• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Logical Consequence by Patricia Blanchette Basic Question (BQ
Logical Consequence by Patricia Blanchette Basic Question (BQ

Chapter 7 Propositional and Predicate Logic
Chapter 7 Propositional and Predicate Logic

... Not valid reasoning, but likely to work in many ...
TRUTH DEFINITIONS AND CONSISTENCY PROOFS
TRUTH DEFINITIONS AND CONSISTENCY PROOFS

Jean Van Heijenoort`s View of Modern Logic
Jean Van Heijenoort`s View of Modern Logic

... concurrently sending you reprints of my two essays regarding the fundamentals; several passages therein relate to the results that you obtained. For example, my paper entitled “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze etc.” also provides a contribution to the set-theoretical relativism held by you. This is ...
MIDTERM REVIEW FOR MATH 500 1. The limit Define limn→∞ an
MIDTERM REVIEW FOR MATH 500 1. The limit Define limn→∞ an

Constructive Mathematics, in Theory and Programming Practice
Constructive Mathematics, in Theory and Programming Practice

... The notion defined by dropping from this definition the last clause, about preservation of equality, is called an operation. In the first part of this paper we shall have little to say about operations, but they will have more significance in the second part, when we discuss Martin-Löf’s theory of ...
appendix-1
appendix-1

full text (.pdf)
full text (.pdf)

CHAPTER 7 GENERAL PROOF SYSTEMS 1 Introduction
CHAPTER 7 GENERAL PROOF SYSTEMS 1 Introduction

proofs in mathematics
proofs in mathematics

Lecture 3. Mathematical Induction
Lecture 3. Mathematical Induction

... Induction plays a very important role in our knowledge about the world and nature. Practically all modern information (scientific and practical) is based on inductive reasoning. Past experience is used as the basis for generalizations about future experience. Induction in natural sciences cannot be ...
File
File

Document
Document

... The more fruitful type of definition is a matter of drawing boundary lines that were not previously given at all. What we shall be able to infer from it, cannot be inspected in advance; here, we are not simply taking out of the box again what we have just put into it. The conclusions we draw from i ...
Section 3. Proofs 3.1. Introduction. 3.1.1. Assumptions.
Section 3. Proofs 3.1. Introduction. 3.1.1. Assumptions.

Frege`s Other Program
Frege`s Other Program

The Future of Post-Human Mathematical Logic
The Future of Post-Human Mathematical Logic

Negative translation - Homepages of UvA/FNWI staff
Negative translation - Homepages of UvA/FNWI staff

.pdf
.pdf

2.1-2.3: Reasoning in Geometry
2.1-2.3: Reasoning in Geometry

Revision Linear Inequations
Revision Linear Inequations

Completeness and Decidability of a Fragment of Duration Calculus
Completeness and Decidability of a Fragment of Duration Calculus

1 - Mira Costa High School
1 - Mira Costa High School

... 1.2 Use Segments and Congruence Goal • Use segment postulates to identify congruent segments. ...
A Logic of Explicit Knowledge - Lehman College
A Logic of Explicit Knowledge - Lehman College

... logics. One is the validity of K(X ⊃ Y ) ⊃ (KX ⊃ KY ) (where K is a modal operator with KZ customarily read “Z is known”). The other is the soundness of the inference of KX from X. The first yields that one knows the consequences of what one knows, and the second, that one knows all tautologies, no ...
Lesson 2
Lesson 2

... • Hence if we prove that the conclusion logically follows from the assumptions, then by virtue of it we do not prove that the conclusion is true • It is true, provided the premises are true • The argument the premises of which are true is called sound. • Truthfulness or Falseness of premises can be ...
The Decision Problem for Standard Classes
The Decision Problem for Standard Classes

< 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 39 >

Axiom

An axiom or postulate is a premise or starting point of reasoning. As classically conceived, an axiom is a premise so evident as to be accepted as true without controversy.The word comes from the Greek axíōma (ἀξίωμα) 'that which is thought worthy or fit' or 'that which commends itself as evident.' As used in modern logic, an axiom is simply a premise or starting point for reasoning. What it means for an axiom, or any mathematical statement, to be ""true"" is a central question in the philosophy of mathematics, with modern mathematicians holding a multitude of different opinions.In mathematics, the term axiom is used in two related but distinguishable senses: ""logical axioms"" and ""non-logical axioms"". Logical axioms are usually statements that are taken to be true within the system of logic they define (e.g., (A and B) implies A), while non-logical axioms (e.g., a + b = b + a) are actually substantive assertions about the elements of the domain of a specific mathematical theory (such as arithmetic). When used in the latter sense, ""axiom,"" ""postulate"", and ""assumption"" may be used interchangeably. In general, a non-logical axiom is not a self-evident truth, but rather a formal logical expression used in deduction to build a mathematical theory. As modern mathematics admits multiple, equally ""true"" systems of logic, precisely the same thing must be said for logical axioms - they both define and are specific to the particular system of logic that is being invoked. To axiomatize a system of knowledge is to show that its claims can be derived from a small, well-understood set of sentences (the axioms). There are typically multiple ways to axiomatize a given mathematical domain.In both senses, an axiom is any mathematical statement that serves as a starting point from which other statements are logically derived. Within the system they define, axioms (unless redundant) cannot be derived by principles of deduction, nor are they demonstrable by mathematical proofs, simply because they are starting points; there is nothing else from which they logically follow otherwise they would be classified as theorems. However, an axiom in one system may be a theorem in another, and vice versa.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report