Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Lake management and restoration procedures in Estonia Information package EU Interreg IIIC project Lakepromo Centre for Limnology Estonian University of Life Sciences Tartu 2005 Preface…………………………………………………………………………………………….3 1 Background……………………………………………………………………………………. 4 1.1 Estonian lakes. The characteristics of lakes suffering from eutrophication………5 1.2 Development of the condition of Estonian lakes………………………………….6 1.3 History and current scope of national lake restoration……………………………8 1.4 Current practices and methods available for lake management and restoration…..9 2 Administrative structure and legislation………………………………………………………..12 2.1 2.2 2.3 Administrative structure…………………………………………………………..12 2.1.1 Institutions engaged in implementation of the Water Act………………...12 2.1.2 Main organizations of water research……………………………………..12 2.1.3 Permit for special use of water…………………………………………….13 Essential national legislation………………………………………………………13 2.2.1 Laws……………………………………………………………………….13 2.2.2 Government Regulations…………………………………………………..14 2.2.3 Regulations of the Minister of the Environment…………………………..15 2.2.4 Order of the Minister of the Environment…………………………………15 2.2.5 Other national plans related to water management………………………..15 Current state of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive………….16 2.3.1 General facts about Estonia………………………………………………..16 2.3.2 Main differences between the Water Act of Estonia and the EU Water Framework Directive………………………………………………………17 2.3.3 Implementation of the Water Framework Directive……………………….17 3 Actors……………………………………………………………………………………………19 3.1 Tasks of different stakeholders and networking……………………………………19 3.2 Overview of research and educational institutions…………………………………20 4 Sources of funding for restoration projects…………………………………………………21 5 Restoration planning and implementation procedures……………………………………..21 6 National best practices and special expertise in methods and projects…………………….23 6.1 Examples of completed restoration projects in Estonia…………………………….23 7 Summary and needs for development………………………………………………………24 References…………………………………………………………………………………………..26 Preface This Lakepromo information package is intended specially for Lakepromo partners and local project participants to lay down a basis for mutual co-operation and learning from other countries. Partners in Lakepromo countries collect information around the common outline, giving an overview of each country’s lake management and restoration. The standard-like structure helps to compare different procedures and to find best practices and solutions to problems. Lakepromo partners will disseminate these information packages further to other stakeholders in their own communities, regions and countries authorities get new ideas for e.g. regional implementation of the Water Framework Directive universities, polytechnics and other teaching and research institutions can use information packages as teaching material restoration project financiers get overview of sources of funding in different countries private enterprises (planners, consults, executors) get overview of restoration methods and operation models in different countries local inhabitants and users of water resources get new ideas for participating in lake restoration projects The emphasis on this booklet is on management and restoration of eutrophicated lakes. However, the UK partner focuses on wetlands and the Spanish partner on its coastal area. As there are many differences among Lakepromo countries, each country chooses the appropriate level of detail in descriptions as far as this common outline is followed. Moreover, the emphasis is on special expertise in each country that other partners could learn during Lakepromo operation. 1 Background Restoration consists of corrective measures in the lake, which are carried out in addition to preventive and/or remedial measures in the watershed area (Adapted from Seppänen 1973, Keto et al. 2004). The following picture illustrates the concepts of lake management and restoration. Condition of lake Condition of the lake GOOD Excessive external nutrient loading POOR Eutrophication Management Condition of lake Reduction of external nutrient loading GOOD Restoration High external and/or internal loading Picture 1. Lake management and restoration (Sammalkorpi) Management 1.1 Estonian lakes There are around 1200 small lakes and reservoirs with an area of at least 1 ha (Fig. 1). Lakes Peipsi and Võrtsjärv are among the largest lakes in Europe. They make up almost 87% of the surface area of Estonian water bodies. Figure 1. Location of Estonian lakes (Kask, 1979). According to the classification developed by A. Mäemets (1974, 1977, 1977a) and based on the natural accumulation type, eight main lake types (among them 27 subtypes) can be distinguished in Estonia: oligotrophic 8%, semidystrophic 5.8%, dystrophic 9%, eutrophic 36.4%, dyseutrophic 36.6, alkalitrophic 2.6%, halotrophic 1.4% and siderotrophic 0.2% ( Fig. 2). 1% 8% 6% 9% 37% 0% 0,2% 3% 36% oligotrophic semidystrophic dystrophic siderotrophic eutrophic alkalitrophic dyseutrophic halotrophic Figure 2. Typology of Estonian lakes (Estonian Environment, 1996) Eutrophication is enrichment of a water body by nutrient salts, which accelerates the growth of algae and higher forms of plant life. This results in aging and vegetal invasion of waters. It is a natural process which can be sped up by human activity. Depending on morphometrical indices, buffering capacity, and content of mineral and organic matter, different lakes have dissimilar sensitivity to eutrophication (Ott, Kõiv, 1999): In deeper mixotrophic lakes the intensification of phytoplankton leads to increase in pH and to oxygen oversaturation in the surface layer; shallow mixotrophic lakes change into macrophytic lakes where pH and oxygen conditions are more stabile. In oligotrophic lakes, where changes were the fastest in 1951-1989, their speed decreased thereafter. In these lakes water became darker, transparency diminished and the content of organic matter is still increasing. Changes in hypertrophic lakes are the smallest because it is hard to spoil a spoilt lake. Eutrophic lakes responded most flexibly to the changes of the environmental conditions: up to the 1980s these lakes became eutrophied fast, while in the 1990s their condition recovered significantly. The aim of the restoration of a lake can be the recovery of its former better condition, improvement of its recreational value, increasing of its production, protection of a certain species or association of species, etc. Exact specification of goals is highly important in sustainable management and restoration of lakes. 