). Creating Partnerships: Constructing our future. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 49, 58-62. ☺ Campbell, J., Herge, E. (2000). Challenges to aging in place: The elder adult with MR/DD. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 18(1), 75-90. ☺ Clark, F., Zemke, R., Jackson, J. (1997). The USC well elderly study. Retrieved November 30, 2004 from http://www.usc.edu/assets/ot/faculty/research/2.html ☺ Cumming, R., Thomas, M., Szonyi, G., Salkeld, G., O’Neil, E., Westbury, C., & Frampton, G. (1999). Home visits by an occupational therapist for assessment and modification of environmental hazards: A randomized trial of falls prevention. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 12, 1397-1402. ☺ Dishman, D. (n.d.) Inventing Wellness Systems for aging in place. Retrieved December 2, 2004 from http://www.computer/homepage/0504/dishman/?SMSESSION=NO ☺ Gallup Organization. (2003). Forging connections: A national public awareness survey of occupational therapy’s role in helping independent-living older adults. [Preliminary report]. Retrieved November 20, 2004 from http://www.promoteot.org/docs/Gallup.pdf ☺ Gitlin, L. (2003). Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. Gerontologist, 43, 628-37. ☺ Gitlin, L., Corcoran, M., Winter, L., Boyce, A., Hauck, W. (2001). A randomized, controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: Effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. Gerontologist, 41, 4-14. ☺ Klein, S., Rosage, L., Shaw, G. (1999). The role of occupational therapist in home modification programs at an area agency on aging. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 16, 19-37. ☺ Holm, M. (2000). Our mandate for the new millennium: Evidence-based practice [Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture]. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 575-585. ☺ Intel Corporation. (n.d.) Helping the elderly age gracefully at home. Retrieved December 2, 2004 from http://www.intel.com/research/prohealth/csaging_in_place.htm ☺ Jackson, J., Carlson, M., Mandel, D, Zemke, R., & Clark, F. Occupation in lifestyle redesign: The well elderly study occupational therapy program. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(5), 326-336. ☺ Lawler, K. (2001). Aging in place: Coordinating housing and health care provision for America’s growing elderly population. Retrieved November 20, 2004 from http://www.chrcatlanta.org/docs/aginginplace.pdf ☺ Mynatt, E., Essa, I., & Rogers, W. (n.d.) Increasing the opportunities for aging in place. Retrieved November 20, 2004 from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fce/ahri/publications/agingInPlace-cuu2000.pdf ☺ National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association. (2003). The NRMLA guide to aging in place. [Booklet]. Retrieved November 20, 2004 from http://www.seniorsafehome.com/Portals/5/consumer_guide_4.pdf ☺ Scott, A., Butin, D., Tewfik, D., Burkhardt, A., Mandel, D., & Nelson, L. (2001). Occupational therapy as a means to wellness with the elderly. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 18, 3-22. ☺ Siebert, C. (2003) Aging in place: Implications for occupational therapy. OT Practice, 8, CE1– CE8. ☺ Taira, E., Carlson, J. (2004). Aging in place: Designing, adapting, and enhancing the home environment. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press. ☺ Trickey, F., Maltais, D., Gosselin, C., & Robitaille, Y. (1993). Adapting older persons’ homes to promote independence. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 12(1), 1-14.