* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PPT - Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Wildlife corridor wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Conservation movement wikipedia , lookup
Habitat destruction wikipedia , lookup
Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Jaguar Presented by: Matt Barker Origins • Jaguar forerunners – Early Pliestocene – Beringia – Descendent of Old World cats Origins • “Yaguar” – “He who kills with one leap” • “Tiger” • “Panther” Classification • Animalia • Chordata • Mammalia • Carnivora • Felidae • Panthera • onca Subspecies • Eight subspecies described (Pocock 1939) – – – – – – – – P. o. onca P. o. peruviana P. o. hernandesii P. o. centralis P. o. arizonensis P. o. veraecrucis P. o. goldmani P. o. palustris • Validity questioned (Larson 1997, Eizirik et al. 2001, Ruiz-Garcia et al. 2006) Distribution • Currently occupies ~46% of historic range • Extripated from Chile, El Salvador, Uruguay Legal Status • IUCN Red List of Threatened Species – Near Threatened • CITES – Appendix I • US Endangered Species Act – Endangered – Jaguar Recovery Plan: till 2008, 2010 Value • Historical – Mesoamericans • Aztec – Jaguar Warriors • Maya – God L • Olmec – Were-jaguar Value • Historical – Hunting/Fur trade • Last harvest in US: – TX 1948 • CITES 1973 • Poaching/Black market Value • Modern – – – – – Ecotourism Umbrella species Scientific Aesthetic Cultural Physical Characteristics • Short and stocky build, large feet, short rounded ears – Length • 1.5 to 1.8 m (5-6 ft.) – Height • 0.63 to 0.76 m(25-30 in.) – Weight • 56 to 96 kg (124-211 lb.) • Females 10-20% smaller Physical Characteristics • Broad powerful skull • Canines are similar to lions and tigers (Christiansen 2007) – Large and not very conical Physical Characteristics • Pelage – Pale yellow to reddish yellow with black rosettes – Spots merge on middorsum forming irregular black line – Whitish underbelly with interspersed spots Physical Characteristics • Pelage – Melanistic • Development of dark pigment melanin in skin or fur – MC1R gene (Eizirik 2003) ID that cat Survival & Longevity • Estimated 12-15 year lifespan – 23 years in captivity Reproduction • Sexual maturity – Females: 2-3 years, Males: 3-4 years • Year-round mating – Seasonal peaks • Births increase with prey abundance • Multiple males will pursue same female Reproduction • Polyestrous • 93-105 day gestation • Up to four cubs, commonly two • Denning Recruitment • • • • Infantcide Born blind ~800g (1.7 lb.) at birth Cubs weaned 1.5-2 years • Disperse – Males: ~30km – Females: ~8km Activity and Movement • Highest amount of activity at dusk and dawn (crepuscular), less during day (Cavalcanti 2009) – Wet season more active in day • Excellent swimmers Activity and Movement • Home range size varies – Female • Wet: 57.1±26.2 km2 • Dry: 69.1±28.7 km2 – Male • Wet: 152±79.1 km2 • Dry: 170.8±97.3 km2 • (Cavalcanti 2009) • Female range fidelity • Male overlap – Land-tenure system Diet • More than 85 species of prey items – Fish, birds, iguanas, turtles, armadillos, tapirs, peccaries, crocodilians, howler monkeys, brocket deer, anteaters, sloths, agouties, capybaras, etc. • Adapted for large, slow prey • Dependent on availability and disturbance – Some selection – Collared peccaries (Weckel 2006) Feeding Habits • Stalk and ambush • Target base of skull or braincase • Will follow prey herds (Mendes 2007) • http://www.youtube.co m/watch?v=DBNYwxDZ _pA#t=1m01s Socialization • Males solitary – Sometime pair • • • • • Mother-cub groups Scrapes, urine, feces Roars Grooming and wrestling Playing Reproductive Behaviors • Urinary scent marks • Separation from males • Mother parenting Interspecific interactions • Pumas – Interspecific segregation (Harmsen 2009) – Hybrids (captivity) • Coyotes • Tapir trails Competition • Humans – Subsistence hunting of natural prey – Other game species • Caiman • Turtles – ~27% of range has depleted prey base Predators • No true predators – Anacondas? • Intraspecific killings • Humans Human Interactions • Livestock depredation – Reduction of natural prey – Ease of predation – Rainfall (Cavalcanti 2010) Human Interactions • Case Study (SotoShoender 2011) – Petén District of Guatemala – Jaguars accused 78.9% of the time – During 5 year period, $14,736 US lost to carnivores • 0.7% of all cattle • Negligible to other losses (black-leg, snake bites) Human Interactions • Habitat loss and fragmentation – Human settlements, logging, ranching, agriculture – Movement • Dispersal • Gene flow – Prey abundance Population dynamics • 2.4-8.8 adults per 100 km2 • Camera traps can overestimate abundance Harvest • Heavily hunted