1.2 Development of the condition of Estonian lakes More than half of the Estonian lakes are in a hypertrophic, mixotrophic or eutrophic state. Most of them have been strongly influenced by the agricultural factor – fertilizers and wastes from collective farms – which accelerated their eutrophication. As result of the collapse of the Soviet type agriculture, the condition of Estonian lakes started to recover from the beginning of the 1990s. The decreased nutrient influx into the lakes decelerated europhication. In addition to agriculture and lowering of water level, eutrophication has progressed owing to the release of municipal waste, industrial waste, as well as owing to mining and air pollution. Nature protection can not always spare lakes from eutrophication. The main reason for this is ignoring of the principle of protection of the catchment area. Land owners (local governments or private persons) are obliged to follow the rules of environmental protection and lake use. Control over lake use has become more complicated after the privatization of some lakes. The main eutrophication-caused changes in Estonian small lakes during recent decades are (Ott, Kõiv, 1999): Total alkalinity, pH, the content of phosphates and sulphates, and the amount of organic matter has increased significantly. Stratification has become much stronger, and the content of dissolved oxygen near bottom has decreased by half in comparison with the time forty years earlier. As a result of climate change, the vegetation period has become longer, and the amount of nutrients has been distributed more equally between the seasons. Owing to the decline in the N:P ratio in summer plankton, cyanobacteria prevail, and there occur water blooms. Considerable increase in cryptomonads in all lake types. Changes in the composition of the fish community: increase in the abundance of crucian carp and tench, and decrease in bream, perch and pike. Contionuous increase in the number of macrophyte lakes; expansion of the reed zone and impoverishment of the composition of littoral species in large lakes. Mixotrophication of lakes – simultaneous accumulation of allochthonic and autochthonic organic matter. Most Estonian lakes end their existence in the mixotrophic state. Alkalization of lakes in northeastern Estonia as a result of air pollution. As a result of fast and one-sided (the amount of biogenic nutrients is not in balance with the amount of mineral components) nutrient enrichment, accompanied with human impact, many soft water eutrophic and hypertrophic lakes with an unstable regime, uncharacteristic of the region, have developed. Cause of eutrophication Fertilization: excessive amounts of nutrient salts are carried into water bodies Livestock farming: excessive amounts of nutrient salts and organic waste are carried to water bodies Municipal waste: excessive amounts of nutrient salts and organic waste are carried into water bodies Industrial waste: toxic substances, incl. heavy metals, are carried into water bodies Oil shale industry: alkaline waste water, containing nutrient salts, heavy metals and toxic substances, is carried into water bodies. Oil shale energetics: production of greenhouse gases. Oil shale mining: excessive amounts of nitrates and toxic substances are carried into water bodies Peat mining: organic matter is carried to water bodies, acidic water is directed to receiving waters Air pollution: flying ash, nitrogen and sulphur gases Consequences Increase in plant nutrient concentrations in a water body causing increase in primary production. Increase in plant nutrient and organic matter concentrations. Increase in primary production. Changes in oxygen and light conditions. Increase in plant nutrient and organic matter concentrations. Increase in primary production. Changes in oxygen and light conditions. Increase in the toxicity of water and water organisms. Appearance of harmful effects of toxic substances on aquatic organisms. Increase in pH above 9 leads to a remarkable increase in ammonia, which causes fish kill. Increase in plant nutrient and organic matter concentrations. Increase in the toxicity of water and water organisms. Appearance of harmful effects of toxic substances on aquatic organisms. Increase in primary production. Increase in the toxicity of water and water organisms. Appearance of harmful effects of toxic substances on aquatic organisms. Change in water colour and light conditions, increase in organic matter content, decrease in pH. Silting. Change of the living environment. Increase in toxic substances, sulphates, hydrogen sulphide. The status of Estonian lakes in the 1950s and 1960s can be considered still natural, not influenced remarkably by human impact. Two percent of all Estonian lakes were oligotrophic; by the beginning of the 2000s typical oligotrophic lakes had almost disappeared. The number of hypertrophic lakes increased by 1.7-fold. Changes in the types of Estonian lakes are illustrated in Figure 3. Figure 3. Evolution of Estonian lakes (according to Ott, Kõiv, 1999). 1.3 History and current scope of national lake restoration There is no example of a properly prepared and implemented lake restoration project in Estonia, although several attempts have been made. Lake restoration intensified in the1970s when possibilities to restore the previous state of the lakes with lowered water level were investigated and tested. The purpose was largely to increase the proportion of the commercially valuable fish stock, and the tested lakes were Lake Ermistu, Lake Lahepera, Lake Väimela Alajärv, Lake Vasula, Lake Maardu, Lake Suure-Jaani, and Lake Harku. Through a rearrangement of fishery the composition of the fish fauna of large lakes was affected favourably. In Lake Peipsi, according to the recommendations of scientists, burbot, roach and perch, which had been considered invaluable fishes, were rehabilitated. The use of Danish seines which damage the stock of valuable fishes was reduced since 1974 in Lake Peipsi. In LakeVõrtsjärv, fish trawling was prohibited in the 1970s, and the total amount of catches was drastically reduced, while all limitations imposed on bream fishing until then were cancelled. As a result, the former ruff lake became a valuable bream, pikeperch and eel lake. In the 1980s, mostly for recreative purposes, attempts were made to restore lakes like, e.g. Verevi, Arbi, Ülemiste and Neitsijärv. Although the condition of the lakes was improved for several years, persistent results were not achieved. In the Soviet period an attempt was made to improve the status of Lake Lahepera (ca 100 ha) located near Lake Peipsi, using the method of mud removal. Despite previous thorough chemical analysis and the establishment of 36 ha mud deposition fields, the work was not completed: there was found no application for mud, technically low quality pumps roiled the water and nutrient salts from mud entered the water. The condition of Lake Lahepera has deteriorated during recent decades: water transparency has decreased almost three metres in comparison to the year 1951, and the lake is often choked up in winter. Pumping of mud failed for technical reasons also in Lake Väimela Alajärv. In Lake Neitsijärv which was strongly contaminated from municipal waste water, profound investigations were made in 1999 and 2000. The proposed plan of measures is still (2005) without financing. A complex method was used in Lake Ermistu in Tõstamaa: mud removal after lowering water level and supplementing of the local fish community with valuable fish