• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS)
IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS)

... think that he or she is deserving of a particular kind of response. Praise and blame are perhaps the most common forms this reaction takes. For example, one who encounters a car accident may be worthy of praise for having saved a child from inside the burning car, or alternatively, one may be worthy ...
Lesson 14: Ethics
Lesson 14: Ethics

... 3. What is the difference between moral problems and ethical dilemmas? • Big differences between a moral problem and an ethical dilemma. • Ascertaining the relevant facts can help solve many moral problems. • Moral problems might not involve facts but simply will power (to steal, or not to steal). ...
Alasdair MacIntyre
Alasdair MacIntyre

... – First: Moral practice embodies genuine objective and impersonal standards which provide rational justification for actions and can themselves be rationally justified. – Second: unsuccessful attempts to maintain objectivity of ethics but rational justification breaks down. – Third: Emotivism widely ...
CHAPTER 6
CHAPTER 6

... • Charity: a rule denying charity would deny love, and would thus be in conflict with our need for love. ...
Ethical Pluralism and Relativism
Ethical Pluralism and Relativism

... We may be able to tolerate other people’s different moral values because we are willing to cooperate and live together in the same society. Thus individual relativism can be refuted if people in the same society share the same political courses. But can neutrality and tolerance be maintained when we ...
Lesson 13: Ethics
Lesson 13: Ethics

... -Thomas Jefferson ...
Utilitarianism - Welcome to the UC Davis Philosophy
Utilitarianism - Welcome to the UC Davis Philosophy

... • The rule, “to do as you would be done by” is a utilitarian rule • It expresses that the happiness of the whole of humanity is paramount • Utility would influence social institutions to ...
Subjectivism in Ethics
Subjectivism in Ethics

...  Values are not tangible things like planets, trees, and spoons. However, this does not mean that ethics has no objective basis.  People have not only feelings but also reason, and these two are fundamentally distinct. ...
Lesson 14: Ethics
Lesson 14: Ethics

... 3. What is the difference between moral problems and ethical dilemmas? • Big differences between a moral problem and an ethical dilemma. • Ascertaining the relevant facts can help solve many moral problems. • Moral problems might not involve facts but simply will power (to steal, or not to steal). ...
9 Deontology*
9 Deontology*

... people might be tempted to kill when doing so would not produce the best results. In short, from a consequentialist perspective, things might go better if people were guided by common sense morality, rather than directly making decisions using consequentialist criteria. Let us call this the conformi ...
Criticisms of Kant - The Richmond Philosophy Pages
Criticisms of Kant - The Richmond Philosophy Pages

... seems that not every universal maxim is a moral one – it could be trivial or amoral  This shows that not every maxim that passes universability is a duty  Kant does not tell us how we can distinguish moral duties from absurd imperatives for surely it is possible to universalise the maxim ‘never ...
FREE Sample Here
FREE Sample Here

... You might begin by asking whether people from various cultures do have different moral beliefs and practices. For example, do they have different sexual mores? Have the students name some if they can. Do they have different views about the place of women in society? Do they have different practices ...
Ethical relativism is the view that moral codes are
Ethical relativism is the view that moral codes are

... Bertram argued that he acted out of love for his wife. “I knew in my heart what I did was right. It was the only thing I could do to carry out her trust in me.” Did he do the right thing? Were you in a similar situation, what would you do? Could you, would you help a loved one to die? Could it ever ...
Three types of modern virtue ethics
Three types of modern virtue ethics

... convincing individuals that they should choose the right ingredients needed for a good life and not to live impulsively. • This view leads Anscombe to assert the importance of the law of double effect, since it is based on the intentions of the moral agent. ...
Piety: Lending a Hand to Euthyphro
Piety: Lending a Hand to Euthyphro

... It is possible to be overly impressedby this dilemma.2However, my concern here is not to examine the pros and cons of theological objectivism and theological subjectivism, nor to defend or attack some version of a divine command theory of moral rightness or wrongness. My contention instead is that i ...
Introduction to Ethics - James Madison University
Introduction to Ethics - James Madison University

...  Provides no way out for cultures in conflict  Because many practices are acceptable does not mean any cultural practice is acceptable (many/any fallacy)  Societies do, in fact, share certain core values  Only indirectly based on reason ...
ppt - stevewatson.info
ppt - stevewatson.info

... Immortality is required for happiness ...
Immanuel Kant and the moral law[1].
Immanuel Kant and the moral law[1].

