Download if on the Internet, Press on your browser to

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
archived as http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Gravity_1.doc
more of Gravity at http://www.stealthskater.com/Science.htm
note: because important web-sites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was
archived from http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m11130.html on January 22, 2002 .
This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned website. Indeed, the reader
should only read this back-up copy if the updated original cannot be found at the original
author's site.
[Keelynet] Re: Gravity/Inertia Dampening Circuit


From: TrevStar22 (view other messages by this author)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:23:13
Hi Jerry -You quoted Brian DePalma as saying "Rotational motion has an effect on the inertia of an object.
The motion of objects in the plane of a spinning flywheel have their inertia REDUCED."
That relates strongly to the work of Henry Wallace whom you probably are aware patented an antigravity field generator based on the concept of how rotating masses affect other masses. Following is a
selection from the web on his work:
Wallace Patents and Politics of Science
Henry Wallace was an engineer at General Electric about 25 years ago and developed some
incredible inventions relating to the underlying physics of the gravitational field. Few people have heard
of him or his work.
US Patent #3626605 -- "Method and Apparatus for Generating a Secondary Gravitational Force Field"
Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA Dec 14, 1971
US Patent #3626606 -- "Method and Apparatus for Generating a Dynamic Force Field" Awarded to
Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA Dec 14, 1971
US Patent #3823570 -- "Heat Pump" (based on technology similar to the above two inventions)
Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Freeport NY July 16, 1973
Wallace discovered that a force field similar-or-related to the gravitational field results from the
interaction of relatively moving masses. He built machines which demonstrated that this field could be
generated by spinning masses of elemental material having an odd number of nucleons -- i.e., a nucleus
having a multiple half-integral value of ђ (the quantum of angular momentum). Wallace used Bismuth
or Copper material for his rotating bodies and "kinnemassic" field concentrators.
Aside from the immense benefits to Humanity which could result from a better understanding of the
physical nature of gravity and other fundamental forces, Wallace's inventions could have enormous
practical value in countering gravity or converting gravitational force fields into energy for doing useful
work. So why has no one heard of him? One might think that the discoverer of important knowledge
1
such as this would be heralded as a great scientist and nominated for dynamite prizes. Could it be that
his invention does not work?
Anyone can get the patents. Study them -- Wallace -- General Electric -- detailed descriptions of
operations -- measurements of effects -- drawings and models -- it is authentic. If you're handy, you can
even build it yourself. It does work. So what is going on?
One explanation I've heard is that Wallace ran up against the politics of Science as dictated in the
late 1960s by the power-block at Princeton, who were primarily interested in promoting the ideas of
their main man (Einstein) and the gravitation-is-geometry paradigm. Maybe there is some truth to this
story. Nowadays, there seems to be a piss-pot full of theoretical physicists working on abstract
geometrical theories and other absurdly difficult mental masturbations, while no one seems to have
made any effort to provide a theoretical explanation of the physics of a nuts-and-bolts invention which
could have enormous practical value.
Maybe we can blame it on the Princeton folks, but I'm more inclined to believe that our defense
industry black project community has confiscated and suppressed knowledge of Wallace's discoveries.
All done of course under the most honorable and sacred banner of "national security". Well, it's been 25
years. We ought to be real secure by now. Isn't it way past time for some trickle-down benefits to real
people? Wallace's inventions offer the potential of improving the quality of life for everyone.
Throughout history, political suppression and hoarding of scientific knowledge has inevitably resulted in
a retardation of human advancement.
It continues today. When will we ever learn?
Regards,
Robert Stirniman ([email protected])
More About the Wallace Patents -- Anti-Gravity Technology
An article about the Wallace patents appeared in the British magazine "New Scientist" in February 1980.
This was written nearly 10 years after Wallace was awarded his patents. Here's a paragraph from the
article.
"Although the Wallace patents were initially ignored as cranky, observers believe that his
invention is now under serious but secret investigation by the military authorities in the
U.S. The military may now regret that the patents have already been granted and so are
available for anyone to read."
I know -- it's a tease. And the rest of the article is the same way. It provides barely enough
information to jab your psyche a little. And not nearly enough to get you off your comfortable ass. And
who knows who the anonymous party of "observers" are who believe that a secret investigation is
underway by the military -- or whether these observers even exist at all. Nonetheless, New Scientist has
a fairly well-established track record for accurate identification of new science trends and issues. And
while the editors of this British journal may be prone to enjoyment of gossip and innuendo, it generally
turns out be grounded in truth.