species. However, water lowering failed and the local fish community remained unchanged. By now the lake has changed into a typical makrophyte lake. In Lake Arbi and Lake Verevi (town of Elva), mainly contaminated with municipal wastewater, incoming wastewater was bypassed the lakes, which improved their condition. In Lake Kaiavere water level was raised by one metre when a fish farm was built. After the closing up of the farm, the regulators of water level were not attended and floods destroyed them. Currently, biomanipulation is going on in Lake Ülemiste in Tallinn. The purpose is to remove plankton-feeding non-predatory fish to reduce summer algal blooms. The lake serves as a water supply reservoir for Tallinn. Despite the decrease in the external nutrient load, water transparency in the lake is only 30-50 cm in summer, and blooms of blue-green algae account for increasing the expenses for water purification. Although different methods were considered for application in Lake Ülemiste, e.g. aeration, phosphorus deposition with addition of a coagulant, and mud removal, biomanipulation was chosen as it is environment-friendly and does not disturb the daily operation of waterworks. Biomanipulation was successfully used also in Lake Harku near Tallinn during two years in the 1990s. However, the effect disappeared also in a couple of years after terminating the process. Still, modernisation of sewage treatment and water drainage systems markedly reduced the inflow of nutrient salts into the lake. The periods of extremely low water level have always brought along argument about the need for regulation of water level in large and shallow Lake Võrtsjärv. The possibility to spare water in the lake during a critical situation would avoid a drastic deterioration of the ecological status of the lake, and would preserve the fish stock and maintain the recreational value of the lake. Assessment of the environmental impact on water level regulation has not yet completed. 1.4 Current practices and available methods for management and restoration of lakes Restoration of lakes is a purposeful direction of biological processes in the ecosystems of a lake or reservoir, or application of technical means for decreasing the load of nutrient salts or increasing the amount of water and changing the species composition in a water body. It is important to stop pollution and eutrophication by all means. Establishment of cattlesheds, settlements and industrial enterprises near lakes should be avoided. If this has already been done, it is necessary to find ways to prevent reaching of pollution from there to a water body. It is important to protect also the catchment area of a water body. Method Biomanipulation Raising of water level Removal of macrophytes Regulation of nutrient load Advantages Efficient method, can be combined with other mehods. Creates favourable conditions for fish. Improves markedly the status of the lake. Good method for restoring the lakes with high macrophyte coverage. Comparatively easy to perform if financed. Disadvantages Presumes profound knowledge on food chain in water body. Presumes profound geological and hydrological investigations. Presumes profound investigations. Raising of water level needed additionally. Presumes good co-operation between environmental Removal of bottom sediments Effective method. Method of diffuse aeration (Verner, 1994) Relatively simple method to favour oxidation processes in stratified lakes. Good for oxidation of stratified lakes without spoiling the thermocline. Good for deep lakes with polluted sediments. Relatively short application time: 1.5-2 months. Long-term influence. “LIMNO” system RIPLOX method (Ripl, 1976; 1994) “Contra-acid” system officials, scientists and local authorities. Expensive special technology, using thorough sediment analysis. Hard to perform in deep lakes. Problems with finding a safe place for sediment deposits. Long duration of use. Spoils the thermocline. Long duration of use. Is not always effective. Presumes profound investigation of the whole water body, including laboratory experiments with sediments. Good method against acidification in lakes with high content of humic substances. Biomanipulation is controlling the growth and development of phytoplankton as the basis of the foodweb to stop eutrophication of water bodies with ecological methods. The main idea of biomanipulation is changing the proportions of the abundance of different trophic groups. The method is often called “top-down foodweb control”. Ecological control over plankton growth can be performed as: 1) removal of plankton- and benthos-feeding fish from a water body, 2) introduction of predatory fishes or zooplankton into a water body, 3) creation of better living conditions for predatory fishes and zooplankton, 4) expansion of habitats with a suitable substrate for filtrating river and lake mussels. Biomanipulation is an effective method for balancing matter circulation in water bodies, but its application assumes profound knowledge of the functioning of the ecosystem and complex investigations of the water body. However, during biomanipulation process there often arise problems which could not be foreseen before starting the work. Raising of water level gives the positive results most definitely. In Estonia, the method was used once, successfully, in Lake Kaiavere –. The method presumes intensive preparation: thorough investigations and measurements, clearing of flooded shore regions from trees and brushwood, and geological and hydrogeological investigations to find suitable places for water level regulators. Removal of macrophytes is mostly used in lakes where the coverage of macrophytes is 100% and the depth of the water body does not exceed 1-1.5 metres. Restoration of such water bodies is complicated as in this case biological and landscape planning methods, as well as chemical and hydrological methods are combined. Most macrophytes are removed from some lake parts for recreative purposes. Restoration of the initial form of such lakes is practically impossible. As the effect of this method is usually short-term, it is recommended to use it in combination with raising of water level, decreasing of the pollution load and removal of bottom sediments. Decreasing of the nutrient load presumes exact calculations of the nutrient balance for the lake. The size of the catchment area and the nutrient load from point pollution sources and diffuse pollution have to be considered. Good co-operation between scientists and local authorities is needed. Establishment of sewage treatment plants and sewerage is an expensive but efficient method for decreasing the nutrient load in water bodies. Removal of bottom sediments is the most effective method of restoration of lakes, but there are several restrictions to application of the method. The deeper is the lake, the more expensive and more difficult it is to perform. It presumes thorough chemical analysis of sediments, special equipment and big deposit basins. To avoid increase in nutrient concentrations in water, it is important that removal of sediments takes place