Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Methodological critic of “Resisting the Protectionist Temptation: Industry and the Making of Trade Policy in France and the United States During the 1970s” by Helen Milner 1st comment paper Designing Social Inquiry Ayoung Kang (I32001) 14th of April, 2014 (1) Restate the author’s major research question and theories (or hypotheses) in “if, then” type of generalization (here I want you to assess the author's IVs and DV); ① Background: 1970s had been hard time for most economies in the world. Generally, it is believed that advanced countries raised trade barrier, mainly non-tariff barriers to protect both import and export industries through many ways including export subsidies and VER (Voluntary Export Restraints). Regulations under GATT were ignored by many countries through 70s and 80s along with the increasing trading blocs. However, the int’l system remained relatively liberal. ② Puzzle: why major industrial sectors of the advanced industrial states stayed open despite the economic and political troubles of the 1970s? ③ Hypothesis: If international economic interdependence increases (in the form of exports, multinational production, and global intra-firm trade) between advanced industrial countries, it affects national preferences and trade policies to maintain a liberal trade system by influencing the preferences of industries and firms. ④ IVs(Independent Variables) Economic interdependence including Export dependence, multinationality, and foreign investment. ⑤ DV(Dependent Variable) Preferences for protectionism at the level of the firms and industries (2) Assess the definitions the author had adopted for his independent and dependent variables and whether they are adequately used. Protectionism: policy restricts or restrains international trade, often done with the intent of protecting local businesses and jobs from foreign competition. It has broad meaning as the author mentioned and RTA (Regional Trade agreement) can be considered as new face of protectionism.1 However, in this article, Milner used ‘protectionism’ as a narrow meaning than general definition without defining it. Economic interdependence: In this paper, international economic interdependence was explained and used as a broader concept in the form of exports, imports, multinational production, and global intra-firm trade. The author claimed while France was more trade dependent within the EC, the US was more dependent on multinational firms and both countries relied upon trade within those firms showed similar levels of integration into the international economy. 1 Montej Abida(2013), The Regional Integration Agreements: A New Face of Protectionism From this, we can tell that Milner considered increasing trade and multinational production within the trading bloc, EC as the sign of interdependence which can accelerate trade liberalization. However, it is hard to say that there is causality link between trade liberalization and RTA membership.2 I think she had to point out that she considered trade concentration within the region as economic integration into the world economy. Export dependence: Certain level of export dependence accelerates open trade regime, however this doesn’t mean that higher export dependence leads freer trade policies. Most developing countries had much high export dependence about 35% than advanced countries about 20% during 2000s.3 If we follow the logic of Milner, developing countries should have been more active in formation of freer trade regime. Multinationality: it is appropriately used as multinational production mainly to explain how much firms are globalized and benefit from production located in other countries with cheaper, more abundant factors. (3) Evaluate the procedures used in measuring variables and the tests devised to show causal relationship between the author's IVs and DV (here I want you to critique the author's selection of the cases.) Where the author’s method has shortcomings, show how it might have 2 World Bank, Faezeh Foroutan (1998), Does Membership in A Regional Preferential Trade Arrangement Make a Country More or Less Protectionist?, p9 3 UNDP(2012), Export Dependence and Export Concentration, p21 been improved. controlling omitted variable bias Milner selected 18 different industries under the highest levels of import competition and economic difficulties to test causal relationship between IVs and DV. When import competition is fixed at highest level, she examined their degree of integration into the int’l economy and their trade policy preferences using data on their export dependence, multinationality and intra-firm trade. If import competition and other IVs including export dependence are not highly correlated, it would have been better to use import competition as IVs. As import competition is one of the important IVs, it would’ve been omitted variable bias if Milner does not hold this variable at the constant level. Limited number of samples (#<20) Though she solved the omitted variable bias by holding the crucial variables at fixed level, she still had the problem as bigger number of cases can produce more precise correlation between IVs and DV. However, the cases Milner used as the set of samples were only 18, less than 20. As Milner mentioned, for intermediate cases, preferences were complex as they wanted limited or selective protection. She needed more cases to prove desired result. Thus, with the small number of cases, it would be better solution to use samples can vary widely according to the level of IV such as comparison between domestic firms and MNCs at the hightst levels of import penetration to show clearer causality.