* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 1. Seyfert Galaxies
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Active Galactic Nucleii (AGN) AGN, refers to the existence of energetic phenomena in the nuclei, or central regions, of galaxies which cannot be attributed clearly and directly to stars. In the case of a typical Seyfert galaxy, the total energy emitted by the nuclear source at visible wavelengths is comparable to the energy emitted by all of the stars in the galaxy (i.e., ~ 1011 L ), but in a typical quasar the nuclear source is brighter than the stars by a factor of 100 or more. Historically, the appearance of quasars did not initially suggest identification with galaxies, which is a consequence of the basic fact that high-luminosity objects, like bright quasars, are rare. One is likely to find rare objects only at great distances, which is of course what happens with quasars. At very large distances, only the star-like nuclear source is seen in a quasar, and the light from the surrounding galaxy, because of its small angular size and relative faintness, is lost in the glare of the nucleus. Hence, the source looks ``quasi-stellar''. 1. Seyfert Galaxies First noted by Fath at Lick Observatory in 1908 who was taking spectra of the nuclei of “spiral nebulae” and noted that NGC 1068 had strong emission lines Slipher obtained a higher quality spectrum at Lowell in 1917, noted the lines were similar to planetary nebulae In 1926, Hubble noted 3 galaxies with strong emission lines: NGC 1068, NGC 4051, NGC 4151 In 1943, Carl Seyfert published a list of 12 otherwise normal spiral galaxies which contain anomolous strong, broad high-ionization emission lines and bright central nuclei. These galaxies are now known as "Seyferts." In some Seyferts, the central nucleus outshines the whole surrounding galaxy. The following figure shows successively deeper images of the Seyfert galaxy NGC4151. In short exposures, only the bright nucleus is apparent, but deeper images reveal the normal spiral galaxy around it. NGC 1068: The central nucleus light output varies on timescales of less than a year o So, the emitting region must be less than ~ a light year across, as the source cannot vary coherently on timescales shorter than this due to light travel time effects: Spectra of the nuclei in Seyferts are non-stellar. They contain: o o o Non-thermal continuum emission Narrow (=> low velocity), forbidden (=> low density material) lines which do not vary detectably (=> large emitting region) Broad (=> high velocity broad, up to 8500 km s-1, full width at zero intensity), permitted lines which vary on fairly short timescales (=> small emitting region) o o Also, strong emission in the radio, infrared, ultraviolet, and X-ray parts of the spectrum. Seyferts have only moderate radio emission (~10 40 erg/s) but strong x-ray emission (> 1042 erg/s) Seyfert galaxies have been classified into two basic types: o Seyfert 1 galaxies are bright in the optical, and have both broad and narrow lines in their spectra. o Seyfert 2 galaxies are fainter in the optical (but the same as Seyfert 1s in the infrared), and they only have narrow lines in their spectra. o Intermediate cases with weak broad emission lines also exist, and are classified as Seyfert 1.3, 1.6, etc. The current paradigm for Active Galactic Nuclei explains the variations between these different classes by the different inclinations from which the galaxies are viewed: o o In the broad-line region (BLR) The Keplerian orbital speeds of the clouds around the central massive body will be large => lines are Doppler broadened. Density is high => no forbidden lines are emitted In the narrow-line region (NLR) The Keplerian orbital speeds of the clouds will be much smaller => lines are narrow Density is low => forbidden lines are emitted o So, if the above Seyfert were viewed from above, you would see: Broad permitted lines Narrow Forbidden Lines Bright continuum from the central engine i.e. a Seyfert 1 o If, on the other hand, it were viewed from the side, you would see: No broad permitted lines (obscured by dust torus) Narrow Forbidden Lines No bright continuum from the obscured central engine except in the infrared and X-ray region, which gets through the dust i.e. a Seyfert 2 Note we already have enough information to estimate the mass of the central engine: o H-beta emission lines (wavelength = 486 nm) from the BLR are typically broadened to a width of ~ 2 nm. The gas must therefore have turbulent velocities of ~ v, where v ~ 106 m s-1 o This emission varies on timescales of ~ a year, so the