without roiling it. The amount of added water should not exceed the amount of water pumped out, and the proportion of water and sediments should remain constant during pumping. “LIMNO” system is a method for oxidation of stratified lakes without damage to the thermocline. The nutrient salts formed during oxidation remain in the aphotic water layer being bioavailable for a short time. The phosphorus formed during oxidation adsorbs on insoluble iron hydroxides and, as a result, the content of reactive phosphorus in water as well as primary production decrease significantly. The concentration of inorganic nitrogen decreases 6-7-fold. The method should be used over a longer time period, however, as it does not guarantee the desired result, it is sometimes recommended to use chemicals for settling phosphorus instead. RIPLOX method (Ripl, 1976; 1994) is suitable for water bodies where sediments are heavily polluted. Use is made of oxidation, phosphorus binding and decomposition of organic matter during denitrification process. Sediments are treated with a brake-like cultivator, through which also compressed air and calcium nitrate are introduced into sediments. The added nitrates are denitrified by bacteria that requiring nitrate oxygen for respiration. Treatment lasts for a relatively short time period, 1-1.5 months, and the result will be maintained if the external nutrient load can be restricted. The method is suitable when the ratio of nutrients to nutrient binding elements is low and where simple aeration would give an undesired result, i.e. introducing more nutrients in water. The method requires prior thorough investigations of the water body and sediments, and laboratory experiments with sediments. The method was first used in Sweden, in Lake Lillesjön in 1975; the lake is still in good condition. “Contra-acid” system is useful for lakes with a high content of humic substances and a short water retention period. Soda is introduced to sediments with a brake-like cultivator as in the case of the Riplox method. As a result, the pH of water increases and phosphorus is released from humic substances. This will result in a higher production of the water body. In Estonia, there is practically no lack of plant nutrients, and the lakes are not threatened by acidification, however, in some semidystrophic lakes rich in fish, decrease in pH can be fatal for fish. Therefore it would be reasonable to apply the “contra-acid” system in lakes where the inflow of allochthonic humic substances has recently increased, e.g because of land amelioration. 2 Administrative structure and legislation 2.1 Administrative structure 2.1.1. Institutions engaged in implementation of the Water Act Ministry of the Environment of the Republic of Estonia (Water Department and County Environmental Departments) –ensuring of a good condition and sustainable exploitation of Estonia’s groundwater and surface water bodies including the sea. Ministry of Social Affairs (Health Care Department, Health Protection Inspectorate) – management of drinking water. Ministry of Agriculture (Rural Development Departments) – management of artificial and heavily modified water bodies. County Government – management of water related problems in counties. Local Municipalities – management of local problems. Environmental Inspectorate – supervision of the environment. Environmental Investment Centre – financing of environmental activities for the development of national environmental projects. Estonian Environmental Research Centre – management of national environmental research. Estonian Environmental Information Centre – collection and storing of all environmental data. 2.1.2. Main organizations of water research Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Limnology – fundamental and applied research of Estonian inland water bodies. University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute – marine research and research of fish resources in Estonian inland water bodies. Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Aquaculture – fish breeding and research of crayfish. Wild Life Estonia – fish research in inland water bodies. 2.1.3. Permit for special use of water A permit for special use of water is necessary in the case of the following activities: Using of surface water more than 30 m3 per day and night. Using of groundwater supply from the Cambrian-Vendian or Ordovician-Cambrian layers more than 5 m3 per day and night. Using of mineral water. Discharging of wastewater or substances hazardous for the nature. Blocking and damming of a water body and lowering of water level. Dredging of a surface water body, covering of the bed of a water body with soil. Drowning of solid waste. Changing of physical, chemical or biological qualities of water. When using private land, also the owner’s approval is needed. To avoid severe environmental damage, a temporary permit for special use of water can be issued. The County Environmental Departments are responsible for issuing permits for special use of surface and groundwater, the Minister of the Environment issues permits for using sea water. Permits for special use of water are not required for individual households or for management of surface water bodies. 2.2 Essential national legislation Below are listed the acts of the Republic of Estonia in accordance with which the management and the restoration of water bodies is carried out. 2.2.1. Laws Water Act The purpose of the Water Act is to guarantee the purity of groundwater, and ecological balance in inland and transboundary water bodies. The Water Act regulates the use and protection of water, the relations between the landowners and the water users and the development of water management plans. Nature Conservation Act The purpose of this Act is to protect the natural environment by promoting the preservation of biodiversity through ensuring natural habitats and a favourable conservation status for the fauna, flora and fungi; to preserve natural environments with a cultural or aesthetical value, or their elements; to promote sustainable use of natural resources. An important aspect of the Nature Conservation Act is protection of the seashore and coast. Fishing Act The purpose of Fishing Act is to regulate relations in fishery and in collection of aquatic plants and to provide main requirements for these activities. During fishing and collection of aquatic plants, the reproduction capacity of their stocks and the productivity of water bodies shall be preserved, and undesirable changes in the ecosystem of water bodies shall be avoided. The Law on Sustainable Development The Act sets out regulations on sustainable use of the natural resources. The purpose of sustainable use of the natural environment and natural resources is to guarantee an environment meeting human needs and necessary resources for economic development without causing any significant damage to the environment and maintaining natural diversity. Planning of the actions related to transboundary environmental impact takes place in international co-operation. Estonia was among the states that signed the Rio documents