Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Model Work Health and Safety Regulations and Codes of Practice Public Comment Response Form Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management Part 3.1 General working environment Individual/Organisational name: Victorian Volume Home Builders safety Alliance (VVHBSA) Section A: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations Exposure Draft General Comments (e.g. regulatory impact, level of prescription, notification, record-keeping requirements) No comment Chapter 1: Preliminary (e.g. definitions) VVHBSA raises concern in relation to the definition of the term “Person Conducting Business or Undertaking” (PCBU). The term may be confused with “Principle Contractor “ (PC) which now is defined as Person with management and control of the workplace. VVHBSA requests that there be clearer definitions regarding PCBUs to include Employers who also employ contractors and subcontractors in their own right who then undertake work for a PC or PCBU. The shared duty of care and responsibilities to apply to all Employers. The relationship between PCs and suppliers/trades had been particularly problematic in Victoria since the introduction of similar legislation in 2007. Regulators appear to be of the opinion that the only entity with responsibilities on construction sites is the PC. In most cases where suppliers and trades are non compliant on site, notices are issued against the PC and not the Suppliers/trades (who is also a PCBU). The new regulations have an opportunity to clarify the duties relating to the PCBUs working under the control of the PC. Chapter 2: Representation and participation (e.g. power to request review of risk control measures in certain circumstances) No comment Chapter 3: General workplace management