Download DRkickertalk_12_6_2004

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Power engineering wikipedia , lookup

Tube sound wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup

Klystron wikipedia , lookup

Triode wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ILC Damping Ring Kickers
Presenter: Josef Frisch
Dec 7, 2004
Basic kicker types
• Conventional pulser (Remainder of this presentation).
– High voltage pulse driving (probably) strip line kicker
– Simple, minimal impedance problems (screen electrodes)
– May require exotic pulser.
• RF kicker
– Pulsed RF source driving low Q deflection structure.
– Makes use of available high power, broadband RF sources
– Possible impedance issues
• Resonant deflection system
– Uses multiple resonant cavities driven with a set of frequencies
to select bunches
– Multiple designs – too varied to discuss here
– Quasi-CW RF eliminates ringing, provides good stability
– Impedance, RF kicks within bunches, etc need to be understood.
Approximate requirements for
pulsed kicker
• Deflection angle 0.6 mrad (0.01 T-M) for TESLA ring
design
• If we allow 10 Meter total kicker length
– Need 50 Amp kicker drive
• Length of each kicker << bunch spacing (assuming
speed of light kicker).
– For 3 nanosecond, need ~20 Kickers
• Stripline kicker impedance probably ~100 Ohms
(assuming speed of light kicker)
• Pulsers: 5Kv, 50Amp, 20 units, 2nanosecond rise and
fall time .
– Just for scale: Actual specifications depend on detailed ring
design
• Un-kicked bunches must not be disturbed by more than
7x10-4 of kicked bunch.
Basic Extraction Scheme
Comments on Basic Scheme
• Shortest ring for given current
– No unused bunches, or gaps (except ion clearing).
• Tight requirements on kicker stability and fall
time
– Need to not disturb neighboring bunches by more
than 7x10-4 of kicked bunch
• Falling edge of a pulse typically more difficult to
control than rising edge.
– Ringing from impedance mismatches, stray
inductance etc.
Buffer pulse scheme
Comments on buffer pulse scheme
• “Buffer” pulses are not needed for luminosity
– Can probably kick by 10-2 of main kick
– Allows longer settling time to 7x10-4.
• Need to replace buffer pulses
– May be tricky with positrons if bunches are generated
by main electron beam: Might need to waste a
machine cycle.
• Slightly longer ring for same average current.
Kicker Gap Scheme
Comments on Kicker Gap Scheme
• Gap allows extraction kicker with fast rise, but
unrestricted settling for next pulse, settle to
7x10-4 after gap
• Injection kicker (larger pulse) only needs 1%
interference with preceding bunch, and 1% after
gap.
• Scheme does not work if positrons generated by
luminosity generating electron beam
– Works if you have a pre-damping ring.
• Scheme requires that ring empty, then re-fill in 2
milliseconds – might cause ring stability
problems.
Kicker Gap Extraction & Injection
Injection and extraction with fast rise slow fall
if DR size is not determined by kicker rise time
Comments on Kicker Gap Scheme
• Average ring current constant
• Allows use of slow fall time kicker
• Requires 2X ring length for same bunch
spacing.
• Beam current harmonic content changes
– DR physics question
Kicker Driver Requirements
• 20 Units
• ~5KV, 50Amps
–
–
–
–
Depends on damping ring design, kicker length, etc
250KW peak power
2.5KW, average power, 1 millisecond
25 Watt long term average
• Few nanosecond rise and fall, with settling to
<7x10-4 for preceding and following pulses.
Snap / Step Diodes
• <50 picoseconds to 20V.
• sub-nanosecond to 300V, 6 Amps. (1800W
peak).
• High power devices from Institute of
Electrophysics
– 600 picosecond to 1000 Amps (?? Voltage)
– 5 nanosecond to 400KV.
– Repetition rates to few KHz.
• Power dissipation probably limits rep rate.
Step recovery diode pulses
Very fast high voltage pulses
Repetition rate limited to ~KHz
(for these devices).
Institute of Electrophysics
Avalanche Transistors
• Avalanche Transistors
– <200 picoseconds to
200V, ~50 Amps (10KW)
– Arrays (tapered
transmission lines)
demonstrated to 40KV,
800A, 200ps. (Kentech)
– Recovery time too long
except in liquid nitrogen
(50nsec reported)
– Average power limited to
~1W / device.
– Combining may lead to
ringing.
• Low Repetition Rate
40 KV in 200ps rise time (Kentech)
MOSFETs
• Individual devices to ~1Kv, ~50Amps, ~3ns rise and fall
times.
• Variety of combining schemes to high power, medium
fast rise.
– DARHT-2 kicker: 20KV, 10ns rise / fall, 1.6MHz burst ( 4 pulses)
– Belkhe / TESLA: 7.5Kv, 72A, 5.3ns, 1MHz (200 pulses). (fall
time slower)
– Belkhe – datasheet 3Kv, 80A, 2ns, 1 MHz (MAX) burst. (10
pulses).
– Kentech: 10Kv, 2ns – could operate at high rate.
• Relatively low impedance – (~10 Ohms), stray
inductance ringing can be a problem
