* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The polarization of light - along with refraction, diffraction and
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Boson sampling wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum Polarization The polarization of light - along with refraction, diffraction and interference - provides strong evidence that light behaves like a wave. The wave model of polarization has allowed us to develop and produce such applications as polarized sunglasses, flat screen TV`s and 3-D movies. This session assumes that you are already familiar with polarization and polarizing filters. It also assumes that you are familiar with diffraction, two-slit interference and photons. For over a century, physicists have known that there are problems with the wave model of light. In many situations light clearly acts like a particle. The conflict between the classical wave and particle models has led to a new model - the quantum model. In this lesson you will explore the behavior of polarized light and how its behavior is explained by the wave and the quantum models. On the way you will see examples of four key concepts of quantum physics: intrinsic randomness, wave-particle duality, measurement-disturbance and entanglement. 1) Put on a pair of the 3-D glasses and close one eye. The polarizing filter in the glasses is reducing the light that gets through. Suppose 1000 photons head toward the filter. How many will pass through? a) exactly 500 photons b) at least 500 photons c) around 500 photons Explain: 2) Keep the glasses on and one eye closed. Look at a second pair. One filter should look dark and the other should look much lighter. If 1000 photons have passed through the lighter filter, how many of these photons will pass through the one in front of your eye? a) exactly 1000 photons b) fewer than1000 photons c) around 1000 photons Explain: 3) Using the same set up as in the previous question. Look at the dark filter. If 1000 photons have already passed through the first filter, how many of these photons would then pass through the filter in front of your eye? a) exactly 0 photons b) over 0 photons c) around 0 photons Explain: 4) Look at the very dark filter again. In between the two filters, place a third filter at 45o. If 1000 photons have already passed through the first filter in your hand, how many will pass through the middle filter and the one in front of your eye? a) around 500 photons b) around 250 photons c) around 125 photons Explain: 5) A single unpolarized photon is heading toward a polarizing filter. Through the filter you will get a) a photon b) half a photon c) a photon with half the energy d) no photon Explain: 6) An unpolarized photon heads toward a filter at 0 and then one at 90o. Through these you will get a) a photon b) nothing c) 50 % chance of a photon d) 25 % chance of a photon Explain: 7) A single unpolarized photon is heading toward a filter at 0 and then one at 45 and then one at another at 90o. Through the three filters you will get a) nothing b) 12.5 % chance of a photon c) 25 % chance of a photon Explain: 8) Crossed polarizers can be explained by classical physics and by quantum physics. Which is correct? a) Quantum is always right b) Classical is always right c) Neither is always right d) Each is right in its realm Explain: 9) Light passes through two slits that are very close together. What will you see? a) b) c) Explain: 10) Light passes through two slits that are very close together. One slit is covered by a vertical polarizer and the other is covered by a horizontal polarizer. What will you see? a) b) c) Explain: 11) The set up is the same as the last question. In addition, a third polarizer is placed in between the slits and the screen. What will you see? a) b) c) Explain: 12) If the first experiment was done with only one photon at a time and the image was allowed to build up slowly you would see a) b) c) Explain: 13) Why is the third filter called a quantum eraser? What does it erase? a) polarization b) light c) knowledge Certain crystals can take one photon and produce two photons with half the energy that have identical but still random polarization. This is called spontaneous parametric down conversion - SPDC. You will hear lots about this at the Institute for Quantum Computing. These pairs of photons are said to be entangled. As soon as you measure the polarization of one of them, you immediately know the polarization of its partner. Measuring one of the pair causes a change to the other one instantaneously – no matter how far away it is. 14) One of a pair of entangled photons is sent toward double slits covered in opposite polarizing filters. The other partner is sent in a completely different direction toward a polarizing filter. This is repeated many times. What will you see after the double slits if you measure the polarization of the photons that go away from the slit? a) b) c) Explain: Reflection: This lesson used a lot of multiple-choice questions. They were being used as a way to increase learning – not as a way to evaluate students. When used this way they are often referred to as concept questions or ConcepTests. What distinguishes a good from a bad concept question? How do you encourage students to have meaningful discussions and not shouting matches? How do you get students to focus on learning and not on being right? What are the advantages of flip books vs. electronic clickers vs. voting with your hands?