• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Structural Multi-type Sequent Calculus for Inquisitive Logic
Structural Multi-type Sequent Calculus for Inquisitive Logic

(pdf)
(pdf)

Gödel incompleteness theorems and the limits of their applicability. I
Gödel incompleteness theorems and the limits of their applicability. I

... the representatives of Hilbert’s school as the central problem of mathematical logic. However, it follows from Gödel’s second theorem that it is impossible to formalize the ‘finitary tools’ that are able to establish the consistency of mathematics even in the framework of a very strong system P .2 ...
Second-order Logic
Second-order Logic

... In first-order logic, we combine the non-logical symbols of a given language, i.e., its constant symbols, function symbols, and predicate symbols, with the logical symbols to express things about first-order structures. This is done using the notion of satisfaction, which relates !astructure M, toge ...
Maximal Introspection of Agents
Maximal Introspection of Agents

And this is just one theorem prover!
And this is just one theorem prover!

YABLO WITHOUT GODEL
YABLO WITHOUT GODEL

File
File

... symbolic language. The answer is direct. It is not necessary to define the new symbol for this, because the existing connective symbols are enough to do this job (see section 1.3.14). In natural language use, there should exists a relation between the statements to be joined by the connective “OR”, ...
Constructing Cut Free Sequent Systems With Context Restrictions
Constructing Cut Free Sequent Systems With Context Restrictions

Justification logic with approximate conditional probabilities
Justification logic with approximate conditional probabilities

... First-order variants of LPPS have recently been studied by Ikodinović et al. [18]. Marchioni and Godo [26] present a fuzzy logic with conditional probabilities that uses non-standard probabilities. There are two main contributions of this paper. The first, obviously, is the introduction of operator ...
Algebraic Proof Systems
Algebraic Proof Systems

What is "formal logic"?
What is "formal logic"?

1 slide/page
1 slide/page

Logic and Computation Lecture notes Jeremy Avigad Assistant Professor, Philosophy
Logic and Computation Lecture notes Jeremy Avigad Assistant Professor, Philosophy

... This document comprises a set of lecture notes that I prepared in the fall of 1998, while teaching a course called Logic and Computation in the Philosophy Department at Carnegie Mellon University. I distributed these notes to the class and then followed them almost word for word, in the hopes that d ...
Formal logic
Formal logic

... If I V (ϕ) = 1 then it is said that V is a model of ϕ, or that V satisfies ϕ; it is a “world” in which ϕ is true. A formula is said to be valid if it is true under all circumstances, that is, if every valuation is a model of ϕ: ϕ is valid if I V (ϕ) = 1 for all valuations V . For instance, it is ea ...
The Science of Proof - University of Arizona Math
The Science of Proof - University of Arizona Math

... The word semantics is used rather generally to refer to meaning. Thus a sentence like “Rover swims” might refer to the ability of a certain dog named Rover. To grasp this sort of meaning requires a knowledge of the world, including animals and bodies of water. On the other hand, we might only care t ...
Reducing Propositional Theories in Equilibrium Logic to
Reducing Propositional Theories in Equilibrium Logic to

classden
classden

Glivenko sequent classes in the light of structural proof theory
Glivenko sequent classes in the light of structural proof theory

Predicate Logic
Predicate Logic

First-Order Logic, Second-Order Logic, and Completeness
First-Order Logic, Second-Order Logic, and Completeness

... semantics”. (What are the criteria for the “right” semantics? On which independent, i.e. non-question-begging grounds can we decide? Is the “right” semantics “right” tout court or is it the “right” one with respect to some purpose? Is there only one “right” semantics?) A more direct approach is call ...
The First Incompleteness Theorem
The First Incompleteness Theorem

... standard; some are used in importantly different ways by different authors; while some natural ideas seem to have no commonly used labels at all. It might be helpful, then, if I star my own non-standard terminology when it is first defined. You can safely re-use unstarred jargon without comment; but ...
Logical Omniscience As Infeasibility - boris
Logical Omniscience As Infeasibility - boris

Ultrasheaves
Ultrasheaves

AppA - txstateprojects
AppA - txstateprojects

< 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 39 >

Axiom

An axiom or postulate is a premise or starting point of reasoning. As classically conceived, an axiom is a premise so evident as to be accepted as true without controversy.The word comes from the Greek axíōma (ἀξίωμα) 'that which is thought worthy or fit' or 'that which commends itself as evident.' As used in modern logic, an axiom is simply a premise or starting point for reasoning. What it means for an axiom, or any mathematical statement, to be ""true"" is a central question in the philosophy of mathematics, with modern mathematicians holding a multitude of different opinions.In mathematics, the term axiom is used in two related but distinguishable senses: ""logical axioms"" and ""non-logical axioms"". Logical axioms are usually statements that are taken to be true within the system of logic they define (e.g., (A and B) implies A), while non-logical axioms (e.g., a + b = b + a) are actually substantive assertions about the elements of the domain of a specific mathematical theory (such as arithmetic). When used in the latter sense, ""axiom,"" ""postulate"", and ""assumption"" may be used interchangeably. In general, a non-logical axiom is not a self-evident truth, but rather a formal logical expression used in deduction to build a mathematical theory. As modern mathematics admits multiple, equally ""true"" systems of logic, precisely the same thing must be said for logical axioms - they both define and are specific to the particular system of logic that is being invoked. To axiomatize a system of knowledge is to show that its claims can be derived from a small, well-understood set of sentences (the axioms). There are typically multiple ways to axiomatize a given mathematical domain.In both senses, an axiom is any mathematical statement that serves as a starting point from which other statements are logically derived. Within the system they define, axioms (unless redundant) cannot be derived by principles of deduction, nor are they demonstrable by mathematical proofs, simply because they are starting points; there is nothing else from which they logically follow otherwise they would be classified as theorems. However, an axiom in one system may be a theorem in another, and vice versa.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report