– Gate drive is very low impedance <<1 Ohm.
• Probably OK for ~10 nsec rise / fall times. (maybe faster)
• May be used as driver for additional stage / compressor
MOSFET Pulses
4MHz pulses, but with 18ns risetime
More MOSFET
pulses (Kentech)
5 channels
Lower voltage
2.5MHz pulser
MOSFET pulser comments
• Very likely to use MOSFET technology in
pulser – maybe with shock line for
compression.
• Some designs (Belkhe) are very fast but
have limited repetition rate. Problem is not
thermal – but design in proprietary.
Shock Lines - Ferromagnetic
•
•
•
•
Nonlinear transmission line: Wave velocity increases with pulse voltage
“Sharpens” front end of pulse
Ferromagnetic (most common): (used for SLAC Kicker (Cassel)
95KV, 380 Picoseconds rise (Seddon et al, 1987), Ferroxcube B2 ferrite
Shock Lines – Ferromagnetic
(SLAC)
Ferromagnetic Shock Lines, Falling
edge
Shock Lines - others
• Ferroelectric
– 20KV, 400 Picosecond (Oxford – Web report)
• Diode loaded line
– Monolithic (Allen, 1994 thesis), 4V at <700
Femtoseconds! (expect <170 fsec in future)
• Vacuum Magnetron line:
– At high voltages, magnetic field insulates line
– Probably only applicable at higher power than
we require.
Shock Lines - comments
• Most work in shock lines has been to obtain very fast,
very high power pulses – well beyond our requirements
• Typically operated at low repetition rates.
• Need to eliminate (typical) slow tail from release of
energy stored in non-linear material.
• For ILC high repetition rate may lead to heating
problems (need low loss nonlinear material).
• Ferromagnetic and ferroelectric materials tend to also
have magnetostrictive / piezoelectric effect
– For millisecond pulse burst could lead to stability problems.
• Many non-linear materials have strong temperature
sensitivity – may lead to stability problems.
Hard Tube Switches
• Pulser based on Eimac Y-690 tube used for
Pockels Cell drive at SLAC (M. Browne, D.
Brown).
– 6KV, 30 Amps, <1.5ns rise time.
– Driven by avalanche transistors – not appropriate for
high repetition rate
– Would need to parallel 2 tubes for ILC kicker (easy)
• Nonlinearity of tubes helps with settling time.
• Average power “not unreasonable” but would
need to check. (grid dissipation)
Hard Tube Pulser
Note, tail on pulse believed to be due to output
Transformer (not needed for ILC kicker)
Custom Tube Pulser
Custom tube Comments
• Single beam switched between multiple
(~20) Anodes.
• Tube parameters comparable to other big
power tubes (klystrons).
• Something of this sort would very likely
work, but would require a large
development effort.
• Only consider if conventional pulsers will
not work.
Kicker Magnet
• Probably need speed of light kicker
• Kicker fill time + pulse rise time -> effective rise
time
– Need short (< 1 Meter) kickers.
• Need to avoid reflections / ringing
– Must be designed as a RF component
– Full E+M simulation / optimization
• Possibly shield beamline with thin screen (to
block beam wakefields (~10GHz), but transmit
kicker fields (~300 MHz).
• Want optimized design to minimize kicker power
Stability / Settling time issues
• Multiplicity of kickers helps with random
noise
• Reproducible and small settling time
problems can be fixed with additional
kicker driven by AWG and power amplifier.
• Probably want feed forward from beam
position / angle out of ring to kicker in main
beam line
– Assumes turn-around after damping ring
Correction Scheme
Correction Scheme - variant
Correction scheme / layout issues.
• The 7x10-4 stability specification is Heroic!
– Difficult to measure without a beam line
(ATF?)
• The kicker driver will likely have pulse –
pulse feedback to flatten the waveforms
• Would like a beamline arrangement which
allows feed-forward from output beam
Ongoing Work
• ATF Damping Ring in Japan: Proposal to build a
single pulse extraction system
– Good test bed for kickers, and stabilization
– Provide ILC – like test beam (~200 bunches)
– Requires higher Kicker drive power than ILC
• Working on kicker / optics design to reduce
• DHART FET pulser -> shock line
– Test high repetition rate shock lines
• DESY working on paralleling Belkhe pulsers to
increase repetition rate.
• SLAC to obtain Belkhe pulser for testing shock
lines.
Overall Comments
• Can probably build a kicker to meet any likely damping
ring requirements, for a small fraction of the damping
ring cost
– Optimize the ring design, see what is needed.
• Best guess: MOSFETs driving Ferromagnetic shock line.
– Hard tubes an option.
• Custom tube can probably solve the problem, but
expensive to develop – leave as a backup plan.
• Want technology demonstration prototypes soon, to
allow selection of technology, and system development.
• Kicker parameters (voltage, current, etc) depend on
details of ring design.