• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Extending modal logic
Extending modal logic

Three Solutions to the Knower Paradox
Three Solutions to the Knower Paradox

Logic and Proof
Logic and Proof

... rise to contradiction (someone loves and does not loves Jill). • We must demonstrate that our specification does not draw the wrong inferences. • We must demonstrate that what we claim holds in the specification does hold. • The demonstration should be given as a proof, which is a systematic way to ...
The logic of negationless mathematics
The logic of negationless mathematics

... propositional calculus. In a mathematical Griss-system only true propositions will occur. So there is no reason for linking them by a sign for disjunction or implication. "In rough" we may find that a certain proposition can be proved as soon as A has been proved and also as soon as B has been prove ...
.pdf
.pdf

Beautifying Gödel - Department of Computer Science
Beautifying Gödel - Department of Computer Science

Logic seminar
Logic seminar

Sets
Sets

PowerPoint file for CSL 02, Edinburgh, UK
PowerPoint file for CSL 02, Edinburgh, UK

... f is called a guessing function: • The learner is allowed to change his mind. A guessing function represents a history of his mind changes. When the learner stops mind changes in finite time, it succeeded to learn the right value. Otherwise, it failed to learn. ...
the theory of form logic - University College Freiburg
the theory of form logic - University College Freiburg

... we could swap the predicates salva congruitate. Exchange of the ‘predicates’, however, would result in meaningless strings of signs and therefore violate the conditions on a proper symbolism. In a Wittgensteinian Begriffsschrift, as we might call a system which respects Wittgenstein’s demands, all w ...
1 Names in free logical truth theory It is … an immediate
1 Names in free logical truth theory It is … an immediate

PROBLEM SOLVING THROUGH FIRST-ORDER LOGIC
PROBLEM SOLVING THROUGH FIRST-ORDER LOGIC

A Brief Introduction to the Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus
A Brief Introduction to the Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus

... provable in this system is intuitionistically valid, but intuitionists reserve the possibility that there may be other formula, not provable in this system, which are nevertheless intuitionistically valid. As time as passed, and no such formula has been forthcoming, this possibility has seemed incre ...
Definability in Boolean bunched logic
Definability in Boolean bunched logic

... A property P of BBI-models is said to be definable if there exists a formula A such that for all BBI-models M , A is valid in M ⇐⇒ M ∈ P. We’ll consider properties that feature in various models of separation logic. To show a property is definable, just exhibit the defining ...
The unintended interpretations of intuitionistic logic
The unintended interpretations of intuitionistic logic

SORT LOGIC AND FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS 1
SORT LOGIC AND FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS 1

... exists, namely, Y . The Comprehension Axiom is the traditional (impredicative) axiom schema which gives second order logic, and in our case sort logic, the necessary power to do mathematics [3]. In individual cases less comprehension may be sufficient but this is the general schema. The difference b ...
4 The Natural Numbers
4 The Natural Numbers

... Øf is included in every successor set. Proof of (1): Øf is a successor set, since it is the intersection of a collection of successor sets (lemma 1). In order to show (2), we first show the following: Claim: Øf is the smallest element of f, which is to say it is the smallest successor subset of S. P ...
Beyond Quantifier-Free Interpolation in Extensions of Presburger
Beyond Quantifier-Free Interpolation in Extensions of Presburger

Lindenbaum lemma for infinitary logics
Lindenbaum lemma for infinitary logics

slides
slides

Gödel`s Incompleteness Theorems
Gödel`s Incompleteness Theorems

... that time his interests turned to philosophy and physics. In 1951 Gödel demonstrated the existence of paradoxical solutions to Albert Einstein’s (1879–1955) field equations in general relativity. His solutions became known as the Gödel metric; these “rotating universes” would allow time travel and ...
1 Proof by Contradiction - Stony Brook Mathematics
1 Proof by Contradiction - Stony Brook Mathematics

... The process of writing a proof by contradiction involves some suspension of disbelief. In order to be effective you need to reason as if the assumption you believe must be false is in fact true. In the real world of course, you may end up discovering new territories where your desired theorem fails. ...
The Surprise Examination Paradox and the Second Incompleteness
The Surprise Examination Paradox and the Second Incompleteness

lecture notes in Mathematical Logic
lecture notes in Mathematical Logic

... procedure; which integer functions, for instance, can we consider to be effectively computable, i.e. such that the computation of their function values can be delegated to a machine? For which decision problems is there a decision procedure, correctly answering each particular case in finite time? T ...
Class Notes
Class Notes

< 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 39 >

Axiom

An axiom or postulate is a premise or starting point of reasoning. As classically conceived, an axiom is a premise so evident as to be accepted as true without controversy.The word comes from the Greek axíōma (ἀξίωμα) 'that which is thought worthy or fit' or 'that which commends itself as evident.' As used in modern logic, an axiom is simply a premise or starting point for reasoning. What it means for an axiom, or any mathematical statement, to be ""true"" is a central question in the philosophy of mathematics, with modern mathematicians holding a multitude of different opinions.In mathematics, the term axiom is used in two related but distinguishable senses: ""logical axioms"" and ""non-logical axioms"". Logical axioms are usually statements that are taken to be true within the system of logic they define (e.g., (A and B) implies A), while non-logical axioms (e.g., a + b = b + a) are actually substantive assertions about the elements of the domain of a specific mathematical theory (such as arithmetic). When used in the latter sense, ""axiom,"" ""postulate"", and ""assumption"" may be used interchangeably. In general, a non-logical axiom is not a self-evident truth, but rather a formal logical expression used in deduction to build a mathematical theory. As modern mathematics admits multiple, equally ""true"" systems of logic, precisely the same thing must be said for logical axioms - they both define and are specific to the particular system of logic that is being invoked. To axiomatize a system of knowledge is to show that its claims can be derived from a small, well-understood set of sentences (the axioms). There are typically multiple ways to axiomatize a given mathematical domain.In both senses, an axiom is any mathematical statement that serves as a starting point from which other statements are logically derived. Within the system they define, axioms (unless redundant) cannot be derived by principles of deduction, nor are they demonstrable by mathematical proofs, simply because they are starting points; there is nothing else from which they logically follow otherwise they would be classified as theorems. However, an axiom in one system may be a theorem in another, and vice versa.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report