• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Lectures on Proof Theory - Create and Use Your home.uchicago
Lectures on Proof Theory - Create and Use Your home.uchicago

... of the principles of logic to be used in deriving theorems from the axioms, so that logic itself could be axiomatized. In this case, too, the timing was just right: the analysis of logic in Frege’s Begriffsschrift was just what was required. (There was a remarkable meeting here of supply and demand. ...
ND for predicate logic ∀-elimination, first attempt Variable capture
ND for predicate logic ∀-elimination, first attempt Variable capture

Introduction to Mathematical Logic
Introduction to Mathematical Logic

... By the widely accepted definition logic investigates the laws, and methods of inference and argumentation. Mathematical logic is a mathematical investigation of this subject, similarly as number theory is the mathematical investigation of the natural numbers. Developing such a theory one can use the ...
Discrete Mathematics
Discrete Mathematics

... declarative sentence) with a definite meaning, having a truth value that’s either true (T) or false (F) (never both, neither, or somewhere in between). A proposition (statement) may be denoted by a variable like P, Q, R,…, called a proposition (statement) variable. ...
Proofs - Arizona State University
Proofs - Arizona State University

A Critique of the Foundations of Hoare-Style Programming Logics
A Critique of the Foundations of Hoare-Style Programming Logics

A Critique of the Foundations of Hoare-Style
A Critique of the Foundations of Hoare-Style

Document
Document

... • there are infinitely many of them, based on different tautologies • validity of an argument form can be verified e.g. using truth tables There are simple, commonly used and useful argument forms • when writing proofs for humans, it is good to use well known argument forms • so that the reader can ...
When Bi-Interpretability Implies Synonymy
When Bi-Interpretability Implies Synonymy

John L. Pollock
John L. Pollock

CSI 2101 / Rules of Inference (§1.5)
CSI 2101 / Rules of Inference (§1.5)

THE AXIOM SCHEME OF ACYCLIC COMPREHENSION keywords
THE AXIOM SCHEME OF ACYCLIC COMPREHENSION keywords

... This observation allows us to ignore identifications between occurrences of constants in judging whether a formula can be used to define a set, because we can generalize a definition containing a constant by replacing each occurrence of the constant with a different free variable. (By “constant” we ...
Chapter 3 Proof
Chapter 3 Proof

... his guilt to be proven. When scientists find that a theory has passed numerous empirical tests, it is taken as proved. We make do with something less than logical certainty in these contexts because there is no alternative. Mathematicians, however, do have an alternative. In mathematics we demand lo ...
Logic and Existential Commitment
Logic and Existential Commitment

The Dedekind Reals in Abstract Stone Duality
The Dedekind Reals in Abstract Stone Duality

... terms of their universal properties. (Recall that, classically, the Sierpiński space has one open and one closed point.) We can form products of spaces, X × Y , and exponentials of the form ΣX , but not arbitrary Y X . The theory also provides certain “Σ-split” subspaces, which we explain with refe ...
Document
Document

Cylindric Modal Logic - Homepages of UvA/FNWI staff
Cylindric Modal Logic - Homepages of UvA/FNWI staff

F - Teaching-WIKI
F - Teaching-WIKI

... conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even tough its truth does not necessarily follow from the premises => L ...
A proof
A proof

... first step is the assumption that p is true; subsequent steps are constructed using rules of inference, with the final step showing that q must also be true. • A direct proof shows that a conditional statement pq is true by showing that if p is true then q must also be true. • In a direct proof, we ...
And this is just one theorem prover!
And this is just one theorem prover!

... the correctness of the software itself, but also of all the artifacts needed to execute the software (e.g. ...
Logic
Logic

Redundancies in the Hilbert-Bernays derivability conditions for
Redundancies in the Hilbert-Bernays derivability conditions for

Sample pages 2 PDF
Sample pages 2 PDF

PDF
PDF

Logic - Disclaimer
Logic - Disclaimer

< 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 39 >

Axiom

An axiom or postulate is a premise or starting point of reasoning. As classically conceived, an axiom is a premise so evident as to be accepted as true without controversy.The word comes from the Greek axíōma (ἀξίωμα) 'that which is thought worthy or fit' or 'that which commends itself as evident.' As used in modern logic, an axiom is simply a premise or starting point for reasoning. What it means for an axiom, or any mathematical statement, to be ""true"" is a central question in the philosophy of mathematics, with modern mathematicians holding a multitude of different opinions.In mathematics, the term axiom is used in two related but distinguishable senses: ""logical axioms"" and ""non-logical axioms"". Logical axioms are usually statements that are taken to be true within the system of logic they define (e.g., (A and B) implies A), while non-logical axioms (e.g., a + b = b + a) are actually substantive assertions about the elements of the domain of a specific mathematical theory (such as arithmetic). When used in the latter sense, ""axiom,"" ""postulate"", and ""assumption"" may be used interchangeably. In general, a non-logical axiom is not a self-evident truth, but rather a formal logical expression used in deduction to build a mathematical theory. As modern mathematics admits multiple, equally ""true"" systems of logic, precisely the same thing must be said for logical axioms - they both define and are specific to the particular system of logic that is being invoked. To axiomatize a system of knowledge is to show that its claims can be derived from a small, well-understood set of sentences (the axioms). There are typically multiple ways to axiomatize a given mathematical domain.In both senses, an axiom is any mathematical statement that serves as a starting point from which other statements are logically derived. Within the system they define, axioms (unless redundant) cannot be derived by principles of deduction, nor are they demonstrable by mathematical proofs, simply because they are starting points; there is nothing else from which they logically follow otherwise they would be classified as theorems. However, an axiom in one system may be a theorem in another, and vice versa.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report