emission must come from a region whose size r ~ 1 light year ~ 1016 m across. o So if the motion of the clouds are bound orbits around the central engine, we can estimate the mass from the usual dynamical formula, i.e. M ~ 1038 kg ~ 108 M . All within a region ~1 light year across !! The AGN Paradigm The following two cartoons summarize the current paradigm by which the nature of the various type of active galactic nucleus can be understood: Direct observational evidence in support of this model comes from an HST image of the dust torus around the centre of the radio galaxy NGC4261: Further support comes from this HST image of the Seyfert galaxy NGC 5728: Here, ionising ultraviolet radiation is emitted by the central source, but it is absorbed by the dust torus, and can thus only escape from the central region in a cone. This image is taken in the light of doubly ionized oxygen, and so reveals the ionization due to the escaping ultraviolet radiation. Evolution / lifetimes of Seyferts. About 10% of Sa and Sb’s are Seyferts – does a galaxy spend 10% of its life as a Seyfert or are 10% of spirals Seyferts? The nuclear emission must certainly last more than 108 years, because Seyfert galaxies constitute about 1 in 100 spiral galaxies. An extreme scenario is that galaxies which are Seyferts are always Seyferts, in which case their lifetime is the age of the Universe (1010 years). The opposite extreme is one where all spirals pass through a Seyfert phase (or phases). SED: big blue bump and infrared bump Note on the optical spectra The optical spectrum of the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 1275. The prominent broad and narrow emission lines are labelled, as are strong absorption features of the host galaxy spectrum. The vertical scale is expanded in the lower panel to show the weaker features. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the broad components is about 5900 km s-1, and the width of the narrow components is ~ 400 km s-1. The emission lines. The permitted lines - those that can be produced at high densities by astronomical standards - show both broad and narrow components. The strongest of these are the hydrogen recombination lines, such as Lyman alpha at 1216 A, H-beta at 4861, and H-alpha at 6563, plus the strong ultraviolet lines of C IV at 1549 and Mg II at 2800. Other features produced only by very rarefied gas at densities of 1000 atoms per cubic centimeter or so - the forbidden lines, denoted by brackets - arise in regions with less velocity structure and are narrower. Some strong examples are [OIII] at 4959 and 5007 A, [O II] at 3727, [Ne V] at 3426, and [S III] at 9060 and 9532. NGC 4151 is a bit unusual in showing strong absorption in several lines, especially Lyman alpha and C IV. The absorption is blueshifted with respect to the line centers, so that it arises in some kind of wind or other gaseous outflow. The spectra of active galactic nuclei are noteworthy in showing species with a large range in ionization at once, from neutral ions such as [O I] and [N I] to highly ionized cases such as [Ne V] and [O VI]. Even hot stars cannot ionize gas as highly as these ions require, so that both a strong source of hard radiation and a wide range in gas density must be present to see such spectra. Radio Galaxies New developments in radio astronomy in the 1950s: A common pattern for radio sources away from the Milky Way (away from the galactic plane): A pair of radio sources, 100kpc – 10Mpc, straddling optical galaxy. Many associated with normal-looking elliptical galaxies, but a few displayed odd features. As techniques improved, not only could vast numbers of radio galaxies be found, but their structures could be mapped in exquisite detail. Interferometer arrays such as the Westerbork Synthesis Telescope (WSRT) and Very Large Array (VLA) revealed that many displayed jets of radio-emitting material tracing from the twin lobes of emission back to a tiny nuclear source. Whatever produced the radio emission had to have a long memory, preserving its direction over millions of years. Emission-line spectra of radio galaxies similar to Seyfert galaxies o Broad line radio galaxies (BLRG) ~ Seyfert 1 o Narrow line radio galaxies (NLRG) ~ Seyfert 2 M87 showed a radio jet shooting thousands of light-years from its core; had already been discovered as an optical jet as early as 1918. Centaurus A looked like en elliptical galaxy cut in two by a thick, irregular absorption lane of dust and gas…here shown in radio, optical, mid-infrared and X-ray: Cygnus A, at the then-remarkable redshift of z = 0.056, was a