between 1960-70 – ~18,000/year – CITES 1973 • Modern hunting – Predator control – Fear – Threat to livelihood • Poaching – ~$3,000 US/pelt Disease & Parasites • • • • • Tungiasis Ticks Canine distemper Feline leukemia Feline coronavirus – Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) • Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) • Dental fractures Weather • Dry v. Wet Seasons – Water rise up to 3m in some areas Starvation & Malnutrition • Tooth decay/fractures • Poor quality prey items – 1-3 day sustinence – Armadillo, paca (Weckel 2006) Habitat • Broad habitat use – Scrub, chaparral, oak, oakpine, tropical deciduous and evergreen forests*, semidesert, grasslands, swamps • Associated with water and dense vegetation • Both sexes prefer tall forest; Males likely to enter low-intensity cattle ranches and agriculture (Conde 2010) Subtropical Moist Broadleaf Forest Swamp (Pantanal) Chaparral Sonaran desert scrub Agricultural/Ranch Lands Population Management • Reduce predator control and poaching • Improve gene flow – Translocations – Reintroductions Habitat Management • Purchase and protection of lands • Cooperating with landowners – 95% of range • Restoration • Inclusion of water buffalo, horses, donkeys with cattle Habitat Management • Jaguar Corridor Initiative – Argentina to Mexico Habitat Management • Pantanal Project – – – – – – – Panthera Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia Rancher focus Education programs Increase ecotourism Private/public lands Partnered with CENAP Population Outlook • Declining, but hopeful • Positive life history traits – Opportunistic feeder – Wide habitat use – Overlapping ranges • Changing public perceptions (Campbell 2011) Needed Management • Continue working with landowners to set aside lands and establish corridors • Reduce hunting and poaching • Education programs and ecotourism • Restore habitat and prey base • Get a better understanding of life history parameters (survival, recruitment, r, K) Current Event Should we preserve land with knowledge of only a few dispersing individuals? Is reintroduction viable? Landscape changes needed? How to deal with maintaining corridors (US/Mexico border wall)? How to change perceptions of landowners/ranchers? Citations • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Demarais, Stephen, and Paul R. Krausman. 2000. Ecology and Management of Large Mammals in North America. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Caso, A., Lopez-Gonzalez, C., Payan, E., Eizirik, E., de Oliveira, T., Leite-Pitman, R., Kelly, M. & Valderrama, C. 2008. Panthera onca. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 28 October 2013. Eizirik, E., Yuhki, N., Johnson, W. E., Menotti-Raymond, M., Hannah, S. S., O'Brien, S. J. 2003. Molecular Genetics and Evolution of Melanism in the Cat Family. Current Biology 13 (5): 448–453. Christiansen, Per. 2007. Canine Morphology In The Larger Felidae: Implications For Feeding Ecology. Biological Journal Of The Linnean Society 91.4: 573-592. Cavalcanti, Sandra M. C., and Eric M. Gese. 2009. Spatial Ecology And Social Interactions Of Jaguars (Panthera Onca) In The Southern Pantanal, Brazil. Journal Of Mammalogy 90.4: 935-945. Weckel, M., W. Giuliano, and S. Silver. 2006. Jaguar ( Panthera Onca) Feeding Ecology: Distribution Of Predator And Prey Through Time And Space. Journal Of Zoology 270.1: 25-30. Harmsen, Bart J., et al. 2009. Spatial And Temporal Interactions Of Sympatric Jaguars (Panthera Onca) And Pumas (Puma Concolor) In A Neotropical Forest. Journal Of Mammalogy 90.3: 612-620. Harmsen, Bart J., et al. 2010. Scrape-Marking Behavior Of Jaguars (Panthera Onca) And Pumas (Puma Concolor). Journal Of Mammalogy 91.5: 1225-1234. Furtado, M. M., and C. Filoni. 2008. Diseases and their role for jaguar conservation. Cat News 4:35–40. Conde, Dalia A., et al. 2010. Sex Matters: Modeling Male And Female Habitat Differences For Jaguar Conservation. Biological Conservation 143.9: 1980-1988. Cavalcanti, Sandra M. C., and Eric M. Gese. 2010. Kill Rates And Predation Patterns Of Jaguars (Panthera Onca) In The Southern Pantanal, Brazil. Journal Of Mammalogy 91.3: 722-736. Soto-Shoender, José R., and William M. Giuliano. 2011. Predation On Livestock By Large Carnivores In The Tropical Lowlands Of Guatemala. Oryx 45.4: 561-568. Pontes, A. R. Mendes, and D. J. Chivers. 2007. Peccary Movements As Determinants Of The Movements Of Large Cats In Brazilian Amazonia. Journal Of Zoology 273.3: 257-265. Campbell, Michael O'Neal, and Maria Elena Torres Alvarado. 2011. Public Perceptions Of Jaguars Panthera Onca, Pumas Puma Concolor And Coyotes Canis Latrans In El Salvador. Area 43.3: 250-256.