• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Introduction
Introduction

...  A conceptual framework whose purpose is to divide standardization work into manageable pieces and to show at a general level how these pieces are related to one another. ...
OLTP Through the Looking Glass, and What We Found There
OLTP Through the Looking Glass, and What We Found There

... with a tiny kernel of query processing code that could process 12700 TPS. This kernel is a single-threaded, lock-free, main memory database system without recovery. During this decomposition, we identified four major components whose removal substantially improved the throughput of the system: Loggi ...
4902RecoveryCh19
4902RecoveryCh19

... •we speak of the DBMS cache (a set of buffers) •the DBMS uses a directory to access the cache •the directory may have a dirty bit for each buffer to denote if the data in the buffer has been modified •from time to time some of the cache buffers will be flushed to disk ...
Set Transaction Statement
Set Transaction Statement

... Count(*) will give you one more number of which tuples you have seen from the previous select statements. Why? A new tuple is inserted !!!!!! ...
Databases
Databases

... Web applications have to “load” the appropriate driver in order to connect to the database ...
The CAT Theorem and Performance of Transactional Distributed
The CAT Theorem and Performance of Transactional Distributed

... The CAP theorem was originally intended for CRUDsupporting NoSQL systems. To warm up discussion leading to our CAT theorem, we discuss an analogy between the CRUD/NoSQL world and the transactional/NewSQL world. First, we argue that abort rates are important to consider in transaction systems because ...
Link to Slides
Link to Slides

... Normally, transactions will take less than a second to run, so lock out isn't a very big issue. ...
chapter19
chapter19

... system should ensure that its updates are not reflected in the database, else inconsistency will result. Duribility : once the user has been notified that the transaction has been completed, the updates to the database by the transaction must persist despite failures. Isolation : if between steps 3 ...
Distributed and Parallel Database Systems
Distributed and Parallel Database Systems

... environments where data are distributed and replicated over a number of machines connected by a network. This is provided by several forms of transparency: network (and, therefore, distribution) transparency, replication transparency, and fragmentation transparency. Transparent access means that use ...
Database Systems
Database Systems

... • Distributed databases make it possible for transaction to access data at several sites • Final COMMIT is issued after all sites have committed their parts of transaction • Requires that each DP’s transaction log entry be written before database fragment updated • DO-UNDO-REDO protocol with write-a ...
Slide 1
Slide 1

... Data Compression Analysis improvements that benefit Excel Services Improves integration between MOSS 2007 Report Center and SQL Reporting Services Fixes reindex problem ...
Practical Database Design and Tuning
Practical Database Design and Tuning

... →Existing tables may be joined (denormalized) because certain attributes from two or more tables are frequently needed together. →For the given set of tables, there may be alternative design choices, all of which achieve 3NF or BCNF. One may be replaced by the other. →A relation of the form R(K, A, ...
Database Management System (DBMS) an Introduction
Database Management System (DBMS) an Introduction

... • Understand why databases are important to modern organizations • Understand how databases work • Understand how organizations can maximize their strategic potential with databases ...
Gancho_ADC_weekly_24thJan2012
Gancho_ADC_weekly_24thJan2012

... segments of the table. However the encoded implementation on the client side needs to be verified. The issue currently under investigarion with trials on reproducing the problem on a the INT8R testbed.  2) Partial replication of the ATLAS_MDT_DCS schema. => Turned to be due to silent supress of the ...
Data Management for P2P Computing: A Vision
Data Management for P2P Computing: A Vision

...  Provide inference rules for coordination formulas  Prove that the rules are sound and complete.  Define a generalized relational theory as a theory with domain closure, distinct domain values, and a finite number of possible relation extensions (CWA).  Define relational multi-context system
Data Management for P2P Computing: A Vision
Data Management for P2P Computing: A Vision

...  Provide inference rules for coordination formulas  Prove that the rules are sound and complete.  Define a generalized relational theory as a theory with domain closure, distinct domain values, and a finite number of possible relation extensions (CWA).  Define relational multi-context system
Coordination Avoidance in Database Systems
Coordination Avoidance in Database Systems

... by the range of database concurrency control policies. In traditional database systems, serializable isolation provides concurrent operations (transactions) with the illusion of executing in some serial order [15]. As long as individual transactions maintain correct application state, serializabilit ...
Database
Database

... A distributed database takes available data stored in multiple locations and makes it appear as a single collection. Concepts > Database > Industrial Databases > Distributed Database ...
Document
Document

... normally accessed using a special programming language known as SQL (Structured Query Language) often embedded within another language such as C++ or Java. • With the exception of a few object-oriented database products released in the late 1980s and the 1990s relational database technology has been ...
(PPT, 183KB)
(PPT, 183KB)