in 1992. Pollution Charge Act The Act provides the rates of the charge to be paid for release of pollutants or waste into the environment and the procedure for calculation and payment of the charge. According to this law, financing of liquidation of damage to the environment, restoration of the environmental state, contribution to natural restoration of renewable natural resources, and research of supplementary stocks of non-renewable resources and of the possibilities of recycling of wastes takes place through the Environmental Research Centre. Environmental Monitoring Act This Act provides the organisation of environmental monitoring, the order of processing and storing obtained data, and the relations between the persons carrying out environmental monitoring and the owners or possessors of immovables. Environmental Supervision Act – sets out the essence of environmental supervision and establishes the rights and obligations of the institutions that implement environmental supervision and of the institutions and individuals that are subject to environmental supervision and the order of supervisory activities. 2.2.2. Government Regulations List of species to be protected under protection categories I and II. The Regulation lists all plant, fungal, lichen and animal species protected in Estonia under protection categories I and II. Protection category I: species which are rare in Estonia, are located within restricted geographical areas, in a few habitats, in isolation, or whose population is sparsely scattered over an extensive area; species which are in danger of disappearance, whose population been reduced as a result of human activity, whose habitats have been damaged to a critical point and whose extinction in the Estonian wild is likely if the adverse impact of harmful factors continue to act. Protection category II: species which are in danger due to their small or declining populations and whose range in Estonia is decreasing due to overexploitation, destruction or damaging of their habitats; species which are likely to exposed to the danger of being destroyed if the existing environmental factors continue to act. List of species to be protected under protection category III - species whose population is endangered by the destruction or damaging of their habitats and has been reduced to a point at which they may be included in the category of endangered species if harmful factors continue to act; species which were included in the protected category I or II but which, due to application of necessary protective measures, are not in danger of destruction. Fishing Rules (rules of fishing and collection of aquatic plants) – the regulation regulates fishing in inland water bodies, in coastal and territorial waters and in the economic zone and the protection areas. 2.2.3. Regulations of the Minister of the Environment List of protected water bodies that serve as habitats for salmonids and cyprinids and the requirements for the quality of water and monitoring – this order establishes the list of protected water bodies that serve as habitats for salmonids and cyprinids and the requirements for the quality of water and monitoring. Maximum limits of hazardous substances in soil and groundwater. Maximum limits of hazardous substances serve as the basis for assessing the condition of soil and groundwater and, if necessary, for planning the measures to be employed in order to improve their condition. For the purpose of this order, the maximum limits of hazardous substances are the reference value and the target value. In the case of soil, reference values are given for dry soil. The reference value is the concentration of hazardous substance in soil or in groundwater which, when exceeded, indicates that the soil or groundwater is polluted and hazardous to human health and the environment. Establishing water quality classes of surface water bodies, the values of quality indicators of water quality classes and the procedure for determination of water quality classes – the order sets out the allowed limit concentrations of different substances for different water quality classes. 2.2.4. Order of the Minister of the Environment Organisation of development of water management plans and supervision of their implementation - according to this order, the Ministry of the Environment is responsible for coordinating relevant activities in three river-basins (West-Estonian, East-Estonian, Koiva) and 8 county environmental departments are responsible for coordinating the activities in 8 sub-river basins (Harju, Pandivere, Viru, Peipsi, Võrtsjärve, Pärnu, Matsalu, Western Islands). 2.2.5. Other national plans related to water management National Environmental Strategy (NES) adopted by the Parliament in March 1997. It sets out ten priority goals for environmental policy. The first goal is Stimulation of Environmental Awareness and environmentally friendly consumption patterns. At present, the Estonian Environmental Strategy is being updated. National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP) Estonian National Development Plan Estonian Rural Development Plan Estonian success 2014 "Sustainable Estonia 21“ (SE 21). The SE 21 is a strategy for the state and for the whole society. SE 21 takes into consideration our traditional values and the idea of sustainable development and it establishes the priority goals for policy and identifies long-term objectives/targets to be achieved by 2030. 2.3 Current state of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2.3.1. General facts about Estonia: Lakes – 5% of the territory, the area of 1200 lakes over 1 ha. Rivers – 31 000 km, > 7000, the longest 162 km. Wetlands – cover 22% of the territory. Forests – ~ 48% of the territory. Agricultural land – 10% of the territory. More than 1200 permits for special water use issued. Availability of hydro energy (less than 1% of total energy production). Mining water accounts for ~ 80% of use of groundwater. Of total use of water ~ 88% water is related to energy production (cooling water). Experience of water management in Estonia In 1960-1980 – the territory of Estonia was divided between 4 watersheds managed by the Water Management Council. Environmental departments were established in 1973, which introduced administrative approach to water management. Since 2000 the territory is divided into 9 river basins. Main water issues today • • • • • • • How to ensure cost-effective water services – how to make investments ensuring the right price of water? Reorganization of water companies – will new changes ensure their sustainability? Management of large scale investment projects – what are the responsibilities of inhabitants and self-governments? Public interest in coastal areas – how to reach integrated management of coastal areas? Safe navigation vs. economic growth. Conflict of thinking in rural areas, sustainability of rural life. Implementation of the EU CAP. Main documents on the Water Policy and their goal National Environmental Strategy. Environmental Action Plan. National development plans. River basin management plans. EU directives. To guarantee good quality of drinking water by 2015 and a common water supply and sewage system for 90% of inhabitants. To set up a common sewage systems and sewage purification for settlements with 2000 or more inhabitants by 2010. To ensure a good status of all waters by 2015. 