Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Modelling forest ground vegetation on landscape scale Larisa Khanina1, Maxim Bobrovsky2, Alexander Komarov2, Alex Mikhajlov2 1Institute of Mathematical Biology, Russian Academy of Science, Pushchino, Russia 2Institute of Soil Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, Russian Academy of Science, Pushchino, Russia DynamicDATA EU25+ Regional Workshop I EFIMOD PAR Climate Initialisation Available PAR for trees, ground vegetation and natural regeneration T 1 R 2 E 3 E . S n Ground vegetation Ground Vegetation Natural regeneration Redistribution of soil available nitrogen Model of soil organic matter ROMUL Forest manager Ecosystem production Data viewer Graph interface Soil features Trees renewal 3D visualisation At the first step · an approach · an algorithm · a special software to calculate dynamics of ground vegetation diversity at a level of forest stand on a base of · Forest Inventory Data · forest simulated results Our approach plant species functional groups in ground vegetation modelling ecological-coenotic species groups introduced in Nitsenko (1969) Species ordination Ellenberg’s scores (by ordination ecological of phytosociological indicator relevés) species values Multivariate analysis Results of multivariate analysis ca. 1000 forest vascular species were split into the functional groups Boreal Vaccinium myrtillus, Maianthemum bifolium, Pyrola rotundifolia, Linnaea borealis Nemoral Asarum europaeum, Aegopodium podagraria, Galeobdolon luteum, Milium effusum Piny Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Pteridium aquilinum, Antennaria dioica, Calluna vulgaris Nitrophilous Aconitum septentrionale, Stellaria nemorum, Urtica dioica Meadow Fragaria vesca, Alchemilla sp., Dactylis glomerata Water/Olg Caltha palustris, Typha angustifolia, Carex globularis To use the groups for modelling dynamics of ground vegetation · to define the dominant group at the initial step of simulation · to define rules of the group switching according to dynamics of the simulated parameters tree species composition, light supply, deadwood volume, litter, soil fertility and moisture Definition of dominant species groups at the initial step Forest Inventory Data Dominant species in ground vegetation Dominant group(s) in ground vegetation Database on ecological-coenotic groups of plant species Definition of dominant species groups at the initial step Forest Inventory Data Dominant tree species Forest Site Index soil fertility and moisture Regional probability tables of correspondence Tree Dominant – Forest Site Index Dominant group in ground vegetation Forest type biodiversity assessment Forest Type = Tree dominant + Dominant group in ground vegetation Vegetation Sample Plots Data Forest type biodiversity indices •Average number of plant species per square unit •Functional structure of ground vegetation Modeling of forest ground vegetation EFIMOD simulations Tree species composition Stand characteristics from Forest Inventory Data Vege tation (forest) type Soil organic matter and nitrogen Deadwood Dominant tree species in overstory Dominant tree species in overstory Dominant ecologo -coenotic group in ground vegetation Dominant ecologo -coenotic group in ground vegetation time 1 time n Vege tation (forest) type BioCalc - a software for dynamic analysis of forest ground vegetation diversity BioCalc input data · tables of probabilistic distribution of the groups in ground vegetation according to the tree dominant and the forest site index · a correspondence table between a forest type and species diversity rank · a time series table of forest stand ecosystem parameters (EFIMOD runs) Rules of functional groups switching User of the BioCalc software selects from the time series tables – in an interactive mode – thresholds for a number of ecosystem parameters. Reaching these thresholds causes a change of the dominant ecological-coenotic group. The user can observe all values of any ecosystem parameter displayed graphically Rules of functional groups switching If the values are digital, a graphic is built where the values go in ascending order, which allows for easy detection of the thresholds BioCalck outputs Dynamics of · ground vegetation functional groups, · forest types, and · species diversity ranks A link with Common-GIS (Andrienko, Andrienko, 1999) for visual exploration of ground vegetation dynamics at the landscape level A case study experimental forestry “Russkii Les” 273-hectare forest lot with 104 stands Four strategies of silvicultural regimes for 200 years time span: ·natural development ·legal clear cutting ·selective cutting ·illegal clear cutting Case study rules of functional group switching (i) meadow group switched to boreal group when spruce began to dominate in overstorey (ii) any group switched to nemoral when oak began to dominate in overstorey (iii) piny group switched to boreal group when deadwood overpassed the 1st threshold value (iv) any group switched to nitrophilous group when deadwood overpassed the second threshold value, and (v) nitrophilous group switched to nemoral group when deadwood fell below the 2nd threshold value Case study rules of functional group switching In the scenarios with clear cuttings: after the clear cutting, a dominant group was taken from a specially designed probabilistic table of the group distribution in ground vegetation designed for the afterclear-cutting conditions Tree dominant dynamics Natural development Selective cuttings Legal clear cuttings Illegal clear cuttings Tree dominant dynamics 200-year dynamics Natural development Legal selective cutting Legal clear cutting Illegal clear cutting The beginning Deadwood dynamics Functional group dynamics Natural development Legal selective cuttings Legal clear cutting Illegal clear cutting Functional group dynamics 200-year dynamics Natural development Legal selective cutting Legal clear cutting Illegal clear cutting The beginning Species diversity dynamics Species diversity dynamics 200-year dynamics Natural development Legal selective cutting Legal clear cutting Illegal clear cutting The beginning Tree dominant dynamics – regional level 50-year dynamics 1 Pine, 2 Spruce, 3 Birch, 4 Aspen I initial state, II legal clear-cutting, III natural development Functional group dynamics– regional level 50-year dynamics I initial state, II legal clear-cutting, III natural development Species diversity dynamics – regional level 50-year dynamics 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 – ranks of species diversity I initial state, II legal clear-cutting, III natural development EFIMOD parameters for ground vegetation dynamics used tree composition deadwood in progress humus amount nitrogen amount in plan light soil moisture Thank you for your attention!