small fuzzy image with two main lobes.Speculation: Colliding galaxy, splitting galaxy? Radio galaxies are typically found in elliptical galaxies, with extended jets Radio emission is non-thermal - synchrotron radiation as electrons spiral through magnetic fields at relativistic speeds (L>1042 erg/s) There are 2 classes based on jet morphology: Fanaroff-Riley Type I (FRI) – edge darkened radio jets, slower jet speeds, lower radio power Fanaroff-Riley Type II (FRII) – edge brightened radio jets, fast jet speeds ~0.1c, higher radio power Fanaroff-Riley (FR) type. Ordinary, symmetric double structure is seen in Fornax A, 3C 219, and 3C 285. Hydra A (3C 218) exhibits an interesting corkscrew form, sometimes seen as suggesting a long-term precession of the jets feeding outwards from the nucleus, while 3C 449 shows a very long and extended set of helical twists more or less symmetric about the core. The radio source of 3C 315 (the butterfly) is tightly twisted. The optical galaxy spans only a small part of the range of the radio source. In Fornax A, it fills the gap between the two lobes, and in the other cases the visible galaxies are much smaller compared to the radio source extent. See, for example, this combined radio and optical image of 3C219. The radio image (NRAO Very Large Array) is coloured red and yellow and is superposed on an optical image (blue) of the parent galaxy. Thin jets of radio emission can be seen carrying energy from the nucleus of the galaxy to giant radio lobes that are much larger than the entire visible galaxy. the radio emission is highly polarized, so we know that it must be synchrotron emission. A web resource containing images of radio galaxies and Quasars can be found at: http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~abridle/images.htm Summary: Fanaroff-Riley Type II radio galaxies possess hot spots at their outer edges (edgebrightened). Type I do not possess distinct hot spots or they are located within the lobe. The FR Is are generally of lower luminosity and the jet speed is lower. Wide radio jets leading to plumes are often visible in the FR Is. In the FR IIs the jets are relatively weak. One needs relativistic electrons, magnetic field to produce the synchrotron radiation. Hot spots: Assume bulk flow of energy within jets powers the radio lobes! The energy is dissipated where the bulk flow is disrupted. Usually involves shock waves to halt the highly supersonic flow. L = 0.5 (dM/dt) vjet2 The mass outflow rate is given by 2L/vjet2 where L is the power. So, given L = 1038 Watts and a jet speed of c/3 = 108 m/s, yields a mass outflow of 2 x 1022 kg/s. 1 solar mass per year is roughly 2 1030/ 3 107 kg/s = 6.7 1022 kg/s. Therefore, about 0.3 solar masses per year must be ejected Quasars Some radio sources were not associated with galaxies, but with stellar-like sources on optical images In 1963, Maarten Schmidt made the breakthrough that the spectrum of 3C273 had nebular emission lines at the then unheard redshift of z=0.158 Soon afterward, 3C48 was found to be at a redshift of z=0.367 (thus began the race for the highest redshift quasar!) Quasars are very luminous – L ~ 1013-1015L These objects are AGN whose nuclear light dominates so that we can’t distinguish the host galaxy These objects are known as quasi-stellar radio sources (quasars); there are also quasi-stellar objects (QSO’s) identified via the spectra that are radio quiet Radio quiet QSO’s outnumber quasars by 10-30x, the term quasar is often used for both Quasars are variable over small time scales – hours to days! Current record for the highest redshift quasar is z=6.4 found in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. PKS 1117-248: The entire spectrum of quasars: Quasar host galaxies: Many are interacting – does interactions trigger AGN activity? Promote fueling gas into centres? Note: not all galaxies with SMBH are AGN (even the Milky Way) Quasars were much (~1000x) more numerous at z~3 than today Is an AGN a requirement for galaxy formation? Does every galaxy have a SMBH? (Remember -- lots have been discovered in nearby ellipticals and bulges!) More interactions in the past? Quasars were also much more luminous in the past There is probably some combination of luminosity and density evolution! Here are the Luminosity Functions for quasars at different redshifts (actually starts to drop off above z=2). This is the co-moving space density!!! Co-moving volume = 1/(1+z)3 2df quasar luminosity function: Blazars: BL Lacs Catalogued as variable stars (e.g., BL Lacertae) Highly variable, highly polarized Variability occurs on