2.3.2. Main differences between the Water Act of Estonia and the EU Water Framework Directive These involve: Classification of water bodies (natural and artificial). Identification of types and classes Formation of water aggregations (one water body can consist of several water accumulations) Assessment of different impacts (impacts of different objects on water) Assessment of risks (which water bodies are at risk) Identification of environmental goals and their fulfilment Economic analysis (covering of expenses) Programme of measures and its structure (what measures will be applied and when) Monitoring programme (what kind of monitoring will be carried out and when) Areas requiring protection (realtion to water management) Before the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) the legislation of Estonia did not deal with the above issues in detail. For example, in accordance with the Water Act of Estonia: Surface water – constantly or temporarily standing or flowing water in a water body or water contained in snow or ice accumulations but not seawater. Water body – constantly or temporarily flowing (river, stream) water or slowly flowing water (lake, sea, reservoir). However, according to the WFD: Surface water – inland waters, except groundwater; transitional waters and coastal waters, except in respect of chemical status for which it shall also include territorial waters. Body of surface water – a discrete and significant element of surface water such as a lake, a reservoir, a stream, river or canal, part of a stream, river or canal, transitional water or a stretch of coastal water. The concept of the directive is more concrete and exact owing to which it is necessary to redefine or specify our water bodies again to render a body of surface water as a discrete element of surface water. 2.3.3. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive Applying the Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires divisionof the territory of Estonia into river basin districts, i.e. the fundamental administrative units of water resources management for the WFD. All inland and costal waters, as well as aquifer systems, are divided or grouped in their turn into water bodies forming the lowest management level of water resources. The subdivision of Estonia into three River Basin Districts (RBD) takes into account two international districts: the Southern District, comprising the river Gauja basin (shared with Latvia), the Eastern District including the Narva River, Lake Peipsi, and the rivers drained towards the Gulf of Finland; and the Western District including the rivers flowing into the Gulf of Finland, the Gulf of Livonia, and the rivers of the islands Saaremaa, Hiiumaa, Muhu and Vormsi. The Ministry of the Environment is responisble for data collection for all three basins. Recent activities aimed at the implementation of WFD 2000 amendemnet of the Water Act. 2001 establishment of the River Basin districts. 2001, compiling of the guidelines for the development of the water management plan. 2002 beginning of the development of water management plans. 2003 harmonisation of the Water Act with WFD. 2004 adoption of the first two water management plans for sub-river-basins (Pandivere and Pärnu). 2005-2006 deadline for completion of water management plans for all other sub-river basins. The present water management plans for the sub-river-basins do not take into consideration all WFD aspects as adoption of requirements is not justfied before the period of respective activities. Objectives of sub-district water management plans To create a unified system for dealing with water management problems. To consider River basin-based management. To present an overview of the main water related problems in the sub-districts. To identify the necessary actions aimed at solving the problems. T o work out a programme of measures to achieve the set objectives. The activities under Article 5 of WFD, May 2005: Description of river basin characteristics. Survey of the impacts of human activity on the status of surface water and groundwater. Summary of economic analyses. Register of the protected areas (map). Further activities Defining all artificial and heavily modified water bodies during years 2005-2006. Development of a monitoring plan 2006. Drawing up of the programme of measures for achieving the objectives 2007-2008. Completion of water management plans (WMP) 2009. Implementation of water management plans 2009-2015. 3 Actors 3.1 Tasks of different stakeholders and networking Most of Estonian surface water bodies are in the possession of the state. A water body can be in the possession of a person only when the whole of it is located within the premises, or when the whole catchment area of a river or stream is located on private land. As the all biggest water bodies are in the possession of the state, we restoration cannot be done without a government approval. For all restoration activities, a permit for special use of water should be obtained from the Ministry of the Environment (MoE). Management and restoration of lakes are mainly financed through the state budget or through foundations. Public procurement for finding out appropriate contractors should be announced if the budget exceeds 300,000 EEK. Public procurement is not necessary when all costs are covered by a local municipality (LM), an enterpreneur or a private individual. If a surface water body is in the possession of the local municipality and if restoration process does not affect other water bodies then the order can be placed and the costs can be covered by the municipality. Possible ways of restoration of lakes in Estonia. 1) Restoration is planned in the framework of programme of measures (water management plan). MoE or LM appies for the execution of a project to establish possibilities of restoration of a water body. If the project is applied by LM it must cover 10% of all related costs. Financing is applied according to the results of the restoration project for performing relevant activities. The winner of public procurement (research or educational organization) will carry out restoration. 2) The concern of local inhabitants, enterprise or municipality about the condition of a surface water body. An enterpreneur or a private individual will apply to LM or MoE County Environmental Department regarding the problem of the restoration of the water body. MoE or LM will place an order for a project for establishment of the possibilities of restoration of the water body. If the applicant does not have own financial resources, they must apply for financing form the state budget or from foundations. If the project is applied by LM or an enterpreneur they must have 10-50% of own financial resources. Financing should be applied for according to the reults of the restoration project. The activity will be undertaken by an organization who has won public rocurement (research or educational organization). Until today (before the completion the water management plans) all lake restoration activities were carried out according the second scenario. These activities mainly involved water level regulation, cleaning of shore areas and, in the case of artificial lakes, sediment removal. Main activities were reduction of pollution from point- and diffuse sources. In cooperation with the Centre for Limnology, the Estonian University of Life Sciences and the Finnish Environment Institute have performed successful activities of bio-manipulation in Lake Ülemiste. 