... • Kant asked that we should not appeal to the consequences of this — for example, empty classes and slow progress through the course — but to whether the principle is coherent or not. • The possible consequences are hypothetical only and we cannot all agree on what constitutes a good or bad conseque ...
1. Moral Decisions, Justice and Peace PPT - 9RE-EP
1. Moral Decisions, Justice and Peace PPT - 9RE-EP

... Who else can have an influence on your values, and therefore, motivations for actions? ...
Slide 1
Slide 1

... Name and explain the questions that we can ask ourselves to help us understand the actions involved in moral decision making. ◦ We can better understand acts involved in moral decision making if we apply the following questions to the situation with which we fare faced: ◦ What? Who? Why? How? Where? ...
Kant and the Moral Will
Kant and the Moral Will

... anyway. If something’s value depended on its good effects, its value would be conditional on those effects. (Take away the effects and you would take away the source of its value.) Since its value must satisfy Unconditionality, it must be valuable even without the good effects.1 What about (i)? Are ...
Ethics 160
Ethics 160

... • If someone claims that there are moral facts, they are merely claiming that when someone says “Action X is moral” they might be saying something true, and they might be saying something false. This is a rather unobjectionable claim. • If someone not only says that there are moral facts, but also s ...
Ethics in a Computing Culture
Ethics in a Computing Culture

... language: Rules regarding human behavior are complex and have many exceptions. ...
meta-ethics - WordPress.com
meta-ethics - WordPress.com

... is. Religious people may say that God exists because the majority of the world’s population believes in a god. Clearly this is not true. If the majority holds that capital punishment is wrong, that doesn’t make it wrong. • The appeal to a moral authority. Many people think that there is a moral auth ...
Ethics Lesson 1 - The Engquist Teachers
Ethics Lesson 1 - The Engquist Teachers

... • A person who believes that criminals should never be executed might hold some of these fundamental principles: – Murder is always wrong. Even when killing a criminal it would turn an innocent executioner into a murderer. – A person can be punished more by spending their life in prison. Living is m ...
< 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 22 >

Divine command theory

Divine command theory is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by what God commands, and that to be moral is to follow his commands. Followers of both monotheistic and polytheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality. Numerous variants of the theory have been presented: historically, figures including Saint Augustine, Duns Scotus, and Thomas Aquinas have presented various versions of divine command theory; more recently, Robert Merrihew Adams has proposed a ""modified divine command theory"" based on the omnibenevolence of God in which morality is linked to human conceptions of right and wrong. Paul Copan has argued in favour of the theory from a Christian viewpoint, and Linda Zagzebski's divine motivation theory proposes that God's motivations, rather than commands, are the source of morality.Semantic challenges to divine command theory have been proposed; the philosopher William Wainwright argued that to be commanded by God and to be morally obligatory do not have an identical meaning, which he believed would make defining obligation difficult. He also contended that, as knowledge of God is required for morality by divine command theory, atheists and agnostics could not be moral; he saw this as a weakness of the theory. Others have challenged the theory on modal grounds by arguing that, even if God's command and morality correlate in this world, they may not do so in other possible worlds. In addition, the Euthyphro dilemma, first proposed by Plato, presented a dilemma which threatened either to leave morality subject to the whims of God, or challenge his omnipotence. Divine command theory has also been criticised for its apparent incompatibility with the omnibenevolence of God, moral autonomy and religious pluralism, although some scholars have attempted to defend the theory from these challenges.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report