the time scale of days Virtually featureless continuous spectra Also optically violent variables (OVV) quasars Collectively OVV’s and BL Lac’s are known as blazers Interpretation Variability on short time scales implies a small area: R=ct ~ 7-10 AU !! (for timescale variability on the order of hours) Highly luminous! Probably powered by a black hole!! Schwarzschild radius is the radius where the “escape velocity” equals the speed of light around a black hole of mass M: RSch=2GM/c2 Continuum emission powered by gas falling onto central black hole, losing potential energy and radiating Since gas has angular momentum it forms an accretion disk Consists of an accretion disk around a supermassive black hole Gas clouds in surrounding galaxy are ionized by this central engine Clouds closest to the central engine are dense and have high velocities (otherwise they would fall in!). So emission lines from this region are broad (~2000 km/s) – the broad line region (BLR) Clouds farther away from the central engine have a lower density and lower velocities. Line emission is narrow (500-1000 km/s) – the narrow line region (NLR) Dust torus surrounds the central engine and BLR in the same plane as the accretion disk. The orientation of the dust torus relative to the line of sight affects the appearance of the AGN. Summary Seyfert 1: Broad/narrow emission, weakr radio, strong X-ray,spirals, variable Seyfert 2: narrow emission, weak X-ray, spirals, not variable Quasars QSR: broad/narrow, strong radio, FRII, polarisation,variable Quasars QSO: broad/narrow lines, weak radio, weak polarisation, variable Blazars BL lacs: strong polarisation, absent/weak lines, strong radio, highly variable, mainly ellipticals OVV quasars: powerful BL Lacs but with emission lines Radio Galaxies BLRG: Broad/narrow lines, strong radio emission, FR II, weak polarisation, elliptical variable, variable Radio Galaxies NLRG: narrow lines only, strong radio, FR I/II, no polarisation, elliptical, not variable in Seyfert 1s we are observing the active nucleus directly. In Seyfert 2s we observe it through an obscuring structure which prevents us getting a direct view of the optical continuum At higher luminosities, quasars take the place of Seyfert 1s, but the corresponding 'quasar 2s' are elusive at present. If they do not have the scattering component of Seyfert 2s they would be hard to detect except through their luminous narrow-line and hard X-ray emission. High-luminosity radio-loud quasars can be unified with narrow-line radio galaxies in a manner directly analoguous to the Seyfert 1/2 unification. X-ray evidence, where available, supports the unified picture: radio galaxies show evidence of obscuration from a torus, while quasars do not The population of radio galaxies is completely dominated by lowluminosity, low-excitation objects. there is no evidence for a torus in these objects at all. Most likely, they form a separate class in which only jet-related emission is important. At small angles to the line of sight, they will appear as BL Lac objects Superluminal Motion The term ``superluminal motion'' describes proper motion of source structure (traditionally mapped at radio wavelengths) that, when converted to an apparent speed vobs, gives vobs > c. This phenomenon occurs for emitting regions moving at very high (but still subluminal) speeds at small angles to the line of sight. Relativistically moving sources ``run after'' the photons they emit, strongly reducing the time interval separating any two events in the observer's frame and giving the impression of faster than light motion. With the advent of very long baseline interferometry (VLBI), we can obtain very high resolution radio images of jets. These images show that jets form coherent structures over 5 orders of magnitude in scale (~1 pc -> ~ 100 kpc) Somewhat disturbingly, knots seen in the jets observed by VLBI are sometimes moving along the jets at superluminal velocities (v > c)! o This effect can be explained geometrically if the jet is directed nearly along the line of sight: o Taking observations in 2 epochs: o o o By the time that light leaves from position (2), light emitted while blob was at position (1) will have travelled a distance AC So, the difference in arrival time for the observer is So, the apparent velocity as seen by the observer is For example, if phi = 11 degrees and v = 0.999c, then v(OBS) = 10.37 c It is therefore quite possible for a relativistic (but subluminal) jet to appear superluminal. Other exciting subjects: Relatistic beaming and one-sided jets Gravitational Lensing Lyman-alpha forests