3.2 Overview of research and educational institutions The Estonian research and educational organizations engaged in some way in the improvement of the status of water bodies: Organization Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Limnology University of Tartu, Faculty of Biology and Geography, Institute of Zoology and Hydrobiology University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute Tallinn University of Technology, Institute of Geology Tallinn University, Institute of Ecology Wild Life Estonia Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Task Fundamental and applied research of Estonian inland water bodies. Teaching of students and post-graduate students. Research of hydrobiology and fish resources of inland water bodies and the sea. Teaching of students and post-graduate students. Research of the structure and functioning of the ecosystems of the Baltic Sea. Assessment of the status of aquatic living resources and prognostication for their sustainable exploitation and protection. Teaching of students and postgraduate students. Applied research of environmental geology, hydrogeology, and nature protection. Fundamentals of restoration of ecosystems under strong impact of human activity. Teaching of students and postgraduate students. Research of aquatic species. Natura 2000 protected species. Meteorological and hydrological monitoring. Web page http://www.zbi.ee/limno http://www.ut.ee/BGZH/ hydrobioloogia.htm http://www.sea.ee http://www.gi.ee http://www.eco.edu.ee http://www.emhi.ee/ 4 Sources of funding for restoration projects Applicant Financier Ministry of the Environment Environmental Investment Centre County Environmental Department Environmental Investment Centre Local municipality Environmental Investment Centre State institutions engaged in environmental protection Environmental Investment Centre Environmental Environmental Investment company/organization Centre Environmental foundation and association Environmental Investment Centre Other associations and organization Environmental Investment Centre How much (%) can be For what applied purpose 100 All restoration projects 100 All restoration projects 90 All restoration projects 90 All restoration projects 90 All restoration projects 90 All restoration projects 50 All restoration projects Prerequisetes for a project to be financed Proper application, urgency (importance) of the project, budget, justification + price offer Proper application, urgency (importance) of the project, budget, justification + price offer Proper application, urgency (importance) of the project, budget, justification, own financial resources (10%) + price offer Proper application, urgency (importance) of the project, budget, justification, own financial resources (10%) + price offer Proper application, urgency (importance) of the project, budget, justification, own financial resources (10%) + price offer Proper application, urgency (importance) of the project, budget, justification, own financial resources (10%) + price offer Proper application, urgency (importance) of the project, budget, justification, own financial resources (50%) + price offer Additional financing can be applied from the European Regional Development Foundation (ERDF). 5 Procedure of restoration planning and implementation The degradation of a natural lake environment worldwide has become of increasing concern not only to ecologists and environmentalists but also to politicians and the general public. Shallow lakes are among the most important and most threatened ecosystems on the earth. They provide habitat for a rich diversity of animal and plant life. The following part describes the content and process of preparing restoration and management plans for eutrophic lakes. Target group represents persons who are involved in management of such lakes, or who are influencing the lake ecosystem with their activity: 1) technicians 2) stakeholders 3) decision makers Basic issues Development and implementation of a lake restoration and management is a time consuming task involving personnel and financial resources. First, one has carefully to answer the following principal questions: 1) Is the lake restoration or management plan needed for the lake? If yes, then why? 2) Is the need for the lake restoration or management plan only seen by yourself or by your institution? What do other stakeholders think about the plan? 3) Who will be responsible for the implementation of the lake restoration or management plan? Check with different interested groups how they will be involved in the process. Do you have convincing arguments to motivate them towards a positive attitude, e.g. general conditions which have to be fulfilled, solutions to serious conflicts of interests, projects to improve the image of politicians? Would your institution be approved as a co-ordinator of the process? 4) Have you identified all relevant local actors and the way how they will be involved in the process? 5) Does your institution have the necessary personnel and financial resources to lead the elaboration of the lake restoration or management plan? A lake restoration or management plan requires analysis of existing data and information for analysing the actual situation. Do you have a professional background to co-ordinate this process? 6) Do you know examples of success in situations similar to yours? Other examples, both positive and negative are, very helpful in preparing realistic lake restoration or management plan. Get in contact with other interested groups. Invite them to meetings and ask them for advice and feedback. Practical experience is much more convincing than theoretical planning. 7) Is your organisation able and willing to accept a compromise? The lake restoration or management plan for the lake ecosystem is part of a dynamic and continuing management planning process. The plan should be kept under review adjusted to take into account the monitoring process, changing priorities, and emerging issues. Lake restoration and management planning should be regarded as a continuous long-term process. Planning should begin with producing a minimal plan that meets, as far as the resources allow, the requirements of the lake and of the organisation responsible for managing the lake. The management plan will be amplified as information becomes available. The most important functions of a lake restoration and management plan are: 1) To identify the objectives of lake restoration or management 2) To identify the factors that affect or may affect restoration 3) To resolve conflicts 4) To define monitoring requirements 5) To identify and describe the management required to achieve the objectives 6) To obtain resources 7) To enable communication within and between sites, organisations and stakeholders 8) To demonstrate that restoration and management will be effective and efficient 9) To ensure compliance with local, national, and international policies. 