Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
PROJECT CONCEPT NOTE SUMMARY Mongolia: Forest Conservation Landscapes Development and 1. Key development issues and rationale for Bank involvement Legalized sustainable forest management could be a "weather-proof" path for livelihood generation among poor rural populations living in forest areas, and would provide steady revenues to government in the form of royalties and taxes if the current illegal harvest (from which game currently receives nothing) can be curtailed. This is important because although Mongolia was the world’s most rapidly-growing economy in 2004, this was achieved in part because of the relatively kind weather of the previous years and the high world prices for copper and gold. It is clear that the economy is vulnerable to price shocks and to bad winter weather and so the GoM is anxious to diversify the economy and to create jobs, especially among the poor. Giving attention to the forests could be part of that strategy. Both forest cover and forest quality are declining and the present estimated levels of forest harvesting are largely illegal and unsustainable. Official revenue streams are declining, illegal logging is rampant, they are decreasing their contribution to GDP, there are declining incomes and non-income benefits supporting livelihoods, rising fuel wood and timber prices, decline in environmental services, and severe loss of wildlife resources which have provided a buffer for rural people. Until now, instead of dealing constructively with the primary problem of unsustainable resource exploitation, GoM has tended to focus on largely peripheral forest issues, such as an forest inventory system, fire control, insect and disease control, and (largely grossly unsuccessful) reforestation for which neither an ecological nor an economic rationale is apparent; and top-down enforcement of regulations has been ineffective. The problems in the forest sector have been aggravated by an erosion of forestry/natural resource management expertise within the Ministry of Nature and Environment (MNE). There are currently no mechanisms in place to encourage communities or commercial timber companies to give attention to sustainable management and action is required by both the government and donors. A two-pronged strategy involving gradual expansion of community forest management and strengthening of the existing Government enforcement regime offers the best solution. The proposed project would support the Government’s vision (PRSP/EGSPRS) of sustainable management of its important forest landscapes which would allow Mongolia’s forests to make significant contributions to economic development. The proposed project is also consistent with the expected outcomes of the current CAS objectives, namely consolidating the economic transition through institutional reforms that improve public sector and market efficiency; and reducing rural and urban vulnerabilities. The CAS lists a forest-related project for FY08. 2. Proposed project development objective(s) The development objective would be to develop sustainably-managed and productive forests to support viable livelihood alternatives for communities in the northern forest landscapes, and thereby to conserve significant environmental services and wildlife resources. 3. Preliminary project description 1 The proposed project would seek to put forest and forest resource management on a modern and effective footing in at least six areas in the northern forests. The expected outcomes would be: the Mongolian forest estate in the target areas would be stabilized and improved in quality; royalties and revenues to government would increase substantially with the decrease in illegal exploitation and the increase in legal harvesting of forest resources; the policy and legal environments would actively encourage sustainable management by communities and the private sector of the forest landscapes and the resources within them; the relevant institutions would be effective and staffed with strong human resources. Component 1. National- and Local-level Strategic Frameworks and Enforcement Support This component would facilitate sustainable management of forests and forest resources by government, communities and the private sector, e.g.: facilitate the necessary changes such that private sector and communities are prepared to invest in the forest landscape make the necessary changes to institutional frameworks at both national and regional levels, clarifying mandates, responsibilities and obligations establish legal mechanisms (permits or leases) to permit community management, harvesting and sale of forest products on formally established forest management areas; assist the State Specialized Inspection Agency (SSIA) to achieve its mandate by providing the material resources (vehicles, communications, computer-based casetracking system) to support modern, effective enforcement operations, and facilitating the development of operational protocols to coordinate and harmonize the activities of SSIA, MNE, police and state prosecutors. monitor timber stocks, rural incomes, conflicts, enforcement, community involvement, abundance of wildlife resources, etc., as an adaptive management approach within the project. Component 2. Capacity-building at National and Local Levels This component would: assist government in consolidating and strengthening the (currently fragmented) agencies involved in sustainable forest resource management and improving their ability to deliver on modern and science-based inventories and ecological research, sustainable yield regulation, ecosystem-based fire and pest management planning, and forest management planning; build capacity for sustainable management of forests and forest resources for community-based and private sector led activities, for regulatory control and compliance provide community-to-community training and capacity building, knowledge-sharing activities assist National University to develop a modern, relevant, science-based curriculum in sustainable natural resource management by providing material resources and by facilitating regular contacts and exchanges between the biological and ecological departments of UoM and university faculties in foreign universities specializing in the appropriate types of forest management assist the State Specialized Inspection Agency (SSIA) to achieve its environmental compliance monitoring and inspection responsibilities by providing modular training 2 programs for inspectors and rangers in the whole range of compliance and enforcement activities. Component 3. Community-based Approaches to Forest Landscape Development and Conservation This project component would scale-up from existing successful experience in participatory planning and execution of sustainable resource management in both forest and grassland landscapes. The component will work closely with aimag and soum governments and communities and channel money to as low a level as feasible. The component would: provide rural finance that would allow communities to invest in hardware necessary for both small-scale forest resource management operations as well as value-adding activities promote and disseminate participatory management rules and regulations within the selected forest landscapes to gain acceptance of community-based natural resource management; provide appropriate training in marketing and entrepreneurship to communities in the forest landscapes; develop opportunities for adding value to sustainably-produced raw forest resources (timber and non-timber) rather than encouraging trading in primary products, and identify (niche) markets; promote fuel-efficient or alternative energy stoves and fuel alternatives to firewood. 4. Potential risks and mitigation Weak governance: The proposed project seeks will professionalize the forest guards, engage communities in the management of their local resources, provide channels for complaints, and provide meaningful livelihood options. Lack of familiarity of community-level management: The problems of forming community groups have been encountered by the SLP but over 300 effective groups have been formed. Lessons will be applied. Weak capacity in the Ministry of Nature and Environment (MNE): Execution of the project components will be through the State Inspection Agency, the aimag governments, and National University, rather than wholly through MNE. 3