... databases, Microsoft favors the term distributed query, which it defines in protocol-specific manner as "[a]ny SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE statement that references tables and rowsets from one or more external OLE DB data sources". Oracle provides a more language-centric view in which distribu ...
Query Answering Under Exact View Assumption in Local As View
Query Answering Under Exact View Assumption in Local As View

... possible to construct a program Pcert which selects a certain answers from possible. A Pcert is not given here, because of strong limitations on a length of the article. ...
Why not use Federated approach for Database Management
Why not use Federated approach for Database Management

... existing systems have been designed for different corporate needs, the resulting enterprise will have to face information inconsistency, heterogeneity and incompatible overlap”. Wijegunartne, Fernandez and Vltoudis in [1]  “…a large modern enterprise, it is also inevitable that …use different datab ...
Transaction Management and Concurrency Control
Transaction Management and Concurrency Control

... order of operations within which concurrent transactions are executed  Interleaves the execution of database operations to ensure serializability and isolation of transactions  To determine the appropriate order, the scheduler bases its actions on concurrency control algorithms such as locking and ...
Failure and Recovery, Logging
Failure and Recovery, Logging

... recovery process to restore the consistency of a system. This information may include ...
Chapter 14: Concurrency Control
Chapter 14: Concurrency Control

...  A transaction is structured such that its writes are all performed at the end of its processing  All writes of a transaction form an atomic action; no transaction may execute while a transaction is being written  A transaction that aborts is restarted with a new timestamp ...
< 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 39 >

Global serializability

In concurrency control of databases, transaction processing (transaction management), and other transactional distributed applications, Global serializability (or Modular serializability) is a property of a global schedule of transactions. A global schedule is the unified schedule of all the individual database (and other transactional object) schedules in a multidatabase environment (e.g., federated database). Complying with global serializability means that the global schedule is serializable, has the serializability property, while each component database (module) has a serializable schedule as well. In other words, a collection of serializable components provides overall system serializability, which is usually incorrect. A need in correctness across databases in multidatabase systems makes global serializability a major goal for global concurrency control (or modular concurrency control). With the proliferation of the Internet, Cloud computing, Grid computing, and small, portable, powerful computing devices (e.g., smartphones), as well as increase in systems management sophistication, the need for atomic distributed transactions and thus effective global serializability techniques, to ensure correctness in and among distributed transactional applications, seems to increase.In a federated database system or any other more loosely defined multidatabase system, which are typically distributed in a communication network, transactions span multiple (and possibly distributed) databases. Enforcing global serializability in such system, where different databases may use different types of concurrency control, is problematic. Even if every local schedule of a single database is serializable, the global schedule of a whole system is not necessarily serializable. The massive communication exchanges of conflict information needed between databases to reach conflict serializability globally would lead to unacceptable performance, primarily due to computer and communication latency. Achieving global serializability effectively over different types of concurrency control has been open for several years. Commitment ordering (or Commit ordering; CO), a serializability technique publicly introduced in 1991 by Yoav Raz from Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), provides an effective general solution for global (conflict) serializability across any collection of database systems and other transactional objects, with possibly different concurrency control mechanisms. CO does not need the distribution of conflict information, but rather utilizes the already needed (unmodified) atomic commitment protocol messages without any further communication between databases. It also allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. CO generalizes Strong strict two phase locking (SS2PL), which in conjunction with the Two-phase commit (2PC) protocol is the de facto standard for achieving global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result, CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join existing SS2PL based solutions for global serializability. The same applies also to all other multiple (transactional) object systems that use atomic transactions and need global serializability for correctness (see examples above; nowadays such need is not smaller than with database systems, the origin of atomic transactions).The most significant aspects of CO that make it a uniquely effective general solution for global serializability are the following:Seamless, low overhead integration with any concurrency control mechanism, with neither changing any transaction's operation scheduling or blocking it, nor adding any new operation.Heterogeneity: Global serializability is achieved across multiple transactional objects (e.g., database management systems) with different (any) concurrency control mechanisms, without interfering with the mechanisms' operations.Modularity: Transactional objects can be added and removed transparently.Autonomy of transactional objects: No need of conflict or equivalent information distribution (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets; no object needs other object's information).Scalability: With ""normal"" global transactions, computer network size and number of transactional objects can increase unboundedly with no impact on performance, andAutomatic global deadlock resolution.All these aspects, except the first two, are also possessed by the popular SS2PL, which is a (constrained, blocking) special case of CO and inherits many of CO's qualities.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report