6 National best practices and special expertise in methods and projects 6.1 Examples of completed restoration projects in Estonia There are no completed successful lake restoration projects in Estonia, however some lake management plans have been rather effective. Rearrangement of fishery in Lake Võrtsjärv In order to increase the stocks of valuable commercial fishes in L. Võrtsjärv, a number of measures, suggested by ichthyologists of the Centre of Limnology, have been put into practice. It became evident that active trawling caused harm especially to the pikeperch stock. The use of trawls was gradually restricted within 1966-1970, and finally stopped. As a result of these measures, the fishing mortality of pikeperch fell sharply and its stock and catches began to increase rapidly (fig. 4). The increased pressure of big predatory fishes has caused a significant reduction in the stock of ruffe and roach. This project can be regarded as the most successful project of lake management in Estonia up to now. 80 Annual catch, tonns 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 Figure 4. Annual catch of pike-perch in Lake Võrtsjärv. Biomanipulation in Lake Ülemiste Biomanipulation as a method of lake restoration was applied in Lake Ülemiste in the year 2003. Until now some preliminary results are only available. Some positive trends, including increase in the biomass and number of big predatory fishes, are already seen in Lake Ülemiste. This is the second attempt in Estonia to put this method into practice. After the decrease of fish biomass due to massive fishing (2.5 fold according to monitoring data with multisize gillnets) the spring clear water period increased in year 2005 (fig. 5). Secchi 200 180 1998 160 2003 140 2004 120 2005 100 80 60 40 October September August July June May April 0 November 20 Figure 5. Seasonal changes of water transparency according Secchi depth in Lake Ülemiste in years 1998-2005. Biomanipulation in Lake Harku In Estonia, this method was first used in Lake Harku, as a result of which some positive trends in water quality were seen in the middle of 1990s after a massive catch of cyprinid fish. Due to the lack of funding the removal of fish was stopped and non-predatory fishes were not caught in sufficient numbers and the desired goal was not achieved. 8 Summary and needs for development To assess the status of management and restoration of eutrophied lakes in Estonia, SWOT analysis proceeds on the basis of prior chapters. Strengths. Good theoretical and practical basis for preparation of lake restoration projects Good co-operation with experts from neighbouring countries (e.g. Finland, Sweden) Some good examples of management of fishery in lakes Long-term experiences in management of eel in lakes Improved status of many lakes due to reduced external nutrient load from agriculture after the collapse of the Soviet type agriculture Improved situation in sewage treatment and drainage systems Application of the European Water Framework Directive Execution of water management plans Elaborated order for planning and realization of restoration of lakes Several sources of funding for restoration projects Weaknesses. No good example of a successful and fully completed lake restoration project in Estonia Non-execution of theoretically prepared projects because of the lack of financing Projects are not financially rewarding, people do not see indirect benefit from restoration of lakes Lack of co-operation between different groups of interest High price and poor availability of good technology Yet poor or not sufficient good situation in sewage treatment and drainage systems in rural areas Opportunities. Economic growth creates interest in and possibilities for funding restoration projects by the state and by local authorities Developing tourism and private entrepreneurship creates the need for and interest in sustainable management and/or restoration of lakes and, which serves also as a good source of financing. Co-operation of different groups of interest enables multi-purpose management of lakes Valuation of voluntary work Learning from experts and co-operation with other countries Threats. Hurrying and economising in the phase of planning of restoration of a lake: insufficient investigations, selection of wrong method(s) Good results of restoration of lakes are not guaranteed Possible failure of restoration, deterioration of the status of a lake Fast developing tourism: increasing number of visitors at lakes, lack of facilities or their low level, disorganization, etc., can result in deterioration of the status of water bodies Fast privatization process: new land owners are not aware of legislation and special regulations Different groups of interest do not agree about the aims and scope of restoration of a lake To conclude, in quickly developing Estonia, the perspective for successful improvement of the status of lakes, either through sustainable management or through restoration, is highly promising. Several strengths as the preparation of future specialists, training of active mangers, co-operation with experts from abroad, improving of the legislation, increasing financial and technical capability, etc. help overcome the weaknesses and threats of this process. References Estonian environment. 1996: past, present and future / Ministry of the Environment of Estonia, Environment Information Centre ; Compiled and edited by A. Raukas Tallinn : Estonian Environment Information Centre Kask, I. 1979. Eesti järvede arvust ja järvenõgude klassifikatsioonist. Rmt.: Eesti NSV saarkõrgustike ja järvenõgude kujunemine. Tallinn. 88-103. Mäemets, A.1977. Eesti NSV järved ja nende kaitse. Valgus, Tallinn, 263 lk. Mäemets, A.1977a. On the classification of Estonian lakes based on the analysis of principal components and coordinates. Eesti NSV TA Toimetised. Bioloogia, 26, No 2: 138-148. Ott, I., Pedusaar, T. & A. Järvalt, 2005. Järvede tervendamine ja biomanipulatsioon. Eesti Loodusuurijate Seltsi aastaraamat 83, 49-71. (Restoration and biomanipulation of lakes, Yearbook of the Estonian Naturalist’s Society 83, p. 49-71, in Estonian). Ott, I. & T. Kõiv, 1999. Eesti väikejärvede eripära ja muutused. Estonian small lakes: Special features and changes. EV Keskkonnaministeeriumi Info- ja Tehnokeskus, Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia, Eesti Põllumajandusülikooli Zooloogia ja Botaanika Instituut. Tallinn.128 lk. Ripl, W. 1976. Biochemical oxidation of polluted lake sediment with nitrate. A new restoration method. – Ambio 5: 132-135. Ripl, 1994. Restoration methods and techniques. Sediment treatment. In: Restoration of Lake Ecosystems. IWRB Publication 32: 75-82.