One thing they got right for sure: The patents are available for anyone to read. Get them. Study
them. No doubt, Wallace got many things wrong about the physical theory of his invention. But he did
discover something very important. It does work. Stay tuned.
2
Regards,
Robert Stirniman ([email protected])
Michael Edelman ([email protected]) writes about the Wallace patents on antigravity
technology:
"Oh yes indeed. I built one, turned it on, and the damn thing floated away. Haven't
been able to get the next one to work."
That's remarkable, Michael. But this is no joke. Although Wallace wasn't able to do anything
immediately dramatic, he did build a device that demonstrated a fundamentally new physical effect.
And he measured it and demonstrated it conclusively in multiple ways.
It has long been postulated that a "kinetic" gravitational force exists in conjunction with the well
know static gravitational force. For many years, scientists and experimenters have theorized that
a"kinetic" gravitational force might exist between relatively moving masses -- analogous to the magnetic
force that exists between relatively moving charges. A force between relatively moving masses is
predicted by some solutions of GR, and has also been predicted by theorists through numerous analogies
between the electromagnetic and gravitational fields. (Both have r-squared law, force required to
accelerate mass, force required to accelerate charge, kinetic energy proportional to MV2, and magnetic
energy proportional to QV2, etc).
People have tried to measure this force for years without success. The "kinemassic" force is very
small and difficult to find. What Wallace did was invent a way to demonstrate it, measure it, and most
importantly put it to use. Wallace discovered how to concentrate the flux of the "kinemassic" field by
using material having unpaired angular momentum in the nucleus -- analogous to how magnetic flux is
more easily generated and concentrated by ferromagnetic material, which has unpaired electron (charge)
spin.
Wallace built a machine which causes the axis of spin of the unpaired angular momentum in the
nucleus to align itself with the Macroscopic spin of the material -- resulting in a much stronger and
measurable kinemassic field. He also clearly documented the existence of the field with multiple
methods of measurement. It's quite a piece of work. You can get the patents. But you won't find much
else anywhere about it because the military has it tucked away. One of the things you can do with it is
use a time varying "kinemassic" field to control/generate a gravitational field and to shield a static
gravitational field -- analogous to a use of a time varying magnetic field to generate or control an electric
field. One of the embodiments of Wallace's invention uses this effect to create a zero gravity chamber
-- possibly similar to the zero gravity chamber that NASA is "rumored" to operate in the Houston area.
Regards,
Robert Stirniman ([email protected])
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Angular Momentum
There is an important relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic angular momentum; microscopic
and Macroscopic angular momentum; and quantum and classical level angular momentum. A body
which is spinning within a larger Macroscopic body which is also spinning will tend to align the axis of
its angular momentum with the spin axis of the larger body.
3
For example, a gyroscope located on the Earth -- unless it is in a frictionless gimbal --will always try
to precess due to the rotation of the Earth into alignment with the Earth's polar axis, at which point it
will no longer precess due to Earth rotation.
Another example: A cylinder of magnetic material spinning around its longitudinal axis will
develop a magnetic field proportional to is angular velocity (Barnett Effect), because the angular
momentum of the electrons in the material will attempt to precess and come into alignment with the
Macroscopic axis of the spinning cylinder, which also brings into alignment the magnetic moment of the
electrons, some of which have unpaired spins (ferromagnetic) resulting in generation of a Macroscopic
magnetic field. Similarly, it is know that a static magnetic field itself contains angular momentum. And
spinning the source of the static field -- whether a magnet or DC current loop -- will result in a
corresponding increase-or-decrease in the field strength.
Another example is the inventions of Henry Wallace which were discovered and patented about 25
years ago when he worked at General Electric. Wallace found that an unusual thing happens when you
spin elemental material which has a nucleus containing an odd number of nucleons (i.e., having an "unpaired" value of angular momentum, resulting in a nucleus with a multiple integer of a one-half value of
the quantum ђ. The spin of the nucleus will begin to line up with the Macroscopic spin axis and will
create a force field related to gravity, which Wallace called the "kinemassic" field. If you haven't heard
of Wallace or his unusual discovery, it might be because information about it has been classified.
if on the Internet, Press <BACK> on your browser to return
to the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)
else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE>
this file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'
4